Workshop B: Maximising the use of PMF reviews within NDCs Case study: NottinghamNDC National data – local knowledge NDC National Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
Getting the show on the road : citizenship through learner-led events Brenda Dean Regional Trainer Post-16 Citizenship Support Programme Oxford : 29 th.
Audit Commission Presentation Calderdale - Partnership Working: Objectives of the review The project focused on partnership working in Calderdale by focusing.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Involving young people Commissioning Workshop “Setting the Standards in Sheffield”
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
YOUTH CRIME AND NDC Key findings from Phase 1 of the National Evaluation Sue Adamson National Evaluation Crime Theme Team.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
DELIVERING SUCCESSION STRATEGIES Some lessons from the New Deal for Communities Programme 4 December 2008 SHARED INTELLIGENCE MOVING FORWARD FROM THE NDC.
CREATING OPPORTUNITIES – JOB CREATION WITH THE THIRD SECTOR LEARNING FROM COMMUNITY JOBS SCOTLAND Alex McTier 18 th September 2013.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
School Improvement Service in Partnership with National and local approaches from England that raise the capacity of organisations to deliver careers advice.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Local Police Planning and Scrutiny ACC McCormick, Local Policing East
The effectiveness of the school’s approach to the identification and development of future school leaders – Alfred Salter Primary School What were our.
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
HR Business Impact Survey Introductory Slides can be adapted.
Council for Disabled Children May What is Independent Support? A 2-year programme to provide additional support to young people and parents during.
RAISING YOUNG PEOPLES’ ASPIRATIONS DENISE McLELLAN CHIEF EXECUTIVE NHS WALSALL WALSALL PARTNERSHIP CONSULTATION EVENT 8 FEBRUARY 2010.
NHS ISLINGTON JSNA UPDATE JSNA Workshop 30 th September Presented by Rachel Maan.
Lucy Akhtar, Children, Young People and Families Communities and Tackling Poverty Welsh Government Family Support– Welsh Government Perspective.
The Sunderland Compact Stephanie Blayney Partnership Development Manager Graham Burt Strategy Development Manager.
Presentation structure An Overview of Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (KTP) The benefits of engaging with KTP How KTP works Case study: Plymouth City Council.
NAVCA Quality Award Andrea Allez Performance Improvement Manager Excellent service for local groups.
Eccles Housing Market Report Community Committee Meeting 25 th January 2005 Shahla Zandi Strategy and Planning (Partnerships and Planning)
CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: Update on Evaluation Planning for the Strategic Plan.
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at Middlesex University Ian Pearson, Head of Academic Quality.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
2011 Scheme Briefing Presentation. –Definition of Mentoring –Aims –Structure / Responsibilities –Quality standards –Recruitment –Matching –Mentor support.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
Key Principles for Preparing the DCSD Community Plan 1.Integration – Social, Economic, Environmental Well-being focused on outcomes and people centred.
2 The aim of Essex Insight ( ) is to share a wide range of information with the public and organisations that operate in Essex.
Better Community Engagement Training for Trainers Course Day 1 This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
What, Why and How? IPSCAN Master Class September 2013.
Statistics for Transparency, Accountability, and Results: The Busan Action Plan for Statistics PARIS21 & The World BankMeeting on the Busan Action Plan.
Framework for success workshop 1 st October 2009.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Name of Pilot Project: Developing pedagogy through collaboration, action research and reflection. Aim of the Project: to set up a collaborative partnership.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
KEITH WOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING MANAGER NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL A Presentation to the 3 rd Annual AAP Conference – 6 November 2009 The Role.
21st March “Supporting Southend Together” Southend Together Board 21st March 2007.
Merton Draft Health and Wellbeing Strategy Provides the focus for the partnership work of the Health and Wellbeing Board and determines its areas of influence.
Local Area Agreement Strengthening delivery Improving Outcomes Jon Bright Director of Policy and Delivery Birmingham City Council.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
WIRRAL LOCAL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP Jim Wilkie Deputy Chief Executive Wirral Borough Council February 2004.
A Vision for the future of partnerships in Ealing?: the principles Review of the Local Strategic Partnership Initial Report to LSP Executive 26 May 2010.
C4EO – Ways of Working Heather Rushton, Planning and Performance 1.
East Sussex Assembly Annual Meeting 10 July 2008 Eastbourne, East Sussex.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
Youth in Focus. Young people’s voices “ money issues are a key thing for me” “the right kind of support is really important to me” “ forming relationships.
The District’s Housing Strategy Progress so far and future delivery 25 th January 2007.
Regional Economic Strategy (RES) Leading the Way and Action Plan Gillian Roll, One NorthEast NERIP Measuring the Economy Seminar 20 th November 2006.
Pre-school Learning Alliance Organising, Operating and Delivering the service at Queens Park Children’s Centre.
Student Partnership Agreements: Impact and Change
Facilitator for NatSIP
Senior Management Leadership Programme Review and next steps
Course Rep Training Coordinators’ Network
Regulation 4 - Elements of the Plan
Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS
Quality in Evaluation: the international development experience
Process and Impact Review
Strategy
East Sussex Community Resilience Programme
RESEARCH FUNDING Organisational communication Science Communication
Presentation transcript:

Workshop B: Maximising the use of PMF reviews within NDCs Case study: NottinghamNDC National data – local knowledge NDC National Evaluation

Developing a Performance Management Approach Marguerite Adewoye Performance & Evaluation Coordinator

Past Experience Pioneered a Citizens’ Jury approach for scoring process. 20 residents involved each year. Training in team working. Some project visits. Evidence presented by “witnesses” from NDC staff and partner organisations. Panel type scoring.

Past Experience Some residents became involved in other parts of the NDC programme. High level of transparency in the process of scoring. Residents did not feel prepared enough to deal with such a large amount of information. Some partners felt uncomfortable with the confrontational style of assessment. Impact measurements were incomplete possibly leading to poor decisions.

Evidence Outcome statistics where new information is available. Output analyses of the projects contributing to the theme. A progress report on each project currently active in each theme. Other selected MORI Household Survey analyses as required to evidence the various parts of the PMF criteria. The contents and results of consultation on this evidence by residents, partners and staff.

Performance Groups Mid January – Six themed performance groups participants in each: residents, NDC staff and partner organisations. Resident training to take place early January. Provide provisional thematic scores, however the emphasis is on making suggestions for improvement plan. Plan was for briefing events on statistical evidence to be held in December.

Involving Major Partners Recent groundwork in linking NDC outcomes with LAA targets. NDC interventions identified in Local and City Action Plans. ONENottingham’s Block Leads who are from various public sector partners will be participating in the performance groups as part of the development of performance management across the city. This will give them the opportunity to examine the interactions of various public and voluntary sector interventions at a neighbourhood level.

Involving Major Partners GOEM have been involved in the development of this approach from the start and are kept informed on progress through monthly strategic management meetings. They have been instrumental in encouraging partnership working with the LSP. The final scoring and composition of the PMF Report will be negotiated between the NDC Partnership and GOEM in February after the performance groups.

Ongoing Performance Management Now receiving several sets of information on a rolling basis, from local sources and national evaluation team. Information on delivery (monitoring and evaluation) being collected on an ongoing basis. Performance Groups will meet again approximately 6 months after current PMF. Improve responsiveness of programme management.