The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Civic Life on the New Frontier Submitted by:- Maulika. R. Kapoori ( )
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
1 Budgets and Budgetary Control Prepared and Presented By Gladstone K. Hlalakuhle.
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Regional Rural Transit Strategy Prepared for: Kern Council of Governments Prepared by: Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates August 2003.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
Mobility Management Increasing Independence for Community Members.
OPTA 2009 Develop A Transit Marketing Plan For Success Thursday, May 21 2:00 – 3:30 PM Margaret Parone Clear View Strategies.
Luxembourg, Ville Kajala Senior Officer on Transparency Directive Issues Pan-European Access to Financial Information Disclosed by Listed Entities.
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
Staff Compensation Program Update
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
Nadine Drew Lynn Goldman Merrie Meyers Charles Webster.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
UNIVERSITY ACCOUNTABILITY An Ontario and New Zealand Perspective.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Results of 4A’s Member Survey -Marsha Appel – 4A’s SVP, Research Services The Social Tools Landscape for Agencies and Clients -Chris Damsen – Netvibes,
ITS America 2005 Enhanced Transit Information CIN RTO Consumer Information Network Regional Transit Organization Presented by: Jesus A. Martinez, P.E.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
1 State of Good Repair Research Vincent Valdes Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation July 9, 2009.
Integration of Service Channels Strategies for Success Iain McKellar, Director, Advisory Services Division.
Mitch Skyer President & Senior Transportation Consultant Solstice Transportation Group.
Communication and dissemination of indicators Soong Sup Lee, World Bank.
1 Involving Data Users in the Planning Process Who are your data users? Why do you meet with your data users? When do you meet with your data users? What.
Universal Postal Union “Connecting today’s postal sector with tomorrow’s future” © UPU 2007 – All rights reservedUniversal Postal Union The Changing World.
Understanding the Do’s and Don'ts of Customer Relations Scott Wisner Customer Service Manager Valley Metro RPTA.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
Be Involved: Correcting Issues & Advocating for Improvements Michael J. Walk Director of Service Development Maryland Transit Administration 2015 Mobility.
GoBerkeley 1 goBerkeley: Integrating TDM and Parking Management into Downtown Berkeley Monday, October 28 th, 2013 Steer Davies Gleave 970 – 355 Burrard.
Secondary School Councils and Effective Communication YRDSB Fall School Council Orientation Forum 2009.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
Identifying Data Needs: Workshop on Household Surveys and Measurement of Labour Force with Focus on Informal Economy Maseru, Lesotho, April 2008.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Overview of Advanced Traveler Information Systems Evaluations Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Manager, ITS Program Assessment U.S. Department of Transportation.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Communicating with Travelers Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality.
Leverus Annual Internet Survey for Associations and Non-profit Organizations: The state of the Internet 2004.
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY Customer-Focused Performance Measures (Looking for a few good measures) by Philip.
TBWG Meeting Burlington, Vermont National ITS Architecture June 10, 2003.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION Compliance with the Implementation of the Batho Pele Principle of Consultation.
Implementing Brunei Darussalam Long Term Development Plan
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis for Arabic Speaking Countries, Amman, Jordan May 2011 Identification.
MATOC Trial Phase Dec 2008 to Jun 2009 Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Richard W. Steeg, PE Chair MATOC Steering Committee VDOT Regional.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis September, Nairobi, Kenya 1/18 Consultations with users in preparing.
EXPERIENCE | Transportation Adding Value for Economic Development Presented to: KCADC Economic Development Alliance September 29, 2006 Mobile Device Technology.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Public Relations Campaigns. _view0/part1/chapter1/multiple_choice_quiz.html
Click to edit Master text styles 12/17/ Click to edit Master text styles 12/17/ Tom O’Neill Technology Department March 13, 2013 Discussion.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
Program Evaluation Overview. Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome.
High-Level Forum on Strategic Planning for Statistics in Central Asia Countries Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic, May 2006 Oleg Kara, Deputy Director General,
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Dissemination and Spatial Analysis for Arabic Speaking Countries, Amman, Jordan May 2011 Identification.
Coordination in Action: Coordination in Action: Building a Camden County Travel Management Coordination Center August 8, 2007 Faith-Based Workgroup.
Brian Cronin Federal Transit Administration ITSA Annual Conference May 4, 2005 Mobility Services for All Americans (MSAA) Foundation Research and Next.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section B 1.
REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER TWG KICKOFF WEBINAR MAY 4 1:30-3:30 PM Next Generation Transit Service Information Portal.
Quality Milestones Elaborate quality system developed over the years “Joint Agenda Building” (JAB) group “Strategic Quality” – Progress report CA/80/04.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
1 Building a Corporate Strategic Communications Plan Agency-wide Consultations April 2009.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
BIC 2013 National Conference Presented By: Tim Quinn, Executive Vice President Date: 27 October, 2013 Time: 15:00 to 16:00 Social Media, Accelerating IT.
ECA-FAO DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM USING MOBILE DEVICES OVERVIEW Meriem Ait Ouyahia Statistician, African Centre for Statistics, ECA Fabio Grita System Support.
Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,
Information Technology Planning
Presentation transcript:

The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007

1 Presentation Outline  Introduction  Literature Review  Characteristics of Communicating with Riders  Communication Costs  Effectiveness of Rider Communication Techniques  Project Results, Conclusions and Recommendations

2 Introduction - Rider Communication  Affects access to public transport services  Affects customer perception  Can build ridership  Can maintain ridership  Contributes to “high quality” service. Examples: Real-time arrival/departure information On-board information and amenities (e.g., wireless Internet) Automated fare payment

3 Introduction – Communication Dimensions  Who and where riders are located  Content, format and accessibility of communication  Communication timing and frequency  Communication dissemination media and access  Capital and operations and maintenance costs associated with communication

4 Literature Review  Customer needs for communication and access to information well understood  Confirms challenge to measure the effectiveness of communication – no one overall measure of effectiveness  Difference between U.S., and European and Asian experience in using electronic media to disseminate communication Public transit embraced more in Europe and Asia than in U.S. Technology use more prevalent in Europe and Asia than in U.S.

5 Characteristics of Communicating with Riders  33 responding agencies  Most prevalent communication types: Operational information Route and schedule information Proposed service changes Public meeting information Security Safety General information Transit in the community  Wide variation in content and frequency of communication

6 Content and Frequency of Communication  Operational information: Real-time - next vehicle arrival/departure time Periodic/one-time basis - regarding detours and delays One-time basis - trip and/or connection time  General information most prevalent of all communications  Safety and security information on periodic basis - reminders about suspicious activities and packages  Dissemination of safety/security information not being done by as many agencies as those disseminating general or real-time information  Trend toward providing certain operational information in real-time, while continuing to provide general information on periodic basis

7 Use of Technology  Internet (website) (22%)  Kiosk (5%)  or page (5%)  Electronic sign at transit stop/station (3%)  On-board electronic sign (1%)  Mobile telephone (1%)  Wireless Application Protocol (WAP)-enabled device (1%)  Wireless device (e.g., PDA, iPod) (1%)

8 Dissemination Media From Federal Transit Administration’s “Customer Preferences for Transit ATIS”

9

10 Methods Used to Determine Content  Operational and general information: Complaint information (30 and 26 agencies, respectively) Consulting with riders (25 and 20 agencies, respectively) No external input (21 and 17 agencies, respectively) Based on another agency’s communication (13 and 16 agencies, respectively)

11 Communications Costs  Few agencies understand and can report costs  Costs reported for: Websites Trip itinerary planning systems Interactive voice response (IVR) systems  Wide variations in costs. Examples: Capital costs for website range from $4,200 to $550,000 Capital costs of trip itinerary planning systems range from $25,000 to $600,000 Capital costs of IVR systems range from $85,000 to $16,000,000

12 Communications Effectiveness  Conduct surveys to determine if reached market  Consult with advisory committee to determine accessibility  Use of surveys and rider feedback to determine understandability  Rider feedback through focus groups, citizen advocacy groups and surveys to determine timeliness  Employee monitoring and feedback to determine timeliness  Determining whether expected changes due to the communication actually occurred : Ridership statistics Volume of calls to customer information Number of complaints Hits on the website

13 Project Results  Limited identification of most effective way to communicate with riders. Need to Differentiate among types of communications and riders Identify point at which communication occurs in travel chain Source: Ministry of Transport and Communications, Finland

14 Project Results (continued)  Consistency most important: Consistency among sources of information within an agency Consistency of information provided to the customer  Simplifying information makes it more effective.* Examples: Bus stop timetables Accessing information on vehicles arriving/departing at a particular stop  *Balance between simplifying information and customizing it difficult to achieve  Major challenges: Reaching specific audience and in affordable/effective way Need for multiple media and multiple languages Timeliness of information

15 Key Conclusions  Need to account for variety of factors: Stage of the travel chain Demographic characteristics of recipients Ownership of and ability to use technology  Establish process for testing, and monitoring accuracy and timeliness  Select appropriate dissemination media based on content of communication and rider demographics  Develop “information strategy”  Ensure internal processes/resources in-place for delivering consistent quality of information  Maintaining or increasing ridership should not be only metric that determines effectiveness

16 For Future Study  Determining specific measures of effectiveness by type of communication  “Model” could be used by agencies to determine most effective dissemination media  Much more information required about capital, and operations and maintenance costs  More information regarding communicating safety and security should be provided to agencies  More in-depth information regarding a communication project from concept-to-deployment should be made available to agencies