Welcome to the Euregio Meuse-Rhine. Euregio Meuse-Rhine characteristics 4 millionen inhabitants 3 member states: Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands 10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

Why does ERA Need to Flourish
1 Brussels, 18 October 2007 Erwin Siweris INTERREG IIIC/IVC JTS Lille, France.
1 FROM INTERREG III TO EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL CO- OPERATION State of Play January 2007.
INTERREG III B, PHARE CBC and TACIS CBC Programme -Combination of EU instruments for transnational co- operation in the BSR CEEC\NIS participation in BSR.
Cordoba, 2010 Claudio Spadon
European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
Title INNOVATION PERFORMANCE. The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs and EU regional policy DG REGIO.
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Development Priorities in Regional Operational Programmes prepared by the Polish Regions for the Programming Periode – 11 October 2007,
European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) Open Days 2006 Making regions work across borders October 10 th, 2006 by JAN OLBRYCHT Member of the.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Planning and use of funding instruments
The Intelligent Energy – Europe Programme at a glance
The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Community Strategic Guidelines for cohesion
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Anders Lindholm European Commission DG Regional Policy, Territorial Cooperation.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 1: Cross-border co-operation DG Regional Policy Brussels, 21 February 2005.
Version 3 Südtirol – Alto Adige Applied Spatial Management Co-financed by DG Regional Policy, Innovative Actions Unit 1 Clusterdevelopment within CAN Südtirol.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Networks and projects on Social economy promoted by Italian Regions Milan, 5 November 2011 Rita Porru Networks and projects on Social economy promoted.
Innovation in cross-border Regions Werner Jostmeier MdL Member of the Regional Diet of North Rhine-Westfalia Brussels, 10 October 2007.
EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.
Pre-commercial public procurement and cross-border Living Labs Pioneering Europe 2020 Smart Regions Espoo, 26 April 2013.
Structural and cohesion funds and the European Semester process –experiences from the past, lessons for the future for the European Structural and Investment.
Energy Efficiency within the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME European Roundtable – Financing energy efficiency in European.
Programme Presentation GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME Ioannina 16 th of October 2012.
Claudia ZiosiSzeged, 16 April ALSO Strand Conference B Szeged, HUngary 16, 17 April 2006.
A GROWTH-FRIENDLY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: THE ROLE OF TRAINING Spanish Public Administration and the decision making process at European, national and local.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Shaun Henry Director, Managing Authority (SEUPB) INTERREG VA – Ireland/Northern Ireland/Western Scotland ( )
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
16 September 2009, Ryn EUROREGION BALTIC – NEW CHALLENGES.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
European Territorial Cooperation Programmes European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Greece-Italy A case study in cross-border cooperation.
How to use an EGTC to manage a programme Pat Colgan Chief Executive Special EU Programmes Body Ireland/Northern Ireland.
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic project Call and themes for the Seventh Call How to Apply Seminar 16 th February 2011 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
The European Structural and Investment Funds & the defence sector Paul Anciaux, Helsinki, 25 March 2014.
MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS: BEST PRACTICES COOPERATING IN SOUTH WEST EUROPE 12th of October 2005.
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
Iruma Kravale Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Head of Development Instruments Department 28 November 2013, Riga.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 17 th June 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European Regional.
Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario
GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME
INTERREG VB Danube Transnational Programme
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
SMATH project kick-off meeting
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the Euregio Meuse-Rhine

Euregio Meuse-Rhine characteristics 4 millionen inhabitants 3 member states: Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands km² 3 languages: Dutch, French, German Five different cultures 5 partner regions: Provincie Limburg (the Netherlands) Regio Aachen (Germany) Provincie Limburg (Belgium) Province de Liège (Belgium) Deutschsprachige Gemeinschaft (Belgium)

Euregio Meuse-Rhine characteristics Connectivity to densely populated areas such as Dusseldorf, Cologne-Bonn, Brussels, Amsterdam and Frankfurt within a radius of 300 km More than 2/3 of the population of Western Europe lives in a 500 km perimeter Around 1.5 million workers Around cross-border workers Around Enterprises 4 Universities 10 Graduate schools 300 research and excellence centres About students (including technical colleges)

Staat BelgienNiederlandeDeutschland RegionWallonische RegionFlandern North Rhein- Westphalia CommunityGerman- speaking Community Frensh Community Flamish Community GovernorateColongne ProvinceLiègeLimburg Dietrict5 District Municipaliti es Different administrative structures

New governance instruments European Gouping of Territorial Cooperation EGTC The EGTC is a new European legal instrument designed to facilitate and promote cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation. Unlike the structures which governed this kind of cooperation before 2007, the EGTC is a legal entity and as such, will enable regional and local authorities and other public bodies from different member states, to set up cooperation groupings with a legal personality. For example, an EGTC or EGTC members can be: Member States regional or local authorities associations any other public body

European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) The EGTC is unique in the sense that it enables public authorities of various Member States to team up and deliver joint services, without requiring a prior international agreement to be signed and ratified by national parliaments. Member States must however agree to the participation of potential members in their respective countries. The law applicable for the interpretation and application of the convention is that of the Member State in which the official EGTC headquarters are located. An EGTC convention sets out in particular: An EGTC convention sets out in particular: the name of the EGTC and its headquarters the list of members the area it covers its objective its mission its duration

Three phases Overcoming the national and linguistic obstacles Opening the borders > more mobility > more obstacles New governance tools needed The Euregio Meuse-Rhine since 1976

Reorientation after 30 years Vision: «Accelarate and deepen cooperation » 7 core areas : - Economic Development (Sustainable Growth, Environment and Employment) - Knowledge Institutes - Labour Market and Education - Health Care - Mobility und Infrastructure - Culture and Tourism - Security + Climate as a transversal objective

A Vision EMR surrounded by metropolitan areas

EMR: Powerful region in Europe Polycentric metropolitan area EMR?

New EMR-Structure Economic Development Knowledge Institutes Labour Market and Education Health Care Mobility and Infrastructure Culture and Tourism Security Climat Metropolitan Area EMR … Economic and Social Council Temporary Committees Secretariat / Office Strategic Support Groups 3-year- Plans Board of Directors Euregional Council Networks

Revenues and Expenditures Expenditures Office expenses Personnel expenditures 216 Translation costs 16 Expenditures Board of Directors 16 Expenditures Euregional Council 17 Expenditures Economic and Social Council 17 Administrative costs 30 Accounting costs 10 Expenditures print products 3 Automatisation 7 Telephone costs 5 Other costs such as representation costs, … 38 Subtotal 375 PR activities 170 Activities of Networks and Temporary Committees 39 Total 584 Revenues Contributions of the partner regions 510 Interests 25 Total 535

INTERREG-IV-A Programme Euregio Meuse-Rhine

Priorities of the Operational Programme 1. Strengthening of the economic structure, promotion of knowledge, innovation and creation of more and better jobs 2. Nature and environment, energy, natural resources and mobility 3. Quality of life Budget for the period : 72 million ERDF INTERREG IV-A Programme Euregio Meuse-Rhine

1. Strengthening of the economic structure, promotion of knowledge, innovation and creation of more and better jobs Promotion of entrepreneurship Competitiveness Promotion of innovation and technology Promotion of the cooperation between research institutes and enterprises Cross-border labour market Tourism INTERREG IV-A Programme Euregio Meuse-Rhine

2. Nature and environment, energy, natural resources and mobility Preservation of nature and landscape Support of production and use of renewable energy resources Improvement of local public transport INTERREG IV-A Programme Euregio Meuse-Rhine

3. Quality of life Promotion of cultural diversity Cooperation in the field of public safety Improvement of health care Reduction of burdens for cross border workers to promote mobility INTERREG IV-A Programme Euregio Meuse-Rhine

Priorities% of the budget Budget of the programme ERDFEU- inter- vention rate Co-financing, private or public contributions 1. Strengthening of the economic structure, promotion of knowledge, innovation and creation of more and better jobs 65% % Nature and environment, energy, natural resources and mobility 18% % Quality of life11% % Technical Assistance6% % TOTAL100% % The INTERREG IV-A- Budget in detail

Overview of the total investment in cross-border projects 1991 – 1993 INTERREG I 67 million 1994 – 1999 INTERREG II 75 million 2000 – 2006 INTERREG III108 million 2007 – 2013 INTERREG IV144 million

Project selection criterias Distinct cross border nature of the project content, organisation, finances and personal on both sides of the border Innovative idea Clear added-value for Euregio Meuse-Rhine Clear and measurable objectives Sustainability of the project Attention to principal of equal opportunities Maximum duration of the project = 36 month Exclusion of double financing

Project selection criterias Who can apply? Public bodies Legal entities (public and private) Private companies The initiative must fit into the priorities of the operational programme The total costs of the project should be of min Euro

INTERREG IV-A EMR Joint technical secretariat (JTS) RA TS

Consultation and decision procedure of the INTERREG-IV-A programme Trilingual project outline to be submitted to the regional Trilingual project outline to be submitted to the regional managers Sketch-CALL Check and discussion of the outline in the JTS First assessment of the outline by the programme partners GO / NO GO 2nd Meeting GO / NO GO: Preparation of the Monitoring Committee Technical assessment by JTS and control of accordance by programme partners Official submission of the project proposal to the JTS in compliance with the remarks formulated by the programme partners Submission for decision to the Monitoring Committee of the EMR (3 times/year)

Theory and practice

Successful projects Please visit us at the Biomedica on the 17th and 18th March 2010 in Aachen (Eurogress) EMR Life science region

A B K O M M E N A TaskForce facilitating commuter mobility in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine Reducing barriers The Commuter TaskForce is an INTERREG project launched by the Euregio Meuse-Rhine. The aim of this project is to reduce or remove the main barriers to job-related mobility within the border triangle Aachen, Maastricht, Hasselt, Lüttich und Eupen. Successful projects

EPICC Euregional Police-Information- Cooperation-Centre Successful projects

Programm Evaluation Project evaluation Interim Program evaluation ( Technical evaluation of the program management) Ex-post evaluation (by the EU- Commission, DG Regional Policy) INTERACT New iniciative Territorial Cooperation projects : INTERACT Project Evaluation and Selection Manual

Progress report and outlook on INTERREG V 48 projects approved so far 97% of the budget committed What we want for INTERREG V The further strengthening of cross-border strands (A) A set of priorities which is focused but matches the needs of the programme area A simplification of the administrative procedures for applicants and programme management More proportionate control mechanisms

Any questions? Thank you for your attention!