Huntington District Inland Navigation Mark Hammond Planning Center of Expertise for Inland Navigation Huntington District 25 March 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRADABLE PERMITS IN WATERWAY TRANSPORT JIM FAWCETT ECONOMIST GALVESTON DISTRICT.
Advertisements

NETS Future Research By Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon and IWR.
Navigation Economic Technologies Symposium 9-10 May 2003 Generic Characteristics of Corps Waterway Models.
Navigation Data & Needs May 9, 2003 David A. Weekly Chief, LRD Navigation Planning Center
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
INP-MAY 03 Inland Navigation Planning Current Practice May 9, 2003 Paul J. Hanley Economist, CELRD-CM-P
WHAT HAPPENED WHILE IT WAS DOWN? THE COLUMBIA-SNAKE RIVER EXTENDED LOCK OUTAGE Freight Policy Transportation Institute.
Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012 Sandra K. Beaupre’ Wisconsin DOT Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012.
1 Ports and Harbors – Transitions and Challenges Ms. Doris J. Bautch Commissioner, U.S. Section of PIANC U.S. Maritime Administration Presented at the.
Indiana Logistics Summit U.S. Barge Transportation – An Overview.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW)
Waterways 1 Water Transportation History. Water Transportation Propulsion History Human (oars, poles) - - 7,000-10,000 BC Wind (sails) - - 3,000 BC Steamboat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Keith Hofseth 16-May-2006.
Channel Portfolio Tool (CPT)
Developing Navigation Performance Measures Barry Holliday Navigation Program Manager US Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters Washington, DC 14 December.
1 Great Lakes Maritime Task Force 14th Annual Informational Briefing for the Great Lakes Delegation Tom Buck, C.E.O. Carmeuse Lime and Stone April 2, 2009.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
WESTCAS - Shortage Impacts on AZ CAP General Manager David Modeer October 29, 2014.
TRANSPORTATION PL201 FUNDAMENTAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Steve Haynes Director – Commodity Marketing and Sales North Carolina State Ports Chairman – Domestic Waterways Committee National Industrial Transportation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
Railroads. Railroad Industry Characteristics Return on Investment –Increased from 5.7% in 1984 to 9.4% in Accounts for 1% of GDP Employs over 200,000.
A New Tool for Estimating and Simulating Economic Impacts of Dredging Activity New, Increased and Reduced Dredging Drs. Yue Cui and Ed Mahoney, Michigan.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Beargrass Creek Case Study Description of the Study Area Hydrology & Hydraulics Economic Analysis Project Planning Assessment of the Risk Based Analysis.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
How We Estimated The CFS Out-of-Scope Sectors Felix Ammah-Tagoe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant/Project Manager MacroSys Research and Technology.
Market for U.S. Grain Barge Services
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
Potential Socio-Economic Impacts of Climate Variability and Climate Change in the Great Lakes Region by George M. Albercook C E P E S Center for Environmental.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE Navigation Data/Information Workshop July 7, 2005 Arlene L Dietz, Director, Navigation Data Center.
Opening of the Panama Canal in 2016 Its Anticipated Impact on Global Soy and Grain Transportation Ken Eriksen Senior Vice September.
HYDROPOWER. Objective: The student will be become familiar with the Corps policy for hydropower development. The student will be have a basic understanding.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
James VanShaar Riverside Technology, inc
Research and Development Inland Waterways Conference 7 March 2007 Improved Hydrodynamic Design/Detection and Evaluation of Scour at Dams John E. Hite,
US Army Corps of Engineers Great Lakes & Ohio River Division US Army Corps of Engineers Great Lakes & Ohio River Division Achieving Navigation Systems.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
Generalized Model of Lockage Delay Based on Historic Data Michael R. Hilliard, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Smart.
The Lower Mon Project William A. Karaffa, P.E. Project Manager Briefing to Waterways Association of Pittsburgh April 14, 2004.
1 Coal Handling & Storage Conference 2015 Paul Rohde, Vice President Waterways Council, Inc.
CANADIAN COLUMBIA RIVER FORUM U.S. Flood Control and Operational Perspective Jim Barton, Chief of Corps of Engineers Columbia Basin Water Management Division.
Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Presentation.
1 Smart Rivers Conference September 15, 2011 New Orleans, Louisiana “Status of Inland Waterways Infrastructure Funding”
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Insert a DP2 Photo here GE Transportation Freight, Fuel, & Emissions Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 001 Team Armadillo, Team #7 Dan.
1 Where Does Electricity Come From?. 2 Overview of Electricity.
March Urban Flood Risk Management. March Objectives Understand the Nature of Flooding & Flood Damage Alleviation Understand the Nature of.
Chapter 13 Transportation in the Supply Chain
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
THE DANUBE WATERWAY– Economic Geography from the Presentation Series „Basics of Inland Navigation“
“If you think we’ve got problems now... and …what can we do about it” Transportation Day-Pittsburgh May 17, 2007 James R. McCarville Port of Pittsburgh.
Port of Pittsburgh Commission James R. McCarville Met Coke Conference – Pittsburgh November 2, 2010 Welcome to the Port of Pittsburgh.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
Western Rivers/ Inland/ Great Lakes
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
Professor Mahesh Pandey Institute of Risk Research and
445 mile navigation system Located in Ok & AR
Economic Operation of Power Systems
Ohio River Basin Energy Commodity Trends
INLAND WATERWAY TRAVEL TIME ATLAS via AIS DATA ANALYSIS
AAPA and AASHTO State of Freight II Survey Results
Senator Dance Town Hall Coal Ash Update December 5, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Huntington District Inland Navigation Mark Hammond Planning Center of Expertise for Inland Navigation Huntington District 25 March 2009

Huntington District 1. Description of Inland Navigation System 2. Economic Evaluation 3. Case Study

Huntington District Inland Navigation System Inland navigation system is a system of lock and dam projects that convert natural rivers with their variable water levels into a waterway system with a constant depth that is sufficient for the reliable movement of commercial vessels.

Huntington District Natural River

Huntington District Lock and Dam Projects 1. Dams convert the river into a series of lakes (pools). 2. Locks allow vessels to pass from one pool to the other.

Huntington District Dam without Lock

Huntington District Dam with Lock Dam Lock

Huntington District Typical Ohio River 15 Barge Tow Overhead View Side View

Huntington District 1200’ x 110’ and 600’ x 110’ Mainstem Ohio Project Typical 15-Barge Tow Single Cut Main Chamber = 60 minutes Double Cut Auxiliary Chamber = 125 minutes

Huntington District Operation of a Lock

Huntington District

Navigation System A series of lock and dam projects that convert a natural river system into a commercially navigable system.

Huntington District Point Pleasant Winfield Charleston Marmet Montgomery Gallipolis E L K R I V E R G A U L E Y R. N E W R I V E R WINFIELD MARMET LONDON R. C. BYRD WINFIELD (New Lock Under Construction) MARMET LONDON SCALE IN MILES WEST VIRGINIA Kanawha Falls, Mi 95.4 ELEVATION IN FEET (N.G.V.D.) HEAD OF 9FT. CHANNEL Point Pleasant Winfield Charleston Marmet Montgomery RIVER MILES ABOVE MOUTH Navigation System and Natural River

Huntington District

Recap Inland Navigation 1. What does it consist of? 2. What is its purpose?

Huntington District Summarization 1.It consists of a series of dams that convert the rivers into series of deep pools with locks alongside the dams that allow vessels to move from one pool to another. 2.Its purpose is to allow commercial vessels to move on the rivers with the assurance of adequate depth.

Huntington District Inland Navigation 1. Description of Inland Navigation System 2. Economic Evaluation 3. Case Study

Huntington District ER Guidance ER Data Navigation Data Center

Huntington District 1.Identify the commodity types 2.Identify the study area 3.Determine current commodity flow 4.Determine current costs of waterway use 5.Determine current cost of alternative movement 6.Forecast potential waterway traffic 7.Determine future cost of alternative modes 8.Determine future cost of waterway use 9.Determine waterway use with and without project 10. Compute NED benefits * Pages 52 – 56 of Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies March 10, Steps

Huntington District Ohio River Basin 1. High Dependence Coal Mining Electric Generating Coke/Steel Production Petrol-Chemicals Construction 2.Low Dependence Agriculture Wood Products Major Shippers on the Ohio River Mainstem

Huntington District Ohio River Mainstem Traffic 242 million tons in 2006 Over 71 percent coal and stone Over 28 percent petrol, grains, chemicals, ores, iron & other

Huntington District Ohio River Basin Coal Reserves over one-quarter of nation’s reserves over 90 percent of highest energy reserves sufficient reserves to continue producing coal within the basin for the next 400 years Ohio River Basin Resources

Huntington District Ohio River Basin Power Plants Ohio River Basin Electric Utilities Water supply Low cost transportation Proximity to low-sulfur coal Clean air requirements 20 percent U.S. coal-fired capacity

Huntington District Ohio River Mainstem Ohio River Mainstem Characteristics 20 navigation locks and dams Main chambers ’ x 110’ 3 600’ x 110 ’ Auxiliary Chambers ’ x 110’ ’ x 110’ 3 360’ x 56’

Huntington District 2006 Ohio River Mainstem State Flows

Huntington District Economics Interaction of supply and demand: Demand = willingness to transport goods Supply = capability of transportation system to accommodate the transport of goods

Huntington District The Mechanics of Measuring Without and With-Project NED Benefits Total NED Benefits with Current River System $ Total Benefits of New Capacity Resulting from Reduced Delays of Existing River Traffic Total Benefits of New Capacity Resulting from Additional Tons of River Traffic Benefits of River Traffic (Land Rate - River Rate): Willingness to tolerate cost of delay Current System-wide Cost of Delay New Capacity, System-wide Cost of Delay Total Benefits of New Capacity River Tons Q* '

Huntington District Key Study Variables 1. Traffic Forecasts 2. Waterway and Overland Transportation Rates 3. Project Reliability - Capacity

Huntington District Key Study Players 1. Traffic Forecasts Economists 2. Transportation RatesEconomists 3. Reliability Engineers

Huntington District Traffic Forecasts How much tonnage will move on the waterway system given regional demand?

Huntington District Forecasts and Uncertainty Forecasts Based on Alternative Futures Utility Based High (Coal Model) Utility Based (Coal Model) Modifies Clear Skies NAAQS Growth Clear Skies

Huntington District Transportation Rates Includes all costs from ultimate origin to ultimate destination; not only the barge costs.

Huntington District Transportation Rates Water Routing Land Routing Metropolitan Statistical Area

Huntington District Development of Transportation Rates is a a Major Study Effort 1. Sample of movements (O-D-C) 2. Cost to rate one movement  $200 - $1, Extrapolate to population

Huntington District Water Routing Transportation Cost 1. Truck to river $ 2.50/ton 2. Unload/load $ Barge to plant $ Unload $ 1.50 Total $ 10.00/ton

Huntington District Least Cost All Overland Transportation Cost 1.Load $ 1.50/ton 2.Truck to Rail Head$ Rail to plant $ Unload $ 1.50 Total $ 20.00/ton

Huntington District Savings per Ton Cost per ton by barge:$10 Cost if shipped overland:$20 Savings per ton: $10/ton

Huntington District System Benefits Savings per ton:$10/ton Tons in millions: 500 m tons Total Benefits:$5 billion

Huntington District Benefits Over Time Unconstrained Sav/tonMTons/yr Benefits 2010 $10 500$5 billion 2030 $ $6 billion Savings per tons x tons per year

Huntington District Reliability – One Possible Constraint Aging infrastructure Increased closures for maintenance Increased closures due to failures Increased frequency and duration of closures

Huntington District Hrs/Tow Tonnage Normal Operations Tonnage-Transit Curve

Huntington District Tonnage-Transit Curve with Closures Hrs/Tow Tonnage Normal OperationsWith Closure

Huntington District Tonnage-Transit Curve with Closures and Traffic Hrs/Tow Tonnage Normal OperationsWith Closure Future Traffic Current Traffic

Huntington District Without-Project Condition Benefits Sav/tonMTons/yr Benefits 2010 $10 500$5 billion 2030 $ $3 billion

Huntington District With-Project Alternative Replace small old lock chamber with a large new lock chamber.

Huntington District Tonnage-Transit Curve with Improvements Hrs/Tow Tonnage Normal OperationsWith Improvements

Huntington District Tonnage-Transit Curve with Improvements and Traffic Hrs/Tow Tonnage Normal OperationsWith Improvements Future Traffic Current Traffic

Huntington District With-Project Benefits Sav/tonMTons/yr Benefits 2010 $10 500$5 billion 2030 $ $9 billion

Huntington District Systems Analysis Improving one project may increase traffic and reduce delays at that project. Increased traffic may increase delays at other projects. Benefits are the reduction in transportation costs for all shipments over the entire route, and not merely the reduction of delays at the improved project.

Huntington District System Effects of Improving One Project Improved project: 4 hour reduction in delay Other project: 1 hour increase in delay System: 3 hour reduction in delay

Huntington District Models - Purpose 1. Develop traffic delay relationships 2. Calculate the effects on system benefits of changing traffic levels, changing project reliability, and changes in lock sizes.

Huntington District Major Points Regarding Economic Procedures 1. Benefits are the savings in transportation costs between river and land routings. 2. Traffic increases and project deterioration are the major determinants of the need for navigation projects. 3. Reduced delays at one project may be partially offset by increased delays at other projects.

Huntington District Any Questions ? or Comments ?

Huntington District 1. Description of Inland Navigation System 2. Economics 3. Case Study Inland Navigation

Huntington District Lower Monongahela River Navigation Study Three projects on the Monongahela River near Pittsburgh. 1. Small and inefficient locks 2. Old and unreliable structures

Huntington District Key Study Parameters 1. Future Traffic Levels 2. Transportation Rates 3. Lock Size and Reliability - Capacity

Huntington District Traffic Analysis 1. What commodities move on the river? 2. Key drivers? 3. Where do they originate and what is the destination? 4. What are the prospects for the future?

Huntington District Traffic Forecasts Traffic – predominantly coal 1. Near term – low to no growth due to high sulfur content of coal. 2. Long term – reasonable potential for growth because of large remaining reserves of coal.

Huntington District Forecast River Traffic

Huntington District Rate Analysis 1. Acquire list of all shipments from the waterborne commerce data base. 2. Hired TVA to develop the rates for the water- routing and least cost all-overland routes.

Huntington District Reliability Major structural problems as well as typical equipment problems.

Huntington District Lock Wall

Huntington District Rusted Gate

Huntington District Chain out of Sprocket

Huntington District Lock Delays

Huntington District Economic Analysis 1. Base Condition 2. Without Alternatives 3. With Alternatives 4. NED Plan

Huntington District Simulation Modeling 1. Simulation – an event tree with probabilities assigned to possible occurrences. 2. Model – mathematical representation of event tree. 3. Simulation Model – computerized version of mathematical model.

Huntington District Event Tree Definition Depicts possible linkage between conditions and possible consequences.

Huntington District Event Tree Conditions and Consequences 1. Probability of breakdowns 2. Time to repair 3. Cost of repairs 4. Consequences of breakdowns

Huntington District Typical Event Tree

Huntington District Simulation Process 1. Simulation – generate random number to compare to probabilities on event trees. Use probabilities to trace path to possible consequences (do for each year). 2. Life cycle analysis – perform simulation of event tree for each year in time period of evaluation (50 years). 3. Iterations – perform life cycle computations a large number of times to ensure all possible paths are simulated.

Huntington District Simulation Process –Depiction Life Cycle Analysis – Multiple Simulations of Event Tree Event Tree Event Tree 2060 Simulation – Simulate possible events as depicted in Event Tree Iterations – Multiple Life Cycle Runs Event Tree 2010 Event Tree 2060 Life Cycle Analysis Life Cycle Analysis - 1 Event Tree 2010 Event Tree Etc. Event Tree

Huntington District Base Condition What is the future if we continue to operate and maintain the projects in the same manner as we have in the past?

Huntington District Probability of Failure Year Probability of Failure % % %

Huntington District Base Condition Projects would become increasingly unreliable at a loss of $300 million in benefits annually. A year-long closure would save $3 million in O&M. Net loss of NED benefits of $297 million annually.

Huntington District Without-Project Alternatives Possible corrective actions to ameliorate the problems: 1. Rehabilitation 2. Traffic Management 3. Reconstruction

Huntington District Without-Project Economics Average Annual Values Benefits:$300 million Costs:$103 million Net Benefits:$197 million B/C Ratio:3:1

Huntington District Residual Problems 1. Intermittent traffic delays 2. Long processing times 3. High O&M costs

Huntington District With-Project Alternative 1. Replace small locks with large locks. 2. Eliminate one of three projects altogether.

Huntington District Existing Profile Future Profile

Huntington District Economics (average annual; $ in millions) Without With Benefits: $ 300 $ 400 Costs: $ 103 $ 122 Net Benefits: $ 197 $ 278 B/C Ratio: 3:1 4:1

Huntington District Economics for Scenarios ( average annual; $ in millions) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 (low forecasts) (high forecasts) Benefits: $ 325 $ 400 Costs: $ 122 $ 122 Net Benefits:$ 228 $ 278 B/C Ratio: 1.9:1 4:1

Huntington District What if costs were significantly higher for the With-Project Condition? Without With Benefits: $ 300 $ 400 Costs: $ 103 $ 200 Net Benefits: $ 197 $ 200 B/C Ratio: 3:1 2:1

Huntington District Areas of Greatest Uncertainty 1. Traffic Forecasts 2. Project Reliability 3. Period of Construction

Huntington District Questions Planning Center of Expertise for Inland Navigation Huntington HQ – (304)