DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Design Review ….. Royal Ordnance,Summerfield 17 th February 2001 National Rocketry Competition 2001 Open Rocketry Association Slide 1/14.
Advertisements

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Closing Summary Design Testing Abstract Monitoring crop heath via aerial photography is a proper technique used to maximize agricultural productivity.
Rock it rocke Temple University
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Team Impact Intelligent Helmet Impact System Preliminary Design Review January 29 th, 2008 Amanda Brodbeck Wei-Chu Liao Wei-Shen Liao Chris Mintle.
Baby SAT University of Missouri-Rolla Carl Seubert Jason Searcy Joshua Jacobs Michelle Rader.
Launch Readiness Review 4/21/06 -David Gooding -Erik Andersen -Anna Vigil -Matt Elsner -Augustine Trujillo DemoSat IV.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
Texas A&M University Ryan Goodnight Amanda Collins Libby Osgood.
Critical Design Review Colorado State University - Pueblo April 15, 2005.
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
DemoSat IV: DoOverRover Colorado State University Derek Bonner Ben Colvin Jon Cox Kenneth Darbonne Nick Ellis Ross MacGregor Mike Neuberg Derek Bonner.
Vertical Profiling of Atmospheric Ozone Critical Design Review Western State College of Colorado Sarah Kampf Keith Nunn Brian Webb 04/02/04.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Minimal Movement Interactive Entertainment Unit Ryan Kelly Michael Lorenzo Ernie Wilson Chase Francis Professor Neal.
Smartphone Overview iPhone 4 By Anthony Poland 6 Nov 2014.
DemoSat V: The Mousetrap August 03, 2007 Matt Hoffman –Team captain, LandSAT construction Devlin Thyne – FieldSAT/GPS SAT construction, testing David Fifield.
CanSat Interim Presentation II
SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor.
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
Project ASCEND! Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Spring 2014 Presented By: Ankit Jain – Project Manager.
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
Team Ramrod Critical Design Review Dan Armel, Michaela Cui, Andrew Grimaldi, Kyle Kemble, Silvia Peckham, Chris Sawyer, & Kelsey Whitesell 2007 October.
PDR Presentation Team JHK Experiment TIC February 27, 2003.
Project: Weather Video Sat 4/2/04 Mesa State College, Grand Junction.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
Flight Testing Small Satellites Through High Altitude Ballooning Presented by Zach Henney 18 April 2015.
DemoSat II Colorado Space Grant Consortium Design (EPICS) Division Colorado School of Mines Golden Colorado Critical.
Preliminary Design Review Your Logo Here Team Leader: Thomas C. Null, III Team Members: Andrew Tomlinson, Matthew Gunter Faculty Advisor: Dr. Roger King.
DemoSat IV: Metro Triple Threat Metropolitan State College of Denver Matt Hanley David Fifield Jason Igo Evan I Spitler Devlin Thyne Matt Hanley David.
Critical Design Review The University of Northern Colorado GoGreenSAT Jessica Gage, Max Woods, Brent Hill, Ryan Marshall, Zach Sears Feb
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
Aerospace Digital Communication Instrument Senior Design Presentation.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Matt Uhlman Ian Chen 1.
Team Honey Badger R.A.H.D. Critical Design Review October 18, 2012 Josh Power Karyn Science Kyle Team Leader C+DH Annie C+DH Zach Budget + Science C&DH.
AIAA Student Section Meeting December 2, 2004 spacegrant.colorado.edu/ demosat Colorado Space Grant Consortium.
DemoSat IV: RedRoverSat University of Colorado at Boulder Jaime Catchen, Chris Homolac, Emily Walters August 9, 2006.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
Temple University Advisors: Dr. John Helferty & Dr. Chang-Hee Won Charles Wright Jinyan Chen Billy Cheng Brittany Gray 1.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
SENSOR SELECTION CALIBRATION OVERVIEWOVERVIEW DESIGN ROADMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project would not have been possible without the extensive.
Pima Community College ASCEND Team Spring PCC ASCEND TEAM ASCEND Spring 2010 Team – James Gardner – Andy Gee – Chris Martinez – Chris Pecora Team.
Inertial Measurement Unit. Project Advisor: Dr. Basart Client: Matt Nelson Team Members (491): Matt Ulrich Luis Garcia Amardeep Jawandha Julian Currie.
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
RoverSat Critical Design Review UCCS Space Grant Team
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
Preliminary Design Review
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Cumulative Design Review
CSU DemoSAT-B 2010 DemoSat V: Colorado State University April 9, 2011
Team Honey Badger Conceptual Design Review
Image Acquisition and Processing of Remotely Sensed Data
Asteroid Ballistics ECE Faculty Advisor: Richard A. Messner
Critical Design Review Team Durango
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006

Three missions in two payloads FieldSat and SolarSat will be in one payload. VideoSat will be in another.

Project Organization Evan Spitler Jason Helms Sarah Ryan Devlin Thyne Jason Igo Team Captain David Fifield Matt Hanley Video Sat Field Sat Solar Sat Professor Keith Norwood Faculty Advisor

Field/SolarSat System Requirements The payload module must weigh less than 1.5kg Record orientation and vibration data and store it on large-capacity media using Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Deploy a solar panel and measure its efficiency before and after impact

Field/SolarSat Mission Descriptions FieldSat To record on-board orientation and vibration during flight SolarSat To deploy a solar panel and measure the efficiency before and after impact

Mission Goals and NASA Benefit FieldSat To develop and integrate new attitude and orientation designs SolarSat To test the efficiency of the deployed solar panels Assess damage to deployed solar panels after impact

Field/SolarSat System Overview The central component of this package is a microcontroller The Field and Solar subsystems communicate with the microcontroller Raw data from the subsystems will be recorded on flash memory for later analysis

Field/SolarSat System Interfaces

FieldSat Subsystem Overview FieldSat subsystem contains an inertial measurement unit Three gyroscopes to measure rotation Accelerometers to measure linear acceleration Altimeter

FieldSat Subsystem Schematic IMU AccelerometersGyroscopes Altimeter Microcontroller

FieldSat Subsystem Interface Inputs: Kinematic motion Outputs: Altitude Acceleration in three dimensions Rotation of three axes

SolarSat Subsystem Overview SolarSat subsystem contains the solar cells, deployment latch, and solar measurement unit (SMU) Solar cells will be thin-film variety and will collect a broad range of light wavelengths SMU measures lumens, voltage and current Deployment latch will be a solenoid

SolarSat Subsystem Schematic Solar cells Deployment solenoid Solar measurement unit Microcontroller

SolarSat Subsystem Interface Inputs: Deployment signal from microcontroller. Outputs: Lumens, voltage, and current measurements.

Field/SolarSat Mass Budget Sensors 20 g Micro-controller board < 100 g Secure Digital board (2) < 50 g Secure Digital card (2) 2 g Battery/other power source 100 g Heating, insulation 100 g Waterproofing, etc. 150 g Case 300 g Solar Cells 450 g Estimated mass 1254 g

Field/SolarSat Monetary Budget Gyro Sensors (3)Donated Micro-controller Board$ SD Board (2)$ SD Cards (2)$ Accelerometers (2)Donated Altimeter$ Solar Cells (2)$ Incidentals*$ * includes all necessary hardware Total$

VideoSat Mission Description Sensor Platforms Audio High-Resolution Video Estimated Recording Time: 135min Launch Ascent Descent Landing Recovery

VideoSat Mission Goals Record a large sum of audio/video data for playback Recover data after sub-orbital descent Self-contained unit

VideoSat NASA Benefit Visually survey landing sites before committing to them Remotely scout for natural resources Bodies of gas Mineral deposits Additional sensors can be added for expanded mission depth Thermal-Band Infrared RADAR Et al.

VideoSat System Requirements Component: Camera unit Battery (onboard) Audio microphone (onboard) Flash Drive (2GB installed) Thermal Protection Chemical heat pack (hand warmer) Impact Protection Foam Mounting Hardware (material to be determined) (hardware to be determined)

Camera Mounting Brackets VideoSat System Overview Camera Unit Microphone Battery (3.7v Li ion) Storage (2GB SD flash drive) Lens Tether Interface Member Foam Insulation (2GB) Chemical heating packet (not to scale)

VideoSat Subsystems Overview Unit Subsystem Contains the Camera, audio recorder, battery and storage device Insulation Subsystem Protection from impact and extreme cold Structural Subsystem Mounts unit and insulation subsystems to the tether.

VideoSat Unit Subsystem Purpose Record Audio Record Video Store Data Light and Sound Storage (2GB SD flash drive) Lens Microphone Camera Unit

Unit Subsystem Interface Inputs: Light Sound Outputs: Video with sound 10 frames/sec 640 x 480 pixel resolution

VideoSat Insulation Subsystem Purpose Protect from extreme cold of high altitude environment Protect from impact during landing (2GB) Foam Chemical heating packet

VideoSat Structural Subsystem Purpose Firmly attach camera to payload tether Protect from impact during landing (2GB) Mounting Brackets Housing

VideoSat System Interface Most subsystem interfaces are mechanical in nature An externalized switch will be mounted on the housing Insulating Foam Activation Switch Camera Unit Wire

VideoSat Mass Budget Camera unit 38g Secure Digital card 2g Housing300g Insulation100g Chemical heating (3) 20g Structural and Hardware150g Estimated mass610g

VideoSat Monetary Budget Camera unit $ Secure Digital card$ Housing$ Insulation$ Chemical heating (3)$ 5.00 Structural and Hardware$ Total$

Schedule Pre- CDR  February  Establish Team  March  Research and Development  April  Design and Cost Analysis Post-CDR  May  Finalize design and initial Prototyping  June  Acquisition of required materials  July  Construct and test  August  Launch and Compile Data

Any Questions?