IPPC implementation in Poland – special focus on public participation in process of issuing IPPC permits INFRA 32645 Ankara, Turkey 5-6 November 2009 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Advertisements

EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Industrial Pollution Control - Harmonization and Implementation in Bulgaria Slavitza Dobreva Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria Final Seminar.
IPPC and Industry By Dr. Ken Macken Dublin Regional Licensing Manager.
Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management: IPPC Neil Emmott Environment Directorate-General 7 April 2006.
Practical use of newly developed BAT conclusions Valts Vilnītis.
Sources of Law Dr Y Scannell. Different kinds of law International European Domestic or Irish law Common law – the law made by the courts throughout the.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
ECENA 4 th Exchange Programme Cluj Napoca, October, 2005 National Updates in the Transposition and Implementation of IPPC directive Ministry of Environment.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
Integrated Control of Industrial and Chemical Substances in Cyprus Integrated Control of Industrial and Chemical Substances in Cyprus Final Conference.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
IPPC Directive state of play and future developements
Croatian Report on new Environmental Protection Law Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. State Secretary Anita Pokrovac-Patekar, B.Sc. Pharm. Senior Environmental.
The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
1 Permitting of industrial facilities in Croatia.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Reflections on draft Recommendations for Revision to Administrative Regulations: By Norman Sheridan, Legal & Institutional.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU Gabriella Gerzsenyi & Menno Verheij European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions Unit 03.
IPPC transposition and experience with its implementation in the Czech Republic ?? …!! AjPíPíSí ??
AйПиПиСи ?? IPPC implementation - experience from new EU member countries & changes brought by Industrial Emissions Directive Monika Přibylová Kiev, 10.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
The Process of Development of IPPC Legislation Robert Sarlamanov MA, IPPC Expert Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Bercen Exchange Programme,
Slovak Environmental Inspectorate Procedure of issuing the permits in the Slovak Republic.
1 st Program of Experience Exchange INSPECTION – PLANNING AND REPORTING (CURRENT SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA IN CORRELATION WITH IPPC) Brijuni,
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
The conception of Information System on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IS IPPC) Ing. Blanka Kapustová, PhD. Slovak Environmental Agency Centre.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture EIA, IPPC and SEVESO Links.
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Slovak republic.
Capacity Building of Kazakhstan Aarhus Centres in Providing Access to and Exchange of Environmental Information Olga Melnik, Information and Analysis Center.
3rd BERCEN Exchange Programme, Prague WASTE CONDITIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Mrs. Marianne Lindström, Finnish Environmental Institute,
PPSD in specific sectors in Bulgaria - Regional Plans for Development National Programme for Ports Development (2006 – 2015) Vania Grigorova, Jacquelina.
Strengths and weaknesses of the permitting system and enforcement process in RIEW – Veliko Turnovo Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water - Veliko.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Iuliana CHIDU European integration counsellor Ministry of Environment and Water Management Prague - CZECH REPUBLIC April 2005 DIRECTIVE 96/61/EC.
Twinning project ENEA – ENforcing Environmental Acquis Skopje, 19 th of November, 2015.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Czech experience - Use of BREFs and national BAT notes, role of IPPC Agency, Czech TWG Multi-Country Workshop June 8th,
Achievements in IPPC Directive Implementation: problems and constraints Albania Ministry of Environment 3 rd BERCEN Exchange Programme for the Environmental.
The current legal situation
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Peter Lukáč Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic Department of Environmental Assessment.
ECENA 4 th Exchange Programme Cluj Napoca, October, 2005 Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning of Kosovo Mr. Muhamet Malsiu, Acting Head.
Albania - Identification and notification of the public concerned in Decision Making : Best practices and Challenges Aarhus Convention Task Force on Public.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Introduction to the philosophy
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
INTEGRATED PERMITTING PROCEDURE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
INTEGRATED PERMITTING IPPC DIRECTIVE: BEST PRACTICE
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
The Final Decision in the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure in Ukraine as a Multilateral Agreement Tretiak Taras Associate Professor of National.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

IPPC implementation in Poland – special focus on public participation in process of issuing IPPC permits INFRA Ankara, Turkey 5-6 November 2009  Artur Dąbrowski

2 INDEX Where I am from? Where I am from? General Info about IPPC in Poland Main steps in the implementation Public participation process Guidline for implementation as the conclusion

3 Geographical Location Mazovia Region is located in middle-eastern part of Poland Capital: Warsaw

4 General Info about the Mazovia Region Area: km² (11,4% of Poland) Inhabitants: (13,5% of Poland) Capital: Warsaw Municipalities: 314

5 INDEX Where I am from? General Info about IPPC in Poland General Info about IPPC in Poland Main steps in the implementation Public participation process Guidline for implementation as the conclusion

6 Goal of IPPC Directive to achieve integrated prevention and control of pollution arising from a wide range of activities by means of measures to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions from industrial facilities to air, water and land, including measures concerning waste, in order to achieve a high level of protection of the environment as a whole

7 Member States have to ensure that permits include all appropriate preventive measures are taken against pollution in particular through the application of BAT no significant pollution is caused waste production is avoided; where waste is produced it should be recovered or, where that is technically and economically impossible, disposed of while avoiding or reducing any impact on the environment energy is used efficiently the necessary measures are taken to prevent accidents and limit their consequences the necessary measures are taken upon definite cessation of activities to avoid any pollution risk and return the site of operation to a satisfactory state.

8 IPPC permit has to Include emission limit values based on BAT Take into consideration potential for transfer of pollution from one medium to another Protect soil and groundwater and establish conditions of waste management if necessary Introduce supplementary requirements necessary to prevent breaches of any environmental quality standard Be periodically reconsidered and updated

9 Polish law concerning IPPC Environmental Protection Law Act on Introduction of the Acts - Environmental Protection Law, the Waste Act and Amending Certain Acts This laws came into force on ( provisions transposing IPPC requirements on )

10 Executive orders Delegation resulting from the previously mentioned acts Regulation of of the MoE on the types of installations that cause considerable pollution of particular elements of nature and environment as a whole (transposition of Annex1) Regulation of of the MoE on the registration fees

11 Executive orders Regulation of of the MoE on the types of installations for which the operators may apply for compliance programs

12 General requirements One integrated permit for all IPPC installations located at one site Permit granted for a limited time – max. 10 years Regular review of the integrated permits (at least every 5 years) Shut down of the installation operation – in case of operating without permit Public participation in the permit issuing procedure Transboundary impact assessment

13 Timetable requirements New installation – before starting operating, Existing installation – not later than (Schedule for individual sectors are set in detail in Regulation of MoE of )

14 Transition period Poland negotiated a 3 years transitional period extending the deadline for full compliance with BAT till for the following groups of installations: municipal heat sources with a rated thermal input between 50 and 300 MW municipal waste landfills receiving tones per day 65 large installations implementing compliance programs

15 Institutions The Competent Authority – Minister of Environment Permit granting Authorities: Marshal of the Voivodeship (regional administrators 16) for installation that can have a significant impact on environment, subject to a statutory requirement to provide a report concerning their impact on environment Starost (county administrators 380) for other installation from Annex 1

16 Institutions Inspection Authority - Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection and 16 Voivod Inspectorates Appeals Authority – Minister of Environment (for Marshals) and appeals boards (for starosts) National BAT Center ( within the structure of MoE)- responsible for assembling and exchanging information on BAT and for running the applications and permits registers

17 INDEX Where I am from? General Info about IPPC in Poland Main steps in the implementation Main steps in the implementation Public participation process Guidline for implementation as the conclusion

18 Main steps in the implementation (1) Establishing the BAT Center within the structure of Ministry of Environment Creating IPPC website: link Inventory of total number IPPC installations Preliminary in Updated in Under marshals competence 1116 Under starosts competence 854

19 Main steps in the implementation (2) Elaboration of guidelines and manuals Information on IPPC distributed at conferences, seminars, trainings available also at website The guideline for IPPC application The guideline for administration on implementation Draft application form

20 Main steps in the implementation (3) English version of BREFs are available on website On Polish website are displayed translation of BREFs into Polish BAT in the Cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries BAT in the Pulp and Paper Industry BAT in the Glass Manufacturing Industry BAT in the Non Ferrous Metals Industries BAT in the Chlor - Alkali Manufacturing industry BAT to Industrial Cooling Systems Reference Document on General Principles of Monitoring BAT on the Production of Iron and Steel BAT in the Ferrous Metals Processing Industry

21 Main steps in the implementation (4) Establishment of Technical Working Groups for different IPPC sectors ( 2002) to gather together representatives of industry, authorities, science, etc to create forum of exchanging information on IPPC and BAT to elaborate branches guidelines for specific sectors

22 Main steps in the implementation (5) Trainings for administration and conferences and seminars for industry training within the PHARE pilot projects, training for trainers and 2600 officials Conferences co-organized by MoE Seminars for selected industrial sectors by Technical Working groups of BAT Center

23 Main steps in the implementation (6) PHARE/DISAE project POL-102 with GB (1998-9) Twinning PHARE 1998 with France ( ) Twinning PHARE 1999 with Netherlands and GB (2000-2) Twinning PHARE 2000 with Spain and Denmark Bilateral project with Denmark (2003-4)

24 Main steps in the implementation (7) Strengthening of administration Developing BAT Center and continuing its work on BREFs Disseminating of Guidelines Updating IPPC website Providing industry with relevant information Performing the pre-inspection to determine the progress in delivering application and effectiveness of permit granting procedure Integrating existing national databases in accordance with EPER requirements Join process of elaboration of the BREFs by EIPPCB in Seville

25 INDEX Where I am from? General Info about IPPC in Poland Main steps in the implementation Public participation process Public participation process Guidline for implementation as the conclusion

26 Public participation in the original Directive 96/61/EC „(…)Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that applications for permits for new installations or for substantial changes are made available for an appropriate period of time to the public, to enable it to comment on them before the competent authority reaches its decision. That decision, including at least a copy of the permit, and any subsequent updates, must be made available to the public.” „The results of monitoring of releases as required under the permit conditions (…) held by the competent authority must be made available to the public.”

27 Directive 2003/35/EC Directive 2003/35/EC (covers public participation in drawing up certain plans and programmes) and updates provisions on public participation in permitting procedures at national level under Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and IPPC, and introduces access to justice rules.

28 Amendments to Directive 96/61/EC from Directive 2003/35/EC – new definitions „The public” shall mean one or more natural or legal persons and, in accordance with national legislation or practice, their associations, organisations or groups; „The public concerned” shall mean the public affected or likely to be affected by, or having an interest in, the taking of a decision on the issuing or the updating of a permit or of permit conditions; for the purposes of this definition, non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed to have an interest;

29 Public participation in the permit procedure in new content of Directive 96/61/EC (1) „Member States shall ensure that the public concerned are given early and effective opportunities to participate in the procedure for: - issuing a permit for new installations, - issuing a permit for any substantial change in the operation of an installation, - updating of a permit or permit conditions for an installation (…)”

30 Public participation in decision-making procedure Annex V to the Directive 96/61/EC (1) 1. The public shall be informed (by public notices or other appropriate means such as electronic media where available) of the following matters early in the procedure for the taking of a decision or, at the latest, as soon as the information can reasonably be provided: (a) the application for a permit or, as the case may be, the proposal for the updating of a permit or of permit conditions (…); (b) where applicable, the fact that a decision is subject to a national or transboundary environmental impact assessment or to consultations between Member States (…);

31 Public participation in decision-making procedure Annex V to the Directive 96/61/EC (2) (c) details of the competent authorities responsible for taking the decision, those from which relevant information can be obtained, those to which comments or questions can be submitted, and details of the time schedule for transmitting comments or questions; (d) the nature of possible decisions or, where there is one, the draft decision; (e) where applicable, the details relating to a proposal for the updating of a permit or of permit conditions; (f) an indication of the times and places where, or means by which, the relevant information will be made available; (g) details of the arrangements for public participation and consultation.

32 Public participation in decision-making procedure Annex V to the Directive 96/61/EC (3) 2. Member States shall ensure that, within appropriate time-frames, the following is made available to the public concerned: (a) in accordance with national legislation, the main reports and advice issued to the competent authority or authorities at the time when the public concerned were informed (b) in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2003/4/EC (…) on public access to environmental information, information other than that referred to in point 1 which is relevant for the decision (…) and which only becomes available after the time the public concerned was informed in accordance with point 1.

33 Public participation in decision-making procedure Annex V to the Directive 96/61/EC (4) 3. The public concerned shall be entitled to express comments and opinions to the competent authority before a decision is taken. 4. The results of the consultations held pursuant to this Annex must be taken into due account in the taking of a decision.

34 Public participation in decision-making procedure Annex V to the Directive 96/61/EC (5) 5. The detailed arrangements for informing the public (for example by bill posting within a certain radius or publication in local newspapers) and consulting the public concerned (for example by written submissions or by way of a public inquiry) shall be determined by the Member States. Reasonable time-frames for the different phases shall be provided, allowing sufficient time for informing the public and for the public concerned to prepare and participate effectively in environmental decision-making subject (…)

35 Public participation in the permit procedure in new content of Directive 96/61/EC (2) „When a decision has been taken, the competent authority shall inform the public in accordance with the appropriate procedures and shall make available to the public the following information: (a) the content of the decision, including a copy of the permit and of any conditions and any subsequent updates; and (b) having examined the concerns and opinions expressed by the public concerned, the reasons and considerations on which the decision is based, including information on the public participation process.”

36 Key elements of the public participation procedure – rules of Polish EPL  Placing of documents in a publicly accessible record;  Notifying the public about the initiation of a procedure, the possibility of becoming familiar with the documentation of the procedure, and the possibility of submitting comments and recommendations;  Becoming familiar with the documentation;  Submitting comments and recommendations;  Cosideration of comments and recommendations by a competent authority;  Notifying the public about the decision made and the possibility of becoming familiar with it together with the accompanying information on the submitted comments and recomendations and the ways in which they were used. Moreover, the competent authority may conduct a public administrative trial.

37 Six steps of public participation  Step 1: Drawing up a plan of public notification and public participation  Step 2: Identifying target groups for public notification and public participation  Step 3: Notification of the public  Step 4: Collection of public comments and recommendations  Step 5: Examination of public comments and recommendations  Step 6: Assessment of the results of public participation

38 Techniques of informing the public - example

39 Techniques of informing the public - example

40 Public participation procedure Information concerning IPPC application in publicly accessible data records (where and when it is publicly accessible – non confidential part, information about possible remarks, 21 days term for public access and for remarks) Aprove or reject public remarks Administrative trial (optional) Public access to project of administrative decision (7 days)

41 General remarks concerning public participation Involving the public in decision-making often means changing administrative practice. Not all authorities accept public participation easily for this reason.

42 INDEX Where I am from? General Info about IPPC in Poland Main steps in the implementation Public participation process Guideline for implemetation as the conclusion Guideline for implemetation as the conclusion

43 Guideline for implementation 1. Identify sites within scope of the directive 2. Assess existing administrative institutions responsible for issue environmental permits and examine regimes to administer and control its implementation by industry 3. Compare IPPC permit requirements and processes to existing national law 4. Establish steps ( phases) of implementation according to the availability and capacity of resources

44 Guideline for implementation 5. Evaluate capacity of existing administration to carry out the responsibilities laid down by the directive 6. Consult representatives of industry( at least from energy, metal production and processing minerals, chemicals, waste management sectors) on implementation issues 7. Consider appropriate level of administration to issue permit. IPPC licensing needs much expertise, knowledge and experience but may be introduced on national as well as regional level

45 Guideline for implementation 8. Consider as a base for IPPC permit evaluation of the design of the entire plant (all production process) rather than end of pipe standards 9. Ensure that permit contain requirements for protecting land air and water from environmental damage and conditions how to identify and monitor air emissions 10. Define penalties for failure to cooperate with the competent authorities and inspectors as well as for breaches of permit requirements by industry 11. Require financial bounds from industrial operators to cover decommissioning costs

46 Guideline for implementation 12. To ensure public participation in licensing process make permitting information available by posting register of decisions and permits in relevant administration office (website)

47 Thank you very much for your attention! Contact details: Artur Dabrowski Tel