Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PID Controllers and PID tuning
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Operational Amplifier Theory and Performance  Modeling an Operational Amplifier  Feedback Theory o Feedback in the Noninverting Amplifier.
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Controller Design, Tuning. Must be stable. Provide good disturbance rejection---minimizing the effects of disturbance. Have good set-point tracking---Rapid,
Nyquist Stability Criterion
Nyquist Plot – First Order Lag
Lecture 8B Frequency Response
ChE / MET Mar Mar 07 2 Apr Mar 09.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Transforming C(s) into c(t): Negative Feedback Control with Proportional Only Controller Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
Level Team Team Members Note by Dr. Henry: List your team members’ names on this slide.
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Feedback Control Systems
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Lecture 7: PID Tuning.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم PID Controllers
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
Lynbrook Robotics Team, FIRST 846 Control System Miniseries - Summary of Lecture /03/2012.
Experimental determination of motor model parameters ETEC6419.
Freight Lift Bonus Project Work Book. forceheight XFTFT.
Sliding Mode Control for Half-Wave Zero Current Switching Quasi-Resonant Buck Converter M. Ahmed,Student member IEEE, M. Kuisma, P. Silventoinen Lappeenranta.
Higher Physics – Unit 2 2.4Analogue Electronics. Op-Amp An op-amp has two inputs and one output. The symbol for an op-amp is: inverting input non-inverting.
Chapter 13 1 Frequency Response Analysis Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant,
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
ME 335 Boğaziçi University A Study on Motor Speed Control.
Basic Concepts  Block diagram representation of control systems  Transfer functions  Analysis of block diagrams  P, PI and PID controllers ( Continuous.
1 Chapter 5 Sinusoidal Input. 2 Chapter 5 Examples: 1.24 hour variations in cooling water temperature Hz electrical noise (in USA!) Processes are.
‘Dude where's my muon?’ Trigger Efficiency of the Single Station. Edward Overton 1.
Process Control Basics Distillation Control Course December 4-8, 2004.
PID. The proportional term produces an output value that is proportional to the current error value. Kp, called the proportional gain constant.
Modern Control System EKT 308
Modern Control System EKT 308 Root Locus and PID controllers.
Chapter - Continuous Control
ChE 182 Chemical Process Dynamics and Control
Lecture 9: PID Controller.
1 Noise Figure Improvement using a Front End Transformer Hooman 9/9/13.
1 CBE 491 / Oct 12 Deadtime in a Process. 2 Dead Time in a Process Show how dead time might show up How it affects block diagrams How it affects.
ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems PID Control Dr. Tony E. Grift Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering.
Probably© the smoothest PID tuning rules in the world: Lower limit on controller gain for acceptable disturbance rejection Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Alternating voltages and currents
Frequency Response Analysis
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Project 1: Brake System Modelling & Control
Nyquist Stability Criterion
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Closed-Loop Frequency Response and Sensitivity Functions
Frequency Response Analysis
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
Presentation transcript:

Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005

Outline Voltage System Background Previous Work: SSOC, Step, Sine, Bode, P-Only PI Model Results PI Experimental Results Conclusions Luyben Method Review Recent Results Conclusions

Purple Team 9/14/05 Voltage System Schematic

Block Diagram M(t) is measured in % and C(t) is in Volts.

Purple Team 10/25/05 Operating Range: Output = 50V to 140V Operating Range: Input = 70% to 100% 75%-100% Input Slope = 2 V/%

Background: Step Input Voltage System K – Gain (Volt/%) t 0 – Dead Time (s) τ – Time Constant (s)

Background: FOPDT Fit

FOPDT Model

Background: Sinusoidal Input K – Gain (Volt/%) t 0 – Dead Time (s) τ – Time Constant (s)

Values taken from Point A  AR = 1.5  f = 4 Hz Bode Plot  K = 2 V / %   = 0.04 sec  t o = 0.08 sec

Background: Sinusoidal Input

Background: FOPDT Averages

Background: Feedback Loops Kc 1 0   s Ke st  R (volts) E ( ) M (%) C (volts) + - CE =

Background: P-Only Controllers

PI Controllers

PI Controllers (Kc = 0.8)

PI Controllers (Kc = 0.5)

PI Controllers (Kc = 0.4)

PI Controllers (Kc = 0.2)

PI Controllers (Kc = 0.1)

PI Controllers (Kc = 0.05)

PI Controllers

τIτI

Conclusions Recommend PI over P-only Recommend τ I = 0.1 Yields widest range of desirable decay ratios. Provides acceptable settling times.

Luyben Method Presented by William L. Luyben, Ph.D at Reno AIChE Meeting Nov. 6, 2001

Luyben Method 1.Insert relay into feedback loop. Relay 1 0   s Ke st  R (volts) E ( ) M (%) C (volts) + -

Luyben Method 2.Specify upper & lower limits of m(t)

Luyben Method

3.Find T u from c(t) 4.Calculate K cu

Luyben Method

What about t o and τ? I still have to run another test right?

Luyben Method

F=1 for Voltage System t o /τ = 2

Luyben Method t o = 2τ τ = 0.01 and t o = 0.02

Luyben Method

Conclusion Only one simple test required (7 steps) Works well for any order systems Similar Results to Bode