Gerald Whitney Operating Experience Program Coordinator Presented May 5, 2010 DOE OEC Workshop - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory "Lessons from the past can highlight the likely problems of the future"

 Hanford Site Mission  MSA Scope/Challenges  OPEX Program Integration  Information Processing

The 586-square-mile Hanford Site is located along the Columbia River in southeastern Washington State. A plutonium production complex with nine nuclear reactors and associated processing facilities, Hanford played a pivotal role in the nation's defense for more than 40 years, beginning in the 1940s with the Manhattan Project. Today, under the direction of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Hanford is engaged in the world's largest environmental cleanup project, with a number of overlapping technical, political, regulatory, financial and cultural issues.

 ~53 million gallons of radioactive and chemically hazardous waste in 177 underground storage tanks  Spent nuclear fuel, and plutonium  ~750,000 cubic meters of buried or stored solid waste, and groundwater contaminated above drinking water standards  ~1,600 waste sites of which 1,180 remain to be remediated and approximately 1,450 facilities of which about 400 are contaminated

 Mission Support Contract (MSC) provides DOE-RL, DOE-ORP, and their contractors with the infrastructure and site services necessary to accomplish the Site mission.  Multiple Prime contractors The MSA is the integrator for these contractors:  River Corridor Cleanup Contract  Plateau Remediation Contract  Tank Farm Operations Contract

 Challenges  Two DOE Field Offices  Multiple contractors working for different FO’s with:  Different work scope  Different programs/processes  Different levels of knowledge of OE program goals  Over 10,000 employees  Multiple OE processes at Hanford inefficient

 Develop a single Hanford database for OE  Include all prime contractors  Define OE Sources for the Site  Establish OE information screening criteria (consistency/value)  Provide useful tools

 Hanford Information and Lessons Learned Sharing (HILLS)web application  Central database storage  Subscription Service: all employees can select topics and receive direct notifications  Collects user feedback  Search tool to quickly find information so it can quickly applied to work packages or at pre-job

HILLS Nuclear Energy Institute NEPA Lessons Learned Office of Env. Managemen t Hanford Contractor OE DOE Corporate Operating Experience Consumer Product Recalls EGCOG Best Practices NRC INPO OSHA Safety & Health Bulletins US Department of Labor DOE Accident Investigatio n Reports Pollution Prevention Best Practices DNFSB Chemical Safety Best Practices NASA Lessons Learned Homeland Security NNSA Lessons Learned EPA DOE Audits and Surveillanc es

 Necessary to deliver affective information to users/implementers  Apply DOE Screening Criteria  Apply fact check (non-DOE information)  Consider Significance and Value: similar situation could exist, low awareness level (if it’s repeat lesson would re-publishing benefit?)

 OE information is reviewed/screened by the MSA OPEX Coordinator and/or by Technical Authorities  Information is tracked in the MSA OE tracking database  Information deemed applicable and useful to Hanford operations is entered into the HILLS database and shared with the site

 Search  quickly find articles by type, source, topic  Share  Easy sharing of lessons learned received, search results  Interaction: comments, feedback 

 Allows contractors to find information with powerful search tools  Allows commenting/blogging 

 With the DOE Complex  Lessons entered into the DOE LL Database  Operating Experience Program Committee  Directly with other DOE Sites  At Hanford  Hanford Information and Lessons Learned Sharing (HILLS)web application  Hanford OE Committee (Lead by MSA)

 OE is reviewed/screened to determine if:  The experience provides significant new information  Has direct relevance to site operations  Has potential to be the basis for significant improvement or cost savings  Information meeting the criteria is entered into the HILLS database

 OE is captured in the HILLS database for storage, retrieval and user tracking  Articles are automatically distributed to subscribers and feedback recorded  Uses a powerful search engine to enable users to:  quickly find relevant articles  ing search results to others

 Articles subscribed provided via  Subscribers will be prompted to provide feedback after reading articles they receive  Feedback is optional but can be used to determine application effectiveness  Managers can request feedback statistics to track use of OE

 Move the HILLS database from the intranet to the internet  Involve remaining Hanford contractors  Improve database capabilities