Elmore County Drug and DUI Court

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

Summit County ADM Board Cross Systems Training
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Mentor Courts, Training Curriculum, & Legislation Brian Clubb Project Director National Drug Court Institute.
Veterans Treatment Courts GEORGIA ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS CONFERENCE JACK OCONNOR BUFFALO VETERANS COURT B.
A guide to local services. Sacro’s mission is to promote safe and cohesive communities by reducing conflict and offending.
Effectiveness of a Cognitive Therapy for Repeat Drinking and Driving Offenders Kathleen A. Moore, PhD Melissa L. Harrison, MS M. Scott Young, PhD Department.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
1 17-Year-Old Offenders in the Adult Criminal Justice System Legislative Audit Bureau April 2008.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
Mental Health Court Georgia Drug & DUI Court Conference – Peachtree City, GA Honorable Kathlene Gosselin, Hall County Superior Court & H.E.L.P.
SMART JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM Lt. Joanne Lake Spokane County Sheriff’s Office Detention Services Assistant Facility Commander-Geiger.
Introduction to Kenosha County Behavioral Health Courts Kenosha County Division of Aging & Disability Jim Truchan (LMFT,LPC,LCSW) Human Services Manager.
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
VETERANS COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY VETERANS COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY Community Court Superior Court of California 909 N. Main Street Santa Ana, CA
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
HOPE Probation H awaii’s O pportunity P robation with E nforcement October 2012 Judge Steven S. Alm First Circuit Court, Honolulu, Hawai`i
Targeting Offenders Prospects, Practices and Concerns June
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
What is the Fathering Court? A program that offer non-custodial parents who have not been making child support payments in the District of Columbia, for.
1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME and PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR’S REPORT.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
4380 SW Macadam Ave., Ste. 530 Portland, OR Informing policy, improving programs Implementation of the Ten Key Components: Variations.
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
National Association of Drug Court Practitioners Anaheim, CA June 2009.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Coordinator 101 Rose M. Ewing. Drug Court History First Drug Court was implemented in Miami, Florida in Today, there are approximately 2,500 therapeutic.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Veterans Treatment Court Hon. Mary Hogan Sullivan Presiding Justice Norfolk County Veterans Treatment Court
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Henu’ Community Wellness Court
Itasca County Wellness Court
Summit County Probation Services
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Substance abuse & criminal charges {Bridges Not Barriers}
Coconino County Recovery Court
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

Elmore County Drug and DUI Court

“The Revolving Door” Movement Of Drug Offenders through the Traditional Criminal Justice System

Response to the 1980’s Crack Cocaine Epidemic Criminal Justice (CJ) System Escalated penalties More prisons Drug Case Management Systems Shortened the time between arrest and conviction Did not address habitual Alcohol or Drug (AOD) use Treatment Many offenders not identified as having AOD problems Few treatment programs No room or waiting lists Lack of cooperative relationships between CJ system and treatment Offenders who were ordered to complete treatment were not involved long enough to develop appropriate skills for long-term sobriety

The Creation of Drug Courts Traditional system is ineffective at addressing AOD issues Treatment system and CJ system have a common goal: stopping drug and alcohol abuse and reducing the related criminal activity Each system possesses unique capabilities and resources Drug courts are among several programs implemented in this new community-based team-oriented approach Drug and Alcohol Offenders

Other Community or Specialty Courts DUI Courts Domestic Violence Courts Mental Health Courts Juvenile Courts Family Courts Truancy Courts Veteran's Courts

And the numbers are… Totals arrests for ECSO and MHPD per Idaho State Police Data 2007 Drug Narcotic Offenses 37 Drug Narcotic Arrests 29 DUI Arrests 95 (122 filed) 2008 Drug Narcotic Offenses 58 Drug Narcotic Arrests 28 DUI Arrests 92 (127 filed) Drug Narcotic Offenses 33 Drug Narcotic Arrests 25 DUI Arrests 92 (122 filed) Over the last 5 years in Elmore County Of 2510 crashes, 5% involved impaired drivers 59 of the total crashes were fatal, and 20% of those involved impaired drivers, resulting in 13 fatalities In 2008, 11,773 people were killed nationwide in alcohol –impaired accidents. That is equivalent to one 737-900 airline crashing, killing every passenger on Board once a week for an entire year

What is a Drug Court? A team effort focusing on sobriety and accountability The Judge is the central figure Team is also made up of Prosecutor, Defense Counsel, Treatment Provider, Coordinator, Probation, Law Enforcement, and an Evaluator Rules are clear and compliance is within the individual’s control Immediate use of graduated sanctions/incentives

The Mission of the Elmore County Drug and DUI Court The mission of the Elmore County Drug and DUI Court (ECDDC) is to advance the safety and well-being of our community, conserve Justice System resources and break the cycle of alcohol and drug addiction among non-violent criminal offenders. These goals will be achieved by providing offenders with comprehensive treatment and education, and increasing offender accountability through intensive court supervision designed to help participants gain control of their lives and reduce recidivism.

The Ten Key Components Key Component #1 Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 2 Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel promote public safety while protecting participants’ due process rights

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 3 Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug court program.

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 4 Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug, and other related treatment and rehabilitation services.

Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing. The Ten Key Components Key Component #5 Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing.

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 6 A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants’ compliance

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 7 Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential.

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 8 Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness.

The Ten Key Components Key Component # 9 Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective drug court planning, implementation, and operations.

The Ten Key Components Key Component #10 Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and community-based organizations generates local support and enhances drug court effectiveness.

Characteristics of Drug Court Participants Education 39% lack high school diplomas or a GED 27% have some college level education, including Associate or Bachelors Degree 25% of graduates from drug court have returned to school (GED or college)  Drug Use and Drug Charges 15.37 years is the average number of years of drug use $129.47 per day is the average daily street value of drugs used $5.00 - $1,800.00 was the recorded range of daily street value of drugs used 73.5% of participants were charged with possession of amphetamine / methamphetamine 5 % of participants were charged with possession of heroin Graduation and Criminal Recidivism from Drug Court 53% of the Ada County participants who left the program, graduated from the program 11% of graduates have been convicted of new crimes Age and Gender 31.51 is the average age of participants 56 years of age is the oldest participant 55% of drug court participants are male 45% of drug court participants are female Criminality Measured by Risk Score 89% of drug court cases from Twin Falls County were assessed using the LSI-R as medium to high risk for their overall criminality and risk of future recidivism   Employment 58% of participants were unemployed at the time of entering drug court 87% of participants gained and maintained employment during drug court $5.12 per hour represents the average hourly wage rate increase of graduates $12,433.70 per year average annual wage increase for graduates

Eligibility Criteria Felony Drug Offenders Felony possession offenses Substance abuse related crimes, Felony probationers with substance abuse issues DUI Offenders First time misdemeanor DUI offenses with a BAC of .20+ Second DUI offenses or more

Ineligibility Felony criminal record for violence Non-Elmore County residents Sex offenders Any defendant who has a significant prior conviction of a serious drug offense, such as delivery

Positive Side-Effects Elmore County Friends for Recovery Council, Inc. Fundraisers (e.g.) All Rise Open Golf Tourney Walk for Recovery Safe and Sober Housing (6 males upstairs) (6 females downstairs)

Bond Issues Post-Plea/Pre-Sentence O/R Release Post-Plea/Post-Sentence Participant Absconds No Bond Warrant Non-Compliance by Partic//ipant Sanction by Court

The Latest Numbers for Idaho Fiscal 2012 (unofficial) 1,955 adult felony offenders participating in drug and M/H Court faced prison By year end 1,711 (88%) had remained in Drug or M/H Court or graduated These offenders were managed in the community-not prison = significant savings Since 1998 Idaho has grown from two to 62 Drug, M/H, and Veteran’s Courts In that time 9,646 individuals have enrolled and 4,747 have graduated 1,129 are still participating in Idaho’s problem solving Courts 2,216 felony, misdemeanor and juvenile offenders were supervised