Integrating Evaluation and Curriculum, GLTS. Welcome Presenters: Lauren Jones - Lead Teacher - Carpentry/ Architectural Drafting, ILT member Paul Mears.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.

Advertisements

Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan

A Guide to Implementation

Purpose of Instruction

Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look

The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.

Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.

1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.

Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski

The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.

SAM for “Really Smart Dummies” Peggy Goodman, Principal Christine Douthart, Assistant Principal Cindy Bloodworth, Administrative Assistant Five Forks.

June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.

WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.

Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.

Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.

Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.

School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.

Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.

New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.

Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.

PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.

Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.

COTTON INDIAN ELEMENTARY LEADER IN ME WHAT IS A TITLE 1 SCHOOL? Each year the Federal Government provides funding to schools that qualify based.

SAU 16 Curriculum Update Joint Board Meeting April 30, 2012.

Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.

Tina Willis and Adrienne Walker YEARLONG CURRICULUM MAPS & UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN.

CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.

A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.

Polk County Public Schools. Why do we need a web-based Professional Development System?

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.

“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson

Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine

1 Lodi Unified School District High Priority Schools Grant (HPSGP) Review of Progress for Live Oak, Needham, and Washington Elementary Schools Mary Camezon,

TLCP Workshop Thurs. Oct. 25, 2007 Given by: Judit Sastre.

Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.

Putting All the Pieces Together DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT Six Systems SIP Core Disciplines Vision STUDENT SUCCESSSTUDENT SUCCESS.

1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.

School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.

Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.

Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.

PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.

Building Coherence: P.S. 162Q Professional Learning Plan October 5, 2015.

Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.

ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.

Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.

East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.

Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.

Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.

ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March

Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.

Instructional Leadership Team: Implementation Woodland Middle School

PLCs and the high performing, High Poverty school

Professional Development Update

CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION

“Laying Foundations for the Future!”

2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit

Presentation transcript:

Integrating Evaluation and Curriculum, GLTS

Welcome Presenters: Lauren Jones - Lead Teacher - Carpentry/ Architectural Drafting, ILT member Paul Mears - Coordinator - Math/Science, ILT member Question and Comments Welcome any time

Professional Practice Innovation Grant DESE Recognized connection between great curriculum and State Model for Evaluation needed strengthening GLTS Recipient among six schools being supported to make connections Recognized for innovative practices in: Implementing a collaborative (PLC) approach. Integrating curriculum and evaluation

Our Management Structure for implementing a collaborative (PLC) approach to integrate curriculum and evaluation

Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) Implementing a collaborative (PLC) approach

The ILT A monthly collaborative effort between colleagues to ensure student achievement is increased throughout the school Comprised largely of non-management employees Charge: Implement selected School Improvement Plan (SIP) initiatives Build the capacity of the current Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) Communication and PD

2013/14: ILT Charter SIP / PPI Grant Development of Curriculum Structure and Curriculum Software Management System. School-wide pacing guides and sample unit plans Make recommendations regarding assessments and grading practices which better support competency/standards - based education

ILT Products - Curriculum Philosophy “Curriculum at Greater Lawrence Technical School begins with the end in mind and is designed to reach all learners through rigorous, inquiry based, student centered instruction.”

ILT Products - Establishing Common Understandings through Professional Learning Communities Summer of 2013 Developed Common language Hyperlink Resource Examples

I LT Products - Establishing Curriculum Structure through Professional Learning Communities Daily “Student” Agenda Developed common daily student agenda. Embedded on staff intranet. Live Links to ensure common understandings.

ILT Products - Establishing Professional Development and Curriculum Structure Support Designed PD that focused on: Mastery Objectives Aligned lessons

ILT Products - Establishing continuous communication and effective feedback Peer Observation Results

ILT - Next Product VS Recommend curriculum management software system

Collaborative Work Support Structure Weekly Common Planning Time (CPT) meetings: Academic v. Vocational Embedded Professional Development - ILT driven, team delivered, no incremental cost Monthly Early Release - curriculum focused Monthly school-wide Faculty Meetings

Evaluation Oversight Committee (EOC) Design team for the new evaluation system

The EOC Structure Composition: 8 administrative seats, 9 faculty and support staff seats, 1 seat for Massachusetts Federation of Teachers Representative. Early Adopter School - second year of full implementation, meets monthly

EOC Product - Structure for Evaluation Narrowed Focus of Feedback, Simplified Forms, Paperless System Rubrics - Indicators v. Standards Measures - five: Daily planning (agenda) Quality of Work and Effort (student-led, differentiated.) Feedback on self-assessment weakness and strength Family communication Goals: individual and collaborative TeachPoint

Education Administration Team (Ed Admin) Integrating curriculum and evaluation

The Ed Admin Team Structure and Charter Responsible for full implementation of evaluation and curriculum system Comprised entirely of evaluators - 12 for staff of 240 Meets weekly to fine tune system and increase evaluation skills (calibration)

Ed Admin Product - Evaluation Schedule Last year: 6 observations for everyone Current year: 5 observations for new teachers and others on a one year plan 4 observations for teachers on a two year plan

Connecting Evaluation System to Teaching and Learning The new DESE evaluation system is built on more frequent observation resulting in timely and specific feedback Answer the following questions (turn and talk): How many observations are you doing? What are the essential steps in your observation procedure? How much time is required to complete an observation?

Observation Time Study -GLTS Short Observation: 30 minutes minimum Notes Completion: minutes Follow-up meeting: minutes - reading literal notes, gathering curriculum, sharing ideas for improvement Write up: minute - Examination of curriculum documents, review of full notes, crafting of C.E.I.J statements, recommendations Total time to connect evaluation and curriculum

The Benefits and risks of increasing feedback Time is required to plan improvement Be timely and specific An opportunity to either build or erode trust

Thank you Everyone!