The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Framework for Teaching Planning and Preparation Day 1 Summer 2012.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
When the State Hands You Lemons: Making Lemonade Out Of the New APPR
EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Principles of High Quality Assessment
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Utilizing FfT to Enhance Teaching and Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Educational Performance Incentive Compensation
The Danielson Model: What Does This Mean for Lutheran Educators?
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation.  Take a few minutes to respond to the following reflection questions:  What brought you into the teaching profession?
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
DOMAIN 1 EDU 325 Practicum I.  Has 22 components organized into 4 domains  The four domains are: ◦ Planning and preparation ◦ The classroom environment.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Compass- Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Daretta L. Wilson EDU645: Learning & Assessment for the 21st Century Professor: Alan Belcher February 16, 2016.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
The 6 Components of DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
Setting Instructional Outcomes
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Planning and Preparation
Presentation transcript:

The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation

Charlotte Danielson

The four domains Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

6 Components of Domain 1

Some opening thoughts… If you were to walk into a classroom, what might you see or hear there (from the students as well as the teacher) that would cause you to think that you were in the presence of an expert? What would make you think: “Oh, this is good; if I had a child this age, this is the class I would hope for.”

Bringing the CCSS to life… “Teaching for deep conceptual understanding, for argumentation, and for logical reasoning, have not been high priorities in most schools. In most classrooms, students do not take an active role in their own learning, nor do they (respectfully) challenge the thinking of their classmates…”

The hallmark of “distinguished-level” practice students assume a large part of the responsibility “Teachers have been able to create a community of learners in which students assume a large part of the responsibility for the success of a lesson; they make suggestions, initiate improvements, monitor their own learning against clear standards, and serve as resources to one another.”

1a – demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline Knowledge of prerequisite relationships Knowledge of content related pedagogy

What would you see? Lesson and unit plans that reflect important concepts in the discipline Lesson and unit plans that accommodate prerequisite relationships among concepts and skills Clear and accurate classroom explanations Accurate answers to students’ questions Feedback to students that furthers learning Interdisciplinary connections in plans and practice

1b – demonstrating knowledge of students Knowledge of child and adolescent development Knowledge of the learning process Knowledge of students’ skills, knowledge, and language proficiency Knowledge of students’ interests and cultural heritage Knowledge of students’ special needs

What would you see? Formal and informal information about students gathered by the teacher for use in planning and instruction Student interests and needs learned by the teacher for use in planning Teacher participation in community cultural events Teacher-designed opportunities for families to share their heritage Database of students with special needs

1c – selecting instructional outcomes Value, sequence, and alignment Clarity Balance Suitability for diverse learners

What would you see? Outcomes of a challenging cognitive level Statements of student learning, not student activity Outcomes central to the discipline and related to those in other disciplines Outcomes permitting assessment of student attainment Outcomes differentiated for students of varied ability

1d – demonstrating knowledge of resources Resources for classroom use Resources to extend content knowledge and pedagogy Resources for students

What would you see? Materials provided by the district Materials provided by professional organizations A range of texts Internet resources Community resources Ongoing participation by the teacher in professional education courses or professional groups Guest speakers

1e – designing coherent instruction Learning activities Instructional materials and resources Instructional groups Lesson and unit structure

What would you see? Lessons that support instructional outcomes and reflect important concepts Instructional maps that indicate relationships to prior learning Activities that represent high-level thinking Opportunities for student choice Use of varied resources Thoughtfully planned learning groups Structured lesson plans

1f – designing student assessment Congruence with instructional outcomes Criteria and standards Design of formative assessments

What would you see? Lesson plans indicating correspondence between assessments and instructional outcomes Assessment types suitable to the style of outcome Variety of performance opportunities for students Modified assessments available for individual students as needed Expectations clearly written with descriptors for each level of performance Formative assessments designed to inform minute-to-minute decision making by the teacher during instruction

Group Activity 1A. What student learning outcomes/objectives and CCS learning outcomes are the focuses of the lesson? Include what data informed this (these) outcome/objective(s). 1B. Briefly describe the students in your class including those with special needs. How will you differentiate instruction for individuals or groups in your class to meet lesson objectives? 1C. How does this lesson align within the current unit of study/across other units? 1D. What instructional materials, including technology, will you employ to meet the learning outcomes/objectives of this lesson? 1E. How do your instructional strategies, including student grouping, promote higher levels of thinking and student engagement? 1F. How do you plan to assess student achievement? Include how your assessment(s) will be a tool for future instruction.