1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distance Education and Active Learning -One Approach to Support Succession Planning Aram Attarian, Ph.D North Carolina State University Department of Parks,
Advertisements

Traffic Crash Characteristics for Jackson Area Transportation Study Wayne State University Transportation Research Group November 26, 2007.
Is it time to revisit the problem young driver? Mrs Bridie Scott-Parker (PhD candidate-under-examination) 1.
National Safety Council Driver Improvement Programs.
SAFE COMMUNITIES Getting Started. from Intentional & Unintentional Injuries Annually q150,000 deaths per year q2,850,000 hospitalizations q$325 billion.
LAPD TELEMATICS PRESENTATION. Why Consider Telematics? 1. Advanced Vehicle Technology 2. Advanced Wireless Communications 3. New Generation of Police.
Model Deployment Overview ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting September 24, 2012 JOHN HARDING, NHTSA.
Introduction to SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study and Roadway Information Databases CUTC Summer Meeting May 2014.
FOT-Net Final Event First FOT-Net Data Workshop Amsterdam, March 2014 Research Data Exchange (RDE) and Safety Pilot Model Deployment Data Dale Thompson.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
Railway Safety Plan and Its Status in Korea
Injury Research in Highway Safety Thomas Songer, PhD University of Pittsburgh Injury Epidemiology EPIDEM 2670.
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Teaching Community Assessments
SHRP 2 Safety Implementation: Strategic Planning Using the Data Meeting with AASHTO Safety Management August 30, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Presentation by Kathryn Swanson WHCOA Listening Session On behalf of the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) January 8, 2005.
Driver Distraction: Results from Naturalistic Teenage Driving Studies Charlie Klauer, Ph. D. Research Scientist Group Lead: Teen Risk and Injury Prevention.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A VERY BRIEF SUMMARY for SCOHTS 2011 Richard Pain.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
Charles Fay, Sr. Program Officer Big Data Meets Computer Vision Dec. 7, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway safety and performance SHRP 2 Strategic.
Analysis of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data [S08(B)] Evaluation of Offset Left-Turn Lanes Jessica M. Hutton Presentation to MCTRS August 15,
Marion Harvie Communications Officer ‘Go Safe on Scotland’s Roads – it’s Everyone’s Responsibility’ - Scotland’s Road Safety Framework for 2020.
1 Development of countermeasures Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 6 hrs.
Field Operational Test Planning Presented by: Dave LeBlanc UMTRI ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007.
Y&feature=related OGk9uFIhA Curriculum framework.
Designated County Partner Grassroots Grant Application.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
SIPLAS RO is a full service contract research organization CRO, offering nanotechnology, biopharmaceutical and medical device companies comprehensive.
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Annual Meeting of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Human Factors Guidelines (HFG) for Road Systems (NCHRP 17-41) July 22, 2009 John.
Enhancing Highway Safety: Applications of the Human Factors Guidelines (HFG) for Road Systems Presentation to the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Western Association.
Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation –Indianapolis, IN Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation.
1 EDR User Perspectives on Parameters & Data Accessibility: Independent Investigator/Consultant Accident Reconstruction Robert C. McElroy, Ph.D. Forensic.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY CHALLENGES EDMUNDS SAFETY CONFERENCE, WASHINGTON, DC, MAY 24, 2011.
The Marketing Plan. SWOT Analysis Good marketing relies on good plans Planning efforts begin with a critical look at itself and its business environment.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
© 2006 PSEN Unit – 3 Inspection & Dynamics The inspection process may seem routine but every trip changes things. Always inspect carefully.
The H-GAC Traffic Safety Program 2004 Status Report Report to the Technical Advisory Committee September 8, 2004 Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area.
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Safety Data and Analysis Center (STAC) Traffic Records Forum 10/27/2015 Carol H. Tan, PhD Team Leader, Safety Data & Analysis Office of Safety Research.
PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION & OVERSIGHT WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD Update on TRB Activities July 29, 2015 PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION.
Evaluation of Law Enforcement Presence on Changing Drivers’ Behaviors – Red Light Running International Traffic Records Forum July 2003.
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
The Greater Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program October 14, 2004 Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX 2004 AMPO Annual Conference.
Southeastern Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths Dodge County Board Presentation October 12, 2010.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Developing Highway Safety Performance Metrics in an Advanced Connected Vehicle Environment Utilizing Near-Crash Events from the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 – Safety Component (SHRP2 Safety) 2012 Update Forrest Council.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
1-1 Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage HRM.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
BUS OPERATOR WORKSTATION PROCUREMENT PROCESS ORGANIZATIONAL GUIDANCE TOOL 1 Version: February 19, 2016 TCRP Report 185.
Driver Education Standard 1 The student and parent (or legal guardian) will discuss the process of the “Graduated Driver License Law” and “Parental.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
Shrp2 and safety training and analysis center (stac)
Analysis of Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries/Fatality Analysis Reporting System matched data: New insights on work-related motor vehicle crashes.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Chapter One Driving and Mobility
Safety Research within Strategic Highway Research Program 2:
Extending the Value of Video Safety Technology
Built Environment and Traffic Safety
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Presentation transcript:

1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting & Conference

2 Overview of the Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) Objectives Test Sites Overview of the Seattle Data Collection Site Key Tasks The Battelle Team Recruitment Boundaries Participant Pipeline Recruit  Schedule  Install Intake and Installation Process Equipment Installed into Participant Vehicles Progress to Date Recruit  Schedule  Install Locations of Participants DAS Installation & Total Intake Times Benefits of the Study Discussion Topics

3 Overview of the NDS Goals Address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing an understanding of how the driver interacts with and adapts to the vehicle, traffic environment, roadway characteristics, traffic control devices, and the environment. It also includes assessing the changes in collision risk associated with each of these factors and interactions. This information will support the development of new and improved countermeasures with greater effectiveness. Includes everyday driving data from ≈ 3000 drivers, male and female, , for 1 or 2 years each

4 Overview of the NDS What types of data are being collected? video images - 4 cameras (forward, rear, 2, in cab) rates of acceleration, lateral and vertical motion, the presence of alcohol within the cabin, position information, turn signal actuation, steering wheel angle, speed, seat belt use and air bag deployment forward radar Separately, data will also be collected on roadway elements such as road type, geometry, shoulders, safety furniture, signage, pavement markings, and more for the roads most frequently used by the volunteer drivers. Crash investigations are also conducted

5 6 National Test Sites Selected sites include Tampa, Florida; central Indiana; Durham, North Carolina; Erie County, New York; central Pennsylvania, and Seattle, Washington.

6 Seattle - Site Characteristics Mix of urban and rural driving –High-density urban driving –Over 600 miles of rural roads –Many opportunities for driving in rural recreational areas –All within a relatively small geographic area Mix of weather and terrain Availability of advanced technologies in vehicles High-quality GIS data available Access to Pacific Northwest Gigapop for high-speed data transfer

7 Seattle – Driver Characteristics High population density Diverse culture with a wide range of incomes, educational backgrounds, and ethnicities Diversified economy employs a diverse workforce, from skilled labor to professional level –Aerospace, business and finance, import/export, software, Internet companies, biotechnology, biomedical research industries, etc. Pro-research attitude (ready recruitment)

8 Key Tasks Obtain Required Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approvals Prepare for Data Collection  Procure and prepare instrumentation facility  Train site staff – Schedulers, Assessors, Installers Manage Participants  Traditional and call center recruiting efforts  Scheduling  Intake (consent, personal assessments)  On-going maintenance and any other issues Install DAS in Participant Vehicles Perform Crash Investigations Upload Driving Data and Monitor Data Quality

9 The Battelle Team Team MemberKey Role in S07 BattelleInstitutional Review Board Considerations, Driver Recruitment, Driver Assessment, Facilities and Associated Equipment, Large Scale Study Management, Data Download and Management, Quality Control TRAC-UWAssistance with Driver Assessment, Data Server and Data Uploads, Access to Federal, State, and Local Traffic Safety Data Roush IndustriesVehicle Instrumentation, System Maintenance Van KLD Associates, Inc.Conduct Crash Investigations

10 Recruitment Boundaries

11 Participant Pipeline Recruit  Schedule  Install

12 Battelle Gateway Corporate Center Gateway Drive Tukwila, WA 98168

13 Intake and Installation Process

14 Driver Data/Assessment Demographics Driving history Driving knowledge Driving behavior Medical conditions Sleep habits Risk perception and risky behavior Sensation seeking Vision, strength, mobility

15 Equipment Installed into Participant Vehicles Head Unit Front Turn Signals Radar Unit Radar Interface Box DAS Main Unit GPS Wi-Fi Antenna Fuse Box OBD Connector Rear Looking Camera

16

17 Head unit (as seen from passenger seat) DAS (mounted under passenger shelf) Front radar

18 Participant Status (as of 5/31/13) 12 month24 month DemographicScheduledCompletedInstalledMCS TargetInstalledMCS Target M: M: M: M: M: M: M: M: F: F: F: F: F: F: F: F: AVT Total Totals: Installed: 432, Completed: 206

19 Location of Participants

20 Benefits of the Study Improved understanding of baseline driving behaviors:  Trip characteristics  Driver performance profiles  Adherence to laws and basic safety practices Improved understanding of unsafe behaviors and traffic events:  Assess circumstances and motivations for speeding, red light running, etc.  Deconstruct crashes and near-misses and examine causality  How do driver, vehicle, roadway, and environmental factors influence behavior and impact crash risk? Improved ability to develop safety countermeasures for:  Education and training  Roadway design and traffic engineering  Vehicle design  Regulation and enforcement  Ability to direct countermeasures at driver subgroups

21 Question or Comments? John L. Campbell, Ph.D. Battelle, Center for Human Performance and Safety