Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
Advertisements

KATIE IRELAND, ANDY HANSEN, AND BEN POULTER Modeling Vegetation Dynamics with LPJ-GUESS.
Figure 3. Outlines of the study with links between different components used. The figure presents the main inputs and outputs from the model used (Glob3PG)
Introduction to Wildland Fire Behavior
Modeling Lime Kilns in Pulp and Paper Mills Process Simulations Ltd. #206, 2386 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 23, 2006.
The paper deals with the reconstruction of the forest fire in The Slovensky Raj National Park in the year Program system FARSITE has been used for.
Spatial Fire Management System
Examining fire spread patterns across a managed forest-land mosaic in northern Wisconsin, USA using a modeling approach Jacob LaCroix, Daolan Zheng, Soung-Ryoul.
Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental.
Fred X. Turck Before striking the match!. The energy flow for combustion is reverse to that for photosynthesis. CHEMISTRY 101.
The Combustion Process. OXYGEN HEAT FUEL THE FIRE TRIANGLE FIRE combustion What basic elements are needed for fire to occur?
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
Fire regimes and the World’s biomes 23 September 2010.
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Duncan Lutes Systems for Environmental Management Bob Keane – USFS – Research Ecologist, P.I. Carl Key – USGS – Geographer John Caratti – SEM – Systems.
Wildland Fire Today and in the Coming Decades: What Might We Expect? Scott Stephens ESPM - Division of Forest Science University of California, Berkeley.
Raster models in GIS What is GIS modelingWhat is GIS modeling Why GIS modeling Why GIS modeling Raster models Raster models Binary models Binary models.
National Fire Danger Rating System. NFDRS Basics Indicator of worst case fire danger Five danger classes –Low, moderate, high, very high, extreme Describes.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
EXPECTATIONS -FS Training course for FARSITE is 60hrs long. -It's own software separate from ArcGIS with it's own quirks and limitations. -Two week lab.
The Coeur d'Alene Tribe is learning the remote sensing methodology developed by LANDFIRE, and will be attempting to apply the methods to higher resolution.
BlueSky Implementation in CANSAC Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006 Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin.
Fire Weather: Temperature & Moisture. Weather and the Earth’s Heat Balance Weather = motion in the atmosphere due to unequal heating Over time, the amount.
Advance the understanding and the prediction of mesoscale precipitation systems and to promote closer ties between the research and operational forecasting.
Mark Finney, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT.
Nancy HF French, Don McKenzie, Tyler Erickson Poster # 301 with on-line demo – Wednesday Development and use of the Wildland Fire Emissions.
System and Data Requirements for Fire and Air Planning Janice Peterson.
LAND MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE TO FIRE Dr. Stephen Bunting and Lovina Roselle Rangeland Center, University of Idaho.
Forest Fire Simulation - Principles, Models and Application
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
FVS Carbon Reporting Using the Forest Vegetation Simulator USDA Forest Service Forest Management Service Center Forest Vegetation Simulator staff.
Oct-03Learning to Use FOFEM 5: Advanced Lesson Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management Learning to Use FOFEM 5 Volume II:
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Fire Ecology and Fire Regimes in Boreal Ecosystems Oct 19, 2010.
A 2012 NASA-CMS Phase 2 study Lead Investigators: Nancy HF French, MTRI Don McKenzie, US Forest Service, PNW, FERA Eric Kasischke, University.
Fire and Fuels 8/31/2010. OXYGEN HEAT FUEL THE FIRE TRIANGLE FIRE.
WRAP Fire Emissions Meeting 5 December 2002 Community Smoke Emissions Model WRAP Fire Emissions Forum Meeting December 2002 Douglas Fox Cooperative Institute.
Map Units for LANDFIRE: Integrating Vegetation Classification and Map Legends.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
Heat Treatment Calculator (H.T.C) Sham Kashyap Computing and Information Sciences Kansas State University.
Computerized Tillage System Calculator Jake Walker, Aaron Weinhold, Adam Duff Spring, 2004 Objectives: Determine if the ASAE fuel consumption equation.
8-1 MFIRS 8 Wildland Fire Module. 8-2 Optional Wildland Fire Module The State Fire Marshal will accept this data… Currently this module does not replace.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Air Quality Effects of Prescribed Fires Simulated with CMAQ Yongqiang Liu, Gary Achtemeier, and Scott Goodrick Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 320 Green.
‘Fire’: The Procedural Method Investigation of Procedural Trees and Fire:
Setting Fire to CIS - or- Small Scale Combustion Chamber and Instrumentation Dave Pogorzala Bob Kremens, PhD, Advisor Center For Imaging Science Rochester.
Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon.
Mechanical fuels reduction treatments effects on fire behavior, fuel loads, and forest ecology Osceola National Forest Sept. 28 th, 2011 Sponsors: Conserved.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN THERMAL UTILITIES AND SYSTEM
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Week 9.  Would you live in an area prone to wildfires? If so, where?  What level of risk from wildfires is acceptable to you? (How would you know if.
Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice
Roger Ottmar Research Forester Fire and Environmental Research Applications Team Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory USDA Forest Service Research—PNW.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
USING THE FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR TO MODEL STAND DYNAMICS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION OF CHANGING CLIMATE Climate-FVS Version 0.1 Developed by : Nicholas.
S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Fire Effects Monitoring Lesson 2: Methods for Measuring Fire Effects Photo: Marshel Moy.
Combustion Control based on Flame Ionization Application in Condensing Heating Appliances by: Martin Kiefer 07 June 2012 Venue: EF5.B: WOC5 Gas Quality.
Prescribed Fire in the Forest Ecosystem FORS 5610 / 7610 Location: Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center For more information: Dr. Pete Bettinger.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
Crown Fire Methods LaWen Hollingsworth Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire Modeling Institute Missoula, MT Sharing Fire Behavior Practices and Lessons.
Unit 6: Prescribed Burning
Unit 6: Prescribed Burning
Basic Fire Behavior Walt Thomson
Unit 1 - Basic Concepts of Wildland Fire
Models of emissions from savannas
Presentation transcript:

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5 is… A computer system to calculate first-order fire effects from simple inputs. A Windows program with a graphical user- interface; also has a batch mode A fire effects calculator that can be linked to GIS First order fire effects are the immediate consequences of fire, whether direct or indirect.

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5 contains… scientific information from many research studies heuristic information to bridge gaps and to select best data and equations an extensive set of default inputs

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5 applies in… Most U.S. forest types Some rangeland vegetation types Areas managed by different agencies

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5 is used for… Conducting environmental assessments Developing fire and silvicultural prescriptions Assessing fire severity

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5 predicts… Fuel consumption Smoke production Tree mortality Soil heating

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Fuel consumption FOFEM 5 predicts consumption of… –Duff and litter –Surface woody fuels by size class, sound and rotten –Live fuels and canopy fuels FOFEM 5 uses Burnup, a theoretical model for predicting woody fuel consumption

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Fuel consumption Duff and live fuel consumption are predicted using rules and regression equations based on –cover type –region –moisture –season. BURNUP predicts woody fuel consumption by simulating –heat transfer between fuel particles –combustion rate –resulting fire intensity

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Fuel consumption Inputs needed: –Fuel load by size class –Fuel moisture Outputs generated: –Fuel consumption by size class –Post-burn fuel load

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Smoke production Predicts fuel consumption rate, emission production rate, and fire intensity over time for both surface and crown fires Simulates the proportion of flaming and smoldering combustion –Combustion efficiency and emission factors vary with fuels and moisture. Estimates production of PM 10, PM 2.5, CO, CO 2, CH 4, NO x, SO x

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Smoke production Smoke production is estimated by multiplying fuel consumption by emissions factors –FOFEM uses separate emissions factors for flaming and smoldering combustion –Flaming and smoldering combustion can occur simultaneously, in relative amounts depending on fuel moisture, fuel particle size class, and fire intensity. –Emission production is estimated in time intervals from ignition until combustion ceases.

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Smoke production Inputs needed: –Fuel load by size class –Fuel moisture Outputs generated: –Smoke production over time for each emission species –Combustion efficiency and emission factors

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Tree mortality by species and size 207 tree species fire behavior must be input by user

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Tree mortality Mortality predicted from bark thickness and crown scorch Species influences mortality only through bark thickness –FOFEM estimates bark thickness from species and diameter. FOFEM’s mortality algorithm has been found to be robust in independent tests –Does not account for season of burn, post-burn insect attack, drought, or differences in burn duration.

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Tree mortality Inputs needed: –Tree species, dbh, height, crown ratio –Fire intensity (flame length or scorch height) Outputs generated: –Probability of mortality –Post-fire stand table

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Soil heating Soil heating model – predicts time, temperature, depth profiles

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Soil heating If a duff layer is present –Unconsumed duff is an insulator –Consumed duff is a heat source If a duff layer is not present –Heat from the surface fire drives soil heating

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Soil heating Interpreting soil heating output

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Soil heating Inputs needed: –Surface fuel load by size class –fuel moisture content –Soil texture and moisture content Outputs generated: –Soil temperatures at a range of depths over time –Depth to 60 C and 275 C

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Strengths Simple, easy to learn and use Can be used for a variety of purposes Accommodates variable level of input detail Expandable structure Uses heuristic information to bridge research gaps

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Collaboration Fuel consumption: Mark Finney and Frank Albini helped implement Burnup calculations and post-frontal emissions. Smoke production: Ann Acheson and Mark Schaaf helped design smoke module Soil heating: Roger Hungerford and Dan Jimenez helped implement the soil heating model

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: Acknowledgements James K. Brown (retired) conceived the FOFEM concept. FOFEM 5 was developed by Elizabeth D. Reinhardt and Robert E. Keane, Missoula Fire Sciences Lab. Computer programming by Larry Gangi, Systems for Environmental Management, Missoula, Montana. Roger Ottmar, PNW research station, helped allow the use of FCC’s as a fuel input alternative. Duncan Lutes, Systems for Environmental Management, assisted with assignment of fuel and tree parameters. Ecosystem classification and default fuel loadings were developed by Scott Mincemoyer, Missoula Fire Sciences Lab.

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview FOFEM 5: more information See the FOFEM 5 website at for more information and to download the software

Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview