ELECTORAL RISK MANAGEMENT POST ELECTION REPORT ON 2015 GOVERNORSHIP AND STATE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS Prepared by: INEC Electoral Risk Management (ERM) Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
East-African Elections Can ICT enhance the democratic process?
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Objectives of the Workshop.
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
Agricultural Programs and Resources Division New Mexico Department of Agriculture Soil and Water Conservation District Supervisor Election Rules.
2014 General Elections Presentation – 22/04/14. Timeline April Polling Station identification complete Correct Voter Details Setup Office in Suva Identify.
ANRC AACD Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 6 Appointments and Election of Directors.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
MEMBERS’ INFORMATION SESSION McMaster Association of Part-time Students May 12 7pmMUSC 234& via WebEx Presentation Electronic Referendum May 13-16,
DOs & DON’Ts of EARLY VOTING Michael Winn Director of Elections Travis County Texas.
Learning about the Election Process
Welcome! 1 Safe Harbor - Safe Schools, LLC - all rights reserved 2012.
ELECTORAL RISK MANAGEMENT ELECTION DAY REPORT ON 2015 GOVERNORSHIP AND STATE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS Prepared by: INEC Electoral Risk Management (ERM) Team.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Starting a Campus-Based Literacy Program: Ten Easy Steps An online training SCALE UNC-Chapel Hill.
ELECTORAL RISK MANAGEMENT ELECTION DAY REPORT ON 2015 PRESIDENTIAL AND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS Incidents of Violence and Theft of Election Materials.
Phone: Fax: Emergency Management: Fire Safety: 15 Edgewood Avenue Atlanta, Georgia website:
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
THE ROLE AND PERFORMANCE OF SECURITY AGENCIES IN THE 2011 ELECTIONS By Otive Igbuzor, PhD Hon. Commissioner, PSC.
NGAC Interagency Data Sharing and Collaboration Spotlight Session: Best Practices and Lessons Learned Robert F. Austin, PhD, GISP Washington, DC March.
Phone: Fax: Emergency Management Director: Fire Safety Officer: 15 Edgewood Avenue Atlanta,
Vocabulary from SSCG8. bias A favoring of one point of view.
International Election Observation Jacques Drouin September 8, 2011.
Security and L&O Management 2009 LS Election UT of DADRA NAGAR HAVELI.
RESULTS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM Date: 4 th February 2013 Venue : BOMAS.
Electoral Justice in Kosovo. Legal Framework Primary Kosovo Constitution Law on General Elections Law on Local Elections Criminal Code Law on the Courts.
DOST and RA 9369 or the Automated Election Law. Background on RA9369  Authorizes the Comelec to implement an end to end nationwide automated election.
Quality Program Roles Quality Council AVC/AVPs Quality Advisor
THE ELECTORAL CYCLE Charles Lasham Centre for Parliamentary Studies Seminar 9 th – 13 th July 2012.
Innovative use of ICT (Ushahidi) to promote Electoral Transparency and Good Governance In Nigeria The ReclaimNaija Story Chuks Ojidoh Deputy Project Director.
Idaho Procedures M100 OPTICAL SCAN PRECINCT TABULATOR.
ACE at a glance EMB DIALOGUE, 6 th December 2011, Stockholm, Sweden Samuel Jones, ACE Thematic Network Facilitator.
Extending the crime survey to include fraud and cyber Joseph Traynor.
Polling station staff briefing session The National Assembly for Wales Referendum 3 March 2011.
Impact Assessment Impact Assessment Guidelines for Class 1 Emergencies.
Election Observation Missions Vania Anguelova, Independent Electoral Consultant London, November 28 th 2011.
1 Crisis Management and Communication Dr. Joy Smith and Ms. Robin Denny.
SOLGM Wanaka Retreat Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 Ready? 4 February 2016 Samantha Turner Partner DDI: Mob:
THE SIMPLE GUIDE: COMPLETING AN INJURY/ACCIDENT REPORT For KPBSD Staff Members.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION TRAINING & EDUCATION VOTER REGISTRATION ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN VOTING OPERATIONS & ELECTION DAY VERIFICATION OF RESULTS.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
2 United States Department of Education, Privacy Technical Assistance Center 1 Western Suffolk BOCES Data Breach Exercise.
Community Electoral Information Session Welcome. This presentation has been developed by the AEC to help communities understand the electoral system and.
Response to an Emergency Training for 211 Staff in Ontario Updated September
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
EsdToolkit CLG - Supporting Local Information Systems Wendy Chong – Regeneration Performance and Digital Inclusion 12 June, 2008.
Best Practices in Vote Counts, Recounts, and Challenges EAC Board of Advisors June 18, 2008 Thad Hall, University of Utah.
Secondary PowerPoint 7: The Voting Process
UNDP NIGERIA Democratic Governance for Development Project (DGD II)
National Population Commission (NPopC)
Mike Cormack, Board Chair Public Employment Relations Board
District’s Plan for Disaster Preparedness.
SECRETARY OF STATE VOTECAL PROJECT CACEO New Law Conference Presentation December 16, 2016.
2017 Canvass Observer Training
Election Situation Room Professional Development Training
Conducting Council Elections
Postal Ballots of ELECTION STAFF
Improving Reliability of Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems
Red Flags Rule An Introduction County College of Morris
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Online Session 4.2: Designing Methodologies and Data Collection
Slide Deck 8: The Voting Process
Organization of Arab Electoral Management Bodies (ArabEMBs)
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme
Online Session 4.1: Designing Methodologies and Data Collection
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
The Electoral System.
About CMEV CMEV was formed in 1997 by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA), the Free Media Movement (FMM) and the Coalition Against Political Violence.
Slide Deck 9: The Voting Process
Management and Monitoring Systems
Thames Valley Chamber / Claire Logic
Presentation transcript:

ELECTORAL RISK MANAGEMENT POST ELECTION REPORT ON 2015 GOVERNORSHIP AND STATE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS Prepared by: INEC Electoral Risk Management (ERM) Team April 12, 2015

Introduction The Independent National Electoral Commission is implementing an Electoral Risk Management (ERM) project to support its activities during the 2015 national and state elections using the Electoral Risk Management Tool (ERMTool). In the run-up to the elections, the ERM team identified and analysed a series of risk factors and indicators covering the pre-election period. The subsequent risk alerts were shared with the INEC leadership to help improve their situational awareness in the lead-up to election. For the April 11 Governorship and State Assembly elections, the ERM team identified a number of election day and post election factors to analyse during and immediately after the election. Methodology and data sources : The ERM team established a desk in the INEC situation room on April 11. The team was composed of seven INEC staff members and was supervised by the Chief Technical Advisor to the INEC Chairman. The team received additional support from the International IDEA programme officer as well as the IFES Electoral Security Expert. The team developed risk alerts by collecting data from ERM desk officers, INEC supervisors in the field, the EOSC desk in the situation room, the INEC Citizens Call Centre in the situation room as well as through online sources such as the media and social media (for incidents of electoral violence). To source data in the field, particularly on election day, the ERM team used the ERM desk officers and INEC supervisors. Questionnaires were prepared using an online format and the ERM team collected data by telephone, monitoring online sources and coordinating with other desks in the Situation Room. Any information obtained via social media platforms to identify incidents of election-related violence were only included once the information had been confirmed or verified by an official or secondary source in the media or from official statements. It should be noted that data obtained from the field is not necessarily comprehensive, but represents the information available at the time of data collection. Data for this report was sourced between 12pm - 6pm. Numerical values and risk values: The values in each of the maps were developed in the election day operational plan developed prior to election day. Respondents were asked to estimate the number of polling units affected by a certain problem and were given three possible responses: -None/few = low risk -Some = medium risk -Many = high risk.

POST-ELECTION ALERTS

NUMBER OF PUS ACROSS STATES THAT ARE STILL VOTING AS AT 2PM Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM (SOME) HIGH (MANY) LOW (FEW)

COLLATION CENTRES ACROSS STATES THAT HAVE NOT FINISHED COLLATION AS AT 6PM Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM (SOME) HIGH (MANY) LOW (FEW)

MAP SHOWING MAIN REASONS COLLATION CENTRES HAVE NOT FINISHED COLLATION Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM; PUs STILL COUNTING HIGH; DISRUPTION OF COLLATION PROCESS LOW; PUs STILL VOTING

RESCHEDULING OF ELECTIONS OCCURING ACROSS THE STATE Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM (VOTING FINISHED IN 80-99% OF PUS) HIGH (VOTING FINISHED IN 0-79% OF PUS) LOW (VOTING FINISHED IN ALL PUS)

REPORTS OF ATTACKS ON COLLATION CENTERS Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM (SOME) HIGH (MANY) LOW (FEW)

REPORTS OF ATTACKS ON INEC OFFICIALS Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM (SOME) HIGH (MANY) LOW (FEW)

ARE THERE ANY REPORTS OF THEFT OR DESTRUCTION OF ELECTION MATERIAL Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC RISK LEVEL MEDIUM; SOME HIGH; MANY LOW; FEW

MAP SHOWING MATERIALS SNATCHED MATERIALS Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 Data source: INEC, ERM STATE DESK OFFICERS Mapped by INEC-ERM team on 12 APRIL 2015 RISK LEVEL MEDIUM (RESULT SHEETS) LOW (BALLOT BOXES)

INCIDENTS RELATED TO ELECTION DAY AND THE POST-ELECTION PERIOD

RISK MAPS ON ELECTION RELATED VIOLENT INCIDENTS The Risk Maps in the following pages show results of data gathered on election related violence that occurred during the gubernatorial election periods. No colour code is given to the map. The maps highlight number of incidents that occurred in the States as well as type of incidents. Description boxes on the map provide more information on the incidents. Maps show data recorded for election day 11 th of March/

Election Day Violent Incidents as at 4:30pm, April 11 th Data Source: ERM State Desk Officers, EOSC Desk officers, Media, Online reportsh7 - Number of Incidents Key: # Total number of incidents as at 4:30pm: 52 incidents Reports of violent incidents targeted at INEC, Polling units, officials, voters and materials There have been many reports of violence and shooting at several LGAs in Rivers. One police man and several others reported dead

Election Day Violent Incidents April 11 th Data Source: ERM State Desk Officers, EOSC Desk officers, Media, Online reports - Number of Incidents Key: # Total number of incidents recorded: 114 incidents Reports of violent incidents targeted at INEC, Polling units, officials, voters and materials

ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS