Implementing an Online Statewide Survey to Address Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among University Students in Arizona Presenters: Peggy Glider, Ph.D. Jon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

2010 Healthy Youth Survey Data... Listening to Our Students Dixie Grunenfelder Learning and Teaching Support Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
11 Liang Y. Liu, Ph.D. Community Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Section Texas Department of State Health Services
SEM II : Marketing Research
Strengthening College Alcohol Abuse Prevention Efforts in Arizona Through a Statewide Tri- University Consortium.
How to use Student Voice Training Session Gary Ratcliff, AVC - Student Life.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Copyright Shanna Smith & Tom Bohman (2003). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Conducting ONLINE SURVEYS Valerie M. Sue, Ph.D.. ntroduction 1.
Community Needs Assessments Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor UGA Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
How to Assess Student Learning in Arts Partnerships Part II: Survey Research Revised April 2, 2012 Mary Campbell-Zopf, Ohio Arts Council
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Stephen E. Lucas Diane H. Jackman Douglas J. Bower Eastern Illinois University American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education 61 st Annual Meeting.
Evaluating NSF Programs
Chapter 10 Questionnaire Design Chapter Objectives explain why it is important for managers or business researchers to know how to design good questionnaires.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
Chks.wested.org and cscs.wested.org Cal—School Climate, Health and Learning Survey 2010/ Survey Administration.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.
Questionnaires and Interviews
In Shape From: National Registry of Evidence- based Programs and Practices (NREPP) Trey Thomas 11/19/2012 Health 313_01 Drugs and Human Behavior.
Arizona Institutions of Higher Education (AZIHE) Network Statewide Online AOD Survey Melissa McGee, Ph.D., MPH University of Arizona AZIHE Network, Chairperson.
FAEIS Project User Opinion Survey 2005 Thursday, June 23, 2005 Washington, D.C. H. Dean SutphinYasamin Miller ProfessorDirector, SRI Agriculture & Extension.
Collecting Quantitative Data
Data to Action: Results and Next Steps for the Healthy Kids Colorado Survey (HKCS) HKCS Advisory Committee Overview October 2014.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
EVALUATION RESEARCH. Evaluation Research  How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit.
Linda G. Shook and Virginia E. O’Leary. Big Data.
Evaluation Requirements and South Dakota-PLI Webinar January 5, 2015 BROOKE BLAALID, MSW AND DOUG PIPER, PHD SPF PFS EVALUATION B CONSULTING, LLC 1.
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
Using Needs Assessment to Build A Strong Case for Funding Anna Li SERVE, Inc.
Process Simplification Advisory Committee August 26, 2009 Review of the University Telephone Directory.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Keys to Successful Marketing  Must understand and meet customer needs and wants  To meet customer needs, marketers must collect information.
September 2007 Survey Development Rita O'Sullivan Evaluation, Assessment, & Policy Connections (EvAP) School of Education, University of North Carolina-Chapel.
The Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom Copyright  2003 Stevens Institute of Technology, CIESE, All Rights Reserved.
Final Report for East Carolina University
Needs Assessment Presented By Ernest D. Pérez Capacity Building Assistance Trainer BORDER HEALTH FOUNDATION Tucson, Arizona CAPACITY BUILDING ASSISTANCE.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
Utah State University Extension Civil Rights Compliance Self-Assessment Tool Dr Dallas L. Holmes Institutional Research 2005 National Diversity Conference.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Group First Step Brief Motivational Interviewing with Statistically High Risk Groups Julie Lyzinski, M.Ed., L.P.C. Tamarah Smith-Dyer, M.S. Office of Alcohol.
Towards No Drug Use (TND) Program Description  Project TND: A series of 12 lessons implemented in all high schools  25 teachers from 14 high schools.
Studying the transition to college: A new prospective study IMPACTS Supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant 4 R37 AA
Introduction Results Hayley Schultz and Kathleen Nybroten, Ph.D.  Psychology and Sociology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Hayley Schultz and Kathleen.
Innovation Software Corporation's Cultural Awareness Training Program Presentation by:
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Data-Based Marketing and the Role of Research in Sport Marketing
Sampling & Simulation Chapter – Common Sampling Techniques  For researchers to make valid inferences about population characteristics, samples.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
National 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Lessons Learned: The Minnesota Young Adult Alcohol Survey American Evaluation Association Annual Conference October 26, 2012.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Collecting Longitudinal Evaluation Data in a College Setting: Strategies for Managing Mountains of Data Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D. 1 Erin Mehalic Burr,
By Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh. Objectives  At the end of the lecture student should be able to –  Define survey  Mention uses of survey  Discuss types.
The University of Texas System Assessment of
The Vermont Young Adult Survey: Methods and Some Initial Findings
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Bob Flewelling Amy Livingston
Presentation transcript:

Implementing an Online Statewide Survey to Address Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among University Students in Arizona Presenters: Peggy Glider, Ph.D. Jon Rudy, M.S. Melissa McGee, Ph.D. David Bower, M.Ed. Arizona Institutions of Higher Education Network

Introduction In August 2003, the Arizona Institutions of Higher Education (AZIHE) Network obtained funds to implement a statewide online alcohol and other drug (AOD) survey that would identify AOD norms, trends, attitudes, knowledge and efficacy of AOD programming for students attending Arizona’s three public universities. The goal of this comprehensive assessment was to generate a common data set that would: 1) Direct AZIHE Network programming, 2) Inform and enable collaborations with key state government stakeholders, 3) Analyze statewide trends, and 4) Educate campus administrators, the Arizona Board of Regents and state officials about the problems of heavy and high-risk drinking among university students and the efficacy of collaborative programming.

AZIHE Network Strategic Plan Goal Statement: “Each campus participating in the AZIHE Network will utilize similar data collection instruments and methods to gather information about college student AOD use and related attitudes, behaviors and consequences.” State Outcome Activity (4.A.): “Coordinate college AOD surveillance and assessment efforts across the state.” Challenge = Schools used different surveys, administered at different times. Solution = Develop a survey that could be easily administered to all three universities simultaneously and at minimal cost.

Project Implementation: Launching a Statewide College AOD Survey Funding sources: 2003 PCCHA Dr. Joel Grinolds Grant ($1,115.00) regional Network funds ($1,500.00) Project Goal: To implement a tri-university alcohol and other drug (AOD) survey that identifies AOD norms, trends, attitudes, knowledge and efficacy of AOD programming for the majority of Arizona university students. Project Objective: To collect 1,500 surveys from each university, for a total of 4,500 statewide. Survey Development: To reduce survey length/ cost, and ensure control over survey administration, the AZIHE Network developed its own survey including items that covered the content of interest.

Project Implementation: Launching a Statewide College AOD Survey (cont.) Human Subjects Approval: Upon completion of survey development, each institution received approval from their IRB to conduct the survey online. Technical Logistics: Principia Web Survey 3.0 was used to create and publish the online survey Domain name ( and ISP service to host the domain and website were purchased via ReadyHosting.comwww.azcollegesurveys.com FrontPage was used to create homepages for each university linking students to the survey Online surveys were pre-tested on a group of graduate students from each university

Project Implementation: Launching a Statewide College AOD Survey (cont.) Subject Recruitment: Random samples of 6000 undergrad students from each institution were generated. Anticipated that approximately 50% of students would see the , and of those 50% would respond. Survey Participant Solicitation: invitations sent to all selected students briefly describing the survey, time requirements and incentives. Students electing to complete the survey clicked on a link that sent them to the survey website. Reminder notices were sent 7 days after the initial invitations were mailed. Data Cleaning & Analysis: Extreme outliers (responses that are not realistic or logical) were removed from the data set. Frequency analyses were then performed on the data.

Project Survey: Survey Item Categories AOD Use – Current use and changes in use, details about “last drinking occasion”, level of drinking in various social situations Protective Behaviors – Alternating, setting limits, eating, use of designated driver, avoiding drinking games Negative Consequences – Injury, violence, sexual assault, trouble with authorities/police, academic troubles, DUI, unprotected sex Perceptions / Attitudes – Perceived consumption among peers; attitudes about campus AOD rules and regulations, state AOD laws and ordinances, and about consumption levels in general Demographics – ethnicity/racial origin, involvement in curricular activities, gender, living arrangement, classification, weight, height, age, GPA

Lessons Learned: Advantages & Disadvantages of Online Surveying Pros Convenient for survey respondent – easy retrieval and submission Convenient for survey administrator – immediate knowledge of response rate Convenient for survey evaluator – automatic data entry Cons Non-use of university issued account – inability to determine reason for non- participation Survey respondent bias – AZ had higher response rate from female students

General Recommendations Do request permission from your University’s institutional review board before proceeding with the survey. Do establish ‘buy-in’ from all the universities that will be participating in your statewide assessment. Do over-sample your population to ensure adequate response rates. Do create and distribute a final report summarizing the highlights of your findings to important stakeholders on your campuses and in your state and local communities. Do report your survey findings ONLY in aggregate form.

Contact Information The authors of this presentation can be contacted at the following phone numbers and addresses: Peggy Glider, Ph.D. – (520) Jon Rudy, M.S. – (928) Melissa McGee, Ph.D. – (520) David Bower, M.Ed. – (480) For a copy of the Report on the Status of College Student Alcohol and Other Drug Use in Arizona, contact Dr. Melissa McGee (information provided above).