Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOING THINGS WITH LANGUAGE
Advertisements

Pragmatics II n Non-Literal Communication. Pragmatics II n Non-Literal Communication n Overstatement: No one understands me. A pig wouldn’t eat this food.
Unit : 22 Perlocution and Illocution.
Conversational Implicature (Based on Paltridge, chapter 3)
Pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS.
Pragmatics A quick summary. Pragmatics and semantics What does X mean? What do you mean by X? –Leech 1983.
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
PRESENTED BY ALLISON HAYASHIDA NAO OGATA KAAN USTUN Culturally Speaking: Face, (Im)Politeness and Rapport by Helen Spencer-Oatey (2008)
Pragmatics November 28, The Light at the End of the Tunnel Today: Syntax homework due! The final homework for the class will be due next Wednesday.
Philosopher J.L.Austin’s book How to do things with words (1962)
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
CAS LX 502 Semantics 12a. Speech acts Ch. 10(3). Conventional sentence types Declarative. (Assertion) Declarative. (Assertion) I seem to have forgotten.
CAS LX 502 7a. Speech acts Ch. 8. How to do things with words Language as a social function. — I bet you $1 you can’t name the Super Tuesday states. —You’re.
Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
1 Introduction to Linguistics II Ling 2-121C, group b Lecture 10 Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006.
ETHNOGAPHY OF COMMUNICATION: SECOND PART
Speech acts and events. Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such.
Speech Acts Lecture 8.
Macropragmatics Speech act theory.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Chapter 7 Pragmatics and discourse analysis. Outline 1. Pragmatics: meaning and contexts 2. Speech act 3. Presupposition 4. Deitics 5. Discourse and Analysis.
SPEECH ACT THEORY J. Austin & J.Searle
PS429 Social and Public Communication PS429 Social and Public Communication Week 4 (25/10/2005) Reading group discussion.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
6.3 Macropragmatics Speech act theory The cooperative principle The politeness principle.
Functions of Speech 1. Expressive 2. Directive 3. Informative (Referential) 4. Metalinguistic 5. Poetic 6. Phatic 7. Heuristic 8. Commissive 9. Performative.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
+ 1. Pragmatics. - What is pragmatics? - Context 2. Speech acts. - direct speech acts - indirect speech acts.
PRAGMATICS A: I have a fourteen year old son B: Well that's all right
Chapter 8 Pragmatics Contents 8.1 Some basic notions 8.2 Speech act theory 8.3 Principle of conversation.
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Practice Examples 1-4. Def: Semantics is the study of Meaning in Language  Definite conclusions Can be arrived at concerning meaning.  Careful thinking.
Chapter 6 Pragmatics. 6.1 Introduction Review of semantics  Meaning in lg.  words Mothervs.Mother-in-law  sentence: in, am, I, T-shirt, today.
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
Your host E. Aminudin Aziz. Austin’s observation on (many or even most) acts realised through speech  People do things with words  The idea sharply.
PROFILING PRAGMATIC ABILITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNERS Marija Kusevska, Biljana Ivanovska, Nina Daskalovska & Liljana Mitkovska; Goce Delcev University-Stip,
Speech Act Theory Mohammad Alipour Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Pragmatics (1) Dr. Ansa Hameed.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect. Sentence Structure Sentences can be classified based on the structures into: Declarative sentence Declarative.
Speech Act Theory Instructor: Dr Khader Khader.  Outline:  How Speech Act Theory began  What is the theory about  Levels of performing speech acts.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Discourse and Pragmatics Speech Acts Lecture 4: Paltridge, pp
Direct and indirect speech acts
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
PERLOCUTIONS AND ILLOCUTIONS
PRAGMATICS Prof. R. S. Pale
SPEECH ACT AND EVENTS By Ive Emaliana
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Three Kinds of Act.
A Streetcar Named Desire
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect.
Speech Acts.
Welcome back!.
Pragmatics.
Discourse and Pragmatics
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS 6.1 Speech Acts 6.2 IFIDS 6.3 Felicity Conditions 6.4 The Performative Hypothesis 6.5 Speech Act Classifications 6.6 Direct and.
Week 9 language in context
Literature review 2 University of Nizwa, 2016.
Pragmatics.
The study of meaning in context
Pragmatics.
Discourse And Pragmatics
Direct and indirect speech acts
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory

What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making requests, suggestions -Offering advice, opinions -Taking orders, taking advice --> These are “Speech Acts”

Propositional Content/ Illocutionary Force Literal meaning of utterance “It’s cold in here” “There’s food in the fridge” “Thank you for not smoking” Aim, intention of utterance Offering Promising Enquiring Requesting Exclaiming in pain Ordering

Three Kinds of Act Locutionary Illocutionary Perlocutionary  Actual, literal meaning  Speaker’s intentions in uttering  Effect on receiver’s thought or action

Illocutionary Acts Depend on … Form Content Context E.g. Possible illocutionary force of ‘Oh’, ‘Yes’ or ‘Hello’ … Can be spread over several sentences …Two or more can coexist in one utterance

Sentence Structure and Language Function Interrogative Declarative Imperative Elicits information Conveys information Issues an order

Direct/ Indirect Speech Acts We don’t always mean what we say We don’t always intend what is expressed by the literal meaning (implicature, irony) Modality e.g. ‘can’ Indirect Speech Acts: “There’s beer in the fridge” “Can I help you?” “I’ll take six lemons” “Nice haircut!”

Direct/ Indirect Requests Brainstorm with a partner how many ways you can think of to request someone to take the rubbish out. (3 mins!)

Direct/ Indirect Requests Please take out the rubbish I request you to take out the trash Trash out now! The garbage isn’t out yet Could you take out the garbage? Who’s doing the trash this week? Are you in charge of the waste? The wastepaper needs emptying

Politeness and Indirectness “I was wondering if you’d like to go to a movie” “Would you mind closing the door?” “Would I be able to borrow some paper?” “What was your name again?”

Performative Verbs I guess you’re from China I bet Roddick’s gonna win I now pronounce you man and wife Promise!

Felicity Conditions -“Right person, place and time” -Successful performative Speech acts need... a social construct (Priest, Queen, Judge, police) appropriate circumstances A speaker with authority Correct procedure and response Speakers with sincere thoughts/ intentions

Cross Cultural Pragmatics and Pragmalinguistics/ Sociopragmatics Across cultures, meaning behind a speech act can vary, e.g. status of the ‘apology’, force of the ‘complaint’, cultural content of ‘requests, questioning styles, ways of giving advice Utterances have local, sociopragmatic conditions There are culturally distinct ways of showing and understanding speech acts (Wierzbicka, 1991)

Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure Due to: -L2 speaker assessing situational factors on the basis of sociopragmatic norms of L1, e.g. Japanese over-apologizing, students misunderstanding the role of the teacher -L2 speaker transferring procedure and linguistic way of realising a speech act from L1 to L2, e.g. complaining, bartering  Difference between meaning and saying

Think …. Have you ever experienced Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure? Describe it and analyse it in terms of ‘saying’ and ‘meaning’

Reference Slides adapted from Brian Paltridge (2002). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis, AEE: Gold Coast. ‘Speech Act Theory’, pp