UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vatican City, 14 th November 2007 Gemma Rauret Director ESG and the current QA trends in Southern Europe: Spain Current trends in the European Quality.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Purpose of the Standards
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Central management of training Program development Local implementation of programs Government orientations, policies and structures Components of the.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
Quality Assurance System in the Finnish Higher Education 3LUC Espoo Anna-Kaarina Kairamo
TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY OF TAJIKISTAN 63/3, N. Karaboev street, Dushanbe, Tajikistan ZIP code : Telephone: ( ) Fax: ( )
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
Bishkek 3/5/2011 DoQuP Standards for QA of SPs in PCs 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes DoQuP standards for.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Alicante 24-26/4/2013 Organization for QA 1 2 nd DoQuP Training Seminar University of Alicante, April 2013 Aim of the Seminar Alfredo Squarzoni University.
Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Quality Assurance Systems in Higher Education in Uzbekistan TerSU / TSAU Z.Djumaev, S.Islomov S.Adilov.
TEMPUS DOQUP in Kazakhstan: Strategic Impact on the National Level Saule Aidarova, Project Coordinator Kazakhstan.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
Effects of Research and Teaching Policy (Bologna) on internal structures Josefina Auladell Head of Administration (manager) Universitat Politècnica de.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
CURRICULUM DESIGN AND RECOGNITION OF PERIODS OF STUDY ABROAD: ECTS PROCEDURES Maria Sticchi Damiani t.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Copyright  Altran SDB, All rights reserved. ALTRAN SDB.
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
Capitolina Díaz Martínez General Director for Equality in Employment Ministry of Equality May 2009, Aarhus University "The Spanish path to fix science.
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs) Professor Dr Mesbahuddin Ahmed Head of Quality Assurance Unit UGC, Bangladesh.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Kick-off meeting of the ENQA/UNESCO-GIQAC Project-Workshop on “Implementing the ESG in the Balkan Region” Accreditation and External Evaluation of HE Institutions.
TOWARDS AN ACCREDITED BLENDED MASTER IN EUROPEAN SOCIAL SECURITY: FEASIBILITY STUDY MAPPING THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Draft findings gathered via.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Training for staff members responsible for writing self-evaluation reports of study programmes, May 2011 University of Tuzla Prof. Dr Emina Nakaš-Ićindić.
TRAINERS AND TRAINING PROCESSES
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Quality and Standards An introduction.
Bulgaria Higher Education System
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs)
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
Presentation transcript:

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 2 Why? 1.- Accreditation processes are based on the trust that is established between the university, students and society. 2.- Accreditation can be considered to be an informative factor of great importance given that it provides the student and society in general with information on the official value of the degree awarded and the assurance that the quality of the degree programme is reviewed periodically by an external independent agency.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS Accreditation also offers the possibility, once the degree programme is accredited, of the transfer of credits with programmes in different universities and countries so the student can take other more advanced degree programmes and receive economic assistance.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 4 Results The results of this accreditation process are taking the form of a new distinguishing factor within the university system that can be used as another criterion in different objectives-based funding processes or in recognised professional bodies; the consequences of a negative ruling, on the other hand, are quite the opposite.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 5 Accreditation is defined, in this model, as an ex post evaluation process that leads to a formal and independent decision on whether a degree programme conforms to certain standards of quality. The result is a formal, binary ruling that establishes either the upholding of the official recognition of a curriculum, the temporary suspension of official recognition, or the definitive revocation of official recognition of the corresponding curriculum. These rulings are the responsibility of the various corresponding public administrations with jurisdiction in higher education.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 6 In addition to the conclusive formal, binary ruling, the evaluators also identify the areas for improvement. This also makes the accreditation model a way of assuring the quality of the degree programmes given in a university. Accreditation must lead to public results so that all interest groups (present-day and future students, university staff and society in general) can know what the resulting administrative consequences are. Both the ENQA’s Standards and guidelines for Quality Assurance and the ECA’s Code of good practice establish the need for accreditation agencies to report accreditation rulings in an appropriate way to the public.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 7 Accreditation must be carried out by an agency that is external to the university offering the degree programme to ensure the credibility of the final ruling. The agency must ensure that the accreditation is sound, i.e., that it is based on predefined criteria of quality and an evaluation process that reveals and provides appropriate technical information on the compliance of these criteria. The ANECA fulfils the requirements to comply with these conditions. The accreditation agency. itself must have an internal quality assurance system, it must be evaluated externally on a periodic basis, and it must have a procedure enabling its rulings to be appealed. The ANECA has entrusted the ENQA with this external evaluation as an assurance for the Spanish university system that its work is recognised by the main European agencies network.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 8 8. Outcomes 9. Quality assurance 2. Students admissions 5.Student guidance 4. Development of the degree programme & learning assessesment 3. Planning of the degree programme 1.Objectives 6. Academic staff 7. Resources & services The ANECA accreditation model structures the accreditation of recognised undergraduate and Master’s degree programmes according to 9 quality criteria and 46 guidelines. The structural relationship on which the model is based on five main points, each one of which refers to one or various criteria for quality as shown in the following charts.

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 9 Accreditation criteria and guidelines, grouped according to the main point Planning and development of the degree programmeThe University has explicit policies and procedures for student admissions that conform to the objectives of the curricula. Institutions where degree programmes are given, as well as the university itself, carry out information, guidance and support activities aimed at the students, which affect and have an impact on their learning process from the time of entry to after graduation. 1. Objectives of the curriculum: The objectives of the curriculum, which include the knowledge, abilities and skills that students must have acquired on completion of their studies, are described in detail and made public. - The objectives are documented. - The objectives define the knowledge, abilities and skills in a precise and assessible way. - The objectives have been disseminated. 3. Planning of the degree programme: The planning of the degree programme is coherent with the objectives of the curriculum in both the overall programming of the degree programme and the course syllabae. The syllabae contain all the necessary elements to inform the student and are made public. - There is a plan for the development of the curriculum in terms of subjects, scheduling and necessary human and material resources. - The plan enables the anticipated objectives of the curriculum to be achieved. - The syllabus for each subject in the curriculum is approved by the corresponding body in the university. - The course syllabae take in the identifying elements of the degree programme and each subject, namely, all the sections referred to in the ECTS guide on objectives, contents, learning methodologies, etc. - The anticipated evaluation methodology complies with the regulations, criteria and procedures. - The course syllabae are made available. - The course syllabae in the curriculum are coherent with the objectives of the curriculum. - There are mechanisms that facilitate student mobility, where this forms part of the objectives of the degree programme. There is planning of work experience/placement in private enterprise and institutions, where this forms part of the objectives of the degree programme. 4. Development of the degree programme and learning assessment: The development of the degree programme conforms to what has been planned. - The degree programmes are appropriately carried out (compliance with the planned activities in the implementation of the curriculum). - There are no serious complaints on the development of the course syllabae. - Incidents identified during the development of the curriculum have been resolved. - Meetings to coordinate different subjects have been held according to the anticipated plan. - Students are evaluated in accordance with the generally established criteria, regulations and procedures and the syllabus. Teaching staff and students are satisfied with complying with the course syllabae. Main point Criteria and guidelines

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 10 Student support services The University has explicit policies and procedures for student admissions that conform to the objectives of the curricula. Institutions where degree programmes are given, as well as the university itself, carry out information, guidance and support activities aimed at the students, which affect and have an impact on their learning process from the time of entry to after graduation. 2. Student admissions: There are student admission policies and procedures that conform to the objectives of the curriculum, which are applied and made public. - There is an admissions policy and procedures. - The admissions policy is defined according to the general objectives of the degree programme and the entry requirements. - The admission criteria and procedures are disseminated. - The admission procedures are applied. 5. Student orientation: Actions are carried out to guide students regarding the development of the degree programme and their future on completion of their studies (careers guidance/postgraduate training). - Documentation is made available to orientate new entry students. - Documentation is made available to orientate the students on the development of the degree programme and the different curriculum content alternatives for completing their studies, including mobility and placement. - Documentation is made available to deal with the diversity of student groups. Documentation is made available to prepare the student for decision-making on completion of undergraduate studies: employment/postgraduate studies. Main point Criteria and guidelines

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 11 Resources that support the degree programmeThe University has sufficient full and part- time qualified academic staff to cover the credits and activities that are programmed in the curriculum. It also has sufficient material means and support services to respond to the needs arising out of the development of the degree programmes in the curriculum. 6. Academic staff: There are sufficient academic staff in terms of number, full/part- time activities and qualification to train the students, so that in each case the quality of teaching, research and the student’s professional training is assured. - There are sufficient, appropriate and qualified academic staff to fulfil the planning requirements of the degree programme. - The core subjects of the degree programme are mostly covered by full time staff. - The prevailing external regulations, and the university’s own regulations, regarding teaching staff selection procedures are applied. - There are teaching allocation criteria that comply with the regulations and are coherent with the objectives of the curriculum. - There is significant participation by teaching staff in activities involving professional development (training, research, innovation, etc.), either internal or external. - In the case of professionally-orientated disciplines, the participation of staff with experience and professional practice in the subjects where these are required is sufficient in terms of number, full/part-time activities and qualification to ensure the anticipated objectives. 7. Resources and services: The resources and services allocated to the degree programme enable it to be developed in accordance with the planned curriculum. - The facilities (classrooms, study rooms, computer rooms, laboratories, meeting rooms, library reading areas) and the scientific, technical, assistance and artistic equipment and materials are sufficient for the development of the degree programme. These facilities may belong to the institution itself or be external, in which case they must be regulated by agreement. - Access is guaranteed to different sources of information, databases, the university’s own library collections and those of other libraries and document centres to cover the needs of the development of the degree programme. There is the necessary technology to obtain, process, store, transfer and present data and information. Main point Criteria and guidelines

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 12 Outcomes Learning by the students is heading in the anticipated direction according to the objectives of the curriculum. 8. Outcomes: The students’ learning outcomes coincide with the objectives of the curriculum and design. - Information is provided on fulfilment of the students’ learning objectives. - The thresholds established for the quantitative indicators are complied with (graduation rate, drop-out rate and efficiency rate). Main point Criteria and guidelines

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS 13 Quality assurance Those in charge of the curriculum have established a quality assurance system that enables them to analyse deviations from what has been planned and areas that can be improved. This system also makes it possible to define and implement proposals for the continuous improvement of the curriculum. 9. Quality assurance: Those in charge of the degree programme have quality assurance systems to analyse its development and the outcomes, enabling them to define and implement actions for the continuous improvement of quality, with the participation of all the stakeholders. - There is a system for gathering information and for review and improvement on: - The objectives of the curriculum. - The admission criteria and procedures. - The planning of the degree programme. - The development of the degree programme and student assessment. - On actions to orientate the students. - The number of academic staff. - The degree programme’s resources and services. - The learning outcomes. - There are consultation procedures for gathering information on graduates, employers and other relevant social groups, on graduate employment, learning that has been acquired (knowledge, abilities and skills), and professional competences and the needs for continuous training. Main point Criteria and guidelines