David A. Starrett, PhD Director, Center for Scholarship in Teaching and Learning ED-MEDIA 2002 – Denver Michael L. Rodgers, PhD Professor of Chemistry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
Prepare Understand the accommodation process & choose level of engagement. Engage Follow procedures for receiving accommodations.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Supporting Faculty Use of IDEA David Starrett Dean, School of University Studies and Academic Information Services and Director, Center for Scholarship.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
Center for Teaching and Learning Vision: The center will foster and sustain faculty development in the pursuit of exemplary practices in teaching and learning.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER Carolyn C. Oakley, Director.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
Evaluation EnAct Campuses Sonoma, Humboldt, Chico, San Francisco, San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, Pomona Presentation July 11, 2007 Public Works, Inc. Mikala.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
Kontos1 Principles of Quality Instruction in Web Classes George Kontos, Ed.D. Assistant Professor
Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Andrea L. Beach,
Building web-based delivery systems Rapid movement by colleges and universities into web-related course delivery Lack the necessary faculty support.
The ACCESS Project, Colorado State University Jesse Hausler, Assistive Technology Coordinator Craig Spooner, Project Coordinator The Universally Designed.
Creating a Departmental Culture Where Teaching is Valued W. Michael Sherman Darcy Haag Granello Jackie Goodway-Shiebler School of PAES Kathryn Plank Office.
STaR Chart Comparison Carol McMillan EDLE 672. STaR Chart Comparison Review of key areas - Teaching and learning - Educators preparation and development.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Program Review  Health Profession Advising  Key Communities  Orientation and Transition Programs  Outreach and Support  Undeclared Advising.
INSTITUTE FOR DISTANCE AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services EDUCAUSE 2002 Copyright Bridget Moore and Mark Raby,
Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
1 Abu Dhabi Women’s College Certified Designer Course.
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
“Technology is Changing Higher Education…” Develop scalable institutional models Need for instructional support staff that are skilled beyond technology.
Developing a Systematic Approach for Faculty Enrichment Using Detailed Assessments as a Basis Presented for Global Learn 2015 by Linda Merillat, PhD Monica.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Custom Faculty Development: Reach Faculty Where They Live Linda A. Leake, M. Ed. Instructional Designer/Blackboard Support Specialist University of Louisville.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Nursing Informatics Integration in a 4 year BSN Program Paper vs Web Based Instruction June Kaminski, RN MSN PhD(c)
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Cornell 18,000 students 2,000 faculty Twelve colleges on Ithaca campus Four are state colleges, eight are private (including grad school and school of.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Terry Morrow University of Florida Sherry Clark University of Georgia Karen Kral University of Delaware Third Annual WebCT Conference.
College Training and Development. To prepare College employees to develop skills needed for current jobs, assist them in effectively responding to job.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Moodling in Ontario: A Professional Learning Approach Anita Drossis Nathalie Rudner ABEL Professional Learning Lead ABEL School Lead Science and Math Teacher.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Supporting Part Time Faculty with Online Learning Presented by Beverly Hartford, Susan Learney, Michael Crawford Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.
Georgia Tech-NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program Mary Lynn Realff, Director and Co-PI March 31, 2005.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Focus Session: Transformative Assessment Educational Technology Strategic Planning at The University of Colorado, Boulder Lecia J. Barker Alliance for.
Financial Literacy Compendium Compiled by Karen Long-Trail, Coordinator of Admissions and Financial Aid TWU T. Boone Pickens Institute of Health Sciences.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Rowan Cabarrus Community College.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
An Overview of Current Processes for Addressing Accessibility in Classrooms Pam Rea, Student Accessibility Services Don Merritt, Office of Instructional.
CERES UNIFIED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES UPDATE
The Active Learning Catalysts Project
Graduation Initiative 2025
Graduation Initiative 2025
President’s Strategic Plan Mid-Year Progress Report
College Training and Development
Presentation transcript:

David A. Starrett, PhD Director, Center for Scholarship in Teaching and Learning ED-MEDIA 2002 – Denver Michael L. Rodgers, PhD Professor of Chemistry Supporting the Claims of Campus Transformation Through Assessment of Southeast Missouri State University’s "Technology Serving Learning Institutes"

2 Regional, comprehensive, Masters granting 9,000 Students 380 Full and Term Faculty Strong commitment to Teaching/learning Use of Instructional Technology in teaching Faculty development Centralized teaching/learning faculty development center (CSTL) incorporating an Office of Instructional Technology (OIT) Southeast Missouri State University

3 Halfhearted tech investment before of 380 faculty had no PC at work -only 16 dialup lines for remote access to University’s network -only accounts for a faculty/staff/student population >10,000 Low faculty e-learning development skills - no online courses - few Web-augmented courses - no coordinated skills development The Internet Revolution (mid-1990’s)

4 Technology Serving Learning Institutes IT Workshops for Faculty Summer session, Winter break Taught by faculty with Student Tech Consultants Diverse participant expertise levels Participants received PD$, software Customized, modular course management software developed by OIT Hardware and software instruction Model evolved: Short course  “ a la Carte ” $70,000 annual budget

5 Evolution of the Institute Changes in length, time, organization reflect new clientele Dynamic faculty interests: new software, teaching techniques, etc. Computing Services interested in offering workshops within Institute Respond to faculty requests: Chairs working around TSL schedules Campus-wide electronic grade reporting workshop using Institute software Assessment Item #1

6 TSL Institute attendance numbers Assessment Item #2

7 Declining costs for the TSL Institutes Assessment Item #3

8 Institute Evaluation instrument results… Assessment Item #4 9-point scale (9=“Excellent”; 5=“Average; 1=“Poor”) “What was your overall rating of this Institute?” “The Institute was practical and useful.” “The facilitators responded effectively to questions.” “The facilitators knew the subject.” 146/149 rated Institute “Effective” or “Somewhat Effective”

9 Institute Facilitator pool Facilitators New Facilitators TSL Veteran Facilitators New TSL Veteran Facilitators S S W S W S W S W Total 4225 Assessment Item #5

10 Number of on-line courses offered TermOn-line Courses OfferedNew On-line Courses Fall 9999 Spring 0055 Summer 0064 Fall Spring Summer Fall Spring Summer Fall Total25098 Assessment Item #6

11 Enrollment in on-line courses TermUndergraduateGraduatePercent seats taken Fall % Spring % Summer % Fall % Spring % Summer % Fall % Spring % Summer 02>628>55>75% Total ~80% Assessment Item #7 Current enrollment

12 Number of faculty IT server accounts 275/380 faculty have active IT accounts New accounts added ~weekly All new faculty receive and use accounts during orientation Assessment Item #8

13 Number of course sections supported by Websites Instructional servers house >500 course Websites Servers house >750 OIS-managed course sites Dozens of new course Websites, OIS-managed sites each semester Assessment Item #9

14 Support for locally-authored course management software (OIS) OIS – modular course management tool for Web-based & Web- assisted courses – 1st taught Winter 2001 Online Manager, Testing, Gradebook, Calendar, Forum Under development: chat, portal, student folders, etc. Faculty serve as advisors, β-testers Close collaboration between faculty and programmers Institute participants provide feedback Assessment Item #10

15 Quality, sophistication of course Websites Increased quality, complexity of course Websites for Web-assisted and Web-delivered courses since 1997 Due to TSL Institutes, increasing faculty experience, other faculty PD Assessment Item #11

16 Changes in strategic plans around the University The University Strategic Plan included technology as one of six priorities The current plan assumes technology as base for ALL plan priorities College and Department plans increasingly reflect technology integration Assessment Item #12

17 Increases in faculty attendance and presentations at IT-related conferences Increasing faculty attendance at tech-related conferences or tech- related sessions at professional society conferences since 1997 An increasing number of faculty presentations at these conferences Assessment Item #13

18 Increased faculty participation in IT committees and discussions on campus Increased number of campus IT committees since 1997 Institute veterans make up an increasing percentage of faculty involved in those committees TLT Roundtables and other IT- related discussions have occurred, with increased faculty involvement Assessment Item #14

19 Increased IT-related purchases & infrastructure development University Information Technology Committee makes budget decisions, allocates funds Increasing IT funding, including smart classrooms, computer labs, software, specialized hardware, personnel Assessment Item #15

20 Student Technology Learning Impact Survey II March 18 - April 8, student addresses from online courses taught F99 - S02 Survey URL sent to all on March invalid addresses 6 opted out URL again sent April 1 to remainder 408 valid responses (19%) Graphic Representation: % students choosing given responses. Assessment Item #16

21 Helpful Feedback from Instructor?

22 Intellectual Effort

23 Does the Instructor Care?

24 Logical Organization

25 Did the Students Learn?

26 Take an Online Course Again?

27 IDEA results IDEA (Individual Development Educational Assessment) student ratings of instruction instrument used to obtain nationally normalized data Results: online courses rated as well as traditional F2F courses; overall indicators show no statistically significant differences Assessment Item #17

28 Faculty visits, phone calls, s to CSTL Support typeAnnual number Phone6,000 1,375 Walk-in500 Equipment loan300 Assessment Item #18

29 Interest in the value of IT-related work in Promotion and Tenure decisions Assessment Item #19 Information Technology Faculty Roles and Rewards advisory document – role of IT in teaching, research, service Inclusion in college and departmental rank & tenure documentation Leadership by administrators

30 Promulgation of standards for instructional Web pages on campus Online course quality focus Numerous approaches to ensuring quality online instruction Technology Associates tasked with creating Instructional Web Page standards Based on AAHE “Seven Principles” implemented with technology Assessment Item #20

31 for further information … Mike Rodgers: David Starrett: Website: CSTL: Thank you for your attention!