Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Race and Magnet School Choice: A Mixed-Methods Neighborhood Study in Urban Connecticut Jesse Wanzer, Heather Moore, and Jack Dougherty Cities, Suburbs,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Race and Magnet School Choice: A Mixed-Methods Neighborhood Study in Urban Connecticut Jesse Wanzer, Heather Moore, and Jack Dougherty Cities, Suburbs,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Race and Magnet School Choice: A Mixed-Methods Neighborhood Study in Urban Connecticut Jesse Wanzer, Heather Moore, and Jack Dougherty Cities, Suburbs, and Schools Research Project at Trinity College, Hartford CT http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ/css

2

3

4

5 What questions can be asked with these types of data?

6 Part 1: Quantitative Research Questions 1) School quality: What is the relationship between magnet application rates and standardized test scores, for both the neighborhood schools and the magnet schools? 2) Geography: How do magnet schools vary in their level of “magnetism,” meaning the average distance they attract applicants? 3) Neighborhood race: How do magnet applicant rates vary across neighborhoods, and are they statistically representative of the racial demographics of each area?

7 Part 2: Qualitative Research Questions 4) Neighborhood rate: How do Hartford parental rationales on magnet school choice vary in neighborhoods with high versus low magnet applicant rates? 5) Parental race: How Hartford parental rationales on magnet school choice vary by race?

8 Pooled data from over 4,000 applications to 6 HPS elementary magnets in Spring 2007 lottery Includes student race, address, magnet preferences Part 1: Methodology -- Data

9 Geographic Information System software (like ArcGIS) allows one to conduct spatial analysis of demographic patterns in magnet school applications or enrollments Part 1: Methodology -- GIS

10 Link data to street map Part 1: Methodology -- Geocoding

11 Geocode street address data as individual points on map Part 1: Methodology -- Geocoding

12 Overlay neighborhood boundary lines (census tracts, elementary school zones, etc) Part 1: Methodology -- Geocoding

13 Use colors to represent data groups Zone BZone A Part 1: Methodology -- Geocoding

14

15 RQ 1) Magnet applicants driven by School Quality? Modest “Pull” relationship toward high-scoring magnets

16 RQ 1) Magnet applicants driven by School Quality? Modest “Pull” relationship toward high-scoring magnets Weak “Push” relationship away from low-scoring neighborhood schools

17 Magnet SchoolAverage Distance (miles) Simpson-Waverly1.9 Mary Hooker2.8 Noah Webster2.9 Breakthrough3.1 Annie Fisher3.2 Kinsella3.2 RQ 2) Magnet applicants driven by Geography? Wide variation across small city suggests that parents are not simply choosing a magnet based solely on geographical convenience of location

18 3) Magnet applicants driven by Neighborhood Race? Hartford Public Schools: 41% Black (mostly North End) and 52% Hispanic (mostly South End)

19 3) Magnet applicants driven by Neighborhood Race? Chi-square analysis comparing expected applicants (based on neighborhood racial composition) to observed

20 3) Magnet applicants driven by Neighborhood Race? In about half of the city’s neighborhoods, Black students statistically more likely to apply if they were a racial minority (relative to Hispanics); similarly, Hispanics less likely to apply when they were the racial majority (relative to Blacks)

21 Part 2: Qualitative Research Questions 4) Neighborhood rate: How do Hartford parental rationales on magnet school choice vary in neighborhoods with high versus low magnet applicant rates? 5) Parental race: How Hartford parental rationales on magnet school choice vary by race?

22 Part 2: Methodology -- Interview Design Door-to-door interviews with parents of school- age children in four neighborhoods – 2 high-rate of magnet applicants – 2 low-rate of magnet applicants

23 – Current school and whether applied to magnet – Perceptions of neighborhood school and magnet schools – Demographics Part 2: Methodology -- Interview Design

24 Part 2: Methodology -- Interview Sample

25 RQ 4) Parental Rationale & Neighborhood Magnet Rates? No meaningful differences between parents’ views on schools in high- versus low-rate neighborhoods

26 RQ 4) Parental Rationale & Neighborhood Magnet Rates? No meaningful differences between parents’ views on schools in high- versus low-rate neighborhoods Choosers expressed similar rates of “pull” motivations in both types of neighborhoods “My niece goes to Hartford Magnet Middle School and it has a good reputation” -Chooser from low-rate area “The information that I got was that the curriculum was different, and they provide more programs for the children.” -Chooser from high-rate area

27 RQ 4) Parental Rationale & Neighborhood Magnet Rates? No meaningful differences between parents’ views on schools in high- versus low-rate neighborhoods Non-choosers expressed similar rates of satisfaction with current school in both types of neighborhoods “They are doing so well. When you got a good thing going, why change it?” -Non-chooser from low-rate area “My kids are doing good there. Most of their teachers were my teachers. They take care of them.” -Non-chooser from high-rate area

28 Racial differences in talking about magnet choices RQ 5) Parental Rationale & Race?

29 Racial differences in talking about magnet choices RQ 5) Parental Rationale & Race? Over half of white families rejected all Hartford Public Schools: “Never thought of it. I just knew I was never sending them to a Hartford school” “[My children] have always had a Catholic school education.”

30 Racial differences in talking about magnet choices RQ 5) Parental Rationale & Race? Over half of white families rejected all Hartford Public Schools: “Never thought of it. I just knew I was never sending them to a Hartford school” “[My children] have always had a Catholic school education.” None of the 31 non-white families followed this pattern Instead, close to half of African-American parents constructively criticized their neighborhood school: “There isn’t much that they do with them to make them really think and focus. So I’m just trying to find something that will challenge them more and get better grades.”

31 Conclusion: Our mixed-methods neighborhood-level analysis emphasizes how race influences the magnet school choice process. Based on our small-scale study, it is possible that magnet schools may not be reducing racial isolation, as originally designed. http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ/css


Download ppt "Race and Magnet School Choice: A Mixed-Methods Neighborhood Study in Urban Connecticut Jesse Wanzer, Heather Moore, and Jack Dougherty Cities, Suburbs,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google