Speech acts and events. Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOING THINGS WITH LANGUAGE
Advertisements

PRAGMATICS – George Yule
Conversational Implicature (Based on Paltridge, chapter 3)
Pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS.
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
PRAGMATICS by George Yule
Philosopher J.L.Austin’s book How to do things with words (1962)
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
A CTING AND C ONVERSING Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.
CAS LX 502 Semantics 12a. Speech acts Ch. 10(3). Conventional sentence types Declarative. (Assertion) Declarative. (Assertion) I seem to have forgotten.
CAS LX 502 7a. Speech acts Ch. 8. How to do things with words Language as a social function. — I bet you $1 you can’t name the Super Tuesday states. —You’re.
Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Presentation on Formalising Speech Acts (Course: Formal Logic)
Macropragmatics Speech act theory.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
SPEECH ACT THEORY J. Austin & J.Searle
Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.
PS429 Social and Public Communication PS429 Social and Public Communication Week 4 (25/10/2005) Reading group discussion.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
6.3 Macropragmatics Speech act theory The cooperative principle The politeness principle.
Theories of Discourse and Dialogue. Discourse Any set of connected sentences This set of sentences gives context to the discourse Some language phenomena.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
+ 1. Pragmatics. - What is pragmatics? - Context 2. Speech acts. - direct speech acts - indirect speech acts.
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS SPEECH ACTS (AUSTIN, 1962).
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Pragmatics 1 Ling400. What is pragmatics? Pragmatics is the study of language use.Pragmatics is the study of language use. Intuitive understanding of.
Semantics by John I. Saeed
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
Your host E. Aminudin Aziz. Austin’s observation on (many or even most) acts realised through speech  People do things with words  The idea sharply.
Speech Act. Speech act theory was proposed by John. L. Austin and has been developed by J. R. Searle. They believe that language is not only used to inform.
Critical Reasoning.
Speech Act Theory Mohammad Alipour Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Pragmatics (1) Dr. Ansa Hameed.
Speech Acts and Speech Events Austin (1962) and Searle (1969)-it is possible to classify utterances into very small set of functions. We ought to assign.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing See R. Nofsinger, Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect. Sentence Structure Sentences can be classified based on the structures into: Declarative sentence Declarative.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Discourse and Pragmatics Speech Acts Lecture 4: Paltridge, pp
Direct and indirect speech acts
PRAGMATICS 2.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
To Linguistics Introduction Department of English Level Four
PERLOCUTIONS AND ILLOCUTIONS
Pragmatics within Linguistics
PRAGMATICS Prof. R. S. Pale
SPEECH ACT AND EVENTS By Ive Emaliana
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Three Kinds of Act.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
conversation takes place in real time, is spontaneous and unplanned
Lecture 7 Speech Acts II.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect.
Speech Acts: some notes useful for the assignment
Speech Acts.
Welcome back!.
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS 6.1 Speech Acts 6.2 IFIDS 6.3 Felicity Conditions 6.4 The Performative Hypothesis 6.5 Speech Act Classifications 6.6 Direct and.
Week 9 language in context
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing
Pragmatics.
Semantics Seven kinds of speech acts
Pragmatics.
How To Do Things With Words
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing Professor Lenny Shedletsky
Direct and indirect speech acts
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Presentation transcript:

Speech acts and events

Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such as compliment in [2a], acknow- Ledgement of thanks in [2b] and surprise in [2c]. [2] a. You’re so delicious. b. You’re welcome. c. You’re crazy. Actions performed via utterances are called speech acts. Different kinds of speech acts apply to the speaker’s communicative intention.

Ctions performed The circumstances surrounding the utterance are called speech event. Types of speech acts 1- locutionary act: It is the act of uttering or producing a meaningful Linguistic expression. 2- illocutionary act: It is the communicative purpose of an utterance. It is known as illocutionary force. 3- perlocutionary act: It is the effect of an utterance on the hearer. It is known as perlocutionary effect.

Ctions performed Q. How can speakers assume that the intended illocutionary force will be recognized by the hearers? A.By two things: illocutionary force indicating devices and felicity conditions. IFIDs It is an expression where there is a slot for a verb that explicitly names the illocutionary act being performed. Such a verb can be called performative verb (Vp). [6] I (Vp) that ….. The (Vp) can be ‘promise’, ‘warn’ etc.

Ctions performed Other IFIDs which can be identified are word order, stress and intonation, as in [8]. [ 8] a. You’re going! [I tell you Y-G] b. You’re going? [I request confirmation about Y-G] c. Are you going? [I ask you if Y-G] Felicity conditions are appropriate circumstances for the performance for a speech act to be recognized as intended. For example, the performance of [9] will be infelicitous (inappropriate) if the speaker is not a specific person in a special context (a judge in a courtroom) [9] I sentence you to six months in prison.

Felicity Conditions General Conditions.  Participants can understand the language being used.  They are not play-acting or being nonsensical

Content Conditions For both a promise and a warning, the content of the utterance must be about a future event Preparatory Conditions. When I promise to do something:  The event will not happen by itself  The event will have a beneficial effect

Sencerity Conditions For a promise, the speaker genuinely intends to carry out the future action For a warning, the speaker genuinely believes that the future event will not have a beneficial effect.

Essential Conditions By the act of uttering a promise I intend to create the obligation to carry out the action as promised. The utterance changes my state from non- obligation to obligation.

Ctions performed There are preconditions on speech acts. 1-The general conditions 2-The content conditions 3-The preparatory conditions 4-The sincerity conditions 5-The essential conditions (cf. pp.50-51) The performative hypothesis It assumes that underlying every utterance (U) there is a clause containing a performative verb (Vp) which makes the illocutionary force explicit. [10] I (hereby) Vp you (that) U

Ctions performed [11] a. Clean up this mess! (implicit performative) b. I hereby order you that you clean up this mess! (explicit performative) The advantages - It makes clear just what elements are involved in the production and interpretation of utterances. - It shows that some adverbs (honestly) or adverbial clauses (because I may be late) naturally attach to the explicit performative clause rather than the implicit version.

Ctions performed The disadvantages - uttering the explicit performative has a much more serious impact than the implicit version. - It is difficult to know exactly what the performative verb might be for some utterances. (p.52) Speech act classification There are five types of general functions performed by speech acts. 1- Declarations are those which change the world via their utterance. [15] a. Priest: I now pronounce you husband and wife.

Ctions performed 2- Representatives are those which state what the speaker believes to be the case or not, such as statements of fact, assertions, conclusions and descriptions. [16] a. The earth is flat. b. It was a warm sunny day. 3- Expressives are those which state what the speaker feels. [17] a. I’m really sorry. b. Congratulations!

Ctions performed 4- Directives are those which speakers use to get someone else to do something, such as commands, orders, requests and suggestions. [18] a. Gimme a cup of coffee. b. Could you lend me a pen, please? c. Don’t touch that. 5- commissives are those which speakers use to commit themselves to some future action. [19] a. I’ll be back. b. I’m going to get it right next time.

Ctions performed Direct and indirect speech acts Types of speech acts can be made on the basis of structure: declarative, interrogative and imperative. Their related communicative functions are statement, question and command/request. [20] a. You wear a seat belt. b. Do you wear a seat belt? c. Wear a seat belt! Whenever there is a direct relationship between a structure and a function, we have a direct speech act. Whenever we have an indirect relationship between a structure and a function, we have an indirect speech act.

Ctions performed Thus, a declarative used to make a statement is a direct speech act, but a declarative used to make a request is an indirect speech act. [21] a. It’s cold outside. * The same applies to the other structures. [23] a. Could you pass the salt? b. Would you open this? * * * * * * * * *