How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Using public procurement to foster research and innovation More Research and Innovation COM(2005) 488 of 12 October 2005 Commission communication to the.
PRESENTATION AT THE WORKSHOP ON LDC PRIORITY NEEDS FOR TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL COOPERATION 29 OCTOBER 2009 GENEVA Sari Laaksonen Coordinator, Integrated.
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION The new European Regional Development Fund Brussels, 12 October 2006 Committee of the Regions N. De Michelis,
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
The Connecting Europe Facility
Anna Panagopoulou TEN-T Executive Agency Head of Unit, T4
February 16, 2014Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Mid-term assessment of information and publicity measures Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
1 Effective Support for Enlargement Accelerating public investments Western Balkans Investment Framework Brussels, 19 October 2009 Alessandro Carano, EIB.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Introduction Dirk Beckers TEN-T Executive Agency Executive Director TEN-T Info Day November 2012.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 OVERVIEW AND PRINCIPLES Anna Panagopoulou TEN-T EA Head of Unit T4 –Technical & Financial Engineering, GIS & Monitoring.
Corridors Herald Ruijters, Head of Unit for Trans European Network, DG Mobility and Transport Brussels, 29 November 2012.
1 Regional Policy contributing to Sustainable Growth in Europe 2020 COCOF technical seminar Brussels 23 March 2011 Mikel LANDABASO European Commission.
An accessible and attractive region: to improve internal and external transport links Aleksandrs Antonovs EU Funds Managing Authority in Latvia.
Istanbul October 2010: EastAgri Annual Meeting – RT4 – Investing across borders: The way forward for agriculture and rural development in the Balkan.
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
17 November 2005Industry Meeting1 Fees & Charges Regulation Ralf Erckmann Certification Manager.
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Roads Yiannis Argyropoulos TEN-T EA Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport TEN-T Info Day November.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.
0 - 0.
1 NECOBELAC Project WORK PACKAGE 3 Cross-national advocacy infrastructure.
South East Europe Investment Committee Work Programme and Communication Plan for th Meeting of the South East European Investment Committee Sarajevo,
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodias development challenges 1.
Draft Change Management Strategy Framework and Toolkit An Overview TAU Workshop: Vulindlela Academy (DBSA) 12 April 2012 Presenter: Dr Patrick Sokhela.
Erasmus+ Erasmus+: Sport Yves Le LostecqueDG Education and Culture Head of the Sport UnitEuropean Commission.
1 World Bank Support TFSCB STATCAP Monitoring systems / Core Welfare Indicators Questionnaire (CWIQ) Readiness Assessment.
Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka Director of the Department for Coordination of Operational Programmes Gdańsk,
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
EuropeAid Co-operation Office Institutional Capacity Development Operations for the ACP Countries Unit AIDCO C4 Centralised Operations for the ACP Countries.
Symposium on Road to sustainable land administration in Africa 7 th annual African conference and Exhibition on Geospatial information, technology and.
STATE OF TRANSPORT CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION ACTIONS IN EEA COUNTRIES, RECENT EXPERIENCES Natalia Sobrino (TRANSyT- UPM) ETC/CCA Task Adaptation.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division ITU - Inland Transport.
Leveraging the impact of climate finance through MDBs Ko Sakamoto Transport Economist Asian Development Bank.
Perspectives of development Petar Margic Budapest, September 17th, 2013 Danube Commission, Budapest.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Partners and cross-border cooperation Annual Conference and Contact Forum “Strategic.
European Rail Agency Workshop 29 th September 2011 (Lille) Dr Björn Paulsson (UIC) Dr Stephen Ingleton (Newcastle University) REDUCING THE OCCURRENCES.
Addition 1’s to 20.
SG MEETING GRI NW– 28 N OVEMBER 2013 Incentives and Cross-border Cost Allocation in the Energy Infrastructure Package Benoît Esnault (CRE) Chair of the.
Mid-term Evaluation Implementation of the EU Structural Funds in R&DI and Higher Education, Stage 1: Strategic view
European Commission Preparation of the Innovation Union Flagship Initiative European Commission Presentation to ERAC 11 June 2010.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
Regional cooperation in the SEETO Comprehensive Network development Nenad Nikolic, SEETO General Manager 11 th SEEIC meeting Sarajevo,
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
Transport ERTMS on the EU core network by 2015, 2020, 2030 strategic (pragmatic) approach UIC conference 2014 I. Vandoorne.
Financing of TEN-T projects via INEA
1 EuroCRIS Seminar Brussels, 13 September 2010 Dr. Peter Fisch European Commission Evaluation of the Framework Programme Tools and Challenges.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) Jose Anselmo – TEN-T Policy Officer Unit B2 – Coordination of TEN-T Priority.
European Structural and Investment Funds for railways in Poland November 2015 Wolfgang Munch, Deputy Head of Unit DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Annual Interreg meeting 06 June 2016 #EUBudget4Results 1.
PLANNING OF RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
5th Regional TAF TSI Workshop SK, CZ, HU
INEA Innovation and Networks Executive Agency
Investing in infrastructure The Connecting Europe Facility
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Presentation transcript:

How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport, TEN-T EA The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September 2010

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September How to improve the technical & financial management of the TEN-T projects? Background The current programme Most recent experience The way forward

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Background (1) Objectives of the improvements already made in the current ( ) TEN-T programme –Facilitate the completion of the TEN-T infrastructure investments and the creation of an efficient Trans-EuropeanTransport network –Enhance the monitoring and administration of projects –Raise visibility of EU support

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Background (2) Main improvements and changes to the programme: –Increased funding ( 8 billion) –More focus on Priority Projects, in particular cross-border sections and bottlenecks –Creation of the TEN-T Executive Agency in charge for the implementation of projects

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Background (3) Main simplifications to the monitoring & administration of projects -Standardised administrative requirements (Decisions, Strategic Action Plans, Reports) -Flexibility on modifications to the cost breakdown -Harmonised templates for financial statements -Standardised examination of payments

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September TEN-T EA managed projects

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Share of completed and ongoing projects in the current portfolio

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Most recent experience (1) Common specific characteristics: –High degree of complexity –Large number of stakeholders –Part of longer term investments –Different sources of funds –Non cumulation of EU funding

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Most recent experience (2) Selection aspects: –High over-subscription –Search for European added value –Leverage effect of TEN-T funding –Dependence on project applications –Evaluation based on information supplied by the applicants

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Most recent experience (3) Implementation issues: –Long preparatory periods –High degree of complexity in the decision making –Optimistic plans –Maturity –Project and risk management aspects –Delays –Regular budget revisions Need for a deeper look into matury and implementation plans

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Most recent experience (4) Financing issues: –Insufficiency of TEN-T funding –TEN-T funding vs other EU sources –Financial crisis –Updated cost estimates –Absorption rates –Streamlining payments/faster response times –EU Financial Regulation

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Most recent experience (5) –Beneficiaries have gradually become familiar with the TEN-T requirements –Close and regular contacts with stakeholders have facilitated the technical and financial management – Sound project management practices yield results and facilitate reporting –Added value of the Agency?

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Key Objectives Better understanding of and preparation for the implementation challenges Improved awareness of the TEN-T requirements Better appreciate beneficiaries needs & practices Bring added value to project and programme implementation TEN-T EA BENEFICIARIES

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September The Way Forward (1) Overview of respective project management methods and tools used Identification of potential national specificities in project implementation Development of common monitoring practices & reporting based on the TEN-T requirements

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September The Way Forward (2) Sharing experiences and good practices for improved quality of project management and monitoring through: -Project Management Workshops -Working groups -Internal information sharing Need to insist on complete and accurate information on both technical & financial progress

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September The Way Forward (3) Provide for improved risk management and better responses to obstacles Facilitate the timely preparation and submission of requirements and shorten the approval time, and reduce the associated workload Closer working relationships Review of the Multi-annual programme project portfolio is ongoing

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Recurrent Challenges Do we provide the right assistance and advice? What are the needs of beneficiaries/project promoters? To what extent do we address them? What are the main issues? How can we disseminate and make the best use of good practices?

The Future of TEN-T Policy & Transport Corridors in Europe Riga, 17 September Thank you for your attention!