An Introduction and Overview Electric Power Research, Engineering and Consulting Why Interoperability? Erich W. Gunther Chairman and CTO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requirements Based Evaluation of BPL for Power System Sensing, Command and Control Applications Erich W. Gunther EnerNex Corporation
Advertisements

The e-Framework Bill Olivier Director Development, Systems and Technology JISC.
A brief for top management Prepared by the Institute of Quality Assurance Integrated Management Special Interest Group Future management is integrated.
IEC WG 19 Meeting Geneva, CH 2012/May/11 Architectural Methodology Joint NIST-SGAC / EU-M.490 RAWG Efforts.
UCAIug HAN SRS v2.0 Summary August 12, Scope of HAN SRS in the NIST conceptual model.
May 2010 Slide 1 SG Communications Boot Camp Matt Gillmore 03/07/11.
The Value of DOD Installation Energy Management Control Systems (EMCS) and Command Centers for Improved Operations and Increased Energy Efficiency Moderator:
Tom Standish Group President & COO Regulated Operations CenterPoint Energy Visions of the Smart Grid: Deconstructing the traditional utility to build the.
Consulting | Program Management | System Integration | Application Development Enterprise GIS Implementation in Utilities – Management Challenges Presented.
Building an Operational Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture Best Practices Presented by: Ajay Budhraja Copyright 2006 Ajay Budhraja,
September 30, 2011 OASIS Open Smart Grid Reference Model: Standards Landscape Analysis.
Cyber Security and the Smart Grid George W. Arnold, Eng.Sc.D. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) U.S. Department of Commerce
Smart Grid - Cyber Security Small Rural Electric George Gamble Black & Veatch
® ® Global Advisory Council (GAC) Outreach overview, Jan 2011 Mark Reichardt, President and CEO Open Geospatial Consortium © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium.
IntelliGrid: Enabling The Power Delivery System of the Future Don Von Dollen EPRI IntelliGrid Program 9th International Symposium on Power- Line Communications.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
IT Governance: Simultaneously Empowers and Controls Source: IT Governance, Chapter 1.
Business Technology Solutions B usiness T echnology S olutions Smart Grid Program Consumers Energy’s focus on Using and Enhancing Industry Standards.
SAP R/3 in the Standard Software Market Ian Mizrahi December 3, 1998.
The Information Systems Planning Process
Opportunities / Challenges in Globalization May 2, 2014.
How to Manage Convergence ? DIGIT B2 - MIA – EA Team Dana Mateescu November 2010.
SMART GRID INTEROPERABILITY PANEL WINTER 2012 FACE-TO-FACE IRVING, TEXAS  DEC. 3-6, 2012 TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION AND THE VALUE OF INDUSTRY COLLABORATION William.
GridWise ® Architecture Council Cyber-Physical System Requirements for Transactive Energy Systems Shawn A. Chandler Maseeh College of Electrical and Computer.
Don Von Dollen Senior Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications Grid Interop December 4, 2012 A Utility Standards and Technology Adoption Framework.
Lessons Learned in Smart Grid Cyber Security
1 IS 8950 Managing and Leading a Networked IT Organization.
Summary Device protocols tied intimately to applications. A need to significantly reduce critical data update times. Current network bandwidth consumption.
1 Jon Sudduth Project Engineer, Intelligent Grid Deployment SWEDE April 26, 2011.
Process for Analysis  Choose a standard / type  Qualitative / Quantitative Or  Formal / Informal  Select access controls  Match outcome to project.
Common Information Model and EPRI Smart Grid Research
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210.
Systems Integration Specialists Company, Inc. The Standards Based Integration Company © Copyright 2010 SISCO, Inc. 1 Introduction to SISCO For CIM Users.
1 Smart Grid Cyber Security Annabelle Lee Senior Cyber Security Strategist Computer Security Division National Institute of Standards and Technology June.
NIST Smart Grid Conceptual Model
Chapter 7 Developing a Core Knowledge Framework
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Iiro Rinta-Jouppi – Sweden – RT 3c – Paper 0210 COMMUNICATION & DATA SECURITY.
Interoperability Standards and Next Generation Interconnectivity Pankaj Batra Chief (Engineering) CERC.
Today’s Agenda Agree on recurring meeting secretary
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Hugh D. Baker, Jr. AMI Open Standards. AMI Value Propositions  Operational efficiencies  Do more with less  Improving reliability  Outage detection.
June 17, 2009 Michael W. Howard, Ph.D. Sr. Vice President The Interoperable Smart Grid Evolving.
Chapter 11 Managing Application Development. Agenda Application management framework Application management issues Criteria for development approach Development.
Smart Grid Introduction
IEC TC57 Smart Grid Task Force Ed Dobrowolski for Scott Neumann 16 June 2010.
Erich W. Gunther UtilityAMI Chairman/Facilitator Chairman/CTO – EnerNex Corporation Jerry Melcher Onsite facilitator for this meeting.
© 2014 IBM Corporation Does your Cloud have a Silver Lining ? The adoption of Cloud in Grid Operations of Electric Distribution Utilities Kieran McLoughlin.
1 IoT for Smart Cities Where we are at and where we could be Olga Cavalli CCAT LAT Argentina Forum on "Powering Smart Sustainable Cities With the Internet.
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
Australian Department of Defence’s Transition to IPv6. Air Commodore David Richards Director General Information Policy and Plans.
Protection of Transportation Infrastructure from Cyber Attacks EXECUTIVE BRIEFING.
Security and Resilience Pat Looney Brookhaven National Laboratory April 2016.
A Layered Solution to Cybersecurity Dr. Erfan Ibrahim Cyber-Physical Systems Security & Resilience Center National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
© CGI Group Inc. “Modernizing your ERP – Getting there and continual improvement” State panelist: Doug Cotnoir, Maine, Controller Tom White, Alabama, Comptroller.
SEMINAR PRESENATATION ON WIDEAREA BLACKOUT (AN ELECTRICAL DISASTER) BY:Madhusmita Mohanty Electrical Engineering 7TH Semester Regd No
Module 5 Special Topic in e-Commerece. What is e-Commerce Utilize telecommunications technology and networks for – Conducting business transactions –
2015 CIGRE USNC GOTF Symposium IT & OT CONVERGENCE
IT Architecture Technical blueprint for evolving a corporate infrastructure resource that can be shared by many users and services processing systems hardware.
BANKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Smart Grid Developments in Alberta
RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND TRAINING FOR THE SMART GRID
Exelon’s Leased Circuit Retirement Program
BEST PRACTICES FOR RELIABLE CARRIER GRADE TELEPHONY
BEST PRACTICES FOR RELIABLE CARRIER GRADE TELEPHONY
ATCO Electric’s “Smart Grid” Strategy
Data Governance & Management Skills and Experience
Introduction to SOA Part II: SOA in the enterprise
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction and Overview Electric Power Research, Engineering and Consulting Why Interoperability? Erich W. Gunther Chairman and CTO

GWAC Interoperability Benefits Study

DANGER: Smart Grid Integration without Standards or Architecture It is not sufficient just to integrate systems haphazardly There must be an overarching plan, or blueprint Otherwise, vital systems integration may be prevented because of: –High costs –Missing technology

CHALLENGES OF INTEGRATION: Building Isolated Systems Utilities and vendors tend to develop intelligent systems in isolation For example, AMR and participation in energy markets Neither project is typically developed with the other in mind. AMR Energy Markets

CHALLENGES OF INTEGRATION: One-Off Integration Integration is typically done after the fact Cost is significant AMR Energy Markets

CHALLENGES OF INTEGRATION: Doing it the Next Time Now want to link in new systems Must first make the old system expandable Then must do another one- off integration AMR Energy Markets SCADA Outage Management

CHALLENGES OF INTEGRATION: And again… AMR Energy Markets SCADA Outage Management Protection Real-Time Contingency

CHALLENGES OF INTEGRATION: And then you remember… AMR Energy Markets SCADA Outage Management Protection Real-Time Contingency Security

AMR Doing it Right: Top-Down Architecture Define standardized interfaces first Incorporate security, network management and other strategies right from the beginning Initial costs are a bit more than one- off integration, but not much more New applications can build directly to the new architecture Data Management Network Management Security Energy Markets

AMR Doing it Right: The Next Phase Can re-use the development from the first phase Expansion was expected Adaptation to legacy systems was planned in advance Overall costs much lower SCADA Data Management Network Management Security Energy Markets Outage Management Outage Management SCADA

AMR Doing it Right: And so on… Benefits INCREASE with time Opposite of the old way Protection SCADA Data Management Network Management Security Energy Markets Outage Management Real-Time Contingency Outage Management SCADAProtection

The Value of Top Down Integration Permits existing infrastructure to be re-used Eliminates redundant effort and last minute retrofits Prevents forklift upgrades Vital system-wide capabilities, like security, comes standard Prepares the system for unforeseen change: –New technology –New applications –New organizational change Incremental DEVELOPMENT Reduced COST! Reduced RISK

Barriers to Planned System Integration Organizational –Corporate culture –Existing policies –Departmental Silos –Lack of human resources Knowledge –Missing applications –Missing algorithms –Lack of training Systems –Lack of standards –Too many standards to choose from –Missing products and services –Not applying formal methodology Business –Lack of policy to use standards –Not writing it into RFPs

15 Smart Grid Standards Domains

Security - DOE / NIST / UCAIug / ASAP-SG Effort US DOE FFRDCs

Conclusion Many of the standards we need are already there There are different needs in different environments –Define new applications and procedures –Agree on common information models –Adopt, evolve existing technologies and protocols –Develop new technologies and protocols –Apply systems engineering discipline Each of these tasks comes with a cost Standards provide the most benefit when implemented frequently and pervasively Pay attention to the business case Specify the use of standards in RFPs Synchronize with the NIST roadmap

Questions Erich Gunther, P.E. – Chairman & CTO Telephone , ext FAX