Update on international information exchange EReg Topic Group I Amsterdam, 25 november 2008

International Data Exchange Goals: –To create safe and reliable international data exchange –No new system for every Treaty, Directive or Council Decision for every new or extra group of users for every functionality –To avoid a spaghetti of connections –Stop ‘reinventing the wheel’ (safe time and money for EU/EC but most for MS) Principles: –Registration Authority is the national hub (no central system) –Expand the existing connections of Registration Authorities –EUCARIS as the main tool for international data exchange

What ‘s going on in 2008 (1) EUCARIS Treaty into force latest January ratification in UK and B nearly completed - changes will be prepared (France and Poland) - new Member States will sign (Romania, Sweden, France, Latvia, Estonia) - new participants (Slovakia, France, Slovenia, Norway, Poland, Bulgaria) Treaty of Prüm became Council decisions - 27 (+4) MS to use technology EUCARIS - latest in artikel 12 (traffic fines?) - parking- and toll fines? - actual implementation

What ‘s going on in 2008 (2) Directive on cross-border traffic enforcement - juridical base? - 1st or 3 rd Pillar - Transport Council WP meetings -> COREPER -> Transport Council 8-9/12 - “ community network” / ”existing network” !! - voting in EP / meeting with rapporteur (ms Ayala Sender) Growing number of bilateral agreements on traffic fines NL-D / F-D / B-F / L-F / F-Zw / F-It / F-Sp / Be-Ne-Lux / others? Gartner report: evaluation of EUCARIS / RESPER -presentation 1 April 2008 Driving Licence Committee -mail Mr. Huberts 24 July 2008 and answers from Member States (for 1 Nov.) -EC proposes feasibility study in October 2008 (?) -EC starts upgrading Tachonet (IBM e.a.) Relation between EUCARIS, RESPER, ROASENET, REGNET, TACHOnet, TUNER/ERRU, bi-laterals

existing and implemented EUCARIS - technology EUCARIS Treaty Technical vehicle & driving licence data Prüm/ Council Decisions Police information Bilateral File transfers Personal and technical data RESPER Driving licence data Tachonet Tachograph cards data TUNER/ ERRU Transport Undertakers data ROASENET Vehicle data Etcetera

Recommendations by Gartner Consider the EUCARIS architecture as a safe and reliable foundation for implementing the RESPER requirements Execute an additional study to determine which of the most likely scenarios is the best by examining the necessity of advanced search and with which algorithm advanced search should be implemented Expand the EUCARIS Letter of Intent with requirements on the quality of data and security precautions Implement an official bi-yearly certification of the EUCARIS connected Member States Should the EUCARIS architecture be considered as the most suitable basis for the implementation of the RESPER system Implement the recommended performance improvements

Conclusions of Gartner report - Start with EUCARIS as it is (Z scenario) - EUCARIS as it is gives highest benefits and lowest costs (Architecture evaluation) - Execute an additional study to examine the necessity of advanced search on names - If this is necessary, study and decide about the three presented options (A,B or C) We read : European Commission says and acts: - Gartner advises (only) additional studies What’s your (DL Committee) advise about the scenario’s? - Looks for relation between systems for RESPER, ROASENET, TACHOnet and Transport Undertakings - Commission will start (in October) feasibility study ? - Gaining time for up-grading Tachonet? - Technology of EUCARIS is out of sight…

CountryEUCARIS VehicleEUCARIS DLFile TransferPrüm AustriaX BelgiumX02008 BulgariaInterested 2009 CyprusInterested Denmark2009 EstoniaXX Finland2008 FranceInterested 2008X GermanyXXXX GreeceInterested 2009 HungaryX02009 Iceland00 Ireland00 Italy2009 LatviaXX LithuaniaXX2009 LuxemburgXX2008X Malta Norway2009 Interested Poland2009 RomaniaX02008 Slovakia Slovenia SpainX SwedenX02009 SwizerlandInterested The NetherlandsXXXX United KingdomXXInterested

Action plan Informative letter to Driving Licence Committee members (on behalf of EUCARIS) Tuned answers of EUCARIS members by participants of DL Committee to Mr. Huberts? Dutch Minister for European affairs is willing to call EuroCommissioner Tajani Interview (by Chairman EReg) given to a national Dutch and Belgian newspaper Connect more countries to (the technology of) EUCARIS Inform Members of the European Parliament, incl. rapporteur Draw people’s attention to letter from CORTE Appointment with to new head of DG TREN Unit 3 (so far refused/not accepted) Involvement Deputy Secretary General European Commission Influencing representatives of DL Committee, CWP Transport, COREPER, TransportCouncil

Update on international information exchange EReg Topic Group I Amsterdam, 25 november 2008