Survey of policies affecting tenured and tenure-track faculty Administered by Appalachian State University’s Faculty Senate, March, 2011. Preliminary data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Special Faculty Meeting Faculty Handbook – Section 4 April 10, 2013.
PROPOSED CHANGES TO BYLAWS 1. Now: SEAS Proposed Change: UB Engineering 2. Now: Committee for Graduate (Undergraduate) Studies Proposed Change: Change.
Faculty Senate Report March 12, 2008 Student Evaluation Committee Teaching Academy.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.
Using Your Faculty Manual …Talking Manual With Your Chair - Dr. Rasoul Saneifard.
Forum on Action Item #1 in advance of the 4/28/11 General Faculty Meeting.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
Fixed-Term Faculty Committee Chair Jean DeSaix. Committee Charge (from Resolution ) monitors implementation of policies and recommendations concerning.
Update 11/9. Academic Senate University Appointments and Promotions Committee Policies and Procedures (approved ASLC 10/20/10)
1 Department review (Faculty and Chair) Academic Programs Council Faculty Council and CAS Dean Undergraduate/Graduate Academic Council UAC Report to Senate.
Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.
Process for conducting a vote of confidence in a Dean FA
The Tenure and Promotion Application Process. Each candidate is responsible for compiling the materials for his/her application with the assistance of.
What Counts for Tenure? Preliminary Survey Results Kathleen A. Terry-Sharp Director of Academic Relations American Anthropological Association Analysis.
Faculty Handbook The Faculty Handbook states that the normal full-time teaching load is 15 credits per term, including 12 credits of assigned courses and.
Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure August 21, 2015 Sue Ott Rowlands, Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs.
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University College of Arts and Sciences Post Tenure Review Faculty Workshop April 17, 2015.
School of Medicine –Promotions and Tenure Jane F. Reckelhoff, PhD Chair, SOM Appointments, Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
EGS Research & Consulting BASELINE SURVEYS OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT CHAIR PERSONS, MATHEMATICS FACULTY AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY.
Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: PROCEDURES AND POLICIES 17 October 2014.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
T&P Guideline Review. T&P Guideline Goals Clear set of guidelines and procedures leading to tenure and promotion to assistant professor – Annual Review.
Report to the Faculty Senate April 14, 2009 Bryan L. Spangelo, Chair.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
Service Opportunities & Shared Governance P. Johnelle Sparks Associate Professor Department of Demography Friend of the Faculty Senate
Forum on Action Item #1 in advance of the 4/28/11 General Faculty Meeting.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
Information from 2/11 meeting The Ad Hoc Budget Committee.
Faculty career development through establishing institutionalized mechanisms to address the needs of pre- tenure and post-promotion faculty in the IDEAL.
Proposed Senate Bylaws Revisions Feb 25, Terms of Senators and Team Members Consider three year terms for members of Faculty Senate and standing.
TCNJ 2015 Promotion & Reappointment Document Faculty Information Forum November 12-13, 2015.
Resolution on selection, duties, and term of Department Heads/Chairs Steering Committee Resolution Information Item.
Klod Kokini Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Engineering Professor of Mechanical Engineering 1 ADVANCE-FAST October 21, 2014.
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR ADVANCEMENT Spring 2016 Workshop.
An Overview of the Promotion & Tenure Process UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 20, 2015 KATIE CARDARELLI, PHD ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC.
Changes to the CALL Spring Quarter 2004 Department Chair Forum May 25, 2004.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
Your Career as a Student Advocate Promotion and Tenure Steven Specter, PhD University of South Florida College of Medicine Tampa, FL.
Positioning Yourself for Promotion and Tenure at KSU
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Tenure Procedure Northwest Vista College
Faculty Evaluation Faculty Workshop on Retention April 2, 2010
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
TIPS: Faculty Advancement, Success, and Tenure (FAST)
Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D
UTIA P&T Workshop Overview of P&T Process June 19, 2018.
Faculty Advancement, Success, and Tenure (FAST)
Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb
Dr. W. Robert Ashurst Faculty Research Committee Chair
Faculty Advancement, Success, and Tenure (FAST)
Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb
Administrative Review
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Preliminary report NTT Task Force.
Resolution on selection, duties and term of Department Heads/Chairs
Kazmer Promotion: UMass Process
Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Administrative Review Committee
After the Dossier is Submitted
Apportionment for 2013/2014 CRAO committee gathered data on faculty numbers in their college as of fall Faculty were counted if they: Held a full.
Administrative Committee Review
UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

Survey of policies affecting tenured and tenure-track faculty Administered by Appalachian State University’s Faculty Senate, March, Preliminary data results, April 2011.

Demographics of respondents 378 faculty (50.5% response rate) College of respondents:43.8% CAS 11.5% COB 13.4% COE 8.2% COHS 13.4% FAA 4.1% MUS 4.4% LIB 1.1% UC Rank of respondents:36% Assistant professor 24.5% Associate professor 39.5% Full professor

How do faculty identify?

Do you support the idea of a differential approach to tenure-track workload? To be elected/assigned after tenure 3/2 with high research productivity 3/3 with moderate research productivity 4/3 with little research productivity

77.9% Support or strongly support 10.4% Neutral 9.9%Oppose or strongly oppose 1.9% Other

Current Faculty Handbook language for appointment to Assistant, Associate, and Full Professor

73% support or strongly support 11% neutral 15% oppose or strongly oppose 1.1% other

69.1% support or strongly support 10.9 neutral 19.2 opposed or strongly oppose 0.8% other

59.8% support or strongly support 13.3 neutral 25.5% oppose or strongly oppose 1.3 other

Should external letters of recommendation be required for promotion and tenure? Promotion to Full: 28.0% said no letters 10.1% said one letter 30.2% said two 25.8% said three 5.2% said four Tenure and Promotion to Associate: 38.2% said no letters 15.7% said one letter 26.6% said two 16.5% said three 3.0% said four

Should the university institute college- level rank and tenure committees? Each college would have its own committee Each department would elect a representative and alternate Promotion and tenure applications would go to this committee after the DPC and department chair but before the college dean The college-level committee would NOT start from scratch in evaluating the dossier The college-level committee would make sure that the department’s stated processes and requirements were met.

40.3% support or strongly support 39.1% oppose or strongly oppose

If we had college rank and tenure committees, who should be eligible to be elected to serve on them? 12.9% responded:Only tenured faculty at the rank of Full 52.8% responded:All tenured faculty 21.0% responded:All tenured and tenure-track faculty

Stay tuned for more…. We will continue to process the data in order to find out how survey responses broke down by rank and college.