New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 08/09 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NRS Liaison for NYS.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.

Advertisements

Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability April 2014.

Complete College OCCC OCCC Course Success Overview Office of Institutional Effectiveness September 18, 2013 Presentation By: Matt Eastwood

State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.

FY Performance Enrollment & Academic Performance GED ® Graduates GED ® Graduates GED ® Graduates Transitioning to Postsecondary.

Evaluation Learning Community New York’s Team: Robert Purga, ACCES Adult Education Venu Thelakkat, ASISTS James Matt, RAEN Marisa Boomhower, Accountability.

PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.

Central Southern Tier RAEN July 17,  Goal Setting Targets are removed from Report Card and Program Evaluation Reports 10 points.

Overview and Discussion of NRS Changes. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2 NRS Changes for FY13 AGENDA  Review changes.

2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.

New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 12/13 Presented by: Rosemary Matt.

New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 10/11 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.

ASISTS Data Roundtable – CST Program Manager training March 20, 2012 Latest updates & reports.

State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.

2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.

LACES Cohorts. Cohort #1: Enter Employment The most important thing to remember regarding employment cohorts for 12/13 is that most of the employment.

State Directors Conference Boise, ID, March 4, 2013 Cesar D’Agord Regional Resource Center Program WRRC – Western Region.

Arkansas State Report Card Are We 5 th or 48 th ? February 21, 2013 Arkansas House Education Committee.

January  Our original research question(s) began as: ◦ For students meeting the criteria for NRS inclusion who were pre and post-tested, what appears,

The Vocational Training System in the United States Thomas Bailey Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University And Peter Berg.

A Survival Guide 13/23/2010.  Today’s Presentation  Presenters & Support Personnel  Handouts  Questions  Follow-Up School Visits 3/23/

1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.

Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.

Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.

NRS Changes & Implications Central Southern Tier RAEN December 14, 2012.

School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.

Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.

FY14 NRS, Updates and Reminders Technical College System of Georgia Office of Adult Education Intake Assessment Form ■ Assessment Policy ■ National Reporting.

Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.

PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.

March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.

Henry County E 2 : Economics & Education March 28, Examine the Data for Education in Georgia 2Economic Impact of Georgia Non-Graduates 3Strengthening.

FY13 National Reporting System (NRS) Changes Technical College System of Georgia Office of Adult Education As required by the National Reporting System.

NRS and MABLE Changes July 1, new data fields for students Highest Credential Achieved Education Location – U.S. or non U.S. Diploma at Entry?

Technical Assistance Workshop Office of Adult Education January 16,

ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.

New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 09/10 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.

Arkansas State Report Card Are We 5 th or 49 th ? July 8, 2013 Arkansas Rural Ed Association.

Chapter 3 Percentiles. Standard Scores A standard score is a score derived from raw data and has a known basis for comparison. A standard score is a score.

Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.

New York State’s Report Card Summary.  Evaluated in TWO Methods NYS Benchmarks Quartile Ranked Educational Gain = 46% Post Test Rate = 65% Follow Up.

MEASURING GROWTH IN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: How Will We Compare Apples to Potatoes? Janet Stephenson School Improvement Resource Teacher 1.

Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.

Understanding the National Reporting System Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability NRS.

New York State Report Cards Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability

Rosemary Matt Director of Accountability for Adult Education.

NYS by the Numbers - The 2016 Statistical Picture.

Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.

February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations

Rosemary Matt NYS Accountability

Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score

What is “Annual Determination?”

Accountability Overview 2016

Important Changes New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards

New York State Report Cards

The State of Oregon Schools

Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation

Adult Education Adult Literacy Job Training Employer Specific Training.

Central Southern Tier RAEN

NRS Updates and Changes

Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card

State and Federal Accountability Overview

Understanding the New Maryland School Report Card

NCETA SPRING 2018 CONFERENCE

Important Changes New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards

ASISTS Program Manager’s Training

Data Management for FY2017 Reporting

Review Summary 29 elements achieved by courses

Presentation transcript:

New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 08/09 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NRS Liaison for NYS

Evaluated in TWO Methods NYS BenchmarksQuartile Ranked Educational Gain = 41% Follow Up Outcomes = 59% Meet Benchmarks = Proficient (Employment, GED/HS Diploma, and Postsecondary or Training) Educational Gain (Weighted) Follow Up Outcomes Quartile Unacceptable Quartile 2 1 – 1.99 Needs Improvement Quartile 3 2 – 2.99 Proficient Quartile 4 3 – 4.00 Highly Proficient

First, an overview of the program:

NYS Benchmark Summary: Meets NYS Benchmarks (both) = Proficient Does Not Meet NYS Benchmarks (one or both) = In Need of Improvement (If score places program in Quartile 1, then = Unacceptable)

Quartile Rank Summary: Note: Quartile Rank includes Weighted Educational Gain

Weighted Academic Gain:

Follow Up Outcomes: Raw numbers used to calculate Program Performance in Percent # students achieving goal # students exiting with goal = 69.6% 1 2 3

Goal Setting & Response Rate:

Overall Performance:

Quartile Rank: Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile

Total Score Total score is calculated as in the past Maximum rating points to be earned: – Weighted Academic Gain 16 – Follow-up Measures (2) 8 – Goal setting 4 – Response Rate 4 – Maximum Total32

Emphasis in FY08/09: Educational Gain (50%) Follow Up Outcomes (25%) Employment & GED Goal Setting (12.5%) Response Rate (12.5%)

Emphasis changes for FY09/10: Educational Gain (40%) Follow Up Outcomes (20%) Post Test Rate* (20%) Employment & GED Goal Setting (10%) Response Rate (10%)

NYS Statistics

Total Number of Students Reported 133,253 Students

Report Card Facts: 180 programs ranked Literacy volunteer programs included in rankings 150 programs met the NYS benchmarks, 30 did not 45 programs were rated Highly Proficient, 105 programs Proficient, 5 programs Needing Improvement and 25 programs Unacceptable

Comparisons to FY08/09 ProficiencyFY07/08FY08/09 Highly Proficient25% Proficient41%58% Needs Improvement9%3% Unacceptable23%14%

Comparisons to FY08/09 In FY07/08 33% of programs failed to meet the NYS Benchmarks In FY08/09 only 17% failed to meet the NYS Benchmarks

FY09/10 Benchmarks Educational Gain = 46% Post Test Rate = 65% Follow Up Outcomes = 69%

EPE Programs:

Amendment Log