Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
PORTFOLIO.
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
- McKinsey & Co. Report Thought to ponder… “It’s a system thing, not a single thing.” -McKinsey & Co. Report.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Roles and Responsibilities of the Instructional Coach
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Differentiated Supervision
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
APPR How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher.
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
Iowa Teaching Standards, Criteria and Evidence
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Steve Lieder TA Wilson Academy Mathematics Goal. All students will improve mathematical skills.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Cape Cod Tech Educator Plan Presentation. Educator Plan Form Due October 15 th …. It is an extension of your Goal Setting Form It is either a 1-year or.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
High School State of the Schools. Foley High School Staff Development Goals for Goal #190% of FHS teachers will participate in a building in-service.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Presenter: Gary Bates

 “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee shall develop a remediation plan of not more than ninety (90) school days in length to correct the deficiencies noted in the certificated employee's evaluation. “ 

 Coursework  Professional development sessions, conferences  Utilizing teacher mentors  Modeling: Providing a substitute for an hour and allowing a teacher to observe a highly effective teacher on a specific skill or competency (ex. have them observe a teacher who is extremely talented at higher level questioning)  Coaching: Have a highly effective teacher come in and coach someone struggling in a specific skill or competency  Create professional learning communities and allow for reflection on instructional practices on specific skills or competencies, identifying exemplars for each.  Initiate “teaching rounds” where departments or individual teachers are able to observe each other and give formative feedback, align level of expectations, and build culture and ownership on the level of instruction in their department

 Goal Statement  Action Steps  Benchmarks  Data  Evidence of Achievement

 Teacher and evaluator work through the process together.  Evaluator identifies areas needing improvement. Evaluator should be able to identify specific examples observed.  Goal setting should be a collaborative effort.  Teacher and evaluator share ideas of what activities/data/evidence need to be chosen to help achieve the goals.  Timelines should be mutually agreed upon.

 Areas for Improvement ◦ Current questioning strategies are not effectively eliciting evidence of student understanding. ◦ Lack of communication with families ◦ Student behavior – standards of conduct are not clearly communicated.  Evidence ◦ Notes from classroom observations conducted on 9/12/13, 10/2/13, and 11/15/13. (As noted on SfS rubric). ◦ No documentation of family communication. ◦ Notes from classroom observations conducted on 9/12/13, 10/2/13 and 11/15/13. (SfS Rubric)

 Goal – Develop the ability to collect and use student learning evidence to differentiate instruction.  Action Steps ◦ Observe two teachers who are effectively implementing this strategy ◦ Participate in 2 webinars, recommended by dept. head, on assessment strategies, especially oral questioning ◦ Participate actively in your professional learning team focusing on instruction and assessment.  Benchmarks ◦ Meet with evaluator between Jan. 6 and Jan. 20 to debrief on lesson learned. ◦ Document attendance at webinars with date and reflection. ◦ Evaluator observations – January-March, 2014.

 Goal – Create communication channels to keep families well informed.  Action Steps ◦ Work with your professional learning team to solicit successful communication approaches ◦ Implement new strategies and discuss their effectiveness with your PLT  Benchmarks ◦ Review biweekly s sent to families from January through March, ◦ Review phone call log to parents of struggling students – January through March, 2014

 Goal – Improve management of student behavior and peer interaction  Action Steps ◦ Attend January 19, 2014, classroom management workshop provided by the district. ◦ By January 31 st, observe three teachers who demonstrate effective classroom management. ◦ Discuss strategies for implementation with evaluator.  Benchmarks ◦ Attended classroom management workshop ◦ Observed three effectively managed classroom ◦ New strategies will be incorporated into lesson plans ◦ Evaluator observations in January, February, and March.

 Make it collaborative  Discuss the observed areas for improvement  Brainstorm goals to correct the deficiencies and appropriate activities to reach those goals  Set timelines ◦ For future observations ◦ For next feedback meetings  Don’t hesitate to intervene if activities are not being conducted or are being implemented inappropriately.  Don’t sugarcoat, but be fair.  Offer encouragement, support, and collaborative opportunities.