1 The Promotion and Tenure Process Managing the Academic Career for Faculty Women at Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Institutions CRA-W.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

Promotion & Tenure Notes 1/2011 Resources – –
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Promotion Information Session Non-Tenure Track Assistant Professors 4/11/13.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Professor of Teaching Tenure Track Stream at UBC Anna M. Kindler, Vice Provost and AVP Academic May 2013.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Getting Started on Your Teaching Portfolio 2013 Future Faculty Teaching Fellows Summer Institute Julie Saam, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education Assistant.
Definitions types added-value tutor role building-up informal learning awareness raising examples 1 Astrid Quasebart ESTA-Bildungswerk gGmbH senior project.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Format for Promotion Review Portfolio KCTCS Faculty Hired 2004 and thereafter; all other full-time faculty who select this criteria.
Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.
Academic Careers Adapted from presentations and slides by: T. Williams - Texas A & M University C. Ellis - Duke University S. Castaneda, Clarke College.
+ PTR at UCONN: Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment of our Faculty Sally M. Reis Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor.
Career Advancement and Promotion Criteria for Clinical Educators Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders 2015 Annual Conference.
Promotion and Ten ure October 21, 2014 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Teaching, Mentoring, and Service at a Teaching College Sheila Castañeda Chair, Associate Professor Clarke College Dubuque, Iowa.
Joi Patterson, PhD VPAA/COO Tenure Track Process.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
New Administrators Orientation | August 27, 2015 Steve Marcus Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Institute for Systems Research Associate.
Staff Development Approaches at The University of Georgia: Philosophy, Models, and Financial Support University of Georgia Institute of Higher Education.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
Academic Advancement As A Clinician Educator Donald W. Reynolds Foundation Grantee 2010 Annual Meeting Daniel Swagerty, MD, MPH Professor, Departments.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Tenure in the College of Arts & Sciences Thoughts and Tips for Women in the Sciences.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Formative Peer Review at Ocean County College. Guiding Principle “Ideally, the peer review of teaching is a critically reflective and collaborative process.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.
SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Tenure and Promotion Workshop November 1, Workshop Logistics Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion criteria Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former UK Personnel System or prior to 2004 in a Community College Grandfathered under Format.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
New Faculty Orientation College of Graduate Studies and Graduate Education at Idaho.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former Kentucky Tech System or Prior to 2004 in a Technical College grandfathered under Format.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 2015
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Outstanding Professor Award Committee Presents:
The UIS Faculty Personnel Process
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
What is Great Teaching? UTIA Promotion & Tenure Workshop 2018
Considerations in Engineering
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Education Portfolio Sean Elliott, MD.
How to Document Great Teaching for P&T Review
Presentation transcript:

1 The Promotion and Tenure Process Managing the Academic Career for Faculty Women at Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Institutions CRA-W Workshop, March 7, 2007

2 What is it? Promotion: moving from one academic rank to another Tenure: status awarded after a trial period to protect from dismissal Usually occurs during the 6 th year Often occurs with the promotion from assistant to associate

3 What is the process? Understand your institutions process Faculty handbook Departmental expectations Informal expectations Various review levels Department College University President / Provost

4 Evaluation Criteria Decide on a realistic plan of action: Teaching (50-80%) Professional Development (10- 30%) Service (10-20%)

5 Teaching Evaluation Areas Content Expertise – 35% Instructional Delivery – 30% Instructional Design – 25% Course Management – 10%

6 Content Expertise Possesses an appropriate degree Knowledgeable about recent trends, findings and value issues within the discipline and incorporates this in the teaching-learning experience Develops a breadth of knowledge that enriches her teaching by making connections to other areas within the field of expertise or in other fields

7 Instructional Delivery Meets all classes at designated times Conducts all classes in accordance with course syllabus Maintains regular office hours Demonstrates interest and enthusiasm for the student learning process Elicits responsible student participation Assessment strategies are varied and reflect course level, content and objectives Interactions with students are respectful and professional

8 Instructional Design All required components of course syllabus are present Course materials are free of errors Learning activities are suitable to students and instructional goals Consistent and ongoing evaluation of course is evident Effort to improve teaching is evident in course design over time Selects teaching strategies that are appropriate for course level, content, and objectives and that promote student participation in course and engagement in area of study Course is congruent with departmental curricula and institutional mission Is fully aware of and uses available college resources in a way that augments the quality of teaching and enhances student learning

9 Course Management Student evaluations administered according to policy Processes course related information in a timely manner (grades, enrollment lists, …) Schedules use of supplementary resources and support services as needed Insures that necessary resources are available when class begins

10 Teaching – portfolio contents Courses youve taught New courses youve developed Student evaluations Peer evaluation from observation Supporting classroom materials Number of students taught Personal goals and philosophy

11 Professional Development Research Scholarship Publications Grants and contracts Major software systems Papers presented Workshops and seminars attended Awards and honors

12 Service Department Academic advising Running a lab Advising a student club Recruitment Mentoring students College Committees Profession Conference or technical committees Review panels / editing Community Outreach to high schools or professional organizations

13 Putting it together Start on your hire date! Do a yearly self-evaluation –Evaluate each class and make a list of what youd do to improve it Collect supporting materials On-going Keep a drawer/file/stack at all times »ALL records »Letters from students »Awards nominated for »Other successes Keep track of dates Letters of assessment / reference Chair, alumni, students Peers - inside and outside of the institution

14 Self Evaluation Be sincere Address strengths and obvious weaknesses Address three areas of evaluation in detail Include goals for each area of evaluation

15 Advice Be visible Choose your enemies wisely Pay attention to criticism / failures Calmly evaluate student evaluations Make a list of specific activities to address perceived weaknesses Have chair and peers evaluate often Formative Summative Get help! Mentor, chair, peers Campus faculty development programs Other senior faculty members

16 Conclusion Stay organized Stay positive You can do it!

17 Resources CRA Career Mentoring Workshop transcripts ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ tenure.pdfhttp:// ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ sm_schools.pdfhttp:// ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ CRA Career Mentoring Workshop transcripts ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ tenure.pdfhttp:// ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/ sm_schools.pdfhttp:// ojects/mentoring/mentorWrkshp/