Www.usask.ca Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the Heart of Academic Culture Patti McDougall, Vice Provost Teaching and Learning April 30 th, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is SoTL good for faculty professional development?
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
1 Accreditation and the First-Year Experience Kay H. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for the Academic Experience College of Charleston.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Building our Future: The First 100 Days A presentation and summary of survey responses and emerging themes.
SCHOOL OF HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS STRATEGIC PLAN 2003 DRAFT.
 Sets overall direction for the University  Identifies institutional distinctiveness and comparative advantages.  Identifies strategic “best fit” with.
Research Assessment Exercise 2006 University Grants Committee.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
UNIVERSITY OF FORT HARE PRESENTATION ON THE ORGANISATION AND OFFERINGS OF THE CURRENT AND FUTURE FACULTY OF EDUCATION Pinkie Mdaka and Lulu Kahla.
Nancy Brattain Rogers Linda Maule Greg Bierly.  The development of collaborative partnerships between education, business, social services, and government.
Documenting Scholarship in Clinical Teaching Eileen Herteis Programme Director Gwenna Moss Teaching & Learning Centre.
Community Engagement: A Continuum from Outreach to Engagement
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Creating Our Future: UConn’s Path to Excellence Open Forum March 26, 2014.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Service-Learning Course Design for Community Colleges: Using the Text for Improved Service-Learning Practice and Outcomes Campus Compact 2007.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
TODAY AND TOMORROW University of Houston- Downtown Strategic Plan Highlights.
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Institutional Snapshot Undergraduate students: 10,346 Graduate students: 543 International students: 141 Multicultural students: 630 Faculty and academic.
Strategic Plan Presentation to Faculty & Staff Spring 2006.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Office of Academic Affairs January 12, 2007 Confirming Portland State’s Leadership Position and Defining Academic Priorities Campus Symposium 2007.
 Traditional View of Excellence Research funding- whatever the topic Number of Doctoral Degree Programs Selectivity Invention/discoveries Size International.
Community Service-Learning: Design, Implementation and Evaluation Cheryl Rose, Canadian Association for Community Service-Learning.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Alan Barnard & Robyn Nash. A funded two phase design project across 4 universities to develop, implement and systematically embed a culture of Peer Review.
Summer Workshop for Tenure Track Faculty University of Maryland Extension August 5 and 10, 2009.
How to pursue scholarship through your Daily Academic Work?
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Student Success: Learning & Engagement DIVISIONAL COUNCILS Fall 2010.
What is and what should be considered a SoTL Output? 23 February 2015 Professor Patrick Crookes WATTLE THINK TANK.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Undergraduate Experiential Inquiry and Research at Rice.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Doctoral Program Orientation
Reflecting upon and using a taxonomy of teaching and learning practices PROFESSOR PATRICK CROOKES National Head of School School of Nursing, Midwifery.
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Eve Lewis Director.
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
2020 Strategic Planning Search Conference
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Engaging Institutional Leadership
February 21-22, 2018.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Developing a Vision of Teaching and Learning for 2025: Lessons Learned
PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE IN SoTL
Presentation transcript:

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the Heart of Academic Culture Patti McDougall, Vice Provost Teaching and Learning April 30 th, 2013

My intentions  Path to developing and implementing a vision for the scholarship of teaching + learning (SoTL)  Set down aspirations  Talk about successful practices

Vision statement  In 5 years time… The SoTL becomes a vital and highly regarded component of the research mission at the University of Saskatchewan. The SoTL is integral to developing and delivering on excellence in education quality and will be rooted in our academic ethos and practice.

Defining SoTL  Study of curriculum and pedagogy  Understanding student learning + enhancing quality of learning experiences  Assessing effective practices  Opportunities for dissemination to broader community

Core characteristics of SoTL  Being public  Being open to critique and evaluation  Being in a form that others can build on Hutchings & Shulman (1999)

Fit within a research-intensive environment  Why? Complex and rapidly changing Student diversity Growing course and program offerings Use of technology to expand classroom borders Rising demands for institutional accountability Hubball, Pearson, Clarke, 2013

Fit within a research-intensive environment  Individual benefits: Strengthen individual practice Teaching … intellectually engaging, energizing Teaching becomes less solitary Hutchings, Huber, & Ciccone, 2011

Fit within a research-intensive environment  Institutional benefits: Investing in capacity Improve faculty development Enhanced learning experiences Evidenced-informed approach to quality Advance institutional agendas Catalyst for change Enhanced reputation Bernstein, 2013; Hutchings et al., 2011

Assessing our starting point  Wuetherick et al. (summer of 2012) 247 faculty members 37 staff members 16% of tenure-streamed faculty complement

Assessing our starting point  70% responded to e-survey 47% less than ¼ of scholarly work 27% half or more of scholarly work

Trigwell’s levels – UofS SoTL activity Level 1 (in-house; non-PR) 48% Level 2 (PR; inside discipline) 28% Level 3 (PR; higher ed) 24% Assessing starting point at UofS

Think, Pair, Share 1. What is the greatest barrier to increasing high quality SoTL work on a campus? 2. How might we overcome this barrier?

Cultivating activity + excellence in SoTL  Igniting people’s passion for teaching Need not be the route for everyone Outside the comfort zone for at least some

Making it easier…  Offering resources (building capacity) People Background resources Financial resources Cultivating activity + excellence

Making it valuable …  Teaching as scholarly work  Rigour, quality, visibility Standards for scholarly work Cultivating activity + excellence

Scholarly standards Clear Goals Adequate Preparation Appropriate Methods Significant Results Effective Presentation Reflective Critique Cultivating activity + excellence Glassick, Huber, & Maerof, 1997

Making it valuable …  Showcase/honour the activity Creating a space – directory, posting results Conferences High profile collaborations Cultivating activity + excellence

Making it valuable …  Educating decision makers Necessary and appropriate standards (e.g., tenure) Where does SoTL fit? Teaching? Research? Service? Making one’s case Clearly inside system and not under radar Moving this forward Cultivating activity + excellence

Identifying and building strength  Leaders and champions  Identifying focal areas of research Cultivating activity + excellence

Focal areas at the UofS - contenders Aboriginal Education/Indigenous Pedagogies Experiential Learning Community Service Learning; Undergraduate Research Distributed Learning (instructional approaches) Cultivating activity + excellence

Identifying and building strength  Creating groups and communities of scholars Multi/Interdisciplinary teams Communities of Practice Effectively translating research into practice Cultivating activity + excellence

Pathways to success  Ensuring the SoTL is part of the larger shared agenda for student learning and success  Leadership, creativity, flexibility