ADEPT Framework www.scteachers.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Are You (Click).
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
1 ADEPT for Speech-Language Therapists. 2 ADEPT Web Site
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
for School Library Media Specialists
For Faculty, Supervisors and Cooperating Teachers
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R)
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
ADEPT A D E P T Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
MODIFIED CURRENT PRACTICE MODEL (SAVING THE BABY!!!) Olde English Consortium Teacher Evaluation Plan – Modified Current Practice Model May 15, 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
SAFE-T NET Introduction
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
ADEPT Updated November SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 Your SAFE-T Guide Who is becoming your your new best friend?
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
New Teacher Program for Induction Contract Teachers
What it means for New Teachers
Dissemination Training
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

ADEPT Framework www.scteachers.org

What is ADEPT? ADEPT is a comprehensive system for Assisting, Developing, and Evaluating Professional Teaching. The scope of ADEPT ranges from college students preparing to become teachers to teachers in the twilight of their careers.

What is the basis for ADEPT? ADEPT is based on a consensually-determined definition of effective teaching. This definition includes domains, performance standards, and key elements.

Is effective teaching the same for all educators? No. Currently, there are four categories of educators within ADEPT: classroom-based teachers, school guidance counselors, speech-language therapists, and library media specialists.

What are the domains for classroom-based teachers? The four domains are as follows: Planning Instruction Environment Professionalism

What are performance standards? Performance standards are statements of what teachers should know and be able to do to be effective (that is, to positively influence student learning).

In terms of classroom-based teachers, how do the ADEPT Performance Standards (APSs) fit into the Domains?

The first domain, PLANNING, includes APS 1: Long-Range Planning APS 2: Short-Range Planning of Instruction APS 3: Planning Assessments and Using Data

The second domain, INSTRUCTION, includes APS 4: Establishing & Maintaining High Expectations for Learners APS 5: Using Instructional Strategies to Facilitate Learning APS 6: Providing Content for Learners APS 7: Monitoring, Assessing, and Enhancing Learning

The third domain, ENVIRONMENT, includes APS 8: Maintaining an Environment that Promotes Learning APS 9: Managing the Classroom

The fourth domain, PROFESSIONALISM, includes APS 10: Fulfilling Professional Responsibilities

What are key elements? In simplest terms, the key elements give meaning to the performance standards by identifying their most important aspects or components.

How many key elements are there for classroom-based teachers? APS 1 and APS 10 each contain 5 key elements. Each of the other ADEPT performance standards contains 3 key elements.

In summary, 4 domains, 10 performance standards, and 34 key elements. effective teaching for classroom-based teachers is defined by 4 domains, 10 performance standards, and 34 key elements.

Further. . . These domains, standards, and key elements apply to classroom-based teachers throughout their career continuums—from pre-professional preparation through full retirement from the teaching profession.

How does ADEPT assist and develop teachers? ADEPT has three primary methods for assisting and developing teachers: Teacher preparation programs include ADEPT as a primary source of teacher development.

How does ADEPT assist and develop teachers? ADEPT has three primary methods for assisting and developing teachers: Induction & mentoring programs focus on ADEPT as a primary source of teacher assistance.

How does ADEPT assist and develop teachers? ADEPT has three primary methods for assisting and developing teachers: Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE) focuses on continuous teacher development.

How does ADEPT evaluate teachers? ADEPT has two primary methods for evaluating teachers: Summative ADEPT Formal Evaluation for Classroom-Based Teachers (SAFE-T) Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)

How is evaluation defined? Evaluation refers to the process of making informed judgments based on the domains, performance standards and key elements, and evidence of teacher performance.

What is SAFE-T? Summative ADEPT Formal Evaluation of Classroom-Based SAFE-T is the Summative ADEPT Formal Evaluation of Classroom-Based Teachers

What is SAFE-T? SAFE-T is a highly consequential formal evaluation process. Results are used to make state-level decisions (e.g. certificate advancement; sanctions against certificates);

What is SAFE-T? SAFE-T is a highly consequential formal evaluation process. Results are used to make district-level decisions (e.g., continuation of employment; contract level eligibility), and

What is SAFE-T? SAFE-T is a highly consequential formal evaluation process. Results are used to make higher education decisions (e.g., the effectiveness of the teacher preparation program)

What is SAFE-T? SAFE-T replaces the original ADEPT formal evaluation models for classroom-based teachers (e.g., TEAM, STEP, FEAT, TEP).

What are the stages of the evaluation process? Stage I: Preparation Stage II: Collection of evidence Stage III: Deliberation Stage IV: Judgments

So, how does SAFE-T work? SAFE-T Stage I: Preparation The district establishes its annual evaluation timeline.

What is the length of time required to conduct SAFE-T? SAFE-T must cover a minimum of 90 working days over the course of a single academic year. SAFE-T must consist of two evaluation periods (also referred to as evaluation cycles) that are roughly equal in length (i.e., approximately 45 working days each).

When is SAFE-T conducted? The entire preliminary (i.e., first) evaluation period must occur during the first semester of the school year. At least a portion of the final (i.e., second) evaluation period must occur during the second semester of the school year.

When does SAFE-T begin and end? The preliminary evaluation period begins on the date the teacher orientation is held. The final evaluation period ends on the date that all final evaluation conferences must be completed, but must end before April 15.

SAFE-T Stage I: Preparation An ADEPT evaluation team is appointed for each teacher who is scheduled to undergo SAFE-T.

What are the evaluation team membership criteria? Each team must consist of a minimum of two trained and appropriately qualified evaluators. One of the members must be designated to serve as the team chair.

What are the evaluation team membership criteria? A minimum of three evaluators is required for teachers undergoing highly consequential formal evaluations.

SAFE-T Stage I: Preparation Each teacher receives a comprehensive orientation to the SAFE-T process.

SAFE-T Stage II: Collection of Evidence Six types of evidence are collected: Long-range plan and teacher reflections Unit work sample and teacher reflections Classroom observation records Teacher reflections on observed lessons Professional performance review(s) Professional self-assessment

SAFE-T Stage II: Collection of Evidence The evidence is compiled as follows: All evidence is placed in a dossier. A dossier is an organized collection of data, somewhat like a portfolio. The dossier is maintained by the team chair.

SAFE-T Stage III: Deliberation Each team member conducts an independent review of the dossier according to the criteria described in the ADEPT formal evaluation summary. The evaluation team members meet to discuss their independent ratings and reach consensus.

SAFE-T Stage IV: Judgments Based on the evidence, the team must reach consensus at each of the following three levels: a judgment regarding each key element, a judgment regarding each domain, and an overall judgment of effectiveness.

SAFE-T Stage IV: Judgments When consensus has been reached at all three levels, the evaluation team prepares a written report. One or more members of the evaluation team meet with the teacher to present the results to the teacher in writing and orally.

How does GBE work? GBE Stage I: Preparation The principal determines which of the two types of GBE is appropriate for each teacher: research & development (R&D) GBE or competence-building GBE.

How does GBE work? If yes, If no,

GBE Stage I: Preparation In R & D GBE, the educator forms a research question, either independently or in collaboration with colleagues, then transforms the question into one or more goals.

GBE Stage I: Preparation In competence-building GBE, the administrator brings the specific performance concern(s) to the attention of the teacher and works with the teacher to develop one or more goals that address the concern(s).

GBE Stage II: Collection of Evidence In R & D GBE, the teacher and supervisor determine the appropriate type(s) of evidence that must be collected for each goal. The teacher is responsible for collecting and compiling the evidence.

GBE Stage II: Collection of Evidence In competence-building GBE, evidence is collected in basically the same manner as in SAFE-T, based on the established goal(s). If, for example, the established goal relates to APS 2, the evidence would need to include a unit work sample.

GBE Stage III: Deliberation In R & D GBE, the supervisor reviews and discusses the available evidence with the teacher at least annually. In competence-building GBE, the administrator reviews the evidence at least twice annually.

GBE Stage IV: Judgments In both types of GBE, one of three possible judgments can be rendered relative to each goal: the goal has been met; progress toward meeting the goal is satisfactory; or progress toward meeting the goal has not been made or is unsatisfactory.