1 Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.Ching-Yao Chan, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IMPROVING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE SETTINGS EEC Board Meeting – November 8, 2011.
Advertisements

School Bus Driver Training
Virginia Association for Pupil Transportation Legislation Committee Report June 2012.
Terminal Safety. Objectives Identify main causes Outline terminal safety organization State the safe working practices.
Contractor Safety Management
The Name Equality Act of 2007 AB 102 (Chapter 567, Statutes of 2007)
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty Chief of Strategic Planning, California DMV.
Chapter 2. New Jersey law requires all applicants for any license to have their eyesight checked 20/50 vision with or without glasses or corrective contact.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Applicability Each standard of this part applies to all motor vehicles or items of motor vehicle equipment manufactured.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Health and safety at work
Chapter 1 and 2 Review Study Guide.
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty California DMV
1 Region One Education Service Center School Bus Driver Training 1900 West Schunior Edinburg, Texas Phone: (956) or Fax: (956)
STEPS TO A VALID NEW JERSEY DRIVER LICENSE
Autonomous Vehicles in California Bernard Soriano and Stephanie Dougherty.
DMV Chapter 1. 6 Point Verification There are four requirements for 6 Point ID Verification: At least one Primary ID At least one Secondary ID Verifiable.
Definition for Levels of Automation
Autonomous Vehicle Regulations Development New Motor Vehicle Board 10 th Industry Roundtable March 14,
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
Process Safety Management
EReg ANNUAL CONFERENCE 11 th MAY 2010 Vehicle Administrative Platform Walter Nissler European Commission Directorate General Mobility & Transport Road.
ELECTRIC CART SAFETY CAL STATE LA
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty Chief, Enterprise Planning & Performance California Department of Motor Vehicles July 22, 2015.
1 TRB Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program University of California, Berkeley Jane Lappin Volpe National.
CHAPTER 1 The NJ Driver License System. Laws Governing the NJ Driver License  In order to operate a motor vehicle in the state of NJ you must carry a.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Inspection Policies and Procedures INSPECTION POLICIES.
CHAPTER 1 NJ Driver’s License System
Security and the National ITS Architecture ITS America 2003 Session 19: The State of the Practice: ITS and Homeland Security May 19, 2003 Minneapolis,
Financial Responsibility. Reference PART 387 MINIMUM LEVELS OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MOTOR CARRIERS.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Cart Training California Lutheran University Safety and Security.
An Update on Automated Vehicle Legislation and Regulation Marc Scribner Research Fellow Competitive Enterprise Institute
Matthew Channon PhD Candidate in Motor Insurance Law at Exeter University.
1 PTC Update ACACSO May 2011 PTC Update ACACSO May 2011.
Section 704.  The driving portion of this course will be performed with a field examiner.
Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia Road Transport Department.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Driver Education Standard 1 The student and parent (or legal guardian) will discuss the process of the “Graduated Driver License Law” and “Parental.
WORKPLACE TRANSPORT Samuel Nii Tettey (Ergonomist)
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Autonomous Vehicles in California
LICENSING OF DRIVERS OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Bernard C. Soriano, Ph.D. Deputy Director
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
California Automated Vehicle Regulations Update
SAE J3016 Revisions & SAE Ads/adas Standards
Accelerating the Introduction of
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Safety is part of our culture at Halliburton
California’s Autonomous Vehicles Program
Submitted by OICA Document No. ITS/AD-14-07
CDE Transportation Unit
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Transmitted by the expert from ISO
Submitted by OICA Document No. ITS/AD Rev1
Safety concept for automated driving systems
AV Regulation in Florida
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Status of the French legislation on shuttles
Norwegian regulation on testing of self-driving vehicles on roads
Presentation transcript:

1 Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.Ching-Yao Chan, Ph.D. Christopher NowakowskiWei-Bin Zhang Roberto Horowitz, Ph.D.Tom West California PATH Program Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley

2 California Automated Vehicle (AV) Legislation Senate Bill 1298 – Approved by the Governor on Sept. 25, 2012 – Adds Division 16.6, Section to Vehicle Code – Authorizes the establishment of safety requirements for testing and operation of automated vehicles by the DMV Defines “Autonomous Technology” as having the capability to drive the vehicle without physical control or monitoring by human operator Defines what is NOT included in “Autonomous Technology” as: BLIS, Automated Emergency Braking, Park Assist, ACC, Lane Keeping Assist, LDW, Traffic Jam Assist, or similar systems individually or in combination Defines manufacturer as either the OEM or the person modifying the vehicle by retrofitting automation

3 SAE Definitions of Levels of Automation (J3016 Surface Vehicle Information Report) 0.Non-Automated 1.Assisted (Lane Assist or ACC) 2.Partial Automation – Driver always in-the-loop and responsible for monitoring – System may require immediate driver take-over Conditional Automation – Automation under clearly-delimited conditions – System may require driver take-over with some lead time 4.High Automation – System capable of transitioning to minimal risk state if driver fails to take over – Driverless operation under limited conditions 5.Full Automation – System capable of functioning without a driver

4 Establishing Automated Vehicle Regulations CA Vehicle Code Section provides regulation authority to the California DMV DMV must adopt regulations by Jan 1, For testing of automated vehicles by manufacturers on public roadways (although testing is currently still allowed until regulations are adopted) 2. For operation of automated vehicles by the public on public roadways 3. Additional regulations may be imposed for automated vehicles capable of operating without a driver in the vehicle Vehicle Code Section states that Federal regulations shall supersede if a conflict arises

5 Mfg’s Testing Requirements in VC AV test driver shall possess the proper class of license for the vehicle being driven AV test driver shall be seated in the driver’s seat and capable of taking over immediate manual control Only employees, contractors, or other persons designated by the manufacturer may operate an AV on public roads Manufacturer shall complete an application/certification for a testing permit and provide evidence of insurance, surety bond, or proof of self-insurance for $5 M

6 Automated Vehicle Regulations in VC A. Mechanism to engage/disengage easily accessible to the operator B. Visual indication that automation is engaged C. Alert the operator of failures while automation is engaged – Require the operator to take over – Or bring the vehicle safely to a stop D. Operator shall be able to take control with throttle, brakes, steering, and/or other means E. Meets FMVSS for vehicle’s model year F. AV technology does not disable any FMVSS feature G. AV includes a data recording system to capture at least 30 seconds of data before any collision

7 Potential Regulation Topics Stated in VC The regulations shall include, but not be limited to: Any Testing, Equipment, and Performance Standards necessary to ensure the safe operation of automated vehicles on public roads Aggregate number of AVs deployed Application process for AV testing permit Special rules for AV registration New license requirements for AV operators Rules for revocation, suspension, or denial of AV permits or licenses

8 Topics Under Current Research 1. How to assess system safety? 2. Testing and certification requirements for manufacturer testing on public roads 3. Testing and certification requirements for sale and operation by general public 4. System-level safety requirements 5. Additional requirements for driverless operation

9 How to assess system safety? Certification documentation of design, development and testing process by manufacturer Third-party safety concept certification Testing – To satisfy standards (that don’t exist yet)? – Driving competency (like current driver licensing test)? – Specific hazard scenarios?

10 Manufacturer Testing on Public Roads Application for approval (documentation) – Level of safety to demonstrate before public road tests? – Contents of documentation when vehicle is modified? – Level of prior closed-site testing? – Evidence that safety requirements have been met? Review and approval criteria? – Self certification vs. third-party? Testing, data recording and reporting – Minimum DVI requirements? – Test driver training? – Number of test drivers per vehicle? – Data recording and archiving? – External indicators of special vehicle status? – Restrictions on vehicle class or operations? – Criteria for discontinuation of testing approval?

11 Requirements for use by general public Application for general public use/sale – How much prior on-road testing? – Other minimum requirements for approval? – Protection of privacy of vehicle movement data? Review and approval criteria – What data should DMV retain about each AV? Operational requirements – Minimum performance? – Minimum DVI to re-engage driver? – Any external markings? – Minimum maintenance requirements? – Licensing of maintenance/repair shops? – Restrictions on vehicle size or usage? Minimum driver requirements – Training, licensing, special knowledge?

12 System-level safety requirements Minimum reliability requirements? Minimum safety level? Cyber-security requirements? Minimal-risk condition capability as a minimum requirement?

13 Additional Requirements for Driverless Operations What minimum level of safety, and how to demonstrate it? What level of closed-track testing before testing on public roads? Restrictions on vehicle sizes or uses? What level of public-road testing before sale to general public? Any special hazard conditions to require in testing? Any special external markings? Any restrictions on passenger activities?

14 Schedule DMV to release first draft set of regulations (administrative aspects of on-road testing) for public review and comment this fall, followed by public hearings before adoption in early 2014 PATH to provide recommendations on second set of regulations (technical issues) by end of this year DMV to release second draft set of regulations for public review in spring 2014, leading to adoption by end of 2014 to meet legislative deadline Further DMV updates of regulations likely annually Useful Links: – –