1 US CMS ASCB (Advisory Software & Computing Board) u Function u Membership u Activities u Future Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GridPP Meeting, 28/6/06 UB Overview à Role of the UB n Represent user community within GridPP management n Request and allocate.
Advertisements

4/2/2002HEP Globus Testing Request - Jae Yu x Participating in Globus Test-bed Activity for DØGrid UTA HEP group is playing a leading role in establishing.
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
Title US-CMS User Facilities Vivian O’Dell US CMS Physics Meeting May 18, 2001.
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
Lucia Silvestris, INFN Bari and CERN/CMC Status Report on CPT Project 23 March 2001, CERN Meeting del Consorzio INFN Status Reports on CPT Project, on.
Research Computing with Newton Gerald Ragghianti Nov. 12, 2010.
Auger Project Management H. Glass Director’s Review15-Dec-2011 Fermilab (Technical Division) has hosted Auger Project Management office since collaboration.
FAMILY COMMUINTY ADVISORY COUNCIL. Children’s Board Family Resource Centers (CBFRC) are designed to help families and communities become happier, healthier.
U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven.
Hall D Online Data Acquisition CEBAF provides us with a tremendous scientific opportunity for understanding one of the fundamental forces of nature. 75.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
Organizing Information Technology Resources
October 23, 2000USCMS S&C Project Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing The Project Plan Matthias Kasemann Fermilab FNAL Oversight Panel October.
Experiment Requirements for Global Infostructure Irwin Gaines FNAL/DOE.
November 15, 2000US CMS Tier2 Plans Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Tier 2 Center Plans Matthias Kasemann Fermilab DOE/NSF Baseline Review.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
ARGONNE  CHICAGO Ian Foster Discussion Points l Maintaining the right balance between research and development l Maintaining focus vs. accepting broader.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
DOSAR VO ACTION AGENDA ACTION ITEMS AND GOALS CARRIED FORWARD FROM THE DOSAR VI WORKSHOP AT OLE MISS APRIL 17-18, 2008.
14 Aug 08DOE Review John Huth ATLAS Computing at Harvard John Huth.
US-CMS Software and Computing 1st Meeting of the FNAL Oversight Panel, October 2000 Core Applications Software Lucas Taylor Northeastern University.
Planning for security Microsoft View
Election Committee Report Florida State University May 11, 2002 US CMS Collaboration Meeting Jim Hanlon and Jay Hauser US CMS Election Committee.
ASTRONET Coordinating Strategic Planning for European Astronomy T HE N ETWORKING.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
ICANN Root Name Server System Advisory Committee March 2, 1999 SUNTEC Convention Center Singapore.
US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004.
DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, US CMS US CMS M&O Planning Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001.
U.S. ATLAS Tier 1 Planning Rich Baker Brookhaven National Laboratory US ATLAS Computing Advisory Panel Meeting Argonne National Laboratory October 30-31,
OSG Tier 3 support Marco Mambelli - OSG Tier 3 Dan Fraser - OSG Tier 3 liaison Tanya Levshina - OSG.
US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Brookhaven National Laboratory DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory.
BNL Tier 1 Service Planning & Monitoring Bruce G. Gibbard GDB 5-6 August 2006.
…building the next IT revolution From Web to Grid…
Tony Doyle - University of Glasgow 8 July 2005Collaboration Board Meeting GridPP Report Tony Doyle.
28/2/2000DJ for FOCUS1 LHC Computing Review  Announced by H. Hoffmann autumn 1999  First Steering Committee meeting 12/1999  By end of 'spring' (?)
GriPhyN EAC Meeting (Jan. 7, 2002)Paul Avery1 Integration with iVDGL è International Virtual-Data Grid Laboratory  A global Grid laboratory (US, EU, Asia,
E-Government Initiative Geospatial Information One-Stop FGDC Coordination Group December 4, 2001 John Moeller.
Friday the 18th of May, 2001US CMS Physics J.G. Branson1 Physics in (US) CMS James G. Branson UC San Diego US CMS Collaboration Meeting Riverside CA.
Session 161 National Incident Management Systems Session 16 Slide Deck.
LCG CERN David Foster LCG WP4 Meeting 20 th June 2002 LCG Project Status WP4 Meeting Presentation David Foster IT/LCG 20 June 2002.
U.S. ATLAS Computing Facilities Overview Bruce G. Gibbard Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. LHC Software and Computing Review Brookhaven National Laboratory.
IAG – Israel Academic Grid, EGEE and HEP in Israel Prof. David Horn Tel Aviv University.
DOSAR Roadmap Jae Yu DOSAR Roadmap 5 th DOSAR Workshop Louisiana Tech University Sept. 27 – 28, 2007 Jae Yu Univ. of Texas, Arlington LHC Tier 3 Efforts.
1 Project Management Software management is distinct and often more difficult from other engineering managements mainly because: – Software product is.
November 27, 2001DOE/NSF review of US LHC S&C projects1 The Software and Computing Committee (SC2) in the LHC Computing Grid Project M Kasemann, FNAL.
J.J.Blaising 18 April 02DataGrid and LCG1 LCG J.J Blaising LAPP-IN2P3 LHC Computing Grid Project (LCG) Launch Workshop March RTAG Common Use Cases.
Elections for USLUO’s Executive Committee John Huth, Harvard Boaz Klima, Fermilab 2 nd US LUO Annual Meeting September 25-26, 2009.
DPS/ CMS RRB-T Core Software for CMS David Stickland for CMS Oct 01, RRB l The Core-Software and Computing was not part of the detector MoU l.
Advanced User Support in the Swedish National HPC Infrastructure May 13, 2013NeIC Workshop: Center Operations best practices.
Presentation to the Finance and Administration Advisory Group ▸Implementing a New Space Request Process ▸Process for requesting additional space.
Chapter 3 Project Management Parts of this presentation is extracted from Ian Sommerville’s slides located at
Scientific Computing at Fermilab Lothar Bauerdick, Deputy Head Scientific Computing Division 1 of 7 10k slot tape robots.
Towards a dependable and sustainable National IT Infrastructure MANAGING IT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS: IMPLEMENTATION NEEDS.
10-Feb-00 CERN HepCCC Grid Initiative ATLAS meeting – 16 February 2000 Les Robertson CERN/IT.
Hall D Computing Facilities Ian Bird 16 March 2001.
US Tier 2 issues Jim Shank Boston University U.S. ATLAS Tier 2 Meeting Harvard University August, 2006.
Strategies for NIS Development
A Dutch LHC Tier-1 Facility
Schools & Youth Structure
Assessment of Our Status After 183 Days (6 months)
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Preparations for the CMS-HI Computing Workshop in Bologna
Position Descriptions
Collaboration Board Meeting
The Survival Plan.
IMPLEMENTATION ,EVALUATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MIS
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

1 US CMS ASCB (Advisory Software & Computing Board) u Function u Membership u Activities u Future Plans

2 Function u Advise the US CMS Software & Computing Project Managers u Represent the interests of the collaboration u (Work with project managers to prepare reviews, define tasks, etc)

3 Membership u Elected (at large)  Paul Avery  Srdihara Dasu  Sarah Eno  Irwin Gaines (chair)  Shuichi Kunori  David Stickland u Ex Officio  Martti Pimia  Jim Branson (elected)  Dan Green  Harvey Newman (elected)  Matthias Kasemann  Lothar Bauerdick  Lucas Taylor  Vivian O’Dell  Ian Fisk

4 Activities u Participate in organization of project  Concur in appointment of project management  Discuss initial budget allocations u Aid in reviews  Internal review Oct ’00  DOE/NSF Review Nov ’00  Upcoming May internal and DOE/NSF reviews u Advise on selection of prototype Tier 2 Sites u Advise on personnel allocation to tasks, prioritization and hardware acquisition plans

5 Details of Issues Dealt With u Detailed revision and justification of numbers for Tier 1 and Tier 2 hardware needs (efficiencies, user disk space, additional simulation and re reconstruction, …) u Contingency vs management reserve u Timing for Tier 2 prototypes, pilots and production centers u Procedure for Tier 2 prototype site selection u Discussion of potential Tier 2 funding from NSF: project manager should control u Funding travails with NSF u Assignment of additional personnel to production support u Integration with Grid R&D projects u Common projects u Revised “baseline” based on stretched out new LHC schedule

6 Future Plans u Continue to prioritize needs of collaboration for hardware acquisitions and software support u Continue to assist project management u Detailed discussion of multi tier model for distributed analysis (funding agencies have not yet bought in to Tier 2)  Is physics done at home or at a few central sites?  What is size of “critical mass” for useful analysis  Fully define role of Tier 2 centers u Establish mechanisms for short term feedback and prioritization