College Success Program Fall 2009 Annual Report. Fall 2009 Cohort For comparative analysis, the cohort of Clermont students whose first enrolled term.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David Fairris Tarek Azzam
Advertisements

Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Institutional Research & Effectiveness Who Are the Freshmen at Austin Peay? Institutional Research & Effectiveness Ellen Smyth May 2009.
NIU – An Historical Snapshot Daniel House Office of Institutional Research Brian Brim Division of Academic and Student Affairs Daniel House Office of Institutional.
Funding Formula Data Work Session Student Information System Website: ▬►Resources ▬►CompleteCollegeTN.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team November 14, 2007.
Institutional Effectiveness and the National Community College Benchmark Project Dr. Glynis Daniels Dr. Ceil Connelly-Weida Lehigh Carbon Community College.
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
HOPE Changes DOE Workshop. HOPE Scholarship Basic eligibility requirements: –Unchanged for current seniors College Prep Diploma – 3.0 GPA Career Tech.
Simplified Version Hope Changes Fall HOPE Changed? HB 326 brought significant changes to both the HOPE Grant and HOPE Scholarship Effective Fall.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team January 11, 2008.
Total International Students At LaGuardia Community College, SP 07, 938 Male 461 Female 477.
Achieving the Dream: Developmental Courses and Student Retention Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment January 2008 Research Report.
AGC Update November Wyoming Public Schools’ Middle College is a collaboration between Wyoming Public Schools and Grand Rapids Community College.
Financial Aid Scenarios How enrollment status can impact a student’s financial aid status.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
Dual Credit and Advanced Placement: Do They Help Prepare Students for Success in College? Mardy Eimers, Director of Institutional Research & Planning Robert.
Patricia Bergh, Dean of Humanities Professors Laura Tobias, Michele Dunnum, and Jackie Knoll.
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
Background of Performance Measures identified 12 Performance Measures Baseline data collected in Performance Funding in Results.
Ron Harrell Assistant Director for Planning and Accountability Arkansas Department of Higher Education Dr. Linda Beene, Director.
Dr. Christina Whitfield April 29, 2013 Big E Symposium KCTCS PERFORMANCE METRICS WHERE’S THE DATA?
Kilgore College Balanced Scorecard FY 2013 Update.
1 2-YR INCREASES FOR A+ COLLEGE READY COHORT 1 SCHOOLS FAR EXCEED NATIONAL AND STATE AVERAGES Percentage Increase in scores of 3 or greater in math, science,
College Success Program Fall 2010 Annual Report College Success Program.
Quality Enhancement Plan Action Item 1. Liberal Arts in University Life  Piloted Fall, 2003 ◦ 3 hour course ◦ Optional (183 students enrolled) Purpose:
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Data Collection Process: USDOL Data Requirements Colleges must be able to identify grant participants by program (credit & non-credit) I. Initial Point.
UMass Boston Retention, Persistence, and Graduation Rates UMass Boston Advising Collaborative March 28, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Policy.
Washoe County School District Saturday CAFÉ Data Summit September 12, 2015.
Higher Education Fact Book The Fact Book compiles tables and graphs reporting enrollment, awards, persistence, tuition, financial trends, and.
A Tool for Tracking the Enrollment Flow of Older Undergraduates William E. Knight and Robert W. Zhang Bowling Green State University Dwindling state financial.
Complete College OCCC Fall 2012 AtD Cohort Retention September 18,
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Program Collaboration and Transfer Update
An Equal Opportunity University Transitions from High School to the University of Kentucky Mike Mullen Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education.
November 12, 2009 Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District Grossmont - Cuyamaca Community College District.
Identifying At-Risk Students Gary R. Pike Information Management & Institutional Research Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.
Retention: Some Recurring Themes n Impact of small groups on freshmen retention n Does declaring a major make a difference in retention? n Do GPA ranges.
LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEW STUDENT ORIENTATION
STATISTICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR EXAMINING PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS Carli Straight, PhD and Giovanni Sosa, PhD Chaffey College RP Group Conference.
College Comparisons. Mean Total Score by College (Possible Score Range 400 to 500) SSD = Total Scores for Colleges of Business, Education, Health and.
New Faculty Orientation A Profile of Eastern Students August 27, 2012.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004.
AGC Update April This AGC update will report on process measures that currently pertain to the Wyoming Middle College.
Integrated Basic Skills & Certified Nursing Assistance Program In 2 quarters students are prepared to work as Certified Nursing Assistants upon completion.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
Progress Toward Degree Requirements Bylaw 14.4 Putting the Eligibility Pieces Together.
Cohort Graduation Rate. Cohort Graduation Rate Trends by Ethnicity 2014 N Size
Achieving the Dream Preliminary Assessment of Developmental Strategies Data Team August 13, 2007.
President’s Special Commission to Improve Graduation Rates Retention & Graduation Presentation to PAC 1.
It Changes Everything. Move On When Ready Go West! Go Now!
Robert Franco, Ph.D. Director, Office for Institutional Effectiveness Professor of Anthropology
DEI A Title V Project Developmental Education Initiative.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Community College of Baltimore County
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
FOUNDATIONAL STUDIES Foundational Studies
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Launching COMPLETE COLLEGE AMERICA Dr. Risa E. Dickson
SVC Students: Who are they
AVID College Completion Project
Undergraduate Retention
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
Using Advanced Analytics to Boost Student Success
MSJC Demographics AY 2007-’08
CCC Operational Definitions
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Noel Levitz Goal Development
Presentation transcript:

College Success Program Fall 2009 Annual Report

Fall 2009 Cohort For comparative analysis, the cohort of Clermont students whose first enrolled term at the university equals 09A was selected. The CSP Participants, Non-participants and College Ready are defined as follows: –CSP Participants are students who placed into 2 or 3 developmental courses and participated in the CSP program CSP Participants have been divided into 2 subgroups: –CSPA are students who had ongoing visits during 09A and additional support during 10W & 10S in some cases. –CSPB are students who registered for CSP and had one meeting during 09A. –Non-participants are students who placed into 2 or 3 developmental courses and did not participate in the CSP program –College Ready are students who have placement test scores on file in one or more areas, placed into fewer than 2 developmental courses and did not participate in the CSP program The 09A Total in the demographic section reflects the composition of all Clermont students enrolled in 09A.

Fall 2009 Demographics CSP Participants (N=42) Non- Participants (N=90) College Ready (N=588) 08A Total (N=3,990) #%#%#%#% Freshmen42100%90100%588100%2,37860% Male1536%3539%26245%1,68042% Female2764%5561%32655%2,31058% Full-time (12+)2969%5966%47080%2,52163% Half-time (6-11)1024%2427%9015%1,11128% Part-time (1-5)37%78%285%3589% Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding

Fall 2009 Average Term GPA N=42 n=40 N=26 n=24 N=588 n=570 * One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between 09A NP and the 09A CSPA & 09A CR cohorts N=16 n=16 N=90 n=83

Fall 2009 and Fall 2008 Average GPAs

Fall 2009 Course Completion Hours Carried Hours Earned % Carried Hours Earned CSP Participants % CSPA % CSPB % Non-participants % College Ready %

Fall 2009 and Fall 2008 Course Completion The percentage of carried hours earned by 09A CSP Participants exceeds 09A Non-participants and is comparable to 09A College Ready. The 09A CSPA percentage of carried hours earned exceeds the 09A College Ready by 10%. Hours Carried Hours Earned % Carried Hours Earned 09A CSP Participants % 09A CSPA % 09A CSPB % 09A Non-participants % 09A College Ready % 08A CSP Participants % 08A Non-participants % 08A College Ready %

Second Quarter Persistence Cohort Fall Entering Headcount Enrolled WinterNot Enrolled Winter #% Avg Fall GPA #% 09A CSP Participants423583% % A CSPA161381% % A CSPB262285% % A Non-participants906876% % A College Ready % % A CSP Participants786279% % A Non-Participants442966% % A College Ready % %1.374 Fall to Winter Note: Average fall gpa based on students who have a gpa on record for fall quarter.

Second Quarter Average GPAs * One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between the 09A NP and 09A CR cohorts. Note: Reflects second quarter persistence of students who were enrolled fall and winter quarters and have a gpa on record for both quarters.

Winter 2010 Course Completion Hours Carried Hours Earned % Carried Hours Earned CSP Participants % CSPA % CSPB % Non-participants % College Ready %

Winter 2010 and Winter 2009 Course Completion The winter quarter percentage of carried hours earned by 09A CSPA Participants exceeds 09A College Ready. Hours Carried Hours Earned % Carried Hours Earned 09A CSP Participants % 09A CSPA % 09A CSPB % 09A Non-participants % 09A College Ready % 08A CSP Participants % 08A Non-participants % 08A College Ready %

Third Quarter Persistence Cohort Entering Cohort Enrolled SpringNot Enrolled Spring FallWinter# % of Wtr ret’d Avg Winter GPA # % of Wtr ret’d Avg Winter GPA 09A CSP Participants % % A CSPA % % A CSPB % % A Non-Participants % % A College Ready % % A CSP Participants % % A Non-participants % % A College Ready % %1.621 Winter to Spring Note: Reflects third quarter persistence of students who were enrolled both fall and winter quarters. Students who were enrolled fall, stopped out winter, then enrolled spring quarter are not included. Average winter gpa based on students who have a gpa on record for winter quarter.

Third Quarter Average GPAs Reflects students who were enrolled fall, winter and spring quarters and have a gpa on record for all three quarters. * One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between 09A CSPB and 09A CR & between 09A NP and 09A CR cohorts.

Spring 2010 Course Completion Reflects students who were enrolled fall, winter and spring quarters and have hours carried/earned on record for spring quarter Hours Carried Hours Earned % Carried Hours Earned CSP Participants % CSPA % CSPB % Non-participants % College Ready %

Spring 2010 and Spring 2009 Course Completion Reflects students who were enrolled fall, winter and spring quarters and have hours carried/earned on record for spring quarter Hours Carried Hours Earned % Carried Hours Earned 09A CSP Participants % 09A CSPA % 09A CSPB % 09A Non-participants % 09A College Ready % 08A CSP Participants % 08A Non-participants % 08A College Ready %

First Year Retention Cohort Entering Cohort Enrolled Following Fall Quarter Not Enrolled Following Fall Quarter Fall#% Avg Fall College GPA #% Avg Spring Term GPA 09A CSP Participants421945% %.691 CSPA161169% %.945 CSPB26831% % A Non-Participants904348% % A College Ready % % A CSP Participants785064% % A Non-Participants442148% % A College Ready % %1.924 Fall to Fall Reflects all students in cohort who entered in the fall quarter and were enrolled in the fall quarter of the following year. Average fall gpa based on those students who have a gpa on record for fall quarter * One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between 09A NP and 09A CR cohorts.