بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Population Covered by Donor USAID 34% ADB 1% Uncovered 23 % Others 2% EC 18% WB 22%

Action Plan for Evaluation and Implementation of Curriculum Development in KMU

Evaluation of Practical work in Biochemistry Department By : Assistant Prof. Wasima Sharifi Department of Bio-Chemistry, KMU December 2006

Background Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, 1 st and 2 nd class completely, and beside that some subjects in grade 3 rd, 4 th, and 5 th are also included. Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, 1 st and 2 nd class completely, and beside that some subjects in grade 3 rd, 4 th, and 5 th are also included. Practical work is an important part of teaching method in Paraclinic (40%) Practical work is an important part of teaching method in Paraclinic (40%) Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planning Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planning

Practical works and Instruments Using Microscopes: Using Microscopes: Biology Biology Parasitological Parasitological Pathology Pathology Histology Histology Microbiology Microbiology Chemistry: Chemistry: Chemistry Chemistry Biochemistry Biochemistry Anatomy Modules: Anatomy Modules: Anatomy Embryology Forensic Medicine Others: Others: Physiology Pharmacology Public health Physics

Practical work room.

Anatomy Models

Practical work room.

Strengths EDC/JICA EDC/JICA Initiation of teachers for the task Initiation of teachers for the task Better background for future Planning Better background for future Planning Weaknesses Absence of evaluation experience Absence of evaluation experience Difficulty of skill evaluation fact Difficulty of skill evaluation fact

Opportunities Assistance of JICA Assistance of JICA Eager for better Education system in KMU Eager for better Education system in KMU A comprehensive and scientific planning for future A comprehensive and scientific planning for future Threats Sustainability of the program? Sustainability of the program? Miss collection and miss interpretation Miss collection and miss interpretation

Goal Improvement of teaching system Improvement of teaching system Objectives Standardization of teaching method Standardization of teaching method Strengthening of weak points Strengthening of weak points

Methods Time: Time: May 2007 May 2007 Mid semester, 2 weeks Mid semester, 2 weeks Class 2 nd students Class 2 nd students Random 20 students Random 20 students Distribution, collection and analysis: Distribution, collection and analysis: Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar, Prof Ahmadzai Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar, Prof Ahmadzai Items in the questionnaire Items in the questionnaire Punctuality Skill Knowledge General impression Scoring: Scoring: Satisfactory, fair and not fair Percentage

Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Sharifi

Evaluation of Paraclinic lecturers By: Associated Prof. Ehsanullah Alimi MD Head, Department of Forensic Medicine December 2006

Introduction Feedback by students for standardization of education Feedback by students for standardization of education Total no. of lecturers in KMU217 Total no. of lecturers in KMU217 Clinic151 Clinic151 Paraclinic66 Paraclinic66 Total no. of departments33 Total no. of departments33 Clinic19 Clinic19 Paraclinic14 Paraclinic14

Introduction (cont.) Criteria for selection of lecturers Criteria for selection of lecturers MD and higher degrees MD and higher degrees 75% Scoring in undergraduate period 75% Scoring in undergraduate period No failure records in undergraduate period No failure records in undergraduate period Age ( < 35 ) Age ( < 35 ) Recommendation by related Department Recommendation by related Department Academic entrance exam Academic entrance exam Approval of Academic council of KMU Approval of Academic council of KMU Assignment by MOHE Assignment by MOHE

Current Situation EDC has already collected evaluation data for all lecturers in August 2006 EDC has already collected evaluation data for all lecturers in August 2006 The data has not been analyzed because of unknown reason The data has not been analyzed because of unknown reason

Weaknesses Some negative reaction from lecturers Some negative reaction from lecturers Absence of evaluation experience Absence of evaluation experience Students will evaluate lecturers in views of reputation (e.g. Strictness will be connected to lower evaluation) Students will evaluate lecturers in views of reputation (e.g. Strictness will be connected to lower evaluation)

Goal Improvement of teaching system Improvement of teaching system Objectives Standardization of teaching method Standardization of teaching method Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points Motivation of lecturers Motivation of lecturers Capacity building for lecturers Capacity building for lecturers

Methods Modification of the current questionnaire Modification of the current questionnaire Every end of semester Every end of semester Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair) Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair) Calculation of percentage Calculation of percentage Sampling of students Sampling of students Sampling method: Sampling method: 30 students, randomized 30 students, randomized

Example of a Lecture

Implementation Processes 3 groups of 10 students will be selected arbitrarily from nd class students 3 groups of 10 students will be selected arbitrarily from nd class students 10 lecturers in 4 departments (biochem, physio, microbio, and pathology) will be evaluated 10 lecturers in 4 departments (biochem, physio, microbio, and pathology) will be evaluated

Resources Personnel: Personnel: EDC evaluation committee and administration EDC evaluation committee and administration Academic Vice Chancellor Academic Vice Chancellor Students Students Time: Time: Collection: One week in the end of each semester (July 2007) Collection: One week in the end of each semester (July 2007) Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs. Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar. Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs. Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar. Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor, EDC and JICA project office in August 2007 Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor, EDC and JICA project office in August 2007

Suggestion All lecturers should be evaluated every year regularly All lecturers should be evaluated every year regularly Students manual for evaluation Students manual for evaluation

Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Alimi

Assessment of student By: Prof. Mohammad Afzal Anwar MD Head, Department of Histology December 2006

Introduction Introduction Total no. of students2745 Total no. of students2745 Faculties4 Faculties4 Curative Curative Pediatric Pediatric Stomatology Stomatology Nursing Nursing Condition to sit in an examination Condition to sit in an examination Student attendance 75% Student attendance 75%

Evaluation of students in end of semester Final Examination Practical Examination (20%) Theoretical Examination (80%)

Current Status Different departments have different formats of examination papers Different departments have different formats of examination papers Combination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etc Combination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etc Distribution of marks to different sections Distribution of marks to different sections Different departments show different failure rates of students Different departments show different failure rates of students

Result of Final Examination 100 (absolute score) Failed Students Succeeded Students 0 50 (in old system)

Failed Student subject Second Chance Failed Student (next year) subject Third chance Failed Student (next year) Current System Used for 2 nd Class or Upper (Not the Credit System)

Result of Final Examination 100 (absolute score) Failed Students Succeeded Students 0 55% in credit system

Introduction (cont.) Credit system and conditions: Credit system and conditions: Currently used for PCB and 1 st class Currently used for PCB and 1 st class One chance for exam One chance for exam If failed, must take tutorial If failed, must take tutorial Pass score for a subject in credit system is 55 Pass score for a subject in credit system is 55 The average of all subject scores for credit system is 60 The average of all subject scores for credit system is 60

Goal Improvement of examination system Improvement of examination system Objectives Standardization of teaching method Standardization of teaching method Detection of examination weak points Detection of examination weak points Improvement of questioning system Improvement of questioning system

Methods Collection of papers from different departments Collection of papers from different departments Decide which method was used for each paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc) Decide which method was used for each paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc) Collection of data Collection of data How many students failed How many students failed How marks were decided for each question How marks were decided for each question

Resources Personnel: Personnel: Dr. Anwar Dr. Anwar Examination committee Examination committee KMU administration KMU administration Time: Time: End of each semester End of each semester

Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Prof Anwar

Evaluation for Practical works in Clinical Education By: Assistant Prof. Ghulam Sakhi Rawan MD Department of Pediatrics, Maiwand Hospital December 2006

Background Clinical Practical works are taught in class 3 rd, 4 th, 5 th, and house job (internship) Clinical Practical works are taught in class 3 rd, 4 th, 5 th, and house job (internship) Practical work is an important part of teaching method in clinic (40%) Practical work is an important part of teaching method in clinic (40%) Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planning Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planning practical works: practical works: Students4 hours/day Students4 hours/day House job7 hours/day for a year House job7 hours/day for a year

Practical works and Instruments class 3 rd : class 3 rd : Physical examination Physical examination Thermometer Thermometer Sphygmomanometer Sphygmomanometer Stethoscope Stethoscope Tongue depressor Tongue depressor Performing IM,SC and IV Injections Performing IM,SC and IV Injections

Practical works and Instruments (cont.) Class 4 th : Class 4 th : Physical examination Physical examination Thermometer Thermometer Sphygmomanometer Sphygmomanometer Stethoscope Stethoscope Fetoscope Fetoscope NG and rectal tubes and folly catheter NG and rectal tubes and folly catheter Reading X-Ray films Reading X-Ray films History taking History taking

Practical works and Instruments (cont.) Class 5 th : Class 5 th : Otoscope Otoscope Ophthalmoscope Ophthalmoscope Laryngoscope Laryngoscope Bronchoscope Bronchoscope Casting Casting Traction and fixation of fractures Traction and fixation of fractures Punctures Punctures History taking History taking Introduction of diseases Introduction of diseases

Practical works and Instruments (cont.) Note: Students are able to do some practical works by themselves but they will only observe other works. House Job: House Job: Practical works as junior assistant/every dept. Practical works as junior assistant/every dept. Skin suturing Skin suturing Dressing Dressing

Current Status Some lecturers lack enough skills to teach Some lecturers lack enough skills to teach Some lecturers are not punctual Some lecturers are not punctual

Goal Improvement of Practical works in Clinical Education Improvement of Practical works in Clinical Education Objectives Standardization of practical works Standardization of practical works Strengthening of weak points in clinical works Strengthening of weak points in clinical works

Methods Who: Dr. Rawan Who: Dr. Rawan To whom: 5 th class students, 10 groups To whom: 5 th class students, 10 groups When: March-June 2007 When: March-June 2007 How: How: Interview with students Interview with students Observation by Dr. Rawan Observation by Dr. Rawan

Methods (cont.) Format of interview questions Format of interview questions Teachers Teachers Punctuality Punctuality Attitude Attitude Skill Skill Knowledge Knowledge Appearance Appearance Students Attendance Interest Knowledge Attitude skills

Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Assistant Prof. Rawan Assistant Prof. Rawan