Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Training Programs The Four Levels
Advertisements

A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management
Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
Training Design Chapter #5 Learning Outcomes  By the conclusion of this discussion you should: å Understand the different kinds of training objectives.
Kirkpatrick.
TRAINING EVALUATION. STEPS TO EFFECTIVE TRAINING 1.Assess Needs 2.Design Training 3.Conduct/Deliver Training 4.Ensure Transfer –Support –Consequences.
Multimedia Evaluation WED 503 and 504 October 11, 2005.
Evaluation of Training
Training OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 23, Agenda Debrief on mid-semester feedback In-class writing Review training cycle Technology and training.
TRAINING TRAINING PROCESS NEEDS ANALYSIS INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES EVALUATION.
MBA 423: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
S.M.Israr Training Evaluation By Dr Syed Israr Aga Khan university Karachi, Pakistan.
Measuring (and Driving) the Value of Training Bruce Winner, Los Rios CCD – Government Training Academy Bruce blogs to the training community at -
Evaluation of Training and Education Activities. Objectives By the end of this presentation, participants will be able to List reasons why evaluation.
Coaching and Performance Management
+ Training Evaluation Plan Increasing transfer and effectiveness through the proper evaluation of our current and future training programs. I am here to.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
LOFTI Training Brad Berens Kathy Mills Rob Monson Joel Price.
Table of Contents Introduction Leadership vs. Management and Path Goal Theory Leadership Followership Management.
INTRODUCTION TO THE S.H.E.A. MODELS FOR TRAINING EVALUATION SMARTRISK LEARNING SERIES December 18 th, 2007 By Dr. Michael P. Shea.
Te4Q Educational Project Review Measuring the Impact of the Te4Q Faculty development program at Marshall University JCESOM and its affiliates. Darshana.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs ITEC 860 Fall 2003 Aniruddh Mukerji.
Chapter no:6 Training and development of sales force.
Performance Management “Ensuring organizational goals are met through motivated people”
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation. Chapter 6 Training Evaluation Concepts Training Evaluation: The process of collecting data regarding outcomes needed to.
Sharing Lessons on Learning Metrics LINGOs Annual Meeting Sept , 2009 Steven Honeyman and Marie-Laure Curie Global Capacity Building Department.
Training 2 MANA 3320 Dr. Jeanne Michalski. Phase 3: Implementing the Training Program Importance of training outcomes Type of trainees Choosing the instructional.
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation
TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?
Group HR Training & Development Welcome Good Evening 18 th September 2012 Sukanya Patwardhan.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment.
© E. Kowch iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch.
What is design? Blueprints of the instructional experience Outlining how to reach the instructional goals determined during the Analysis phase The outputs.
TRAINING FOR RESULTS EFFECTIVE TRAINING AS A PROFIT CENTER.
Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM
©2014 Center for Creative Leadership. All rights reserved.
Strategic Human resource Management Training & Developing.
Chapter 4 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT. Introduction Need for organizations to build and sustain competencies that would provide them with competitive advantage.
MGMT 471: Human Resource Development I. HRD/Training Process II. Paradigm Shift III. Needs Assessment/Outcomes IV. Transfer of Learning V. Training Methods.
Human Resource Staffing and Performance Management Introduction
SIUC Instructor Workshop Introduction to Assessment and Evaluation.
EVALUATING AND REWARDING TEAMS Chapter 16. EVALUATING AND REWARDING TEAMS  An important way to motivate teams is through performance evaluation and reward.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
1 Training. Who needs training? When is training necessary? What makes training programs effective? How are training outcomes measured? Training Basics.
The Kirkpatrick Model organizational change Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
Is Your Training Program REALLY Working? How to achieve the highest ROI for your training investment.
1 Training. Who needs training? When is training necessary? What makes training programs effective? How are training outcomes measured? Training Basics.
Employee Development Human Resource Management. Employee Training: Trends n Four economic and demographic trends u Unskilled and undereducated youth u.
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Conducting a Needs Analysis
 Introduction to I/O  Personnel Psychology ◦ Interviews ◦ Training & Development ◦ Performance Appraisal  Organizational Psychology ◦ Engagement &
HSM 220 MART Teaching Effectively/hsm220mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
Return on Investment: Training and Development Session 1 ROI and Evaluation.
9/12/2018 Product Knowledge.
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
HRD Evaluation Introduction.
HCS 370 Education on your terms/snaptutorial.com.
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
نیازهای آموزشی بیماران و طبقه بندنی این نیازها کارگاه مدیریت آموزش بیمار فاطمه حشمتی نبوی دکتری پرستاری.
Education Theory and Practice B ETP520S
Presenter: Angelia Bendolph Harkcon, Inc.
Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model
Evaluation of training European Administrative School
Adjunct Training – August 2016 | Jason Anderson
Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter

OBJECTIVES Know the difference between focusing on training and focusing on performance Know the difference between focusing on training and focusing on performance List the three areas of focus in training evaluation List the three areas of focus in training evaluation Describe the various methods used for evaluating training and performance Describe the various methods used for evaluating training and performance List and describe Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training List and describe Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training

Introduction Final step in ISD is summative evaluation Final step in ISD is summative evaluation Ignored because of time and $ Ignored because of time and $ To ensure training programs are effective To ensure training programs are effective Training vs. Performance Training vs. Performance

Three Areas of Focus Focus on performance allows training programs to be more effective Focus on performance allows training programs to be more effective Individual Individual Process Process Organization Organization (triple focus of evaluation)

Methods Performance checklists Performance checklists Pre- and Post-tests Pre- and Post-tests Reaction sheets Reaction sheets Performance appraisals Performance appraisals

Four Levels of Training Evaluation Reaction Reaction Learning Learning Behavior Behavior Results Results

Reaction Measure participants reaction Measure participants reaction Feedback is valued Feedback is valued Invested in improvement Invested in improvement Participants motivation to learn Participants motivation to learn Reaction sheets, course critiques Reaction sheets, course critiques

Learning “Learned” means increase in skills knowledge or change in attitude (Kirkpatrick 1998) “Learned” means increase in skills knowledge or change in attitude (Kirkpatrick 1998) Pre- and post-test Pre- and post-test

Behavior Participants experience a change in behavior due to training Participants experience a change in behavior due to training Four conditions are necessary Four conditions are necessary  Having a desire to change (training factor)  Knowing what to do and how (training)  Having a climate that is conducive to change (organizational)  Being rewarded for instituting the change (organizational)

Results Did the training have an impact on the organization (profits, revenue, errors) Did the training have an impact on the organization (profits, revenue, errors) Time consuming Time consuming Hard to quantify Hard to quantify

Practice Test A focus on training allows the program being developed to be more effective at addressing the organizational issues. A focus on training allows the program being developed to be more effective at addressing the organizational issues. True or False

Practice Test Which level evaluates how much of what was learned in the training has been applied to the work environment in support of the organizational goals? Which level evaluates how much of what was learned in the training has been applied to the work environment in support of the organizational goals?BEHAVIOR

Practice Test Kirkpatrick’s second level is Kirkpatrick’s second level is a) Learning b) Behavior c) Results d) Reaction

QUESTIONS CONGRATULATIONS!!