Joint Special Operations University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tactical (Combat) Orders
Advertisements

Tactical Operations Orders
Course of Action Development
Joint Operation Planning Process:
COMBAT ORDERS.
Operational Auditing--Fall Preliminary Survey n Opening conference n Agenda n Tone & teamwork n On-site tour--MBWA n Document study n BPO analysis—O’Brien.
MISSION ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Maj Tom Woods
Commander’s Intent & Guidance Deployable Joint Task Force Augmentation Cell (DJTFAC) Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Major Paul Zavislak.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Lesson Components of an Effective Marketing Plan
What kind of task will help students synthesize their learning?
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
Crisis Action Planning Commander’s Guidance and Intent
03 Sep 2013 Overall Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Unit 4.2 Correspondence drafting and UN briefing techniques UN Peacekeeping PDT Standards, Specialized Training Material for Military Experts on Mission.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
The Military Decision Making Process
Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Course of Action Development UNCLASSIFIED CTF Training.
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Chapter. Date: AUG 2010Briefer: Mr. Russell Woody, Director, MCIWEST Regional PlansSlide: 2 Analyze Define problem/opportunity.
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
Enterprise Architecture [Product Name] [Enterprise Architect] [Discipline and Names] To-Be Powerpoint Presentation v
Mission Analysis (MDMP)
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Military Decision Making Process – Multinational (MDMP-M)
1 The Military Decision- Making Process (MDMP). 2 MDMPAgenda MDMP Agenda 1. Module 1: MDMP Overview/Receipt of Mission/Mission Analysis PE # 1 – Cdr’s.
Military Decision-Making Process
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Analysis.
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
COA Development Steps Analyze available forces.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
COMMANDER’S INTENT & GUIDANCE
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
Staff (Running) Estimate
Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.
Course of Action (COA) Comparison
TAC Mission Analysis. Oporder Format Situation – Higher Headquarters’ Mission and Intent (Citadel’s Mission Statement and Guide to LDP) Mission (Commandant’s.
JFCC Space and Global Strike Lt Col David Adler, USAF Special Assistant to the Commander 19 Oct 2005 UNCLASSIFIED This Briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Brief to.
Critical Facts & Assumptions
Major William B. Pittman 18 September 2015
Multinational Force Course of Action Development
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team Course of Action Analysis
What kind of task will help students synthesize their learning?
Campaign Planning Process Step 4 – Campaign Formulation
Religious Inputs/Outputs
RUNNING ESTIMATE METT-TC UNIT: DTG: EVENT: (PAGE 1 OF 5)
2 Selecting a Healthcare Information System.
RUNNING ESTIMATE METT-TC UNIT: DTG: EVENT: (PAGE 1 OF 5)
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
HCS 542 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
HCS 542 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
The Competition Continuum Joint Doctrine Note Proposal
RUNNING ESTIMATE METT-TC UNIT: DTG: EVENT: (PAGE 1 OF 5)
Proposal/Initiative Title
Administrative Instructions – Short Version (Option 2)
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
Risk Assessment Matrix
ASLO CSS BOS SMAP PLANNING PROCESS CHART
Header Title 2/23/2019.
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
OPERATIONAL READINESS
Military Decision Making Process-Multinational (MDMP-M) Overview
Course of Action Development
Military Decision Making Process - Multinational (MDMP-M) Overview
Presentation transcript:

Joint Special Operations University Joint Operation Planning Process (JOPP) Course of Action (COA) Decision Brief Format This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Operational Studies Department JSOWC-SOPC UNCLASSIFIED

COA Decision Brief JP 5-0 Aug 2011 (IV-41) Purpose of the briefing Opposing situation Strength Composition Location and disposition Reinforcements Logistics Time and space factors Combat efficiency Friendly situation Mission Statement Commanders intent statement d.

COA Decision Brief (Con’t) JP 5-0 Aug 2011 (IV-41) Operational concepts and COAs Any change from mission analysis in the following areas Assumptions Limitations Adversary and friendly COGs Phasing of the operation (if phased) Lines of operations/lines of effort Present COA. As a minimum, discuss: COA#___ (short names) COA statement (brief concept of the operation) COA architecture Task Organization Command Relationships Organization of the operational area Major differences between each COA Summaries of COA d.

COA Decision Brief (Con’t) JP 5-0 Aug 2011 (IV-41) COA analysis Review of the JPG wargaming effort Add considerations from own experiences COA Comparisons Description of the comparison criteria and comparison methodology Weigh strengths and weaknesses with respect to comparison criteria COA recommendations Staff Components

Opposing Situation Strength Composition Location and disposition Reinforcements Logistics Time and space factors Combat efficiency

Opposing Situation Strength Composition Location and disposition

Opposing Situation (Con’t) Reinforcements Logistics Time and space factors Combat efficiency

Friendly Situation & Mission Statement

Commanders Intent Statement PJ 5-0, IV-26 Purpose Method End state JP5-0 states there is no set format but gives 2 examples

Commanders Intent Statement JP 5-0, III-17 Purpose End state Operational risk Jp5-0 Gives two possible formats

Operational Concepts and COAs Any change from mission analysis in the following areas: Assumptions Limitations Adversary and friendly COGs Phasing of the operation (if phased) Lines of operations/lines of effort

Present COAs. As a minimum, discuss COA# (short names) COA statement (brief concept of the operation) COA sketch COA architecture Task Organization Command Relationships Organization of the operational area Major differences between each COA Summaries of COA

COA #1 COA statement (brief concept of the operation using sketch) COA# 1 (short name) COA statement (brief concept of the operation using sketch)

COA #1 Architecture Task Organization

COA #1 Architecture Command Relationships

COA #1 Architecture Organization of AO

COA #2 COA statement (brief concept of the operation using sketch) COA# 1 (short name) COA statement (brief concept of the operation using sketch)

COA #2 Architecture Task Organization

COA #2 Architecture Command Relationships

COA #2 Architecture Organization of AO

Major Differences Between Each COA Summaries of COA

COA Analysis Add considerations of own experiences Review of the JPGs wargaming efforts Add considerations of own experiences

COA Comparison Description of comparisons criteria and comparison methodology Use COA decision matrix Weigh strengths and weaknesses with respect to comparison criteria

Decision Matrix (Maximum matrix, higher score is better) Criteria Wt COA 1 COA 2 Total UNCLASSIFIED

COA X and short name

COA X and short name

COA Recommendations Staff Components