E-101 Section 7 October 24, 2012 Assessing the Performance of an Education System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institutional coordination of climate change policy: Lessons from the South African experience B.A.S.I.C Project Beijing Michael Goldblatt 18 th February.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Copyright The Info-Tech Research Group Inc. All Rights Reserved. D1-1 by James M. Dutcher Strategic IT Planning & Governance Creation H I G H.
E-101 Thursday Section 1 T HURSDAY, 1 ST NOV., – P. M.
SEM Planning Model.
Systems Analysis and Design 9th Edition
Policy Analysis Analyzing the Problem Bardach, the eightfold path
Public Finance Public Policy Paper Igor Baranov Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Assessment of laws and policies for promoting rights of children Dr Bernadette Daelmans Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health World.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Proposal Writing for Competitive Grant Systems
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Presentation to Asia Health Policy Program Palo Alto, CA 20 October 2011 ASIA PACIFIC OBSERVATORY ON HEALTH POLICIES AND SYSTEMS.
Results Frameworks Somalia Joint Needs Assessment November 2005.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Assessment of project proposals within EU grant schemes 17 & 18 December 2013 Government Office for Cooperation with NGOs Zagreb VLADA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Identification and Selection of Development Projects.
Capacity promotion in research and education on clean development mechanism (CDM) Preliminary results and plan to implement the task 5 in year
6 th Regional Statistics Seminar November 1 st, 2013 St. Kitts Marriott, Frigate Bay Beverly Harris 6 th Regional Statistics Seminar November 1 st, 2013.
Systems Analysis and Design 8 th Edition Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated planning and Assessment of National Development Plan of the Czech Republic.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
A-801 Wednesday Section 1 W EDNESDAY, 31 ST O CTOBER, – P. M.
IFPRI INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Mutual Accountability and Joint Sector Reviews in the Implementation of CAADP Godfrey Bahiigwa – IFPRI/ReSAKSS.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
The Project Workplan and Budget Inception Workshop and the First Steering Committee Meeting of the UNEP/GEF Project “Piloting Integrated Processes and.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
E101 Section 8 October 31, 2012 Policy and Program Evaluation.
ESPA Comprehensive Management Plan Framework Development Natural Resource Interim Legislative Committee July 12, 2006 Jerry Rigby Chairman Idaho Water.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Social Accounting and Audit (SAA) - Ten Simple Stages An introduction…
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Universal Health Coverage:
PFM reform – change management Module 3.2 Preparing and managing a PFM reform programme 1.
Identifying Monitoring Questions from your Program Logic.
BPA 303 Educational Tutor/ indigohelp. BPA 303 Entire Course BPA 303 Week 1 DQ 1 BPA 303 Week 1 Individual Assignment Theories Paper BPA 303 Week 1 DQ.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation for UNDP/GEF projects MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF UNDP/GEF PROJECTS Inception Workshop, Baikal Lake Watershed Project,
Building an ENI CBC project
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Country Level Programs
Background Non-Formal Education is recognized as an important sub-sector of the education system, providing learning opportunities to those who are not.
Mapping Special Interest Group SNOMED IHTSDO
Project Name: Country:
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
Project Kick-off <Customer Name> <Project Name>
DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK: National Accounts and Supporting Statistics
Quality Framework Overview
Presentation transcript:

E-101 Section 7 October 24, 2012 Assessing the Performance of an Education System

 Situating Ourselves in the Course (1 minutes)  Discussion of the readings (10 minutes)  Reimers & McGinn, Informed Dialogue  Kremmerer, Utilizing Education and Human Resource Sector Analyses  OECD’s Education at a Glance (2011)  David Section Leading (45 mins)  Logical Framework (30 minutes)  Housekeeping & Questions (5 minutes) Agenda

1 Introduction to Comparative and International Education 2 The Process of Policy Analysis 3 Education Policy Options Course Overview

1 Introduction to Comparative and International Education 2 The Process of Policy Analysis Course Overview –Week 6 – How Education Policy is Made –Week 7 – Assessing the Performance of an Education System –Week 8 – Policy and Program Evaluation

Summary Case Studies from Informed Dialogue

Summary Kremmerer

Summary Education at a Glance

David Section Leading

Program Theory “Program theory…refers to the mechanisms that mediate between the delivery (and receipt) of the program and the emergence of the outcome of interest. The operative mechanism of change isn’t the program activities per se but the response that the activities generate.” - Carol Weiss, Evaluation, p. 57 You will be reading a section of this book for next week.

Program Theory For each program, there may be multiple pathways to the intended outcome. GOAL: More 6-year-olds in school

From Program Theory to Implementation to Evaluation  Logical Frameworks  can help you to organize:  Design  Implementation  Evaluation  Developed by USAID in the 1960s  Vary slightly, but always include: 4 x 4  Narrative Summary, Indicators, Means of Verification, and Assumptions

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Purpose: Outputs: Activities: (Inputs)

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal Purpose Outputs Activities (Inputs) IF AND THEN

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: Activities: (Inputs)

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Develop human capacity in XX country. Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: Activities: (Inputs)

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Develop human capacity in Somalia. Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: By abolishing school fees, expect to see more children enrolling in primary Activities: (Inputs)

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Develop human capacity in Somalia. Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: By abolishing school fees, expect to see more children enrolling in primary Activities: Abolishing school fees.

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Develop human capacity in Somalia. Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: By abolishing school fees, expect to see more children enrolling in primary Activities: Abolishing school fees. All primary schools no longer requires fees.

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Develop human capacity in Somalia. Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: By abolishing school fees, expect to see more children enrolling in primary Activities: Abolishing school fees. All primary schools no longer requires fees. Poll families to ask what fees exist.

Logical Frameworks Project Structure Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Important Assumptions Goal: Develop human capacity in Somalia. Purpose: To increase the number of primary school graduates. Outputs: By abolishing school fees, expect to see more children enrolling in primary Activities: Abolishing school fees. All primary schools no longer requires fees. Poll families to ask what fees exist. Primary can be funded without fees.

Appendix

Sector Analysis: What is it?  Sector Review: summary of the state of the sector  Sector Assessment: success of the sector in meetings certain goals  Sector Analysis: (most comprehensive) includes review and assessment (above), and also describes sector needs, constraints, and opportunities for improvement.  (Kremmerer, 1994)

Sector Analysis: What is it? Tries to answer questions relating to:  External efficiency  Internal efficiency  Access & equity  Administration & supervision  Costs & financing (Pigozzi & Cieutat, 1998)

Sector Analysis: What is it? The contents of a sector analysis may include: 1.Synthesis 2.Economic & Financial Analysis 3.History, Structure & Management Capacity 4.Analysis by Sub-Sectors: 5.Special Studies 6.A list of background documents (Pigozzi & Cieutat,1988)

Sector Analysis: Steps I.Initiation II.Formation of the National Steering Committee III.Determination of the scope of the analysis IV.Formation of the subsector teams V.Formation of the technical analysis team VI.Instrumentation and collection of data VII.Preliminary analysis of data VIII.Discussion of preliminary findings IX.Collection of any additional data X.Formulation of draft recommendations XI.Discussion of draft recommendations XII.Revision and prioritization of recommendations. (Kremmerer, 1994)

Opposition sectorsSupport sectorsOpposition sectors External actors Sector positi on Anti-system Legal Opposition Ideological support Core support Ideological support Legal Opposition Anti- system The Government Social sectors Political parties Pressure groups Political Mapping: An Example

Stakeholder Map: An Example