DATA COLLECTION Documenting Our Accomplishments in a Time of Accountability, Competition, and Limited Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
New Service Models. Why? Simply put: we cant do all you tell us you want and need Service and collection models that defined excellence in academic libraries.
Teacher Evaluation and Pay for Performance Michigan Education Association Spring 2011.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION Open Forum January 16, 2013.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
The CSU at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Meeting the Needs of the People of California.
Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention Presented to Nebraska RtI Consortium February 23, 2007 Kathy L. Bradley-Klug,
Academic Planning Data Base System Overview California State University.
Implementing Undergraduate-Faculty Teaching Partnerships in Your Classroom Anna L. Ball Neil A. Knobloch University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference Texas Reporting Presented by: Bethany Heslam.
1. 2 Documenting Faculty Credentials for the Faculty Roster 2002 SACS reaffirmation – UK cited for non-compliance related to faculty competence Comprehensive.
LEARNING CENTER & SUPPLEMENTAL LEARNING ISSUES Wheeler North San Diego Miramar College Ray M. Sanchez Fresno City College.
Course Portfolio: Making Pedagogy Visible Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Queensborough Community College, CUNY Spring 2008.
Electronic EDI e-EDI. The EDI has been in use since 1999 using a paper-based system and computerized spreadsheets to collect and manage EDI data. Over.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Creating a Teaching/Professional Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Integrating Information Literacy into Blackboard Pamela Jackson San Diego State University CARL Conference April 22, 2006 Asilomar.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Moreno Valley Strategic Planning Schedule Voting Protocol Subcommittee Functions MV Planning Process.
PROGRAM REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS SERVICES WHY??
B. Joseph White Human Resources Front End (HRFE).
QIPM SURVEY RESULTS 2006 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE DEPARTMENT (NOW THREE DEPARTMENTS)
FINANCIAL UPDATE AND BUDGET MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 2014.
The University of North Carolina Office of the President State Higher Education Executive Officers The University of North Carolina Office of the President.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
1 PENN STATE HARRISBURG CAPITAL COLLEGE Curricular Cooperation at Penn State: Major Themes and Goals
Community Service-Learning: Design, Implementation and Evaluation Cheryl Rose, Canadian Association for Community Service-Learning.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Legislative Accountability Measures – Part I. AB 94 Budget Trailer Bill Section Costs of Education Due October 1, 2014, and October 1 of each.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
Transformation and Coordination of Developmental Education Programs Strengthening Student Success Conference 2007 San Jose, California.
VSEP Implementation For Program Administrators
WELCOME. How to Accurately Report Time and Effort for Faculty March 2007 Activity Reporting System.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Relationship with Program DirectorsRelationship with Program Directors New major ideas are generated at the department level Departments offer courses.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
E VALUATING YOUR E - LEARNING COURSE LTU Workshop 11 March 2008.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
CASRAI Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information David Baker, Executive Director.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Curriculum, Budgets, and Enrollment Management Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Ian.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
June 1, 2016 CSU Chancellor’s Office Program Design and Proposal Development Academic Planning Training Summit.
August 08 Montgomery College 1 Institutional Effectiveness Facilities Master Plan Middle States Review College Area Review Outcomes Assessment Academic.
Course Classification Primer Margy Merryfield June 1, 2016.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Course Classification Primer
LINKS Peer to Peer Support Program
State performance plan indicator 14
State performance plan indicator 14
Presentation transcript:

DATA COLLECTION Documenting Our Accomplishments in a Time of Accountability, Competition, and Limited Resources

Need for Documentation u Political Context u Fiscal Context u Focus on OUTCOMES u Continuous Improvement and High Quality

Previous CSU Methods for Collecting Information u CSU Specific u GCS/LSA Database u Campus Profile for Annual Report u Listserv inquiries u Various systemwide questionnaires u SNAPS u Technology Survey u Other Venues u Campus Compact Annual Survey u Listserv postings u Campus Cares

Expectations for u Continued use of methods in the past: u GCS Database: June 30, 2003 u LSA Database: August 29, 2003 u Campus Profile for the Annual Report: June 30, 2003 u Listserv inquiries u New method: APDB

Academic Planning Data Base System Overview California State University

Objectives u Collect, analyze, and provide statistic data on faculty workload and on courses taught u Conduct special statistical studies with data as needed for CSU administrators and state legislators

Overview The Academic Planning Data Base (APDB) is a Computerized Information System based upon two separate but coordinated files: The Faculty File – contains information on al l persons compensated from instructional or administrative accounts, and having teaching responsibilities in the CSU, regardless of funding sources. The Section File – contain information on all courses offered during a given term. The two files are linked by Social Security Number (SSN)

Campus Faculty File Key elements are : Year Term Campus Code Faculty SSN Faculty Name Assigned Dept & School Code Salary Range Code Instructional Faculty Fraction Instructional Admin Fraction Administrative Level Code Assigned Time Code Assigned Time WTU Other Support Fraction Faculty Transaction Data File # 1

Campus Course File Key elements are: Service-Learning Indicator Discipline Code Course Level School Code Department Code Course Abbreviation Course Number Course Suffix Section Number Course Classification (CS) Number Course Credit Units Enrollment Space Type Begin & End Time Meeting Days Faculty SSN Team Teaching Fraction Faculty Transaction Data File Course Section Transaction Data File # 1 # 2

APDB Standard Term Reports Course Section Report Section Size Frequency Distribution Rpt FAD Faculty Assignments by Dept. Report Summary by Classification and Level Report Course and Section Data Report

New APDB Report in Service Learning Report

Key Benefits u Monitor faculty workload u Monitor student faculty ratios u Monitor course offerings, enrollments, class sizes and mode of instruction by course level (LD, UD & GD) u Monitor space utilization

Key Benefit to Service Learning u Identify service-learning sections throughout the CSU u Generate systemwide reports on service-learning offerings and enrollments.

APDB System Overview Data Element Important to Community Service Learning

Service-Learning Indicator Definition This data element is used to identify courses designated as "service learning" by a particular CSU campus. In general terms, a service-learning course actively involves the student in a community service experience that directly relates to the content area of the course in question. Each CSU campus has a coordinator who implements and maintains policies and procedures for designating particular courses as service learning. Values Blank = Course section in question is not classifiable as ‘service learning’ (blank is defaulted to “no”) Y = Course section in question has been classified as ‘service learning’ by the reporting campus N = Course section in question is not classifiable as ‘service learning’

Implications for CSL u The campus “designates” service-learning sections in APDB. u Therefore, the campus must develop a process to identify and designate service- learning sections. u The campus must also develop a process to educate about, and implement, the service- learning course designation policy. u Campus will submit APDB data file on June 23, 2003.

Models for Consideration u Developing a Service-Learning Course Designation Policy u San Jose State University u Using the Service-Learning Course Designation Policy u CSU Fresno

QUESTIONS

NEXT STEPS IN SUPPORTING YOU TO MAKE THIS A REALITY

Next Steps u Meet with your APDB coordinator u Ask APDB coordinator what information management system is used on your campus to generate the APDB files (i.e. Banner) u Determine the process for “marking” service-learning sections in that information management system u Determine on campus who else should be involved

SMALL GROUP WORK u Based on the information that has been shared, what do you think your next steps will be on campus? Share your ideas with your colleagues and get some feedback u What support will you need in order to facilitate those steps?

WRAP-UP