1 School Grades & AMO Overview 2012-13 Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Advertisements

Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Mary Jane Tappen Executive Vice Chancellor Division of Public Schools.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
Test Chairpersons Meeting September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
Testing and Accountability Update: Legislation, School Grades July, 2013 Dr. Karen Schafer Director, Office of Accountability and Testing.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Rule Development Workshop: School Grades Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division of Accountability,
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
A Survival Guide 13/23/2010.  Today’s Presentation  Presenters & Support Personnel  Handouts  Questions  Follow-Up School Visits 3/23/
Testing and Accountability Update: Legislation, School Grades July, 2013 Dr. Karen Schafer Director, Office of Accountability and Testing.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update Florida Charter School Conference November 20, 2014.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Florida’s School Grading System Updates District Assessment and Accountability.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Leadership Academy on School Performance Reports September 25 to 27, 2012 Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Student Services Meeting September 2012 Gisela Feild 1.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C. Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum Contact Meeting Adapted.
1.  Non-FCAT Components  Review FCAT Components 2.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement School Grade Changes for All Schools in FCAT Writing Standard is set at 3.5. (in rule) Reading performance.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida’s School Grading System Overview and Updates 1.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
1 School Grades and AYP for New Accountability Coordinators.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. School Accountability Rules.
Florida Raising the Ceiling, Raising the Floor February 15, 2011.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Fall Conference 2013 Lake Mary, Florida November 14, 2013.
th Grade Cohort Standard Diploma Option (24 Credits) Year student enters Grade 9 SubjectCreditsDescriptionTesting Requirements 2015/2016 Graduating.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Lake Mary, Florida May 8,
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Accountability Update
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
FY12 Accountability Updates
Overview of School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress,
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
Gisela Feild Administrative Director
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
AYP and Report Card.
Revising High School Grading Requirements
Accountability Presentation
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
Presentation transcript:

1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research

All Schools ReadingMathWritingScience Performance FCAT 2.0/FAA (100) FCAT 2.0/FAA (100) FCAT/FAA (100) FCAT/ FAA (100) Learning Gains All Students FCAT 2.0/FAA (100) FCAT 2.0/FAA (100) Low 25% Learning Gains (Level 1 & 2 only) FCAT 2.0 (100) FCAT 2.0 (100) (300) (100) Additional Components: Test at Least 90% of students, 95% to earn an “A”  Adequate Progress of the Low 25% -Grade lowered one letter grade if not met.  Performance threshold of 25% proficient in Reading -Grade lowered if not met. 1.More rigorous cut scores for Achievement Level 3 – : Reading, Math, – : Science 2.Include students with disabilities and English language learners (more than 1 year) in performance 3.Learning gains differ between level 1 or 2 students 4.Added weight for students who increase their Level to a 4 or 5 or level 1 or 2 students improving 33% more than required for a gain 5.Writing proficiency: Alternative School student inclusion in “home” school grade to be defined in December 2012

Defining Learning Gains Three ways to make a learning gain: Move up by one or more achievement levels. Maintain a satisfactory achievement level. For Level 1 or 2, demonstrate more than one year’s worth of growth on the FCAT 2 vertical scale or improve on a common scale score from FCAT 2 to an EOC. 3

New Developmental Scale Score Gains Retained Students may now make a DSS Gain –Points required to make a gain based student’s current grade level –Points required for retained grade 3 equal grade 4 requirement –All level 1 or 2 retained are included in the low 25% FCAT Level Retained Grade 3 Grade 3-4 Grade 4-5 Grade 5-6 Grade 6-7 Grade 7-8 Grade 8-9 Grade 9-10 Reading Level Level Mathematics Level Level

Learning Gains (FAA) Learning gains for students who take the Florida Alternate Assessment (FAA) have been included in School Grade beginning in The FAA has nine separate performance levels, ranging from 1 to 9, with 4 or higher equaling proficient. A learning gain is defined as improvement in performance level or the maintenance of a proficient level. Students scoring level 1-3 may make a gain if they remain the same level but improve by 5 scale score points.

Additional Requirements Adequate Progress of Lowest Performing 25% in Reading and Mathematics –At least 50% of the low performers in a school must show learning gains in reading or math, or the school must show annual improvement in percent making gains –The school grade is lowered one letter grade if the requirement is not met - for schools that would otherwise be graded “C” or higher Students who move up 1 or more achievement levels to –Level 4 will be weighted 1.1 –Level 5 will be weighted 1.2 Non-Proficient students (FCAT and FAA) who make 33% more than the expected DSS gain will be weighted 1.1 –Example: Student was level 1 in grade 3 reading, scores 16 points higher would count 1.1 towards gains. 6

Elementary Grade Points (800) At least 525 school grade points shall be required for a School Performance Grade of A. At least 495 school grade points shall be required for a School Performance Grade of B. At least 435 school grade points shall be required for a School Performance Grade of C. At least 395 school grade points shall be required for a School Performance Grade of D. If an elementary school accumulates fewer than 395 school grade points, it shall be F

Middle Schools 8.Students with both FCAT 2 and EOC scores will be included in Math performance using the higher score (FCAT 2 or EOC). Students should only have FCAT or EOC. 9.High School EOC participation and performance will be included in school grade 10.Algebra and Geometry will be included in learning gains and Algebra will be included in identifying the low 25%. ReadingMathWriting Science Civics Acceleration Performance High School EOC’s Industry Certifications Participation- 50 Performance- 50 FCAT 2.0 /FAA (100) FCAT 2.0/ EOC/FAA (100) FCAT/FAA (100) FCAT/FAA (100) EOC (100) Learning Gains All Students FCAT 2.0 /FAA (100) FCAT 2.0/ EOC/FAA (100) Low 25% Learning Gains (Level 1 & 2 only) FCAT 2.0 (100) FCAT 2.0 (100) (300) (100)

Middle School Acceleration Mathematics Acceleration Component for Middle Schools includes High School courses taken 7 th or 8 th grade. Participation Denominator: –8th grade students scoring Achievement Level 3 or higher on their grade 7 FCAT 2 Mathematics, and –All other students who took the EOC assessment and enrolled in the appropriate course or its equivalent Performance –Denominator- Unduplicated participants –Numerator- Students scoring level 3 or higher based on their first EOC attempt in that year.

Middle School Grade Points (900) At least 590 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of A. At least 560 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of B. At least 490 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of C. At least 445 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of D. If a middle school accumulates fewer than 445 school grade points, it shall be F When available the Civics EOC will add 100 points.

High Schools Assessment Components – 50% “Other” Components – 50% Reading Math (Algebra, Geometry)WritingBiology AccelerationGrad Rate College Ready US History Performance Participation (150) (100) Overall (200) Reading (100) EOC (100) FCAT 2.0 /FAA (100) EOC /FAA (100) FCAT/ FAA (100) (0) EOC/FAA (100) Learning Gains All Students Performance (150) (100) At Risk (100) Math (100) FCAT 2.0/FAA (100) EOC/FAA (100) Low 25% Learning Gains FCAT 2.0 (100) EOC (100) (300) (100) (300) (200)(300)(200) (100) Additional Components:  Meet the at-risk graduation rate target (65%) 8.Bank middle school performance on high school EOCs for high school grades 9.Use the 4 year Federal uniform rate and a 5 year modified federal rate to include both standards and special diplomas in the graduation rate 10.Adjust the points provided or removed for growth and decline 11.Add component for US History EOC Beginning

High School Changes EOCs will be incorporated into the school grades model as they are implemented (Algebra I-2012; Algebra I, Geometry, & Biology Passing middle school EOC performance will be banked for high school grades Learning gains will be calculated for Algebra in 2012 and Geometry in 2013 The target for at-risk graduation will be 65% due to the shift to the Federal Uniform Graduation Rate. Students with 2 consecutive Algebra EOC scores (grade 8 and 9) will be used in Learning gains.

High School Changes Continued Growth/ Decline Change –Increase of zero 0 to 4 points will be no additional points for annual growth. –Increase of 5 to 9 points will be 5 additional points for annual growth. –Increase of 10 or more points will be 10 additional points for growth. –Schools will lose 5 points before weighting factors are applied if performance declines 10 percentage points

Accelerated Participation Denominator: Count of 11 th and 12 th grade students except FCAT exempt (FAA) students. Participating students in grades 9 and 10 are included in the numerator regardless of success Students in more than one course will receive extra weighting Component will be worth 150 points

Accelerated Performance 15 Denominator: unduplicated acceleration participation numerator. Numerator: Successful completions o Credit-earning scores on AP, AICE, IB, Industry Certification o Grade of “C” or higher in dual enrollment courses Students with more than one successful completion will receive extra weighting Component will be worth 150 points

Graduation Rate Summary Information 16 Graduation Rate Methods Students Not Included in the Calculation GraduatesNon-Graduates National Governors Association (NGA) Rate Used in Students who transfer to: Other schools (public, private, or Dept. of Juvenile Justice facilities); Home-education programs; Adult education programs Deceased students Standard Diploma recipients Special Diploma recipients Dropouts Certificate of Completion recipients GED recipients Continuing enrollees who are not on-time graduates New Federal Uniform Rate Required for federal reporting beginning in Students who transfer to: Other schools (public or private) Home-education programs Deceased students Standard Diploma recipients Dropouts Certificate of Completion recipients GED recipients Continuing enrollees who are not on-time graduates Special Diplomas Transfers to Adult education programs or Dept. of Juvenile Justice facilities who are not standard diploma recipients.

Postsecondary Readiness - Reading, Math Denominator: On-time High School Graduates Numerator: Students scoring ready on SAT, ACT, CPT, or PERT during high school Calculated separately for reading and mathematics with max of 100 points each College Readiness will be recalculated to include all on time grads for Growth/decline comparison. 17

HS Grades (1600) At least 1,050 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of A. At least 990 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of B. At least 870 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of C. At least 790 school grade points shall be required for a school grade of D. If a high school accumulates fewer than 790 school grade points, it shall be F

19 Current School Grading Scale A = 65.6% of points B = 61.9 % of points C = 54.4.% of points D = 49.4 % of points F = less than 49.4 % of points Elementary = 800 possible points Middle Schools = 900 possible points High Schools = 1600 possible points

AMO Overview Overview Under reporting requirements of Florida’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility waiver, Florida will include the following information in applicable sections of the annual School Public Accountability Reports (SPARs), which can be accessed online at prd.doe.state.fl.us/eds/nclbspar/index.cfm: prd.doe.state.fl.us/eds/nclbspar/index.cfm For the “all students” group and each subgroup described in ESEA section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) (b)(2)(C)(v)(II) –information on student achievement at each proficiency level (percent scoring satisfactory or higher) –data comparing actual achievement levels to the State’s annual measurable objectives (AMOs); –the percentage of students not tested; –performance on the other academic indicator for elementary and middle schools (writing); and –graduation rates for high schools.

Additional Components Learning Gains Points for the Low 25%, Math (All Students only) Learning Gains Points for the Low 25%, Reading (All Students, only) Four-Year Federal Formula Graduation Rate (All subgroups) Writing – Percent Scoring Satisfactory (All subgroups) Columns for AMO Reading and Math targets for 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017

Sample School Example, AMO for Proficiency in Math Sample School: % Proficient in Math = 64% ½ percent non-proficient = 36% x ½ = 18% Proficiency target for = 64% + 18% = 82% –Target for = 64% + [(18% ÷ 6) x 1] = 67% –Target for = 64% + [(18% ÷ 6) x 2] = 70% –Target for = 64% + [(18% ÷ 6) x 3] = 73% –Target for = 64% + [(18% ÷ 6) x 4] = 76% –Target for = 64% + [(18% ÷ 6) x 5] = 79%