Public School Choice, Integration, and Peer Environments: Evidence from Durham, NC Robert Bifulco University of Connecticut Helen F. Ladd Duke University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Document on Racial and Ethnic Disparities Data from the Davis Joint Unified School District compiled by Jann Murray-García, M.D., M.P.H. Nicelma.
Advertisements

Affirmative Action in Higher Education after the Seattle and Louisville Decisions: Reexamining the Socioeconomic Alternative AAAS/NACME Roundtable Richard.
Parental Choice and Segregation: Evidence from the United States Helen F. Ladd
American Education Policy What Works Link to Education data.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Teacher Effectiveness in Urban Schools Richard Buddin & Gema Zamarro IES Research Conference, June 2010.
Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
Explaining Race Differences in Student Behavior: The Relative Contribution of Student, Peer, and School Characteristics Clara G. Muschkin* and Audrey N.
Housing Segregation and Spatial Mismatch Race and Ethnicity Population Trends and Policies.
Public and Private School Choice in Greater Hartford: A Brief Overview and Computer Mapping Analysis Jack Dougherty and Naralys Estevez Trinity College,
KIPP: Effectiveness and Innovation in Publicly-Funded, Privately-Operated Schools October 4, 2012 Presentation to the APPAM/INVALSI Improving Education.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Using State Longitudinal Data Systems for Education Policy Research : The NC Experience Helen F. Ladd CALDER and Duke University Caldercenter.org
OCTOBER 13, 2010 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION RESEARCH SEMINAR SERIES Natasha K. Bowen UNC School of Social Work Too Good to Be True: Can a Brief Writing Intervention.
Mikaila Mariel Lemonik Arthur Data on Race and Education.
Race and Magnet School Choice: A Mixed-Methods Neighborhood Study in Urban Connecticut Jesse Wanzer, Heather Moore, and Jack Dougherty Cities, Suburbs,
Closing the Achievement Gap: A path to lower mortality rates in minority groups Through education reform directed at closing the achievement gap between.
Magnet Schools and Peers: Effects on Student Achievement Dale Ballou Vanderbilt University November, 2007 Thanks to Steve Rivkin, Julie Berry Cullen, Adam.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 8 Neighborhood Choice.
What should an index of segregation measure? Rebecca Allen Institute of Education, University of London Presentation to Bristol Segregation.
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
Enrollment Actual Fall Housing Enrollment Average Daily Attendance year.
Effects of School Choice on Achievement II Discussion.
Understanding Student Achievement: The Value of Administrative Data Eric Hanushek Stanford University.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Dropout Data Report State Information February 12, 2013.
Chapter 8 Neighborhood Choice McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Q: Have NYC schools become more or less segregated over the last 10 years? Source: IBO analysis of student data provided by the DOE’
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
Measuring the Achievement Effects of Charter Schools in North Carolina Helen F. Ladd (Duke) Presentation for SREE conference Based on joint research with.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 7 EDUCATION.
Data Analysis of Sweetwater High School Presented by: LeLycia Henderson & Zorayda Delgado.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
Asian Americans and Affirmative Action. What is Affirmative Action? Institutional efforts to increase the number of underrepresented minorities in U.S.
DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
Link Between Inclusive Settings and Achievement in Urban Settings Elizabeth Cramer Florida International University.
Education: American Indian Students Vs. American Students Two Realities in One Continent Arianna Pavoncello Let’s Get Started!
Topic: Final Project Review. The following Power Point is a template (a sample for you to follow) for the way your final presentation should be formatted.
Persistence of Segregation in the United States: A Century of Inequality John R. Logan Brown University.
School Segregation, School Poverty and Incarceration in Minnesota.
1 Economic Segregation: Challenging Ohio’s Schools Rebecca Reno and Jason Reece Research Associates Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnicity.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
WHY SEGREGATION?. Patterns of Segregation in Los Angeles Income Segregation –Map of median income –Map with % earning over 100,000 –Map with % earning.
The Impact of Comprehensive School Counseling Programs on Student Performance Greg Brigman, Ph.D. Linda Webb, Ph.D. Elizabeth Villares, Ph.D. Florida Atlantic.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
FCD CWI 1 The Foundation for Child Development Index of Child Well- Being (CWI) 1975 to 2004 with Projections for 2005 A Social Indicators Project Supported.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Education applications and potential use for liability and remedy.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Do Your Parents Affect Your Future? A survey at Deering High School tells you why. By Sarah Muzzy.
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
1 School Improvement & Accountability Update for P.S. Jones Middle Presented by: Tracey Nixon Principal.
Widening Participation - who, what, how and where? Linking London: a case study in practice 'Working in partnership to create opportunities'
FCD CWI 1 The Foundation for Child Development Child and Youth Well-Being Index (CWI) 1975 to 2005 with Projections for 2006 A Social Indicators Project.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
Have Post-Secondary Access Policies Have Helped Marginalized Youth? Karen Robson (York University), Robert S. Brown (Toronto District School Board), and.
14-Feb-03RAND1 Vouchers and Charter Schools What We Know and What We Need To Know Brian Gill RA.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
Tony McCoy EDL 518 Summer 2010 Elmwood High School- iirc Data Evaluation.
Annual Report to the Public CENTERPOINT OCTOBER 10, 2016 SCHOOL DISTRICT.
New York City Independent Budget Office Education Team
Discipline Identification and Reporting
Racism & Educational Inequality in the Lives of African-American Youth
School Segregation by Race & Socioeconomic Status
Tract > 75% White Tract > 75% Black Tract > 25% Hispanic Tract > 25% White and > 25% Black Tract has other racial composition.
Findley Oaks Elementary Data Overview
Interpreting Racial and Ethnic Income and Wealth Gaps: Framing Matters William R. Emmons* Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis March 28, 2019 *In collaboration.
Presentation transcript:

Public School Choice, Integration, and Peer Environments: Evidence from Durham, NC Robert Bifulco University of Connecticut Helen F. Ladd Duke University Stephen Ross University of Connecticut

Theory Outgroup Avoidance Hypotheses Neutral Ethnocentricism Liberation Model

Choice in Durham Assigned schools 21 elementary schools; 6 middle schools Liberal transfer policy Magnet schools 6 elementary schools; 2 middle schools Year-round schools 3 elementary schools; 2 middle schools Charter schools 6 elementary schools; 6 middle schools

Grades 3-5Grades 6-8 All stdnts w/ Addr. DataAll stdnts w/ Addr. Data Total Number Assigned School59.8%61.5%57.9%58.8% Magnet School12.4%12.8%13.8%14.1% Year-Round Schl6.1%6.4%10.1%10.3% Transfer15.8%16.5%10.1%10.4% Charter School5.8%2.7%5.1%3.6% Alternative Schl0.1%0.0%3.0%2.8%

Empirical Analyses Decisions to Opt Out Schools Chosen by those who Opt Out Counterfactual Comparisons

Decision to Opt Out Probit Model Y igs = f (X igs,C z,D igz ) Predictors of Interest –% black and % college educated in assigned attendance zone –Distance to schools with higher % white and higher % college educated

Decision to Opt Out Results for white parents with college education are consistent with outgroup avoidance/neutral ethnocentrism. –10 point decrease in % college educated in assigned zone increases likelihood of opting out by 10.4 percentage points (Elementary) –10 point increase in % black in assigned zoned increases likelihood of opting out by 15.5% (Middle) –Students more likely to opt out the nearer they live to a school with 15% more white students than in their assigned school

Decision to Opt Out Some results consistent with neutral ethnocentrism –white parents without a college degree are more likely to opt out of schools with a higher % college educated parents, –black parents with college degree are less likely to opt out of schools with a higher % black students Overall support for neutral ethnocentrism is weak Black parents without college more likely to opt out: the higher the % black, the lower the % college educated, The closer they live to a school with higher % college educated parents

Differences in Peer Environment for Students Opting Out (Grade 6-8) BlacksWhites Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. % black * * % coll. ed. parents * * Avg. reading score * * Parents without CollegeParents College Degree Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. % black * % coll. ed. parents * * Avg. reading score * * Below Average AchieversAbove Average Achievers Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. % black * % coll. ed. parents * * Avg. reading score * *

Differences in Peer Environment for Students Opting Out (Grade 3-5l BlacksWhites Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. % black * * % coll. ed. parents * * Avg. reading score * Parents without CollegeParents College Degree Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. % black * % coll. ed. parents * Avg. reading score * * Below Average AchieversAbove Average Achievers Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. Assigned School Chosen SchoolDiff. % black * * % coll. ed. parents * * Avg. reading score *

Racially Integrative and Segregative Choices Grades 3-5 % Making Integrative Moves % Making Segregative Moves White students Black students All students Grades 6-8 % Making Integrative Moves % Making Segregative Moves White students Black students All students

Integrative and Segregative Choices, By Class Grades 3-5 % Making Integrative Moves % Making Segregative Moves Parents with college Parents without college All students Grades 6-8 % Making Integrative Moves % Making Segregative Moves Parents with college Parents without college All students

Racial/Ethnic Segregation, Actual Compared to Counterfactual Grades 3-5 IsolationExposure to Whites Actual Counter- factualActual Counter- factual Students Own Ethnicity Black * * White * * Hispanic * Grades 6-8 IsolationExposure to Whites Actual Counterfa ctualActual Counterfac tual Students Own Ethnicity Black * White * * Hispanic *

Exposure to College Educated Education of Student's Own ParentActual Counter- factual Elementary Less than College College Degree Middle School Less than College College Degree

Schools with largest change in student composition Elem. Sch #1 Elem. Sch #2 Middle Sch #1 Middle Sch #2 % White in Zone % White in School % Coll Ed. in Zone % Coll Ed. In Sch Avg. Ach. In Zone Avg. Ach In Sch % Incons. In Zone % Incons. In Sch % Superior in Zone % Superior in Sch

Conclusions School choice in Durham has had: small effects on racial segregation larger effects on segregation by class. Some neighborhood schools have significantly higher concentrations of disadvantaged students as the result of choice programs. In the absence of direct controls over the student composition of particular schools, school choice programs of the type used in Durham, are unlikely to decrease student segregation by race or class relative to neighborhood assignment policies.

Outstanding Questions Effect of choice programs on residential locations decisons Effect of choice programs on decision to opt for private schools.