Institutional Control Program Long Term Care and Control of Decommissioned Mine/Mill Sites Located On Crown Land Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Mines and Steel Development ``FORMALIZATION AND LEGALIZATION OF ARTISANAL AND SMALL- SCALE MINING IN NIGERIA A PRESENTATION BY ENGR. CHARLES.
Advertisements

Albania Good practices and Gaps 13 December 2013.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Introductions; Objectives and Scope of the Course Tr aining course on Authorization and Inspection of Uranium Mining.
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D3- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste - Site and supporting facilities - Environmental protection - Emergency planning QUESTIONS.
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D1- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES  Why is the NPP decommissioning required / necessarily?  How.
Uranium Working Group (UWG) Public Meeting Science Museum of Virginia November 27, 2012.
Exemption, Clearance, Discharges
Safety and Security Aspects of the Management of High Level Waste and Spent Fuel Ramzi Jammal Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations.
Regulating Legacy Sites in Canada 2014 Ron Stenson, Senior Project Officer Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Ron Stenson, Senior Project Officer Canadian.
1 “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” “Environmental Auditing in the Republic of Macedonia” State Audit Office Nada Sekulovska Gorast.
History of Nuclear Safety Legislation in Pakistan
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Institutions and Engagement What is the role of institutions (RWM agencies, regulators, etc.)? Should they play a purely technical role, or engage themselves.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Government of Canada Policy on Radioactive Waste and Legacy Uranium Mines Tom Calvert Uranium and Radioactive Waste Division Natural Resources Canada May.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
NRC Decommissioning Activities for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Bruce A. Watson, CHP Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.
National Radioactive Waste Disposal Institute Bill Presentation to the NCOP Select Committee on Economic and Foreign Affairs October 2008.
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ LLRWMO’s Legacy Sites in Canada IAEA RSLS Elliot Lake Workshop Mark Gardiner 2014 May 2.
1 International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Technical Meeting Amel MELLOUK – ASN / DRC Jérémie VALLET – MEDDE/MSNR Regulatory.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
TRP Chapter Chapter 3.1 Regulatory approaches.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency David Bennett (David 14 – 18 December 2014 JAEC, Amman, Jordan National Policy and Strategies.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Clean-up of former nuclear sites and the role of the Planning regime Jim Cochrane.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “National legislation and licensing” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Legislation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “ Development of regulatory framework for oversight of decommissioning Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Steve Martin Environmental Planner Permanence of Compensatory Mitigation.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
LEGAL and REGULATORY FRAMEWORK for NUCLEAR and RADIATION SAFETY in BULGARIA General overview Dr. M. Mateeva – Chief Inspector R. Markova-Mihaylova – Chief.
15th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Sydney, 2006 Nuclear Regulatory Decision Making The Australian Context John Loy CEO Australian Radiation Protection.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
STRENGTHENING NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR THE CONTROL OF RADIATION SOURCES RER/9/096 REGIONAL PLANNING MEETING ARMENIA ASHOT MNATSAKANYAN Head of Radiation.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: ROMANIA.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT SLOVENIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY ADMINISTRATION Regulatory Infrastructure in Slovenia Iztok Anželj.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Sustainable Uranium Resources Development Business Model Canvas for MONGOLIA / MINISTRY OF MINING Presented by.
Status of national system for control of radioactive sources: TANZANIA
Sustaining Cradle-to-Grave Control of Radioactive Sources (INT-9182) Workshop on implementation of a national cradle-to-grave control system for radioactive.
Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Energy
Management of RS/DSRS in Brazil Ademar José Potiens Júnior
Abdulla Al Yammahi Specialist, Radiation Safety Inspection
SMA ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM 2018
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
National Radioactive Waste Management Agency Bill
REGULATORY ASPECTS OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY Dr
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Control Program Long Term Care and Control of Decommissioned Mine/Mill Sites Located On Crown Land Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy April 2013

The Life Cycle of a Mine Exploration Operation Construction Monitor Decommission Release Institutional Control

Institutional Control Program Establishes an endpoint for mining company activities on sites located on Crown land Establishes funding for the long-term care and control of the closed sites Company responsibilities for sites under the Environmental Management and Protection Act remain

Establishes an Institutional Control Registry Establishes two funds: – Monitoring and Maintenance – Unforeseen events Institutional Control Program

Institutional Control Registry The functions of the Registry include: — Establishing a formal record — Defining site specific requirements for acceptance — Conducting site activities (monitoring and maintenance) — Providing public access to records — Maintains fund records and financial assurances

Program Costs Types of costs: – Administration of the Institutional Control Registry – Monitoring of sites – Maintenance of sites – Unanticipated future costs of sites

Uranium – A Special Case Federal Constitutional Authority for Nuclear Facilities National and International Obligations –Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (IAEA) –The Nuclear Safety Control Act and Regulatory Framework (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) Licence Exemption

IC Process Application to include: – Saskatchewan Environment (SE) and CNSC identified requirements for release/ exemption. – Ministry of Economy (ECON) requirements of costs for performing the identified monitoring and maintenance plan – Estimated major failure event and cost for purposes of determining financial assurance. – Identify lands to enter program – – Identify recommended future land use and restrictions.

IC Procedure Typical Procedure: – SE and CNSC review application – perform final inspection. – SE and CNSC confirm release and exemption can be issued and initiate process. This includes presentation to the Commission. – ECON proceeds with establishment of Crown Reserve – First Nations and Metis Relations (FNRM) proceeds with surrender/revision of surface lease.

Example Site Impact Area

IC Procedure (cont’d2) Typical Procedure: – ECON determines financial factors to calculate funding requirements based on monitoring and maintenance schedule. – Financial assurance requirements are determined based on cost of major failure event.

Example Site Calculation

IC Procedure (cont’d3) Typical Procedure: – For ownership purposes, CNSC licence exemption, SE Release, FNMR surface lease surrender, ECON acceptance into Registry occur on the same day that the funds and financial assurance are paid.

IC Future Site Management Future Plan: – ECON performs monitoring and maintenance program as required by plan. ECON can employ third party or use government resources.

IC Management Long Term: – ECON reviews program and publishes Registry report every 5 years. Includes reviews that funds are sufficient for monitoring and maintenance plan requirements. – The Unforeseen Events Fund is essentially a “rainy day fund”. The intent is that there is no planned access of the funds under normal operating scenarios.

In April 2008, Cameco applied to enter the former Contact Lake Gold Mine Site into the IC Program. They had to: meet the environmental conditions and requirements to receive the Release from Environment meet requirements for surrender of the Surface Lease Agreement surrender the mineral rights for the establishment of a Crown Reserve pay a registration fee and deposits into the ICMM and ICUE funds submit a monitoring and maintenance program Cameco met the conditions and the site was accepted in May 2009 Contact Lake Example

An important component of mining regulation Saskatchewan is an international leader Institutional Control is a “Win – Win – Win” solution Institutional Control Program

Thank you