Prepared By Jacques E. ZOO Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature David Bohm, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (New York, 1957). From Feyerabend, P. K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WORLD VIEWS: WHAT IS TRUE?
Advertisements

WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Philosophy and Science
 French philosopher, mathematician and physical scientist (optics, physics, physiology)  Father of Early Modern Rationalist Philosophy  Early Modern.
Behind the welter of names – positivism, naturalism, post-positivism, relativism, feminist standpoint epistemology, foundationalism, postmodernism, each.
Science-Based Discussion Of Free Will Synopsis: Free Will: The capacity of mental intent to influence physical behavior. Classical mechanics makes a person’s.
Weber ‘Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Historical Explanation’.
Chapter Three Building and Testing Theory. Building Theory Human Nature –Determinism: assumes that human behavior is governed by forces beyond individual.
Introduction to Research Methodology
Hume on Taste Hume's account of judgments of taste parallels his discussion of judgments or moral right and wrong.  Both accounts use the internal/external.
LECTURE 12 ANTI-REALISM AND VERIFICATIONISM. WILLIAM ALSTON CLAIMS THAT MANY KINDS OF ANTI-REALISM ARE BASED ON VERIFICATIONISM VERIFICATIONISM IS A PHILOSOPHICAL.
Chapter Two SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN BUSINESS
Sabine Mendes Lima Moura Issues in Research Methodology PUC – November 2014.
Computability Thank you for staying close to me!! Learning and thinking More algorithms... computability.
Sociological Imagination and Investigation Lecture 2: What can we know and how do we know it? The philosophical presuppositions of sociological thinking.
Bell Ringer To what extent is science socially & culturally embedded? Provide an example.
Acquiring Knowledge in Science. Some Questions  What is science and how does it work?  Create a list of words to describe science  Which ways of knowing.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Jean Piaget ( ).
The Scientific Method. What is the Scientific Method? The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic.
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH TRADITIONS.
Science and Intelligent Design. 1.Introduction This presentation describes: 1.the logic of science in relation to ontology (i.e. the study of reality),
Research Methods and Design
N What do you expect from Science? n Science is a process, not a thing. n Science is a paradigm based on understanding nature (rather than passively observing.
Nature of Politics Politics: Science or Art?. The scientific approach Generally described as a process in which investigators move from observations to.
Critical Thinking in Education. Defining Critical Thinking Asking pertinent questions Evaluates statements & arguments Admits a lack of knowledge & understanding.
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
Virginia Standard of Learning BIO.1a-m
SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 4 Testing of statistical hypotheses.
Nursing Research Prof. Nawal A. Fouad (5) March 2007.
Chapter 2: The Scientific Method and Environmental Sciences.
MODULE 3 INVESTIGATING HUMAN AND SOCIL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CARIBBEAN.
On Denoting and its history Harm Boukema. Everyone agrees that “the golden mountain does not exist” is a true proposition. But it has, apparently, a subject,
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
EXISTENCE OF GOD. Does God Exist?  Philosophical Question: whether God exists or not (reason alone)  The answer is not self-evident, that is, not known.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Nature of Science. Science is a Tentative Enterprise  The product of the judgment of individuals  Requires individuals to defend their conclusions by.
The Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Goal of Modern Science… …to understand and explain how the natural world works. Science only gives us descriptions.
2010 Virginia Science SOL. Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science.
11/26/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant III Charles Manekin.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 5 Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Nature of Science Observation v. Inferences Hypothesis, Theories, & Laws Variables & Controls.
Definitions of Reality (ref. Wiki Discussions). Reality Two Ontologic Approaches What exists: REALISM, independent of the mind What appears: PHENOMENOLOGY,
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence or how come we all exist? Is there a rational basis for belief in God?
Logic UNIT 1.
Fall 2009 Dr. Bobby Franklin.  “... [the] systematic, controlled empirical and critical investigation of natural phenomena guided by theory and hypotheses.
Validity and Reliability in Instrumentation : Research I: Basics Dr. Leonard February 24, 2010.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
Transient Unterdetermination and the Miracle Argument Paul Hoyningen-Huene Leibniz Universität Hannover Center for Philosophy and Ethics of Science (ZEWW)
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Line and Angle Relationships 1 1 Chapter.
Critical Theory and Philosophy “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” Marx, Theses on.
What Is Science?. 1. Science is limited to studying only the natural world. 2. The natural world are those phenomena that can be investigated, discovered,
What is Postmodernism? A complicated term A set of ideas emerged as an area of academic study since the mid-1980s It is hard to define it is a concept.
1 Prepared by: Laila al-Hasan. 1. Definition of research 2. Characteristics of research 3. Types of research 4. Objectives 5. Inquiry mode 2 Prepared.
RESEARCH METHODS B 1. SESSION 2: SCIENCE AND RESEARCH (cont.) V.Scientific explanations VI. Theorizing and logical process 2.
Philosophy of science What is a scientific theory? – Is a universal statement Applies to all events in all places and time – Explains the behaviour/happening.
WHAT MODELS DO THAT THEORIES CAN’T Lilia Gurova Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology New Bulgarian University.
EXPERIENCE REASONING RESEARCH DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE REASONING Deductive Reasoning (Top-Down Approach) Deductive reasoning works from the more general.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
What is Philosophy?.
Meaning, Definition and Concept of RESEARCH
Philosophy of Mathematics 1: Geometry
Ethics: Theory and Practice
The Nature of Scientific Knowledge
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Hypothesis, Theories, & Laws Variables & Controls
Debate issues Sabine Mendes Lima Moura Issues in Research Methodology
Presentation transcript:

Prepared By Jacques E. ZOO Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature David Bohm, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (New York, 1957). From Feyerabend, P. K.

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  Nature is about the World we live in  and about ideas developed for understanding this world  It is often assumed-and the basic philosophy of many contemporary physicists supports this assumption that within sciences speculation and ingenuity can not play a very great role as

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature physical theories are more or less uniquely by the facts  Bohm in his book shows that this is not correct, and that today there exists a clash of ideas about fundamental things the imposing and perhaps a little terrifying picture of science as a unalterable and steadily increasing collection of facts is nothing but a myth

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature ingenuity and speculation play in physics as great a role as anywhere else  Bohm says, the separation between sciences and humanities is due to false picture, if not a caricature of science  It is this false picture which is attacked throughout his book

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  The book explicitly refutes the idea that complementarity, and only complementarity alone, solves all the ontological and conceptual problems of Microphysics  Bohm discusses and criticizes the validity of induction and empirical generalizations and of universal theories

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  Two interpretations of complementarity as an attempt to provide an intuitive picture for an existing theory, and as a heuristic principle guiding future research  One of the basic assumptions of Orthodox is that: in our descriptions of nature the purpose is to trace down, as far as it is possible

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature relations between the manifold aspects of our experience  For them the facts of experience play the role of building stones out of which a theory may be constructed, but which themselves neither can, nor should be modified  The reasonable assumption is that our ideas, and our experiences may be

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature erroneous and that the latter gives at most an approximate account of what is going on in reality  Cosmological generalization is that: the world contains infinitely many levels each level is characterized by a set of laws which may be causal or probabilistic, or both

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  In either case, each law inevitably has its errors, and these are just as necessary a part of its true significance as are those of its consequences that are correct  Every scientific description is true within a certain domain of validity  The assertion of the absolute validity of

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature a physical principle implies the denial of any theory that contains its negation  Scientific research does not, and can not lead to a knowledge of nature that is completely free from errors  The errors referred to could be either subjective or objective, or both depending on the complex behavior of nature

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  Nature is such that no law can ever be universally valid, hence it is sound scientific method to restrict the laws we find to a certain domain it is unsound method to apply them outside this domain, and never should we proclaim a certain law as universally valid, i.e. as valid in all domains of experimentation, and under all possible conditions

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  If we are careful enough in our pronouncements about the applicability of a scientific theory, and if we always restrict it to its proper domain,  We do not run into the risk of being refuted by new discoveries  More specifically, the assumption that Newton’s laws are universally valid has implications from the unlimited science

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  Bohm defines two basic cosmological principles of nature, namely: The principle of infinity of nature, and The principle that there exist complexes which are relatively stable over a certain period of time which allow for the description, in terms of finite laws and concepts of parts of nature  Cosmology describes basic structure of our world

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  The two principles by Bohm are not even empirical, or scientific  They represent absolute truth, and are based on experience, and  They are not defined within a certain domain of validity they are not capable of improvement by taking into account errors

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature  The conditioned validity of the law and its approximative character are thus wholly dependent upon the objective existence of such other domains  Lack of domains outside the domain of its applicability, leads to a statement about the infiniteness of matter in becoming unconditionally and absolutely valid

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature Conclusion:  It is quite impossible to entertain a point of view which has no reference to any facts whatever, and it is equally  Impossible to introduce a new moral system unless it is somewhat related to situations already existent

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature Conclusion:  Every theory of the universe, whether mythological or scientific in content, possesses some degree of truth.

By: Respickius Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature End of my Presentation! & Thank you for listening!