MICE Electronics & DAQ P J Smith University of Sheffield.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assignment 1 Team: Pirate Captains. Were making another chat program. But WHY?! Theres so many!
Advertisements

SAM 2007 v4 The Student Experience Including SAM Projects, SAM Exams and SAM Training.
Int 2 Computing Software Development.
MICE Target Report Video Conference 15/03/07 Chris Booth Sheffield 15 th March 2007.
ICT Class System Life Cycle.  Large systems development projects may involve dozens of people working over several months or even years, so they cannot.
Student Getting Started Guide Updated June Ensure that you are connected to the Internet. 2. Launch your web browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox,
MIS 2000 Class 20 System Development Process Updated 2014.
MICE Target Electronics, DAQ and BPS MICE/ISIS Target Meeting 17 th September 2010 P J Smith – University of Sheffield.
The MICE target and the ISIS BPS system By Edward Overton 1.
Computer Engineering 203 R Smith Project Tracking 12/ Project Tracking Why do we want to track a project? What is the projects MOV? – Why is tracking.
Using an FPGA to Control the Protection of National Security and Sailor Lives at Sea Brenda G. Martinez, Undergraduate Student K.L. Butler-Purry, Ph.D.,
MICE Electronics Upgrade P J Smith (University of Sheffield) J Leaver (Imperial College) 17 th June 2009.
GOLD Status and Phase-1 Plans Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Status of Electronics and Control System P J Smith University of Sheffield 20 th August 2009.
MICE Target Electronics & DAQ Update P J Smith University of Sheffield 2 nd December 2009.
MICE Electronics Update Mice Target Workshop – Dec 2010 P J Smith James Leaver.
Another 3U unit to be attached to top of here yet! (3U unit provides a few more LED’s and the IO to the FPGA board. It will also provide space for an additional.
MICE Target Report Chris Booth (for target team) Sheffield 7 th May 2009.
Characterization Presentation Spring 2006 Implementation of generic interface To electronic components via USB2 Connection Supervisor Daniel Alkalay System.
Status of Electronics & Control System P J Smith University of Sheffield 16/12/2009.
Target Control Electronics Upgrade 08/01/2009 J. Leaver P. Smith.
Target Electronics 27 th November Overview Current System is composed of many discrete units with separate processors that do not talk to each other.
1 FINAL PRESENTATION PART A Implementation of generic interface To electronic components via USB2 Connection Supervisor Daniel Alkalay System architectures.
Target Assembly and Installation Update 20 th August 2009 Paul Hodgson The University of Sheffield.
Target Controller Electronics Upgrade Status P. Smith J. Leaver.
1 Mid-term Presentation Implementation of generic interface To electronic components via USB2 Connection Supervisor Daniel Alkalay System architectures.
Confidential / Property of Danfoss Bauer GmbH 23 June Danfoss Bauer GmbH Installation Notes MC-CAT Version 6.0.
4 types of implementing information systems
Trigger and online software Simon George & Reiner Hauser T/DAQ Phase 1 IDR.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
MICE CM26 March '10Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM25 o DAQ System Upgrade o Luminosity Monitors o Sequels of.
© 2008, Renesas Technology America, Inc., All Rights Reserved 1 Introduction Purpose  This training course provides an overview of the installation and.
12/09/2015Sheffield University 1 Target Electronics Recap - Decision has been made to rebuild the target electronics control system so that it is upgraded.
Leo Greiner IPHC testing Sensor and infrastructure testing at LBL. Capabilities and Plan.
DPNC Yannick FAVRE Electronics Highlights /12/ Electronics Highlights2 Electronics group  3 Engineers  Daniel La Marra  Stéphane Débieux.
Understand Application Lifecycle Management
Group Electronique Csnsm AGATA SLOW CONTROL MEETING 19th fev AGATA PROJECT PREPROCESSING MEZZANINE SLOW CONTROL GUI FOR THE SEGMENT AND THE CORE.
MICE MICE Target Mechanism Control Electronics Upgrade P J Smith – University of Sheffield James Leaver – Imperial College 2 nd March 2009.
24/10/2015Sheffield University 1 Target Electronics Recap - Decision has been made to rebuild the target electronics control system so that it is upgraded.
1 AutoCAD Electrical 2008 What’s New Name Company AutoCAD Electrical 2008 What’s New AMS CAD Solutions
Intermediate 2 Software Development Process. Software You should already know that any computer system is made up of hardware and software. The term hardware.
1 Control Software (CAT) Introduction USB Interface implementation Calorimeter Electronics Upgrade Meeting Frédéric Machefert Wednesday 5 th May, 2010.
SEABAS DAQ development for T3MAPS Readout Abhijeet Sohni (with – Max Golub, Raymond Mui and Sean Zhu) Fall Quarter 2014.
SONIC-3: Creating Large Scale Installations & Deployments Andrew S. Neumann Principal Engineer, Progress Sonic.
Target Installation Plan. Requirement Assemble and test two complete target systems in time for August shutdown How do we do this? What do we need to.
Lecture 6: Writing the Project Documentation Part IV.
SONIC-3: Creating Large Scale Installations & Deployments Andrew S. Neumann Principal Engineer Progress Sonic.
John Coughlan Tracker Week October FED Status Production Status Acceptance Testing.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
1Malcolm Ellis - Tracker Meeting - 28th November 2006 Electronics - Station Acceptance  Hardware: u 1 MICE cryostat with 1 VLPC cassette. u VME crate,
Firmware - 1 CMS Upgrade Workshop October SLHC CMS Firmware SLHC CMS Firmware Organization, Validation, and Commissioning M. Schulte, University.
Proposal for an Open Source Flash Failure Analysis Platform (FLAP) By Michael Tomer, Cory Shirts, SzeHsiang Harper, Jake Johns
Introduction ProjectRequirements Project Requirements In a previous senior design project, a wireless front-end was added to Iowa State University’s Teradyne.
Programme for “Target 3” – test of alternative bearing materials (from Jason Tarrant) –Drawing updates by 11 th November –Bearings: Material approval –
By: Matt Kelly (CE), Michael Krenzer (EE), Hemsley Pichardo (EE), Tina Podrasky (ISE), Brad Wideman(CE)
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory September 1999Fifth Workshop on Electronics for LHC Presented by S. Quinton.
DAQ ELECTRONICS 18 March 2015MEG Collaboration Meeting, Tokyo Stefan Ritt.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory October 12, Beam Position Monitors Facility Advisory Committee October 12, 2006.
Getting Ready for the NOCTI test April 30, Study checklist #1 Analyze Programming Problems and Flowchart Solutions Study Checklist.
Chris Booth Sheffield 29th March 2006
Target Installation Plan
A. Aloisio, R. Giordano Univ. of Naples ‘Federico II’
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
Design Components are Code Components
RCM Turbo SQL Version.
Software Myths Software is easy to change
Quicken Tech Support Phone Number One of the top software there is, the quicken software can pose a number of trouble and if you are new.
SDLC Model A framework that describes the activities performed at each stage of a software development project.
Presentation transcript:

MICE Electronics & DAQ P J Smith University of Sheffield

MICE Overview The target controller upgrade is a 3 phase project to upgrade and integrate target control electronics: Phase 1 – Move the control algorithms into an FPGA and interface the FPGA board to the older style IO cards. To place the FPGA under computer control to give a much improved user interface. The Phase 1 controller is currently operational in R78. Phase 2 – To improve the design of the older IO cards, giving them more functionality and placing the entire target control system onto PCBs. Phase 3 – This is to integrate the target DAQ into the target controller. 13/05/20112P J Smith - University of Sheffield

MICE Phase 2 Progress 13/05/20113 FPGADC1DC2 Another 3U unit to sit on here

MICE Phase 2 Progress Work to be done is mostly testing... Communication with FPGA has been proven. Most digital IO has been tested Communication with analogue components over SPI – untested. I am adding some ‘engineering’ menus to the terminal application. This will permit the unit to be tested/diagnosed more thoroughly. The addition of these menus requires some more VHDL coding to be done for the FPGA. I then intend to run some short tests of the system on an old target at Sheffield before moving the phase 2 controller to R78. Software The software GUI needs updating to take account of improvements and functionality in the controller – This work is being undertaken by Matt Robinson. Timescale... I expect the system will be ready for moving to RAL by early June if all goes well. 13/05/2011P J Smith - University of Sheffield4

MICE Phase 2 Progress 13/05/2011P J Smith - University of Sheffield5 Screenshot of Terminal Application Engineering Options permit diagnostics to be performed and give access to functionality that would normally be hidden from the user. There will be about ~20 Engineering options by the time the application is complete. The software GUI is currently being updated to reflect the system changes. The engineering options will be password protected.

MICE Installation We would like to spend some time running the Phase 2 controller in R78 to prove the reliability of the controller and to calibrate the BPS system. This will allow us to ensure that the BPS system limits can be set in such a manner that they will not trip during normal operation. During this testing period it may be possible to move the phase 1 controller into the MLCR. The phase 1 controller is now well tried and tested and will give a much improved interface for MICE users during the summer run (Note that the Phase 1 controller does not have a BPS system.) After further testing of the Phase 2 controller in R78 it will then be ready for integrating into the MLCR. It should be relatively easy to swap the phase 1 controller out for the phase 2 controller. As we intend to build 3 identical versions of this phase 2 controller it will then be possible to have 2 identical systems running in R78/MLCR and a complete spare that will be used for development work at Sheffield. 13/05/2011P J Smith - University of Sheffield6

MICE Schedule 7 Additional time to code & evaluate additional functions required. Additional Testing in R78 is needed– Aim to start in early June in R78.

MICE Phase 3 Phase 3 is the final part of the project and will integrate the MICE DAQ into the target controller. We’re starting to think about the details of how we integrate the DAQ into the controller. It is apparent that it will be necessary to change from a USB interface to Ethernet due to bandwidth requirements. This will require a second FPGA board that is different to the one that is being used to control the target– Ed is starting to consider some of these issues. 13/05/2011P J Smith - University of Sheffield8

MICE END 13/05/2011P J Smith - University of Sheffield9