1. Jan 31, 2005 Community Update

2. Jan 31, 2005 Thanks to the voters… Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood Schools Improvement Act of 2004”

3. Jan 31, 2005 What did you approve in Measure R ? 1.New construction/Acquisition projects ($1.857B) 2.Repair, Upgrade, and Modernization projects ($1.563B) - Specified projects - Projects of certain types

4. Jan 31, 2005 What we committed to… A Plan Engaging Stakeholders Strategic Execution Plan

5. Jan 31, 2005 General Process Some Projects Already Identified Other Projects Need to be identified

6. Jan 31, 2005 Project types: 1.Major repair ($315M) 2.Core Facilities ($300M) 3.Small Learning Communities ($88M)

7. Jan 31, 2005 Identify the Remaining Projects Possible Major Repair Projects Possible Core Facilities Projects Possible Small Learning Communities Projects Sorting Process List Confirm Priorities Community Review Citizen’s Bond Oversight Committee & Board of Education June 2005 Strategic Execution Plan

8. Jan 31, 2005 Methodical Process Assess the Needs –Condition of Buildings –Safety / Building Code Compliance –Functionality

9. Jan 31, 2005 1. Major Repair

10. Jan 31, 2005 Prioritizing Major Repair Needs Assess the Condition of the Facilities Determine the Facilities Condition Index (FCI) The Higher the FCI: The Higher the Repair Needs

11. Jan 31, 2005 Facilities Condition Index (FCI) DISTRICT CLASSROOM BLDG Building Needs:Cost of repair: Re-roof $12,000 Re-Paint Exterior $2,500 New Energy Efficient Lighting $8,000 Total $22,500 Current Building Replacement Value $160,000 FCI = Cost of Needed Repairs Current Replacement Value = $22,500 $160,000 = 0.14

12. Jan 31, 2005 Approach: Allocate funds to achieve consistent level of repair across District Projects selected per weighted scores in the following categories: –Immediate health and safety –Code compliance and liability –Asset safeguards and deterioration –Age and aesthetics

13. Jan 31, 2005 2. Core Facilities Sanitary Facilities Food Service Kitchen / Cafeteria Multi-Purpose Rooms Lunch Shelters Libraries Administrative Offices Gymnasiums Auditoriums Playgrounds Parking

14. Jan 31, 2005 Campus Ranking by Need Survey the Core Facilities Compare Existing Facility to New School Facility Prioritize the Needs by: Category of the Facility (cafeteria, library, etc.) Deficiency of the Facility (missing or too small)

15. Jan 31, 2005 Category Priorities Higher Category – More Points 1. Code Compliance & Life-Safety Requirements 2. Sanitary Facilities, Food Preparation, Food Serving, Indoor Dining/Multi-Purpose Room 3. Library, Administration Space, Lunch Shelter 4. Gymnasium, Auditorium, Playground, Parking

16. Jan 31, 2005 Deficiencies in Facilities Less Space / Greater Need – Higher Deficiency Factor Missing Core Facility – Maximum Deficiency Factor 100% of New School Facility - No Deficiency Factor

17. Jan 31, 2005 Proposed Funding Distribution by Core Facilities Category 76% 12% 76% for Missing or Extremely Deficient Core Facilities 12% for Food Services Modernizations 12% for Local District Determined “Needs-Based” Modernization

18. Jan 31, 2005 3. Small Learning Communities

19. Jan 31, 2005 Program Objectives: Conversion of existing High Schools and Middle Schools Personalized learning environments of 350-500 students Supports Autonomy of Space and Scheduling

20. Jan 31, 2005 Potential Projects: Space conversions –Specialty classrooms (multimedia production, performing arts) –Decentralized core curriculum classrooms (science, computer labs) –Teachers’ meeting/work rooms –Support Staff/Admin. space New buildings and additions

21. Jan 31, 2005 Priority Criteria: Planned Instructional Programs API Score Program Improvement Status Calendar Student Population Single-Track Capacity New School Impact on Population Number of SLCs planned

22. Jan 31, 2005 Delivery Plan: Assessment / Scope Definition (Nov 04 – May 05) –School conversion requests –Scope review, estimates, and prioritization –Approval by Superintendent –Bond Oversight Committee review –Board of Education approval Design / Construction

23. Jan 31, 2005 In Conclusion…

24. Jan 31, 2005 What will we accomplish? Continuation of Proposition BB & Measure K Will not fix everything These objective processes will address the most critical needs Other Critical Needs will Remain

25. Jan 31, 2005 Next Steps… Identify specific projects Brief Communities on the Results of the Process Identify Costs & Schedules Incorporate in the Strategic Execution Plan Bond Oversight Committee review Board Approval Design & Construct Projects

26. Jan 31, 2005 For more information… -List of new construction projects at: http://www.laschools.org/sep/ -List of existing facilities modernization and repair projects: http://www.laschools.org/efsep/