Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
Advertisements

Lec 25: Ch2.(T&LD): Site planning
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT The Comprehensive Plan – Key to Concurrency Photo: Ragan Smith Inc.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
June 18, 2013 WINDSOR PARKWAY – ROSWELL ROAD INTERSECTION RELOCATION FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Capital Region Transportation Planning Agency Regional Mobility Plan Capital Region Transportation Planning Agency Regional Mobility Plan.
Lec 8, TD: part 1, ch.5-1&2; C2 H/O: pp : Urban Transportation Planning, Intro. Urban transportation planning process and demand forecasting Short-
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Multi-Modal Concurrency PSRC TRAC-UW Depart of Urban Design and Planning Evans School.
Lec 28: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Traffic assignment Learn how to assign generated and distributed trips to the street system approaching the site.
Lec 19, Ch.17, pp : Sample simple timing problems (Objectives) Master the steps of simple signal timing through 4 sample problems in the textbook.
Lec 26: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Trip generation
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Land-Use and Transportation
Urban Planning Grade 12 Geography. What you should be learning ► Illustrate strategies to improve urban environments ► Evaluate models of urban structure.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
HB Rough Proportionality and City of San Antonio Requirements Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. September 30, 2009 Christina De La Cruz, P.E.
FREIGHTSUPPORTIVE LAND USE PLANNINGGUIDELINESFREIGHTSUPPORTIVE PLANNINGGUIDELINES FHWA Talking Freight Series May 18/05 Video Seminar on Context Sensitive.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
1 Wakulla County Concurrency Management System October 6, 2011.
RR Farms, LLC Presented by James Stowers, Esq. Wright, Casey & Stowers, P.L. --- Pioneer Square --- Pioneer Square.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Problem 1: Determination of Facility Types for Analysis.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Local Zoning Policy Effects on Transportation Planning – and vice versa April, 2005.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Modeling Drivers’ Route Choice Behavior, and Traffic Estimation and Prediction Byungkyu Brian Park, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Studies University.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Lec 27: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Directional distribution of site traffic Notice the difference in the trip distribution process between urban transportation.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Health Impact Assessments And the Built Environment What’s the Connection, ANYWAYS?
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Thoroughfare Plan Update
32 Transportation Midway City 2016 General Plan
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Travel patterns in a city
Travel patterns in a city
Design Criteria CTC 440.
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development of the Provo/Orem area) Understand that accessibility plays an important role (for site planning) Understand the differences between urban transportation planning and site (transportation) planning

Review of transportation-land use cycle The construction of a new arterial streets, or major reconstruction of an existing thoroughfare, modifies the accessibility of an area; this, in turn, leads to development and increased traffic demands. When I was a student some 20+ years ago, the University Parkway was hugged by apple orchards!

Forces that influence the dynamics of land development include… Governmental policy and programs at the national, state, and local levels At local level: comprehensive (master, general) plan, zoning ordinance, and subdivision regulations Changes in family income Changing family and personal preferences Transportation technology and cost structure Transport system changes Level of Service provided by the urban transport system

Accessibility: The transportation system is the basic infrastructure element which influences the pattern of urban development. San Diego experience after about 170 miles of freeways have been constructed. Increased traffic volumes and property values Change in system LOS

Hypothetical example: accessibility and market area What this argument wants to say is that the effect of lowered travel speed (longer travel time) will disproportionately affect the market area. E.g. My wife says “There’s no decent outlets in Utah County! Park City has one, but it’s not as big as the ones in NJ and it’s too far. I would rather run to TJ Max.”

Accessibility: The transportation system is the basic infrastructure element which influences the pattern of urban development (cont) Change in shopping-center market area Before the DC beltway construction After the beltway construction ( lighter shade ) Travel time greatly reduced by the Beltway Trip to multiple malls became feasible (chaining shopping trips)

Accessibility: The transportation system is the basic infrastructure element which influences the pattern of urban development (cont) Migration of primary retail location (sounds like the Provo/Orem area) Downtown developed first Southeast: residential development  away from CBD  Need for a shopping area within reasonable travel time  Mall development Southeast: Continual development in the southeast area  A new mall

Urban transportation planning: summary

4 levels of urban planning process A very long range horizon for strategic planning of major transportation corridors land use patterns and other permanent elements of the urban environment An intermediate 20-year horizon for the planning of significant changes in transportation facilities, water, waste water, and other major infrastructure elements and land use patterns A short-range horizon (5 to 10 years) for planning and programming of major development Design and construction of individual public works projects and private developments Urban transportation planning Site planning

Urban transportation planning: Purpose Identify major travel corridors and provide projections of the approximate volume of traffic within these corridors Identify major potential problem areas in the proposed network Provide a basis for planning and programming major network improvements Evaluate the compatibility of the future land use and transportation assumptions  A macroscopic way of looking at the system This macroscopic planning cannot provide detail data such as turning volumes and peak hour volumes which are needed for actual physical facility design.

A macroscopic tool does not meet the needs of the microscopic level site-planning Reliable projections of turn movements at individual intersections or access drives Reliable projections of the traffic volumes on individual street segments Reliable estimates of traffic volumes at access drives as for different access locations and/or designs The effect of numerous access points to an arterial as opposed to only a few direct access points Left-turn and right-turn requirements Effects of change in land use Effects of modest changes in the location of activities Reliable estimates of the traffic on the frontage roads separate from that or the main lanes of a feeway or at-grade arterial

Site planning Site specific and micro-scale planning involving analysis of Traffic impact of specific proposed development Adequacy of the access drives Stability of the on-site circulation and parking Can the existing intersection and streets handle increased traffic? Change in turning movements? How much extra traffic go through the community?

Site planning (cont) Requires detailed geometric, traffic, and control data to perform these tasks See Table 1-2 on pp. 13 & 14.