2015-2016 Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Advertisements

Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Monitoring – IDEA Grant
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Correction of Non-Compliance Prior to Notification Monitoring and Supervision March 11, 2013.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Monthly Special Education Coordinator Meeting November 13, 2012.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
WHAT IS EMIS? Education Management Information System Established by law in 1989, the Education Management Information System (EMIS) provides the architecture.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY March 10, 2011.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
March’s Special Education Coordinator Meeting March 12, 2013.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
12/15/2015LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children Mid Year Update Leslie County Schools.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MONITORING – IDEA GRANT Jenifer Spear Office of Special Education Programs.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Monitoring in California Special Education Division California.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) CEC Presentation March 2014 Grand Rapids, MI 1.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
January 21, 2014 Welcome! The January COP call will begin in a few moments. –Event password: 5COPcall –Event number: 666– To hear the presentation.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
SPR&I Regional Training
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015

Purpose of the review The primary focus of the department’s monitoring activities shall be on: 1)Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities; and 2)Ensuring that states meet the program requirements under Part B of the IDEA, with particular emphasis on those requirements that are most closely related to improving educational results for children with disabilities. ARSD 24:05:20:18.01

Which Districts Are Reviewed? Currently districts / agencies are reviewed once every four years. Districts / agencies are also reviewed for the following reasons: 1)The district had a complaint or Due Process in the past year. 2)If the district did not meet state targets on State Performance Plan (SPP)

Review Process Overview Announcement Letter Pre ‐ site Activities On ‐ Site Activities Corrective Action Plan Closing the File

Announcement Letter An announcement letter will be sent to each district/agency indicating they will receive an on-site or off-site visit during the upcoming school year.

Pre ‐ site Activities Team Leader will send an to make initial contact to the District Superintendent and Special Education Director – the district’s primary contact person will be established Schedule letter – delivered via and hard copy  Confirms the On ‐ site review date(s)  Schedule of Review Day(s)  Identifies the Review Team Members

 Child Count Verification The team will verify your December 2014 child count. Please make a copy of the front page of each IEP from the December 2014 child count. Remember the IEP needed is the one “in effect” on December 1, 2014.

 Data Team lead will provide districts with a copy of the data being reviewed prior to on-site review. Discuss any issues with district contact person. (Note: It may be in coordination with SPP Coordinator)

 Highly Qualified Staff The team will review the certification and job duties of district staff.

 Secondary Transition A pre-site transition letter with information pertaining to the number of transition files needed for the on-site review by category of disability.

 Comprehensive Plans Local education agency comprehensive plans – Contents. Each local education agency must have a current comprehensive plan approved by the school board on file with the district superintendent or designee. Documentation supporting the implementation of the local school district's comprehensive plan shall be maintained by the district for review by Special Education Programs staff during onsite monitoring visits. Districts shall update comprehensive plans consistent with § 24:05:21:01.02 and recertify their content annually. ARSD 24:05:21:01 Prior to on-site review the district will need to submit the most updated comprehensive plan to the team lead for review. If a compliance issue is identified and new policy procedures are required, they will require it in the comprehensive plan

On-Site Activities

Entrance Activities Entrance Conference Participation in the entrance conference is left to the discretion of the district administration. We welcome all participants. Introductions and Overview of the day Confirm location of copier Review Team Meets

Staff Interviews Team members will conduct interviews with principals and general education teachers This year’s focus was on the referral process and suspension The team leader will also meet with the Special Education Director to review the district’s policies, procedures and practices.

General Supervision File Reviews Student files from the 2014 child count must be available to the review team. All Special Education Teachers, Early Childhood Educators, and Speech Pathologists will have files reviewed. Student files will be selected by the team leader from each special education teacher’s caseload and as a representative sample of Disability Categories Technical assistance will be provided to the district special education staff through the file review process.

State / District Assessment Accommodations The team will be looking at accommodations provided during State/District assessment. If the documentation needed by the team is not available in the files reviewed for general supervision, additional files will be selected.

Indicator 13 Pre-site will include specifics for the district. Representative Sample of Disability Categories Minimum 2 files per teacher of transition aged youth. Each transition teacher will show evidence of inviting outside agency. Sample transition letter

Private School Only for districts with private school in district boundaries. Review the consultation documentation. Pull two files based on 2014 Private School Child Count 1 files will be receiving services. 1 file of student not receiving services.

Fiscal If district budgets in IDEA Federal Funds Application purchasing of equipment for student or classroom, reviewers will follow up.

Exit Activities Review Team Meets to compile Information Exit Conference The team will meet with the staff to review the findings. Final determinations of non-compliance will be made by Special Education Programs. Participation in the exit conference is left to the discretion of the district administration. We welcome all participants.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan (CAP) OSEP Memo 09 ‐ 02 identified two federal requirements: Prong 1 Fix the file in which non ‐ compliance was identified Prong 2 District provide additional documentation as evidence of continued correction of non ‐ compliance

CAP Timeline A copy of the Accountability Report will be sent both via and hard copy within 30 days from the on-site review. Prong 1 (60 days) Individual files requiring immediate correction Prong 2 (1 year timeline starts from report date) Additional IEP documentation and/or update policy, procedure, and practice. ARSD 24:05:20:20 Note: If not completed in a timely manner, sanctions could be applied. ARSD 24:05:20:23

CAP Reports Public Report Lists the ARSDs that are in non-compliance Posted to the State website until CAP is closed District Report Prong 1 Student/Teacher Non-compliance issue What needs to be submitted Prong 2 Requirements to show continued compliance

The team leader will provide technical assistance to the district throughout the corrective action phases. Appealing the CAP We encourage districts, if you feel an error was made, please put your appeal in writing along with reasons why and submit to the office for review.

Closing The File When all the Prong 1 and Prong 2 corrections are finalized, the CAP will be officially closed. The team lead will notify the office. A letter stating that all items of non-compliance have been met will be sent to the superintendent and special education director.

Rescheduling due to weather The team leader will: Notify the District Superintendent and team members Establish potential dates to reschedule the review Coordinate the reschedule date

What Can Districts do to Prepare for Reviews - Right Now? Notify your special education staff Make copies of all the IEP cover sheets that will verify the 2014 Child Count Create a list for each staff member of initial and re-evaluations completed by each one during the school year.

Thinking about the Future If you always do what you always did, You will always get What you always got. ~Albert Einstein

File Review Procedures New this year: One file review with sped teacher, general education teacher and administrator

File Review Form

QUESTIONS?

PowerPoint will be found on Accountability Process link at accountability.aspx accountability.aspx Arlene Maxfield Special Education Programs 605 ‐ 773 ‐ 2594

Resources IEP TA Guide IEP Transition TA Guide, Indicator 13 checklist and TSLP contact information