St. Louis Public Schools Accountability Plan October 20, 2009 1 Kelvin R. Adams, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
MSIP Accountability Plan
October 8, 2009 James Dishman, Ed.D. Dan Edwards, Ph.D.
Submitted by: Dr. Cleopatra Figgures, Chief Accountability Officer
Building Our Future: One Community, One School, One Child at a Time Goals of the Special Administrative Board St. Louis Public Schools October 14, 2008.
Recommendations for the Strategic Communications Plan Presented by the Parent Advisory Board October 20, 2009.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update February 10, 2009.
School Board Roles and Responsibilities. Four Roles of a Board Member VISION - creating a shared vision STRUCTURE - Applying the vision ACCOUNTABILITY-
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
GRC©bridgegroupllc. The Challenge PoliticalAdministrative.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
7 Accountability Getting clear about what you want to accomplish with technology How will you measure its use? How will you communicate its effects?
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Sustainability… Start Now for a Vibrant Future Sustainability Workshop for Persistently Dangerous Schools Grantees Philadelphia, PA Tuesday, September.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Topeka Public Schools Strategic Planning Workshop October 14, 2009.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Arkansas Leadership Academy Offices Purpose of School Support The Arkansas Leadership Academy School Support Program, in collaboration with the Arkansas.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Title I Schoolwide Mid- Year Review Melissa Moe and Kris Rangel January 24, 2013.
DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Illinois report cards Project introduction to the P-20 Council April 27, 2011.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Focus groups conducted: ▪ Teachers ▪ Board of education members ▪ Principals ▪ Union leaders ▪ Parents ▪ BPS.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Single Plan For Student Achievement January 27, 2016 Los Angeles Unified School District Local District Northwest “Building Academic Excellence Through.
Board of Education Workshop Wednesday, October 9, 2013.
Creating Focus in the Organization – The Five Year Educational Plan 2008 TASA Midwinter Conference
New BC Framework for Enhancing Learning Rocky Mountain District Framework for Enhancing Learning.
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Focused Midterm Report
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
ABC Unified School District
Presentation transcript:

St. Louis Public Schools Accountability Plan October 20, Kelvin R. Adams, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools

Purpose: The Accountability Plan After the 4 th Cycle MSIP Full Review in the Spring 2009 and the presentation of findings from that review in the Fall 2009, SLPS has developed an Accountability Plan, as required Outcome: The Accountability Plan is the two year strategic document that will support and address what SLPS must do to: Regain accreditation with the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Remedy deficiencies identified by the MSIP Review Address and execute the standards, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Long Range Plan (CLRP)

DESE directed unaccredited districts to create an Accountability Plan after a Full MSIP Review to address findings not met or met with concern District staff and one Special Administrative Board (SAB) member, under the guidance of the Superintendent, and in consultation with the Missouri School Boards Association,developed the Accountability Plan Five teams, with a selected leader, worked collaboratively to consider the CLRP, known district performance challenges and MSIP findings to identify precise objectives, strategies and action steps that would guarantee improved performance in five areas: Student Performance Highly Qualified Staff Facilities, Instructional Programs and Support Parent and Community Involvement Governance

Twelve critical and urgent objectives that correspond to the objectives of the Comprehensive Long Range Plan Five major goals – one for each of the five performance areas 30 objectives – what SLPS must do to meet the goals 63 strategies – how SLPS will accomplish its objectives, and Action steps – the specific part of the plan that describes the: owners – persons responsible for the action to be taken benchmarks – points in time for the action to be taken timelines– deadlines and measure s for accomplishment

Following approval by SAB and acceptance by the DESE, the Accountability Plan will become the strategic performance document for SLPS The Accountability Plan includes elements that provide for constant monitoring, a focus on continuous improvement and measures of progress The SLPS Accountability Plan benefits from the experiences of the Kansas City Metropolitan School District - as that district has implemented the accountability process with success and is being used to communicate district improvement to the community and to DESE

The reporting process developed for the plan includes constant monitoring and measurement at specific levels and ties specific progress to the actions of specific individuals Progress will be reported through data compiled into composite profiles for each of the Plans five performance areas Data reports will inform the superintendents monthly reporting to the SAB at its regular meetings and also inform the district quarterly reporting to its DESE/MSIP supervisors External and internal monitoring will be done by an Accountability Advisory Group composed of vested stakeholders

Specific and meaningful information generated by the monitoring process will provide SAB members and SLPS administrators the capacity to inform the community about district progress with accurate and current information The District s Accountability Plan will be the dynamic tool which will be used to continually monitor SLPS, with each school revising its School Improvement Plan into a School Accountability Plan that encompasses the performance elements identified in the District plan The five performance areas – especially the action steps - will be constantly sharpened, focused, measured and revised over the next two years as the plan is executed

The Accountability Plan outlines the expectations, responsibilities, interventions and measures SLPS will follow for the next two years The Accountability Plan states clear, comprehensive and high standards on educational progress towards meeting student performance standards The Accountability Plan allows for: educational performance of SLPS to be based on review of reliable and valid data from the district an appraisal of the effectiveness of objectives and action steps taken to improve student learning within SLPS building collaborative relations with those invested in the success of SLPS