Facilities Condition Audit Summary of Findings Entech is a full-service Architectural/Engineering firm providing design, construction management, facilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR and Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Lisa Marie McCauley, Kings College, VP/CFO.
Advertisements

Facts about King County Metro Transit Area served …. 2,134 square miles Population served …. 1,884,200 Coaches …. 1,301 (907 diesel, 235 hybrid, 159 electric.
Closing the Gaps: Facilities Development and Planning Systems Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board February 26, 2004.
PRAC and Integrated Planning October 22, Integrated Planning Model.
PERFORMING EFFECTIVE BUILDING SYSTEM RECOMMISSIONING STUDIES Joseph J. Watson, P.E. Booth # 312.
Protecting Public Safety, Public Health, Public Assets and a Special Quality of Life FY08 Town of Sudbury Budget – Article 3.
Del Mar Union Schools Facilities Master Plan Update September 19, 2012.
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACILITIES PLAN: TEN-YEAR PLAN: MID-POINT STATUS FISCAL YEAR 2002 Presentation to the Council of Deans Robert F. Pack.
Why We Need It?  Lack of Space  Need to Meet Code Requirements  Inadequate Communications & Technology  Facility Maintenance Issues.
IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education FY2013 Budget Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PRESENTATION
ENERGY CONSERVATION & MODERNIZATION FOR GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
FBCLS Facilities Master Plan September 14, Future Planning Team Dave Esely Sheryl Franke Bud Hertzog Blake McKinney Wendell Shaffer Sara Taylor.
2005 Administrative Services Program Reviews As we strive towards continuous improvement.
Successful Facility Assessments: Savings through Facility Manager and A/E Partnerships May 27, 2014.
Capital Budgeting.
I-Web Documentation Part VI – Work Items FACILITY CONDITION SURVEY TEAM Steve Oravetz PE, R1 (Team Leader) Bruce Crockett, R1 Randy Warbington PE, R8 Jim.
Chapter 1 Infrastructure Management System. Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life- cycle management of infrastructure systems for water,
Building for Their Future Dublin Unified School District.
Manage the Facility Condition Index (FCI)
FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY Report to the Commission on Higher Education I.Priorities & Plans for II.Budget Requests III.Capital Bond.
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
Academic Budget Presentation March 4, FY05 University Budget Unit Description NonExempt BudgetExempt Budget Total Budget President's Units 2,121,8942%
Managing the Facilities Asset Portfolio Prepared for the Tuition Policy Advisory Committee by The University of Texas Physical Plant September 10, 2003.
1 City Manager’s Proposed Budget for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 City of Palo Alto Finance Committee May 13, 2009 General Fund Capital Improvement Program.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
Physical Building Audit Physical Building Audit By; Engr.Dr.Attaullah Shah PhD ( Civil) Engg, MSc Engg ( Strs), BSc Engg ( Gold Medalist),), MBA, MA (
Jan 31, 2005 Community Update. Jan 31, 2005 Thanks to the voters… Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood.
MMSD Facility Assessment Outline Mission and Goals History –Building Construction Dates Facility Management Process –Previous 5 year Plan –Website –
Financial Skills. Objectives 1.Business strategy 2.Budget strategy 3.Calculations 4.Practice.
Department of General Services Strategic Capital Asset Management (SCAMP) “You Can’t Manage What You Can’t Measure” COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO.
Department of Public Works Public Buildings Division Joey Duncan, P.E., Director.
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Guidance on Five-Year Plan Summary of Required Actions Attachment G.
Facilities Condition Assessment Initiated: February 2004 Consultant: ISES Corporation Stone Mountain, GA Scope: Identify the conditions of our facilities,
Asset Management in Action: Use of a Triple Bottom Line Approach to Prioritize Capital Improvement Needs Richard Cuthbert R. W. Beck, Inc.
Klein High School Original building built in 1963 Move KHS to HS #5 in 2011 Move back to renovated KHS in 2013.
Carroll County Public Schools Board of Education Work Session August 27, 2014 FY 2016 Capital Budget and FY 2017 – FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program.
Comprehensive Asset Protection Each school district shall develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive asset protection plan for every school building,
August 18, 2011 Facility Master Plan Master Plan Presentation “Listen” “Listen”“Understand”“Create”
Budget Planning Update New Hanover County Schools Board Work Session December 16, 2014.
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Proposed Changes to Attachment G FY 2011 – FY 2015 Five Year Plan.
1 Age of Smithsonian Facilities Age of Buildings From Museums And Facilities: Critical Assessment and Improvement Objectives.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Ontario School Boards 72 district school boards in Ontario Approximately 4,900 schools TDSB presently operates 551 active schools Approximately 11.3% of.
Interview For Professional Architectural Services Florida Department of Health Office of Design and Construction 4052 Bald Cypress Way Tallahassee, Florida.
MODERNIZATIONS “The First Five” Golden West Elementary Lathrop Elementary Lincoln Elementary Sequoia Elementary Shasta Elementary December 8, 2015.
Ontario School Boards 72 district school boards in Ontario Approximately 4,900 schools TDSB presently operates 551 active schools Approximately 11.3% of.
PORT OF TACOMA. Contract Increase & Award Pier 7 Structural Repairs Request authorization to expand the scope of existing A/E Contract No and.
Office of Facilities & Property Management STEPHEN SALBER, DIRECTOR.
Updated Facility Condition Assessment Prince George’s County Public Schools June 17, 2008.
MODERNIZATIONS MEASURE G OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE September 8, 2015.
San Francisco Fire Department Facilities Update.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2014 / 15 Fourth Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
PORT OF TACOMA Capital Lumber Lease Extension Action Requested of Commission Authorize the Chief Executive Officer or his Designee to enter into a Lease.
Facility Assessment Reports FY 16 Survey Results June 9, 2016.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2015 / 16 First Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
Long-Term Planning Presented by: APP Site Visit Don Untch
February 13, 2017.
Tomahawk School District Community Survey Results
Southern Lehigh School District
“That’s my old place?!”.
Plant & Facilities Department
Enterprise Asset Management Proposal to Expand AiM :
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (Five Year Plan)
CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The Asset Management Journey for Building Assets
Update to Board of Trustees: November 9 FAC Meeting
TSAG Overview Mission Vision Core Values Operating Principles.
FIRELANDS Local School District
East Troy Community School District Community Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Facilities Condition Audit Summary of Findings

Entech is a full-service Architectural/Engineering firm providing design, construction management, facilities management, and planning services. Entech Engineering, Inc. 4 South Fourth Street Reading, Pennsylvania (610) "Committed to Providing Unrivaled Service" About Entech

Entech’s Facilities Condition Audit Qualifications Award for Excellence Eastern PA Chapter American Institute of Architects Buildings Magazine “The Numbers are In” College Planning & Management Magazine “Facility Management for the New Century” College Planning & Management Magazine “Data Linking Requirements in Facilities Condition Audit RFPs”

Facilities Condition Assessment Benefits Provides: n A multi-year process to manage facility(s) assets n Support for your Facility Master Plan n Dynamic budgeting, not based on past allocations Incorporates: n Standardized facility benchmarks 4 Facility Condition Index (Deferred maintenance Total / Replacement Value) 4 Funding Total per Square Foot (all projects identified) 4 Time Weighted Method & Plant Replacement Value (PRV) Method (estimated annual allotment for a building’s annual maintenance and renewal )

Analyzed Systems s HVAC s Electrical s Plumbing s Exterior Architectural s Interior Architectural s Fire Detection & Protection Other Considerations s Regulatory Authority Compliance s Handicapped Accessibility s Energy Saving Opportunities s Environmental Concerns

Facilities Condition Audit Process Original Survey 2003 Resurveyed 2008  Field Observations 19 Buildings Surveyed 363,742 square feet u Project Development 320 Projects u Budget projections $21.5 million 10 year projection

Building Replacement Budget Values Projections Administration Building$13,294,801$2,285,595 Athletic Storage Building$820,368$128,367 Center for Lifelong Learning (Security/Welcome Center) $1,339,200$219,092 College Center$8,271,504$1,720,007 College Center / Bookstore Annex$4,784,400$390,830 Greenhouse$403,488$93,674 Health & Physical Education Center / Gym$22,614,769$2,938,066 Health Sciences Building$4,765,392$677,836 Hiering Science Building$10,685,520$485,500 Instructional Building$26,632,801$4,720,748 Instructional Computer Center$2,229,120$310,903 (Kean) Administrative Support Building$725,760$42,415 Library$25,372,657$2,359,253 Maintenance Building$2,358,288$114,478 Office of Information Technology$2,373,408$536,126 Robert J Novins Planetarium$3,151,440$2,054,268 Southern Education Center$4,320,000$47,378 Technology Building$11,299,392$333,752 W. Kable Russell Building$11,694,240$2,109,386 Totals$157,136,548$21,564,674

Facility Condition Index Lower numbers represent better conditions Benchmarks are set by APPA//NACUBO Good Poor Fair

Priority Definitions u Immediate: Address immediately. These include life safety or code violations, critical equipment that is not functional or close to failure. Generally scheduled for execution in the first year. u High: Schedule soon. These include items needing attention in the near term, as failure would impact the mission. Generally scheduled for execution two to four years out. u Medium: Schedule in the foreseeable future. Generally scheduled for execution five to seven years out. u Low: Less important projects related to aesthetic or minor performance issues, or projects related to systems or equipment that will reach the end of its useful life cycle within the ten-year scope of this Audit. Generally scheduled for execution eight to ten years out.

Project Priority Summary

Ten Year Plan Summary Deferred Maintenance$3.3million Capital Renewal$ 8.1“ Capital Improvement$10.1“ Total $ 21.5 “ u Replacement value of facilities surveyed = $ 157 million Funding Designations Deferred Maintenance: These items are in need of repair or replacement, but do not relate to ongoing maintenance. Capital Renewal: These items still function as originally intended, but will exceed their useful life within the period being considered by the analysis. Capital Improvement: Work that improves, enhances, or updates.

Ocean County College 10-Year Cost Projections (O&M not included)

Ocean County College Deferred Maintenance Elimination Trend