The Quality Review A Reflection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
Parents as Partners in Education
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Session Materials  Wiki
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
MS 219 Historical Data. M.S. 219 Quality Review Recommendations ( ) 1. Further develop all teachers’ skills, knowledge, and understanding of.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
David Abbott Director of Student Services Mary Barton CFN 204 SATIF November 21, 2011.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Comprehensive Planning
Using data for instructional decision-making
Presentation transcript:

The Quality Review A Reflection

Pre-Review Information School Self Evaluation Form SSEF CEP Demographic Data Goals and Action Plans Learning Surveys Previous Quality Review Data Packet (outcomes for the past three years)

School Self Evaluation Perhaps the most important document Complete with input from school community Share with community Be Honest Be Comprehensive Be able to support all that is written within this section.

School Self Evaluation School Profile: Self Explanatory School Site Distribution: Be site specific in completing this section How was the SSEF developed: Should not be completed solely by one person. Share with constituents within the community for feedback and suggestions The next five boxes refer to the Quality Statements Describe what has been done or is being done to address the areas for improvement on the 07-08 QR: Be honest! Highlight the Three most IMPORTANT features of the school. For example : an increase of students moved to LRE, number of admits, discharges since September…etc Don’t forget to copy and paste to your self evaluation the 2008-09 CEP Goals and Action Plans. SSEF should not be more than 8 pages.

Self Evaluation Before you begin to complete the self evaluation it would be wise to reflect upon the District 75 Quality Review Criteria Rubric. Gather key points and information that can support your responses to each of the Quality Review Statements. Bullet Responses.

Quality Statement 1 Gather Data: School leaders and faculty consistently gather, generate and analyze information Reflective Questions: Do staff come together at least once a month to look at student data. Do staff look at data in all of the Core subject areas Do they create a picture of individual student needs Do staff look at formative data to analyze learning outcomes for students…project long and short term goals Is there a system in place to address the needs of all students and to identify subgroups of students with similar needs Are students and their families engaged in ongoing communication around assessments, outcomes and next steps Do staff include students in being self reflective Do staff communicate with families other than the marking periods Does the school have systems in place to collect the data and to identify trends in individual students and service categories Once the data is collected does the school have a system in place to share instructional practices and organizational decisions Does the school have a system that allows families to track student progress in all subject areas.

Quality Statement 2 Plan and Set Goals: School leaders and faculty consistently use data to understand each student’s next learning steps Reflective Questions: Is there a system in place to regularly set measurable objectives for individuals and groups of students in all core subjects and to identify a series of NEXT STEPS to promote student learning outcomes Is there a system in place to set interim benchmarks Is the school community informed and involved in the school improvement planning cycle Does the school community use an effective data driven plan for evaluating the goals of the CEP and to develop strategic action plans to inform the next round of goal setting School leaders and faculty meet at minimum once a month to review data, adjust timeframes (if necessary) and to discuss next steps for all students so that they will reach their goals in all core subject areas School leaders and faculty meet regularly with students and their families to ensure that there is an understanding of the student goals School leaders and faculty effectively communicate high expectations and clearly explain how these can be achieved School leaders and faculty meet with students to facilitate self –assessment in all core subjects

Quality Statement 3 Develop Coherent Instructional and Organizational Strategies: School employs challenging, rigorous instruction that is aligned with the standards and provides for positive outcomes for students Reflective Questions: Are all of your teachers knowledgeable about the New York State Standards Do all your teachers know that students in Alternate Assessment Classes are held to the same standards as general education population but that they are modified and better known as the Alternate Grade Level Indicators Is the curriculum challenging, differentiated, and does it address the students IEP goals and objectives Do staff come together with the administration and or a grade level teacher to align the curriculum with the state standards Do staff and administration come together to review IEP’s and amend them in concert with parents when necessary Is the school budget aligned with the CEP and supports instructional initiatives that will result in students meeting IEP goals Is there equity across the school in the distribution of fiscal and other resources to best support teachers as they delver coherent rigorous instruction Is there a sense of trust, respect and support for all within the school community Staff and Leadership work collegially with one another Students show interest and engagement in their learning.

Quality Statement 4 Align Capacity Building to Goals: School aligns its leadership development and structured professional collaboration around meeting the schools goals and for accelerating student learning Reflective Questions: Does the school support the Professional Teaching Standards If the PTS are not in place does the school leadership engage in conversations with staff to promote their professional growth that supports positive outcomes for students Is there a system in place that provides for a differentiation of Professional Development Support that is based on teacher need Is there evidence of a functioning school –wide Inquiry Team and the work of the team public to all across the school community Are there additional groups of teachers/administrators engaged in an Action Research Project focused on a common targeted need. Are there teachers on the schools Academic Cabinet Is there a system that allows for ALL teachers and support providers to come together to share resources and best practices Does the administration plan strategically so that teachers can come together to engage in professional conversations. Does the administration support and plan for inter-visitations and/or Walk Throughs to support best practice Is there a system in place that allows for the Pupil Personnel Team to meet regularly with all constituents present Is there outreach to community based organization to support students and their families

Quality Statement 5 Monitor and Revise: The school has structures to monitor and evaluate student’s progress and for flexibility adapting plans and practices to meet its goals Reflective Questions: Are there systems in place to regularly examine individual student progress and to determine next steps Are teachers consistently assessing student progress, and setting measurable objectives Does the school administer interim assessments, analyze the results and identify next steps Do the school leaders monitor curriculum on an interim basis to ensure that it is aligned with the results of the assessments and IEP goals Do the school leaders gather all of the schools data and information to evaluate the effectiveness of organizational decisions and modify if necessary Do the school leaders use data to evaluate the effectiveness of the professional development supports afforded to staff. Is the process of self evaluation and reflection part of the school culture. School Vision is clear, supported and internalized by all within the school community

Meeting with the Principal: Some hypothetical questions that may be asked. How do you and your staff strategically and consistently analyze a wide range of data How do you use a range of data to analyze learning outcomes for individual students and groups of students How do you identify and address the needs of all subgroups of students How are interim benchmarks used to identify student growth and effectiveness of curriculum How do you ensure for the differentiation of instruction How do you and your teachers engage parents in discussions about their child’s progress How do you and your faculty help individual students (where appropriate) assess their own needs (not only behavioral) in order to improve How are parents involved in identifying student needs What does data collection look like in this school Do you and your staff track student progress over time and if so how How do you set measurable goals for students in all subject areas How do you track progress of the goals Who develops the CEP How do you determine the goals of the CEP How often do you reflect upon the goals of the CEP and with whom Do staff have individual goals. If so how are they identified

Meeting with the Principal: (Cont.) How is the curriculum aligned to the NYS standards What types of formative assessments do you use and why How do teachers ensure that every student is engaged How do you align the budget with the various school-wide initiatives and curriculum that you have in place How do you know if your staff has all of the resources necessary to teach the diverse groups of students that your school serves Do you believe that there is mutual respect and trust for all of the constituents within the school community How do you ensure for appropriate behaviors How do you ensure that all specific related services are provided for individual students and how is this monitored Does every teacher have their own personal professional development plan If so, how was it developed How do teachers in this school meet to engage in professional conversations How do you celebrate best practices in this school Are teachers empowered and if so please cite some examples How does the administration monitor teacher progress How do you provide for a comprehensive guidance plan for students. Is this school involved with any community based organizations to provide supports for student’s both emotionally and academically

Meeting with the Inquiry Team: Some hypothetical questions How many foci groups does your school have What is the focus of each of the groups How did you determine the foci of each of the groups What assessment tools did you use Is last years focus related to this years and if so what impact did last year have upon this year What success have been noted thus far How do you share the information about the progress that the target group(s) have had Have you seen a change in teaching strategies and improved outcomes for students and if so how

Meeting with Teachers: Some Hypothetical Questions Are you provided with student data What types of data are you provided with What do you do with the data Do you track student progress over time, and if so what do you do with the data that you’ve collected How is the IEP developed. If you assess a child at the beginning of the school year do you change the IEP How are parents/guardians involved in the IEP process How are families involved in the tracking and monitoring of progress over time What assessment do you have in this school How often do you assess How are interim assessments used to monitor the curriculum Do you have personal goals for yourself as a professional. If so how were they developed Can you speak to the professional development support that your receive…how do you decide what you need Are your students (if appropriate) aware of their personal learning goals

Classroom Observations The Observation will provide evidence that supports the Quality Statements but will also relate to the Professional Teaching Standards INSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT USE OF DATA Differentiation of content, process, product Student engagement Scaffolded instruction Interdisciplinary connections Effective questioning Strong content knowledge Lessons are consistent with content standards Collaboration between students support c0-learning Safe, respectful classroom Environment reflects curricular and achievement goals Meaningful feedback to students Exemplary works Effective use of resources Students practice self assessment Needs-based grouping Classroom practices reflect teacher awareness and utilization of available data Planning for different learning styles

Classroom Observation (cont.) Reflective Questions: Are lessons differentiated Are IEP goals aligned to instruction Are all students engaged Is there cross curricula connections Are the lessons aligned with the State Standards Are the classrooms safe, nurturing, age appropriate with evidence of student work Are adaptive tools being used where appropriate Are teachers planning based on student assessments and learning needs Are there small needs based groups While there may be teaching occurring….are the students learning Can the administrator answer the question, if asked by the reviewer, “ what was the intent of that lesson and what did the students learn?”

The Exit The Principal may invite a few key people to the Exit (Network Leader, Assistant Principal, School Base Coach) The Reviewer will present to the Principal a Summary of what the school does well and what the school needs to improve. The Principal is the only one who should respond to that summary document during the EXIT. Comments from Network Leaders etc. will be heard only AFTER the review is completed. These comments are technically “off the record.”