Outcomes based education:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

Indian Institute of Remote Sensing Indian Space Research Organisation Dehradun Challenges in Capacity Building in Remote Sensing & GIS P. S. Roy
OverviewOverview – Preparation – Day in the Life – Earnings – Employment – Career Path Forecast – ResourcesPreparationDay in the LifeEarningsEmploymentCareer.
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Educating for a Sustainable Future – Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge The EE BOK Working Group Debbie Reinhart, PhD, PE, BCEE University of.
National Academic Reference Standards
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Information Literacy Demonstration – Partnership of Faculty and Library Gergana Georgieva Information Literacy Librarian August 25, 2008.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
1 Positive Learning Outcomes Through Problem-Based Learning Willie Yip Department of Computing.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
A. ABET Update i. Overview of documents submitted to ABET (Self-Study) EWRE Retreat 8/2/2005 ii. What we need to do between now and ABET visit in November.
Assessment: Engineering Laboratories Jim Henry, Ph.D., P.E. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Southeastern Section ASEE, 2002 Gainesville, FL.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
ABET Introduction of ABET to CE 203 Tim Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
What is ABET Accreditation and Why Should I Care?
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
Assessment Report Department of Environmental Science and Biology School of Sciences and Mathematics Chair: Christopher Norment Assessment Coordinator:
Career Opportunities in Statistics John Borkowski Montana State University Panel Discussion Pattaya Conference on Statistics Pattaya, Thailand.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
Environmental Engineering Curriculum Evolution and Future Directions James Kilduff and Sim Komisar Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colloquium.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
Bachelor’s Program in CIVIL ENGINEERING Duration of Studies: 8 terms Academic Degree to be Awarded Bachelor of Civil Engineering.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
ABET Accreditation Process Chemical Engineering Department Prof. Emad Ali.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Use of Surveys N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
A Software Engineering Model Based Curriculum Development Approach Leon Pan University of the Fraser Valley.
Sachchida Tripathi Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Indian experiences in interdisciplinary curricula.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Engaging Students in Different Course Formats: Teaching small classes & labs Shivanthi Anandan, Ph.D. Department of Biology and Drexel Center for Academic.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Outcome Based Education
Energy Management and Planning MSJ0210
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes based education: EnvE Outcomes based education: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Benno Rahardyan Environmental Engineering Study Program Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering Institut Teknologi Bandung

Goals Faculty efficiency and efficacy Improved student learning Knowledge Skills Attitudes Behavior Improved learning environments Accountability Accreditation

*EnvE

The Process of Continuous Improvement* *EnvE

Continuous Improvement Action Process Outcomes Course Assessment Course Questionnaire Exit Survey Employer Average a. Scientific Expertise 2.36 3.30 2.92 3.35 2.98 b. Experimental skill 2.62 3.28 3.06 3.18 3.17 c. Design Abilities 2.28 3.36 3.02 3.09 2.94 d. Teamwork 2.49 2.84 2.71 e. Problem Solving 2.54 3.73 2.99 3.22 3.31 f. Professional Responsibility  2.86 3.38 g. Communication Skill 2.93 3.54 3.04 3.27 h. Understanding of Engineering Impact 2.73 2.46 2.77 i. Long life Learning  2.85 2.47 3.50 3.08 j. Contemporary Issues 2.35 2.96 2.88 2.86 k. Technical Know-how 2.55 2.05 3.11 2.72

Performance Indicator Continuous Improvement Action Process 1 2 3 4 Student Outcome Performance Indicator 1-under expectation 2-below average 3-meet expectation 4-exceed expectation An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. Proficient in mathematics through differential equations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, general chemistry, relevant to the program study (earth science, biological science, fluid mechanics) 1. Describe mathematical, physical, chemical and biological relations for given facts/occurences in environmental engineering. Student can not describe and can not see any relation Student can describe but can not see any relation Student can describe and can see the relation Student can describe, see the relation and extend the potential impact of problem   2. Recognize basic engineering problems, identify the data, and classify the related knowledge for solution Student can not recognize, identity and classify the related knowledge of solution Student can recognize, but can not identity or classify the related knowledge of solution Student can recognize, identity and classify the related knowledge of solution Student can recognize, identity, classify the related knowledge of solution and also mention update invention. 3. Demonstrate application of differential equation, statistic, probability, calculus-based physics, general chemistry and other relevant science to solve the problem Student can not demonstrate solution of given problem Student can only mention several solutions without solving the given problem Student can demonstrate application to solve the given problem Student can demonstrate application to solve the given problem and also explain the interpretation of solution. Outcome A (EXAMPLE)

Comparison of Outcomes Measurements Student Outcome Assessment results Comparison of Outcomes Assessment Results Comparison of Outcomes Measurements Attainment standard of 3.00 Area of Improvement Area of Improvement Area of Improvement

Comparison of Outcomes Assessment Results Student Outcome Assessment results Comparison of Outcomes Assessment Results Comparison of Outcomes Measurement Results (2012 Data) Outcomes Course Assessment Course Questionnaire Exit Survey Employer Average a. Scientific Expertise 2.36 3.30 2.92 3.35 2.98 b. Experimental skill 2.62 3.28 3.06 3.18 3.17 c. Design Abilities 2.28 3.36 3.02 3.09 2.94 d. Teamwork 2.49 2.84 2.71 e. Problem Solving 2.54 3.73 2.99 3.22 3.31 f. Professional Responsibility  2.86 3.38 g. Communication Skill 2.93 3.54 3.04 3.27 h. Understanding of Engineering Impact 2.73 2.46 2.77 i. Long life Learning  2.85 2.47 3.50 3.08 j. Contemporary Issues 2.35 2.96 2.88 2.86 k. Technical Know-how 2.55 2.05 3.11 2.72

Closing the loop •What do the findings tell us now? •Did our “treatment” improve learning? •What else do the findings show? •What’s the next step? •What have we learned about our assessment process? Infrastructure? What can be improved?

ITB: Exit survey (Directorate of Education) Alumni survey (Career Center) User survey (Career Center)

Continuous Improvement Outcomes Assessment and Improvement Plan* Outcomes 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 d. Teamwork * 2018 Curriculum Preparation g. Communication Skill j. Contemporary Issues a. Scientific Expertise h. Understanding of Engineering Impact k. Technical Know-How f. Professional Responsibility i. Life-long Learning b. Experimental Skill c. Design Abilities e. Problem Solving Note: spesific observation scientific expertise: TL2101 Fluid Mechanics I, TL2104 Engineering Mathematics, TL2201 Fluid Mechanics II, TL2202 Environmental Chemistry, TL2203 Environmental Microbiology experimental skill: TL3103 Environmental Laboratory design abilities: TL3105 Water Supply Engineering,TL3202 Drainage & Sewerage,TL4101 Water Treatment Plant Design, TL4102 Wastewater Treatment Plant Design Teamwork: TL4201 Environmental Impact Assessment, TL4202 Project Planning Problem Solving: TL3101 Unit Operation, TL3102 Unit Processes, TL3203 Water Management Professional Responsibility: TL4098 Field Work Communication Skill: TL4098 Field Work, TL4099 Seminar and Final Task Understanding of Engineering Impact: TL2105 Environmental Health, TL2205 Environmental Epidemiology TL4201 Environmental Impact Assessment Long life Learning: TL4099 Seminar and Final Task Contemporary Issues: TL3104 Solid Waste Management, TL3201 Air Pollution, TL4103 Air Pollution Control Technical Know-how: TL2103 Engineering Drawing , TL3103 Environmental Laboratory *EnvE

Optimizing assessment of student work Daina Briedis, 2013

OUTCOMES IMPROVEMENT PLAN Program Outcomes Courses Improvement a. Scientific Expertise Action: maintain Quiz Assignment Book preparation Reading textbook material up dating Laboratory improvement b. Experimental skill   Action : maintain Field trip Guest lecturer c. Design Abilities    Better assignment Collaborative Learning Course Benchmarking Course Relevance Improvement Curriculum Development Evaluation General Indicators Faculty Capacity Building Improvement Students Project Improving Scientific Expertise Maintaining Class Attendance Maintaining Learning Process Performance Training ABET Accreditation

OUTCOMES IMPROVEMENT PLAN Program Outcomes Courses Improvement Long life Learning   Environmental Epidemiology Air Pollution Control Seminar and Final Task Action : maintain Note taking Problem based learning type assignment Collaborative learning type assignment Student centered learning collaborative learning j. Contemporary Issues Engineering Drawing Environmental Health Solid waste Management More case studies of problem Content enrinchment k. Technical Know-how Engineering Mathematics Unit Process Water Treatment Plant Design Air Pollution Monitoring Audio visual content Supporting equipment Laboratory improvement Availability of facility. ABET Accreditation

CURRENT STATUS POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION Priority/Representing Courses CURRENT STATUS POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT scientific expertise: TL2101 Fluid Mechanics I, TL2104 Engineering Mathematics, TL2201 Fluid Mechanics II, TL2202 Environmental Chemistry, TL2203 Environmental Microbiology experimental skill: TL3103 Environmental Laboratory design abilities: TL3105 Water Supply Engineering,TL3202 Drainage & Sewerage,TL4101 Water Treatment Plant Design, TL4102 Wastewater Treatment Plant Design Teamwork: TL4201 Environmental Impact Assessment, TL4202 Project Planning Problem Solving: TL3101 Unit Operation, TL3102 Unit Processes, TL3203 Water Management Professional Responsibility: TL4098 Field Work Communication Skill: TL4098 Field Work, TL4099 Seminar and Final Task Understanding of Engineering Impact: TL2105 Environmental Health, TL2205 Environmental Epidemiology TL4201 Environmental Impact Assessment Long life Learning: TL4099 Seminar and Final Task Contemporary Issues: TL3104 Solid Waste Management, TL3201 Air Pollution, TL4103 Air Pollution Control Technical Know-how: TL2103 Engineering Drawing , TL3103 Environmental Laboratory Outcome-related Courses

Course Assessment Plans for Improving Outcomes

IMPROVEMENT Course Portfolio + Lab development C.2 Learning Process Improvement C2.1 Maintaining Class Attendance C2.2 Maintaining Learning Process Performance C.3 Academic Atmosphere Improvement C.4 Course Relevance Improvement C.5 Advising Improvement C.6 Teaching Method Improvement-Improving Soft Skills C.6.1 Faculty Capacity Building C.6.2 Implementation of teaching method improvement C.6.3 Improvement of Communication Skill C.7 Improving Scientific Expertise C.7.1 International Guest Lecture Series C.7.2 Environmental Engineering Seminars Series CURRENT STATUS POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT

Portofolio online Metode Perkuliahan Metode Evaluasi Sistem Penilaian Uraian terhadap Hasil Kuesioner dan Statistik Kelas Refleksi Pelaksanaan Perkuliahan Rencana Tindak Lanjut

Courses Weakness and Improvement action Continuous Improvement Weakness Evaluation and Improvement action Courses Weakness and Improvement action

Continuous Improvement The Result of Weakness Evaluation Related to Outcomes a) through d) Outcome Weakness Evaluation (Improvement plan) a. Scientific Expertise Generally, students understanding about course material is less than 75% Students still have difficulty to obtain literatures relevant with the course The class room facilities cannot optimally support the learning atmosphere. Method of teaching, improved supporting facilities, b. Experimental skill Lack of modern laboratory equipment and very limited in number Some of the laboratories are not clean and tidy enough Students are less accustomed to perform experiments independently Maintained c. Design Abilities The opportunity to practice about good design is still limited Students are lack of knowledge about the design process d. Teamwork The students have not been able to communicate effectively Increased opportunities in rehearse of team work, collaborative learning

Continuous Improvement The Result of Weakness Evaluation Related to Outcomes e) through k) Outcome Weakness Evaluation (Improvement plan) e. Problem Solving The students do not understand the learning material integrally Maintained f. Professional Responsibility Students having lack knowledge about environmental engineering professionalism g. Communication Skill Students are not used to state their opinion well Increased opportunities in group work presentations, collaborative learning h. Understanding of Engineering Impact Students’ knowledges on environmental engineering application are limited Introduction of more Guest lectures in the courses, site visits i. Long life Learning j. Contemporary Issues Students awareness about environmental related issues are low Students too much focusing on learning environmental engineering academically Guest lectures and site visits k. Technical Know-how Students’ knowledge and understanding about the engineering tools usage are low Students do not understand the engineering tools application More workshop sessions

Continuous Improvement Activities of Continuous Improvement Lab development C.2 Learning Process Improvement C2.1 Maintaining Class Attendance C2.2 Maintaining Learning Process Performance C.3 Academic Atmosphere Improvement C.4 Course Relevance Improvement C.5 Advising Improvement C.6 Teaching Method Improvement-Improving Soft Skills C.6.1 Faculty Capacity Building C.6.2 Implementation of teaching method improvement C.6.3 Improvement of Communication Skill C.7 Improving Scientific Expertise C.7.1 International Guest Lecture Series C.7.2 Environmental Engineering Seminars Series

Continuous Improvement Activities of Continuous Improvement C.8 Improving Contemporary Issues and Access to Modern Tools C.8.1 Invited Speakers C.8.2 Field Trips C.8.3. Field Work Student Activity C.8.4Training C.8.5 Laboratories Visit C.9 Students Competition C.9.1. Internal Student Competition C.9.2. External Student Competition C.10 Improvement of Evaluation Method C.10.1 Improvement of Course Portfolio C.10.2 Course Benchmarking C.10.3 Evaluation General Indicators C.11Curriculum Development C.12 Improvement Students Project

Continuous Improvement Course Z Prev Year Year-0 Year-1 ... Activities of Continuous Improvement Lab development C.2 Learning Process Improvement C2.1 Maintaining Class Attendance C2.2 Maintaining Learning Process Performance C.3 Academic Atmosphere Improvement C.4 Course Relevance Improvement C.5 Advising Improvement C.6 Teaching Method Improvement-Improving Soft Skills C.6.1 Faculty Capacity Building C.6.2 Implementation of teaching method improvement C.6.3 Improvement of Communication Skill C.7 Improving Scientific Expertise C.7.1 International Guest Lecture Series C.7.2 Environmental Engineering Seminars Series √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ - √ √ EXAMPLE √ √ √ √ √ √ - √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Continuous Improvement Course Z Prev Year Year-0 Year-1 ... Activities of Continuous Improvement C.8 Improving Contemporary Issues and Access to Modern Tools C.8.1 Invited Speakers C.8.2 Field Trips C.8.3. Field Work Student Activity C.8.4Training C.8.5 Laboratories Visit C.9 Students Competition C.9.1. Internal Student Competition C.9.2. External Student Competition C.10 Improvement of Evaluation Method C.10.1 Improvement of Course Portfolio C.10.2 Course Benchmarking C.10.3 Evaluation General Indicators C.11Curriculum Development C.12 Improvement Students Project √ √ √ √ √ √ - - √ - √ √ - √ √

EXAMPLE OUTCOME G Continuous Improvement Teaching Method Improvement-Improving Soft Skills Improvement of Communication Skill Year Writing skills Presentation skills Moderator Questions Paper Summary Slide Poster Oral presentation -2005 Indonesian - Ind 2005 Eng. 2006 Ind.&Eng Eng (optional) 2007 2008 Eng (obligatory) 2009 2010 Process-oriented Improvement Improvement in Final Project Seminar EXAMPLE OUTCOME G Result/Output-oriented Improvement English Proficiency Score (predicting TOEFL score)

Recommendation summary General improvement scheme Feedback information delivery General continuous improvement schedule Improvement online portfolio Program development General improvement action