AGATA Core - upgraded front end electronics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Detector Characterisation Group
Advertisements

April 17, 2015Jonathan Valvano EE445M/EE380L.6 Recap RTOS Debugging/verification Lab 4 Application of RTOS Input sound, analog filter Digital filter, FFT.
O Signal formation for energy, time and position measurements o Segmented detectors; - advanced FEE for Ge Detectors o Briefly, some specific issues and.
This lesson covers the following outcomes Unit 54 P1, P7, P8 Unit 6 P10, P11.
Specific requirements for analog electronics of a high counting rate TRD Vasile Catanescu NIHAM - Bucharest CBM 10th Collaboration Meeting Sept 25 – 28,
First complete test measurements of the AGATA Core _ Pulser Assembly. AGATA Core Pulser, Segments Bulk Capacitances (First measurements of the Pulser Core.
University of Milano Department of Physics and INFN HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE LOW-NOISE PREAMPLIFICATION OF NUCLEAR SIGNALS A. Pullia, F. Zocca, C. Boiano, R.
Ch7 Operational Amplifiers and Op Amp Circuits
EKT314/4 Electronic Instrumentation
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
Preliminary Design of Calorimeter Electronics Shudi Gu June 2002.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
L.Royer– Calice DESY – July 2010 Laurent ROYER, Samuel MANEN, Pascal GAY LPC Clermont-Ferrand R&D LPC Clermont-Fd dedicated to the.
SIGMA-DELTA ADC SD16_A Sigma-Delta ADC Shruthi Sujendra.
Detectors and Preamplifiers Detector deliveries Customer Acceptance Tests Available detectors AGATA triple detectors Scanning program P. Reiter IKP University.
B.Satyanarayana. B.Satyanarayana INO Weekly meeting June 8, Rise time: 2 to 3ns Pulse height: mV.
On the origin of Differential Crosstalk in segmented detectors B. Bruyneel for the AGATA week, Uppsala, Sweden July 2008.
P. Baron CEA IRFU/SEDI/LDEFACTAR Meeting Santiago de Compostela March 11, A review of AFTER+ chip Its expected requirements At this time, AFTER+
PSI - 11 Feb The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
65 nm CMOS analog front-end for pixel detectors at the HL-LHC
Status of integrated preamplifiers for GERDA GERDA meeting – MPI Heidelberg, Feb 20-22, 2006 F. Zocca, A. Pullia, S.Riboldi, C. Cattadori.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Presented By Mythreyi Nethi HINP16C.
Detector Module Three 36-fold segmented detectors 111 preamplifiers Cryostat Jürgen Eberth University of Cologne Detector Team: Dirk Weißhaar Preampl.
S. Bota – Calorimeter Electronics overview - July 2002 Status of SPD electronics Very Front End Review of ASIC runs What’s new: RUN 4 and 5 Next Actions.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
2/June/2009LHCb Upgrade1 Single ended ADC Differential ADC –Convert single ended signal to differential (use AD8138 amp) –ASIC differential output ADC.
Proposal of a digital-analog RPC front-end for synchronous density particle measure for DHCAL application R.Cardarelli and R.Santonico INFN and University.
AGATA Detector Meeting March 16th, 2006, Cologne Detector Acceptance Tests: delivered: three symmetric detectors S001 properties excellent S002 properties.
VMM Update Front End ASIC for the ATLAS Muon Upgrade V. Polychronakos BNL RD51 - V. Polychronakos, BNL10/15/131.
CBM 12 th Meeting, October 14-18, 2008, Dubna Present status of the first version of NIHAM TRD-FEE analogic CHIP Vasile Catanescu and Mihai Petrovici NIHAM.
Ultra-fast differential front-end electronics
Front End Electronics (FEE) solutions for large arrays of segmented detectors FEE for large array with segmented HP-Ge detectors - Specific case: combined.
TIMEPIX2 FE STUDIES X. Llopart. Summary of work done During summer I have been looking at a possible front end for Timepix2 The baseline schematic is.
Analog Front End For outer Layers of SVT (L.4 & L.5) Team:Luca BombelliPost Doc. Bayan NasriPh.D. Student Paolo TrigilioMaster student Carlo FioriniProfessor.
Readout Electronics for high-count-rate high-resolution
C.Beigbeder, D.Breton, M.El Berni, J.Maalmi, V.Tocut – LAL/In2p3/CNRS L.Leterrier, S. Drouet - LPC/In2p3/CNRS P. Vallerand - GANIL/CNRS/CEA SuperB -Collaboration.
FUNCTION GENERATOR.
Front End. Charge pre-amp and detector Voltage regulator. TOP side. Detector linear voltage regulator BOTTOM side. Charge pre-amp.
The AGET chip Circuit overview, First data & Status
Operational amplifier
Mrs V.S.KharoteChavan,E&Tc,PC poly
PADME Front-End Electronics
Valerio Re Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy
DCH FEE STATUS Level 1 Triggered Data Flow FEE Implementation &
A 12-bit low-power ADC for SKIROC
KLOE II Inner Tracker FEE
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
"Fast reset" ASIC Preamplifier
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
Detectors and Preamplifiers
Chapter 13 Linear-Digital ICs
DCH FEE 28 chs DCH prototype FEE &
AGATA Detector Work Performed at Saclay in lessons learned -
CAT of AGATA detectors &
Comparator What is a Comparator?
A Fast Binary Front - End using a Novel Current-Mode Technique
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
STATUS OF SKIROC and ECAL FE PCB
On the origin of Differential Crosstalk in segmented detectors
BESIII EMC electronics
AGATA week Uppsala, July 2008
Status of the CARIOCA project
Status report Detector team
AMICSA, June 2018 Leuven, Belgium
Presented by T. Suomijärvi
Presentation transcript:

AGATA Core - upgraded front end electronics Upgraded Charge Sensitive Preamplifier - new frequency compensation for Single & Dual Gain Core Reworked Dual Gain Core, reconfigurable: - either Single or Dual; either LV-CMOS or LVDS Programmable Spectroscopic Pulser - as a tool for self-calibrating energy, time, dead time, time alignment, detector characterization etc.) G. Pascovici for the AGATA Preamplifier and Detector Groups, Uppsala, 09.07.2008

Motivation, going on work… Follow-up on previous AGATA Week presentations: - Wiring and Frequency Compensations, B. Bruyneel and G. Pascovici, Orsay, 2007 - Dual Gain Core (e.g. with 5 MeV and 20 MeV ranges) Dino Bazzacco’s request, Aug. 2007 - ToT Method (calibration and measurements), Francesca Zocca et al, Padova, 2007

Transfer function at high frequency range  Dominant pole compensation See presentations of B. Bruyneel & G. Pascovici @ AGATA Week, Orsay, Jan, 2007 Return GND concept for single & triple cryostat Wires – inductivities …

Front-End Electronics & wiring in cryostat Issue: Front-End Electronics & wiring in cryostat Cold part Warm part Core return GND Cold part Warm part

AGATA Single & Dual Gain Core reworked frequency compensations tested with AGATA_Dummy-3D internal network compensation Lead comp. (1. OpAmp) Cryostat wiring as part of the front-end electronics external network compensation - minimum Miller effect (min.) - lead compensation (min.) - lead-lag compensation (adj.) - dominant pole compensation (adj.) AGATA Dummy 3D capsule + wiring

AGATA Single & Dual Gain Core reworked frequency compensations internal network compensation Lead comp. (1. OpAmp) Cryostat wiring as part of the front-end electronics external network compensation - minimum Miller effect (min.) - lead compensation (min.) - lead-lag compensation (adj.) - dominant pole compensation (adj.)

AGATA Single and Dual Core frequency compensations tr ~ 30-40 ns Multiple frequency compensations: - minimum Miller effect - lead compensation - lead-lag compensation - dominant pole compensation * without dominant pole & lead-lag compensation networks * implemented dominant pole & lead-lag compensation network Comments: Stability criteria not only oscillations, rather it is circuit performance as exhibited by peaking and ringing the method of compensation depends on the equivalent op amp type and feedback, source and load networks tr ~ 25 - 30 ns a HF rejection with almost no extra “price” paid for rise time !

(cold) tr ~ 26.8 ns Ch.1 @ ~ 800 mV tr ~ 29.2 ns Ch.1 @ ~ 220 mV Dual Core in ‘GP - Cryostat’ (cold) Dual Core in ‘GP - Cryostat’ (cold) cryostat equipped with AGATA cold parts and wiring (only 1.8 Ohm, no 48.5 Ohm!) tr ~ 26.8 ns Ch.1 @ ~ 800 mV ~ 25.6 ns Ch.2 @ ~ 220 mV Equivalent resolutions (if cold Cf ~1pF) Ch1 ~ 1.15 keV @ ~ 150 keV Ch2 ~ 1.25 keV @ ~ 150 keV (6 µs shaping time Ortec 671 & IKP-MCA) rise time ~ 26 -29 ns (+/- 2ns  10mV-1V) no overshoots & undershoots NB: flat top of ~ 500 ns (PSA  peaking) tr ~ 29.2 ns Ch.1 @ ~ 220 mV ~ 29.2 ns Ch.2 @ ~ 60 mV

Single / Dual Gain Core Final Specifications AGATA Single / Dual Gain Core Final Specifications news - core front-end Single or Dual Gain Extended range ~180 MeV (both single and dual gain) LV-CMOS or LV-DS for the INH-Ch1, INH-Ch2 and Pulser Trigger-In LV-CMOS for SHDN and Pulser DAC CNTRL lines Up-dated frequency compensation for cryostat wiring (dominant pole comp)

Time over Threshold (ToT) method See Francesca Zocca, AGATA Week, Padova, Nov. 2007; FreeDAC Workshop, Ljubljana, Mai, 2008

Fast Reset as tool to implement the “TOT” method Analog Mode + DT1 Active Reset – OFF Fast Reset circuitry ToT ~ DT2 Active Reset – ON very fast recovery from TOT mode of operation fast comparator LT1719 (+/- 6V) factory adj. threshold + zero crossing LV-CMOS (opt) LVDS by default

Dual Gain Core - the upgraded features and its structure Linear Range: 2keV -180 MeV (far beyond the ADC limit !) Two modes of operations: a) Pulse Amplitude b) Time Over Threshold (ToT) (0-5 MeV); (0-20 MeV)  (5-180 MeV); (20-180 MeV) cold part warm part Ch 1 ~ 200 mV / MeV C-Ch1 /C-Ch1 INH1 SDHN1 Pole /Zero Adj. Fast Reset (Ch1) Differential Buffer (Ch1) Common Charge Sensitive Loop + Pulser Wiring 36_fold segmented HP-Ge detector + cold jFET one MDR 10m cable Ch 2 ~ 50mV / MeV C-Ch2 /C-Ch2 INH2 SDHN2 Pole /Zero Adj. Fast Reset (Ch2) Differential Buffer (Ch2) Single Core or Dual Core wiring  FADC Programmable Spectroscopic Pulser Pulser CNTRL

Time over Threshold [ToT] method F. Zocca, AGATA Week Padova, Nov., 2007 Time over Threshold Analog Core Ch.1 Core Ch.1 Reset Threshold Ch.1 Analog Time over Threshold Core Ch.2 Core Ch.2 Reset Threshold Ch.2 5 MeV 20 MeV 180 MeV

keeping INH-C as LV-CMOS digital signal Issue: INH-C1 and Core Ch2 X-talk on the transmission line due to INH-C1 return GND … X-talk ~ 9 mV (~ slow signals) keeping INH-C as LV-CMOS digital signal Advantage: - simple upgrade of the single gain core to dual gain core Disadvantage: - relative large crosstalk  INH-C1 and 2.nd core signal INH-C1  Core_Ch2 X-talk ~ 15 mV (~ fast signals)

AGATA Dual Core crosstalk test measurements AGATA Dual_Core LVDS transmission of digital INH and Pulser_In signals AGATA Dual Core crosstalk test measurements Ch2 (analog signal) vs. LVDS-INH-C1 (bellow & above threshold) Core amplitude just below the INH threshold Core amplitude just above the INH threshold Ch1 @ INH_Threshold - (~ 4mV) Ch1 @ INH_Threshold + (~ 4mV) Ch2 @ INH_Threshold + (~ 1mV) Ch2 @ INH_Threshold + (- 1mV) LV_CMOS LV_CMOS INH_Ch1/-/ tr ~ 1.65 ns INH_Ch1/+/ INH_Ch1/+/ tf ~ 2.45 ns INH_Ch1/-/ (1) Core_Ch1, (2) Core_Ch2, (3) INH_Ch1(LVDS/-/, (4) INH_Ch1(LVDS/+/) G.Pascovici, Dual_Core IReS Test Box, warm jFET, Feb.23, 2008

Dual Core in ‘GP-Cryostat’ (cold) 5 & 10 m LVDS transmission line Trigger tin ~ 1.0 ns tr ~ 26.8 ns Ch.1 @ ~ 800 mV ~ 25.6 ns Ch.2 @ ~ 220 mV 5m cable tr, tf ~ 1.5 ns 10 m cable tr, tf ~ 1.5 ns ~ 22ns / 5m Resolutions: Ch1 ~ 1.15 keV @ ~ 150 keV Ch2 ~ 1.25 keV @ ~ 150 keV (6 µs shaping time Ortec 671 & IKP-MCA) Rise time ~ 26-29 ns NO overshoots & undershoots Pulse shape: flat top of ~ 500 ns tr ~ 29.2 ns Ch.1 @ ~ 220 mV ~ 29.2 ns Ch.2 @ ~ 60 mV

Rework to be done in the FADCs LV-CMOS to LVDS LVDS to LV-CMOS tin ~ 1.0 ns tr, tf ~ 1.5 ns 10m cable + 1.22V Tiny converter PCBs to be installed in the FADCs LVDS- TX LVDS- RX (2x)

Dual Gain Core - the upgraded features and its structure Linear Range: 2keV -180 MeV (far beyond the ADC limit !) Two modes of operations: a) Pulse Amplitude b) Time Over Threshold (ToT) (0-5 MeV); (0-20 MeV)  (5-180 MeV); (20-180 MeV) cold part warm part Ch 1 ~ 100 mV / MeV C-Ch1 /C-Ch1 INH1 SDHN1 Pole /Zero Adj. Fast Reset (Ch1) Differential Buffer (Ch1) Common Charge Sensitive Loop + Pulser Wiring 36_fold segmented HP-Ge detector + cold jFET one MDR 10m cable N.B. The dual gain core can be configured also as a Single Core with LV-CMOS digital signals Ch 2 ~ 50mV / MeV C-Ch2 /C-Ch2 INH2 SDHN2 Pole /Zero Adj. Fast Reset (Ch2) Differential Buffer (Ch2) Single Core or Dual Core wiring  FADC Programmable Spectroscopic Pulser Pulser CNTRL

Potential use of PSP for self-calibrating Parameter Potential Use / Applications Pulse amplitude  Energy, Calibration, Stability Pulse Form  Transfer Function in time (rise time, fall time) domain, ringing  (PSA) Detector Bulk Capacities  Crosstalk input data (also for Dummy Capacities) (Detector characterization) Pulse Form  TOT Method  (PSA) Repetition Rate (c.p.s.)  Dead Time (Efficiency meas.) (with periodical or statistical distribution) Time alignment  Correlated time spectra Segments calibration points  Low energy calibration points  Alignment of segment signals

Pulser Mode of operation Exponential Rectangular Advantage: Good DC Level Advantage: Same P/Z  good PSA Disadvantage: Different P/Z for Signal & Pulser PSA! - Bipolar Signals ( + & - ) Advantage / Disadvantage Base line OK (good P/Z), but two DC levels from pulser duty cycle, respectively Pulser Specs and Measurements Dynamic range: - Core 0 to ~ 180 MeV (opt. ~ 90 MeV) - Segments 0 to ~3 MeV (opt. ~ 1 MeV) Rise Time Range: 20 ns - 60 ns (by default ~45 ns) Fall Time Range: 100 µs - 1000 µs (by default ~150 µs) Long Term Stability: < 10 / 24 h - 4

Measurements: GSI Single Cryostat (Detector S001) Portable 16k channels MCA (IKP) Resolution (acquisition time 12-14h): - core 1.08 keV Pulser (Detector) - cold dummy (V3): 0.850 keV - segment Pulser: < 0.90 keV - core @ 59.5 keV: 1.10 keV - core @ 122.06 keV: 1.15 keV

Conclusions A very low noise, very wide dynamic range charge-sensitive pre-amplifier has been developed and tested to be used with a highly segmented and encapsulated HP-Ge AGATA Detector Furthermore its wide spectroscopic range has been successfully extended by more than one order of magnitude, by switching (below the maximum of the ADC range) from the standard amplitude spectroscopic method to the new TOT technique - two modes of operations  four sub-ranges, namely: 0-5 (20) MeV and 5(20)-180 MeV A very clean transfer function at very high counting rates and adverse cryostat wiring (useful set of 2D & 3D “Dummy - detectors”) An accurate Programmable Spectroscopic Pulser has been developed and imple- mented in the AGATA front-end electronics

Conclusions A very low noise, very wide dynamic range Single Core Dual Core A very low noise, very wide dynamic range charge-sensitive pre-amplifier has been developed and tested to be used with a highly segmented and encapsulated HP-Ge AGATA Detector Furthermore its wide spectroscopic range has been successfully extended by more than one order of magnitude, by switching (below the maximum of the ADC range) from the standard amplitude spectroscopic method to the new TOT technique - two modes of operations  four sub-ranges, namely: 0-5 (20) MeV and 5(20)-180 MeV A very clean transfer function at very high counting rates and adverse cryostat wiring (useful set of 2D & 3D “Dummy - detectors”) An accurate Programmable Spectroscopic Pulser has been developed and imple- mented in the AGATA front-end electronics Floating motherboard Floating motherboard Triple Ganil Triple Milano Floating motherboard Floating motherboard Triple Cryostat, one set of 12+1 warm CSPs